Pahlaj Nihalani reveals why Bombay Velvet might not be changed to ‘Mumbai’ Velvet
7:56 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
DNA (February 4, 2015)
The filmmaker who should be most worried is Anurag Kashyap whose Bombay Velvet is around the corner. Would Kashyap be compelled to change his title to ‘Mumbai Velvet’? The director recently took on the CBFC over the issue of inserting anti-smoking statutory warnings in his film Ugly. Kashyap had to finally relent and let the movie be released with the offensive anti-smoking warnings.
As far as the use of ‘Bombay’ in his film’s title is concerned the CBFC is very clear on the issue. Speaking on the issue Pahlaj Nihalani the CBFC’s chairperson says, “This is a State matter. The Maharashtra government officially changed the name of Bombay to Mumbai in 1995. And still, if filmmakers and song-writers continue to use the unconstitutional name for the city, we’ve no choice but to delete it. The city is called Mumbai, not Bombay. Making films and writing songs are a social responsibility. You can’t change geography and history just to sound trendy.”
However, Kashyap’s film may be the exception to the rule. Explains Nihalani, “If a film is a period drama, if it is set during a time when Mumbai was called Bombay, then we may consider retaining the old name for the city. However in the contemporary context Bombay won’t be allowed at all.”
This entry was posted on October 4, 2009 at 12:14 pm, and is filed under
Bollywood News,
Bombay,
Bombay Velvet,
Censor Board,
Mihir Joshi,
Mumbai
. Follow any responses to this post through RSS. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment