Showing posts with label Shamitabh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shamitabh. Show all posts

Nobody has our language of cinema around the world-R Balki


Filmmaker R Balki loves the unique way of storytelling that Bollywood films have, and does not want them to give up on their originality to compete with Hollywood
Kavita Awaasthi (HINDUSTAN TIMES; February 24, 2020)

He has a number of critically-acclaimed and commercially successful films to his credit, but even after 13 years as a filmmaker, R Balki feels there is a lot to learn. “Cinema is huge and vast and it keeps changing. There are so many people telling so many wonderful stories. What’s unique about Bollywood is that we have a distinctive way of storytelling and a unique language. We should try to take that forward and not try to be like the West — of course, not in terms of technology which we should improve on — but I mean in terms of storytelling,” he says, adding that at times, we curse certain kinds of Hindi films and wonder when will we up our standards or win the Oscars, “which is wrong”.

“I feel there is a lot of originality in Bollywood. Nobody has our language of cinema around the world. So, why should Bollywood change? That’s our originality and why are we hell-bent on being something else? I am sure a film with our originality and our voice can make a mark in the world as the world too wants to see unique stories. Look at the Academy-Award winning film Parasite,” he says.

The filmmaker, who has directed and written Cheeni Kum (2007), Paa (2009), Shamitabh (2015), Ki & Ka (2016) and Pad Man (2018), admits that simplicity has always worked for him as a storyteller. “Not having too many complications in the story works. The only film that didn’t work at the box-office was Shamitabh, perhaps because the concept was good but we tried to pack in a lot in the film which backfired,” he says. Ask him about his next project and he says, “I love watching films and never itch to get back to direction. I am working on a script, let’s see how it goes.”

Balki doesn’t follow a plan neither does he have a goal to make a movie every few years. “I let a thought stay with me for a long time before I decide I should put in that one year writing it and another year making it. Filmmaking is a laborious process and I would rather not take things forward unless I really feel for the subject at hand,” he concludes.

Even after so many films, it is never easy to get Amitabh Bachchan on board for a project-R Balki


Kavita Awaasthi (HINDUSTAN TIMES; February 12, 2020)

He has directed Amitabh Bachchan in three films — Cheeni Kum (2007), Paa (2009) and Shamitabh (2015), yet filmmaker R Balki says it is never easy to get “Mr Bachchan on board for a project or a film. It never was and never will be”.

It’s been five years since his last Bachchan and Dhanush-starrer, Shamitabh released and talking about it, Balki quips, “It feels like it flopped just yesterday (laughs). It is not always about whether a film works or not, but it’s more about what you remember about the journey. Shamitabh was special as we did something no one had done before. We may have gone wrong but we still cherish the experience. It was an ode to the greatest voice in Hindi cinema, that of Mr Bachchan. I am sad that the film didn’t work because of what it paid tribute to.”

Shamitabh is the story of a speech-impaired aspiring actor Dhanush who gets a chip fitted in his larynx to enable him to speak with someone else’s voice. A failed actor played by Amitabh Bachchan provides the voice, leading to stardom and eventually, ego clashes.

“Dhanush was fabulous in the film and so was Akshara Haasan. This was the first film where we recorded the dialogues before canning the shots, which was quite unusual. Dhanush had to act to the dialogues, and they were like the background composition. The techniques were novel and it was painful to shoot,” recalls Balki.

Though the filmmaker-actor duo have had a great working relationship, Balki admits that he always looks for something unique in a role or story before taking it to the senior actor. “My motto is to make a special film with him and push the envelope. Otherwise, why make it at all? Our associations worked because I never think too much about how a role or a story starring Amitji would work out,” he says.

Balki is currently working on a script and rumours are that his next directorial will star Bachchan. Ask him about it and he says, “I am writing a script, let’s see how it goes. Only once I finish the script, will I think about the next step. I have written scripts with actors in mind, but not every script takes that path. For the current script, I am not thinking of any actor right now,” he concludes.

I want to play a villain who’s the hero (central character) of the film-Dhanush


Dhanush shares what’s on his wish-list for future projects...
Himesh Mankad (MUMBAI MIRROR; June 11, 2019)

Dhanush is gearing up for the release of his Hollywood debut, The Extraordinary Journey of the Fakir, based on Romain Puertolas’s bestselling novel. The author and his director Ken Scott who have collaborated on the screenplay, came to Mumbai for research. “They figured it all out, I just had to shoot my part,” he smiles, saying one of the producers had contacted him and though initially hesitant, he was won over by the script even though going global was not on his to-do list. “I don’t plan things, they often fall into place organically. I am blessed to have met the right people at the right time.”

The film, screened at Cannes last year, is a subtle take on immigrants and Dhanush admits that though their worlds are different their journeys follows a similar graph. “Even mine is an extraordinary journey,” he says.

Since R Balki’s Shamitabh in 2015, Dhanush hasn’t been seen in a Hindi film. The break, he asserts, wasn’t intentional and at the same time he doesn’t segregate between Hindi and Tamil cinema but see them as one big industry received differently by different audiences. “I’ve liked a script, you will see me in a Hindi film soon,” he promises, believing Shamitabh was way ahead of its time but he is still proud to have been a part of the film.

With content decimating regional and language barriers, there is much to explore and a great time to be an actor. And having played diverse characters, Dhanush now wishes to dive into the negative space. “I want to play a villain who’s the hero (central character) of the film,” he reveals.

He also wants to work with Shankar, who last directed his father-in-law Rajinikanth in 2.0. “But it would happen only if Shankar sir thinks so,” he says. And what about a film featuring Rajini and him? “I hope it happens someday but so many things have to fall in place for that. Rajinikanth is unbelievable, no one can pull off what he does,” he marvels. What are dinner table conversations like in a family of actors? He laughs, “We interact like any other family and since we’re in the same profession, discuss work sometimes.” 

The younger generation is far more accomplished than I am-Amitabh Bachchan


Madhureeta Mukherjee (BOMBAY TIMES; September 17, 2016)

One would think blue is more his colour. Or rugged shades of black and brown. Even suave greys and olives. But one would've never associated the colour Pink with the macho image of one who has had the swag to beat all swagger. Yet, he carries off his role in Pink with panache, so characteristic of Amitabh Bachchan. That's gumption. Yes, the movie is making waves and not just for the colour he smote. He dauntlessly questions a woman in the courtroom, “Are you a virgin?“ No jazz, no dramatic upheaval, yet, he jostles you out of your comfort zone.And breaks the silence on a subject that has been shamed and silenced in our society for generations. That's the impact of just one of the many dialogues the thespian delivers in his deep baritone. AB wears Pink with pride, a new shade of pink -that's pretty, potent and powerful. Read on...

While shooting for the film you had tweeted, 'Work getting really tough on PINK... Scenes and the moment... days ahead are filled with apprehension.' Given the subject, was it very emotionally difficult?
Every film is a tough shoot, and I believe that every day is a test, a challenge. I always think about how the scene is going to be the next day and whether we are going the way the director wants. This film is not about women empowerment. It's not a documentary wanting to make any deliberate statements, but it is a story of three independent girls who live by their own rules. One day, they happen to meet these boys in a club and then an incident happens, which culminates at the courtroom. I play a character who lives opposite their building and observes them, and those are the mysterious moments of the story. What ensues in the courtroom is what you will find out after watching the film. Whatever has been written has been researched well and the makers have met several lawyers to ensure that the procedures, the language and protocol are as close to reality. When Shoojit Sircar shared the concept with me, I said yes to it within a couple of minutes. I strongly believed in it. I didn't know what role I was being offered; I didn't know how the screenplay was going to shape up and who would be cast in it. I just felt that since the concept is so strong, I had to be associated with this film. With Pink, we wanted to make certain statements which could be taken either way, but it was important that we say it. The film was also shot in a particular style where we had seven cameras working at the same time. Everyone who was involved in the frame and in the scene was active, and that required us to be shooting a 20-page scene at once. And so my apprehension was about how I would learn these 20-page scenes. It's like how some recordings used to be done in the olden days, when we had a live orchestra with 200-300 musicians and Lataji (Mangeshkar) and Kishoreji (Kumar) would sing live. At that point, even if one of the violinists went wrong, we had to stop and restart all over again. Of course, nowadays with modern technology all that has changed. So I was hoping that I didn't go wrong, because if did then the whole scene would have to be reshot.

Your first collaboration with Shoojit didn't work out, but ever since, both of you have done some commendable work together.
Yes, we did a film (Shoebite) which is ready but hasn't released due to some problem with the production house. But then we have done various other ad campaigns, Piku and now Pink. I am honoured to be working with him.

A lot of people from the industry argue with the term 'women centric' films. They think that by that logic, most films in our cinema would be called male-centric. What is your view on that?
Why should anyone think like that and what's wrong with a film that's women-centric? Such films have been made from times immemorial, like Mother India and several of Bimal Roy's films. Even in recent times, there are many movies made where women play the lead, and Piku is one of them. Actresses like Kareena (Kapoor Khan), Alia (Bhatt), Kangana (Ranaut) and Deepika (Padukone) are all playing pivotal roles in movies.

Do you think there are more roles written for women today as compared to the past?
I think it's important to realise that women comprise 50 per cent strength of the nation. Why women haven't been given prominence is a personal choice of the filmmaker. Jaya (Bachchan) has worked in so many films where she has played the central character. I think women should be given their place of importance and equality in society. Many thought processes with regard to women have changed over the years and I am happy as that is the way it should be. It's unfortunate that such an obnoxious and hideous incident like Nirbhaya happened for the issue to be given so much notice; while there have been many similar cases before. There is lot more focus on the issues now that should have been looked upon years and years ago. We have had several social issues or paradoxes, if I may say so, that have lived with us for centuries. All of that is changing now. Look at our own film industry, earlier the only woman on a film's set other than the actress, would be her mother. Today, there are so many women on the set and they are involved in several aspects of filmmaking. It shows how the temperament of people has changed over the years. I keep quoting two instances that show us how the thought process with regards to women has changed. One of them is a quote by someone as important and as valuable as William Shakespeare. In Macbeth, he says “bring forth men-children only.“ You can't dare say that today. Ek purani kahawat hai jo bahut sadiyon se chali aa rahin hai. Aaj kal aap woh kahawat nahi keh sakte -“Dhol, gawar, shudra, pashu, naari...yeh sab tadne ke adhikari.“ It means ki dhol, gawar, shudra, pashu, naari yeh sab pitne layak hai. You can't say that anymore. Dhol ke elawa baaki koi cheez aaj nahin hain jis par aap kuch keh sakte hain. So that makes you realise what women power is today and I think Pink attempts to open that conversation.

A lot has been spoken about pay parity in the entertainment industry - in Hollywood and our film industry. You recently said that Deepika Padukone was paid more than you in Piku and that was fair.
I feel that if Deepika played the central character in Piku and I played the side role, why I should be paid more than her? And the fact is that my value as an actor today is far less than the other stars, but so what?

So do you feel that the actresses are given their due monetarily?
That's a commercial decision of the filmmaker, how much is being invested and what are the budgets. If you have the biggest stars today like Salman Khan, Shah Rukh Khan Aamir Khan, Ranveer Singh, Hrithik Roshan and Ranbir Kapoor in a film, they have a certain attractive power and so they deserve that kind of money. They ask for that kind of money and they get it. Suppose, my first day collection is in the range of Rs 2-3 crore and other actors collection is in the range of  Rs 30-40 crore, obviously they are going to be paid more, and you have to understand that it is a matter of commerce.

You are very active on social media, but a lot of negativity and criticism comes with it.
I don't block my views on social media; I feel that it is good to understand that everything you know is not absolutely correct. There's criticism and there's abuse on my blog. If you imagine and think that you are infallible and you are without any fault, then what the heck are you doing in this world? You might as well be sitting up in heaven, because we all have faults and we all make mistakes. If somebody points it out, I don't feel bad or block out anyone else's views. I only block out bad language and I warn them to stop using the F-word, as it doesn't suit this platform.

Director R Balki told me that while shooting for Shamitabh you were grouchy throughout the film, and when he asked you what was wrong, you said, 'I am in character.' When you are so absorbed in a character, does it take you long to step out of that zone?
He is joking, that's my natural temperament. I am grouchy, and I am always non-communicable with people. I am just joking (laughs!). Well, try sticking a beard on your face for 18 hours, you will be grouchy. So that's what it was. It was the beard that made me grouchy. Every time I put it on, I would say that this is the last time I am doing a film where I have to put a beard on my face.

Everyone who works with you says that you have a childlike enthusiasm on the sets. Do you keenly observe younger actors while working with them?
I am in great admiration of the younger generation as I feel they are far more accomplished than I am and far more alive. They are confident and determined, and I don't possess that quality. I have seen that they are so relaxed and easy, and as soon as the camera turns on they become incredible performers. I want to learn from them. This generation is remarkable and I feel very privileged to be in their company. I am 74 and the average age on the set is 30-40 years, so there is a huge difference. It is fantastic to see how aware they are about the world; they know what they are doing and where they want to go. They have a solution to every kind of problem and that's impressive.

You feel that they come more ready and prepared on the set than you were when you started out?
Yes, they are very prepared even before their very first film. I am pretty sure that they spend a lot of time studying, learning, going to training institutes before facing the camera. I am still learning, I'm not natural and as easy as I should be. I am amazed how they are and that is a quality that I don't have.

But I am sure, for them sharing screen space with you must be intimidating?
I don't believe that anyone should be intimidated by me. Are you intimidated sitting in front of me? No, of course not. Then why should they be? I should be the one intimidated, because I don't want to make any kind of mistake in front of the camera, or in front of anyone as that would be embarrassing.

Marriage, the way it is defined, makes it a flawed institution-R Balki


Madhureeta Mukherjee (BOMBAY TIMES; March 31, 2016)

He writes lines that creates brands. He sells ideas that tell a story. At the core, his thoughts are simple, but his movies lather up fresh images and frothy emotions, probably with more jhaag than the detergent he advertises.

R Balki doesn't dish out the usual Bollywood broth; in fact, there is nothing usual about his stories. Not even the lead pair or their romantic ramblings. So what, if there's cheeni kum or a little less masala in his plot¸ he's known for his rare recipes. And his movies leave a delectable aftertaste that lingers. Call it an acquired taste if you please. His next, Ki & Ka starring Kareena Kapoor Khan and Arjun Kapoor, is about breaking gender stereotypes. Balki does that best ­ break stereotypes. No wonder, he cast a man who reeks of machismo, Arjun, in a role of a doting, domesticated hubby. Wearing apron, mittens, et al. “In our country when we see a man doing feminine stuff, we always think he is a bit of a woman. Arjun is all masculine, and when he does gentle stuff there is no chance of questioning his masculinity,“ Balki says.

He's an ideas man. Does he ever know when an idea is not working? He's quick to admit, “Eighty per cent of the time your idea works and you get a license to be in the creative field. Twenty per cent of the time, even if you start without an iota of doubt, you will fail. But in advertising it is much simpler, as the next opportunity comes to redeem you much faster. In movies, it takes a wee bit longer.“

He adds, “People don't see ideas, they see a film. For the filmmaker it is about the idea, though often you can have a superb idea but a boring film.“ For someone who sees daily churn of creative ideas, he is overtly critical about his own work. He explains, “I analyse a lot before making a film, not once it is done. I never watch my ads or my film. In fact, if I know my movie is playing on television, I switch the channel. I am deeply embarrassed with everything I have ever done in my life. When you finish a film you feel like you are the genius of the century, three days after that you start remembering things you have done.“

He pauses and adds, “I am objective about my work. After I finished Shamitabh, I got the best review from the usher at a multiplex. He told me, 'Sir, films need some reaction like mast tha, boring tha, sad tha. But you haven't given them a vocabulary, and it's not a very positive thing.' By that he meant that two people had died pointlessly and the whole film had become insignificant for no reason. It was such a superb way of looking at it. When you leave the audience without words, they don't know how to react when asked about the film. That is a dangerous thing. So now on, it's simple ­ no one will die in my films ever again (laughs).“

He has set his benchmark high, so when Shamitabh didn't evoke the response he expected, it must have deeply affected him. He expresses, “One way is to question if you were right, and if you do that you are dead. The other way of looking at it is...okay some people disagree, so what? I was going on to the path of questioning myself, but I saved myself that pain. I am surrounded by the right people who tell me when my work is s**t. They even tell me that 'don't be s**t for too long'.“

Balki is not the kind to resort to empty hyperbole. He's modest, even self-deprecating. But I am sure there is a creative arrogance in the man too. “My only arrogance is that I can write and I won't stumble for a script. The decision to write is what takes time. I don't make magnum opuses, or construct palaces, so I never shoot for more than 45-50 days, as it gets too painful. And I start feeling distant from the film. My stories are very people centric, so I like to be in that zone.“

Talking about zones, there is one he loves being in and it's called the Amitabh Bachchan zone. I have met innumerable Bachchan fans. Then I met Balki. A fan who takes his idol for granted. Hold on, he has an explanation for that too. Like a child on a sugar-high, he excitedly says, “People hesitate to say things about icons like Ilaiyaraaja, PC Sreeram and Amitji. For me it is much simpler to disagree with them than with anyone else from the industry. It's not that I am over familiar with Amitji, but I can take him for granted. Besides these few people I mentioned, and Gauri (Shinde) too, I never take anyone else for granted. I am not a director who likes to see Amitji doing what he has not done before. I want to do with him what I want to see in him ­ as a fan. I have grown up watching his films and it is easy for me to write for Amitji; the tone of Hindi changes while writing for him. I could write his drunken scenes, arrogant lines and witty lines in my sleep.“

So, does that mean he has a creative understanding with Mr Bachchan, too? “No,“ he exclaims, “I don't have any understanding of the way he is or what he is thinking, but I have a very good understanding of how he is as an actor. During Shamitabh, Amitji was very grouchy throughout the film. I asked him if there was a problem, and if I have killed somebody? He looked at me and said, 'I am in character.' After Shamitabh, I swore that I would never again write a serious film for Mr Bachchan.“

Balki balks at the word 'inspiration'. “How do I know what will inspire me? To me, that inspiration is called 'luck'. I was staring at a tree when I thought of Ki & Ka. I was travelling in a cab and I thought of Shamitabh. I am just lucky that ideas fall into my lap. I can't call myself a genius for that. I only use my skills to shake that luck.“

Well, I take that bit with a pinch of salt and we move on to discussing what the most shocking thing about gender stereotypes is? “The fact that we are still discussing it.“ He asserts, “The fact that we still find it so cute to see a man at home, while the woman is working. I think men and women are compelled to do certain things fearing what the society will think of them. Society is not feeding or clothing you, so who are they to comment on your life?“ Ki & Ka makes marriage appear cool. It gives us a fresh take on an institution that is often a hot topic of debate in young circles. “My point is that you should never be able to say if two people are married. You should see a couple and think that they are in love and are having an affair. Why can't marriage be as cool as romance? Marriage, the way it is defined, makes it a flawed institution. If it is defined as something else, maybe it will make things better. You can't force two people to be bound just because of a legal bond. I believe you should have annual renewals of the marriage contract (laughs).“

Well, how much of the 'Ka' does he see in him? “Well, Gauri and I both work, and we do our share for the house. People say they don't take their work home, but we take all our work home. We talk and fight about it, too. Our life is films. Sometimes, I cook and put the clothes in the washing machine. The way the house looks is completely Gauri's territory. She wants my advice and then she will reject it (grins). I can't show that I am not interested, as that will upset her. Often, I don't show that sensitivity, so Gauri's statement to me is, 'I wish you were some of the characters you write'. I always tell her I can't put myself in my characters, because I am already living myself. I would write about what I want to be and can't be.“

I have no clue what kind of movies work-R Balki


Paa director Balki, ahead of his next release, a love story that challenges established gender roles work
Aastha Atray Banan (MID-DAY; March 6, 2016)

"After Shamitabh, I got umpteen calls and messages from Amitji and Jayaji, saying you better not wait another four years to make a movie. Start now!” laughs writer-director R Balakrishnan, 50, better known in the film fraternity as Balki.

It’s been a year since Shamitabh released, and his next film, Ki and Ka, will be out next month. “I told them I was tired, I wanted to take a break. But they said, no way! Make a movie now. So, I sat right here…” he says, throwing a look around the Khar office he operates from, “ and thought of an idea — a love story.” Starring Kareena Kapoor and Arjun Kapoor, Ki and Ka follows what happens when established gender roles are reversed. Kareena plays an aggressive professional, while Arjun is a docile house husband, who chooses to “be this way, when he could have been whatever he wanted”.

With Ki & Ka, Balki is seeking to challenge the slots we have created in our minds and society. “I wanted to show a different side to love. I like starting my movies at a point different from anything seen before. How does a man express his love for a woman when he is doing what a woman does?” Before he casted for the film, he came across a picture of Kareena and Arjun in a magazine, and realised they would fit the bill. “I wanted a hunk of a man, as masculine as can be. And a girl who is the epitome of femininity. When someone who is out - there manly performs a feminine role, the audience could feel disconcerted, but eventually, they’ll relate to the characters. It turned out to be a fun, light movie.”

Balki, who is known for telling thought-provoking, but simple stories — Cheeni Kum and Paa — wants the audience to walk out of cinemas feeling, "Maybe, we could live like this too."

And yet, he doesn't know what works for the audience. With decades of advertising experience (he is behind the hugely popular ‘daag ache hain’ campaign), and as Chairman and Creative Director of Lowe Lintas, you’d expect him to know what the audience ‘will buy’. “I actually don’t. Nobody does. Some movies work, some don’t. God knows why Paa worked and Shamitabh didn’t. It’s a matter of what the moviegoer wants at that moment.”

He says it’s the same for advertising. “For instance, we made a Pepsodent ad in 2001. A musician played the ghattam, which is a matka played like a drum. A kid played the same kind of music by drumming his fingers on his teeth. This idea didn’t gel with the audience; they thought it was a Colgate ad, because Pepsodent had never associated itself with the image of a strong teeth, germ fighting toothpaste. I thought it was a brilliant ad, but it didn’t work.”

What he is clear about, though, is that Bollywood needs entertaining movies. “[We need] movies that engage people. But what engages people also changes every two years, so, it’s not like we are making better movies now than we were before.” He picks a subject “that’s trippy”, and then justifies the trip by being disciplined about making it. “Pick a subject people are curious to know more about. That’s how you’ll reach out to everyone. That’s the aim.”

Akshay Kumar honours brave stuntmen at Zee Cine Awards 2016


BOMBAY TIMES (March 5, 2016)

Akshay Kumar's open letter in support of stunt men and women who are the real heroes has shaken the industry and how. To make his heartfelt appeal a reality, the superstar took an initiative to honour and felicitate stuntmen of India who have lost their lives performing risky action sequences. “If stunt people were not there, we wouldn't be seen as heroes. So many awards nights are hosted in India and all over the world, but stunt people never walk away with a trophy. We come on screen and portray heroism, which is fake, while they remain unsung heroes,“ says the actor. The first stuntman to be felicitated is Raju, who lost his life during the shooting of Akshay's film Jaanwaar (1999). The actor personally gave a cheque of  Rs 11 lakh to Raju's family. His wife, two kids and his brother, Mehboob, accepted the award. This will be showcased at the Lux Zee Cine Awards 2016 (ZCA), which premieres today on Zee Cinema at 7 pm.

A special award has also been instituted on ZCA 2016 called 'The Stunt Person of the Year Award'. Akshay announced the nominees and the first winner is Amit Grover for his bike stunt in Shamitabh. Since Amit was out of town, Akshay will personally present the award to him.Talking about this initiative, the actor says, “Award shows should not have a special category, but a 'must' category to honour them.“

Akshay will be present at this awards show annually to honour the most deserved.

Arjun Kapoor-Kareena Kapoor to play married couple in R Balki's next?


Amitabh Bachchan will be seen in a special appearance
Sanyukta Iyer (MUMBAI MIRROR; June 5, 2015)

R Balki's as-yet-untitled film rolls on July 1 in Mumbai with a start-to-finish 30-day schedule. The light-hearted love story features Arjun Kapor and Kareena Kapoor playing a married couple. And Amitabh Bachchan as a father figure in a special appearance.

Says a source close to the development, "The role was discussed with Mr. Bachchan on the sets of Shamitabh itself. Every film Balki has made features Mr. Bachchan and that's not going to change in the future."

The source adds that Big B, who co-produced Shamitabh, did not take a single rupee out of the pie and this time too he's acting for free.

The film is a modestly budgeted "quickie". And Balki has ordered the unit to not spend on unwanted extras, props or locations. To top it all, he will not be filming for more than a month.

When contacted Balki said, "I'm still writing the film."

Every two seconds I am looking at my phones. We are all married to our phones-Amitabh Bachchan

Amitabh Bachchan
We catch Amitabh Bachchan in a unique mood. In a long, candid chat, he veers from being misty and nostalgic about his father and the other people who shaped his life, to being upbeat and excited about how he still manages to get challenging roles
Harivanshrai BachchanShubha Shetty Saha (MID-DAY; May 31, 2015)

He walks in exactly at the scheduled time for the interview. Yet again showing that his penchant for punctuality hasn’t taken a beating even after 46 years in this industry, which is full of people who have scant respect for other people’s time.

He is dressed in a kurta pajama with a shawl across his shoulders, reminiscent of his dad — the celebrated poet late Harivanshrai Bachchan. Talking about his father, Bachchan says he truly wishes he had the willpower that his dad did.

He goes on to narrate two amazing anecdotes from his father’s life to reiterate his point. “My father’s dedication to whatever he thought of and making sure that it was achieved purely by his willpower was phenomenal. I must tell you about these incidents. Pandit Nehru once asked my father to translate a biography written on him by Micheael Brecher from English to Hindi. He wanted to publish it by his birthday, (November 14) which was just about three months later.

My father had so much to do in such little time, so he would sit in his study for hours together. He would hang a painting outside the door, so that we know that we should not be disturbing him. But one day we got worried because he hadn’t come out of the study for about 20 hours. When I went in to check on him, I saw that he had kept his left hand in a bowl of water. When I asked him about it, he said, “My left hand is paining. Actually my right hand was paining because I have been writing non-stop, so I willed the pain to go from right to left, and now the left hand is paining so I have kept it in a bowl of water to get some relief’,” he says.

Rock solid
"Another time, when we were staying in New Delhi, he would go for his morning walk around 4 am. He would find some figurines on rocks in the area and he would bring them home and paint them. One day, he came back from his walk and woke me up. He was standing next to a huge boulder just outside the house. He wanted it brought in as he wanted to paint the garud (eagle) on it. The boulder was so huge that I had to get some four or five people to take it inside. I asked my father how he managed to bring it till outside the house. So he told me that he had seen it some time back and so, for three months, every morning he would push it about three inches towards the house, till he managed to get it outside the house. That’s the kind of willpower I am talking about. He was just amazing,” he says with a sigh that seemed mixed with a tinge of regret at having lost him.

Band of friends
Ask him if older also means lesser friends and lesser people you love and admire, he nods. He says, “I always believe that once you are someone’s friend, you are a friend for life. Once you share a part of your life with someone, you cannot disown them. I will always have that respect for a friend, irrespective of whether the other person respects or not. Yes, as you grow older, there are fewer friends around you. My samdhi, Shweta’s father-in-law (Rajan Nanda), once told me something very pertinent when a friend of mine passed away. He told me over the phone, “Now is the time when you don’t make friends, you lose them.” It is very sad, but it is the fact of life. As you grow older, so many people are gone from your life. Khwaja Ahmad Abbas, the gentleman who gave me a break in my career, is gone, people who shaped my career like Manmohan Desai, Prakash Mehra, Shakti Samanta... they are gone. SD Burman, RD Burman, so many people. When you are with them, you are full of vigour and joy and never imagine that there will be a time when they are not going to be around, even if you want to, you won’t be able to see them again.”

Cashing in on that emotional mood he’s in, we ask him whether he is still romantic at heart, he laughs. “I hope so. Yes, filmmaking itself is a romantic thing. Love necessarily doesn’t have to be a male-female equation. I am in love with my granddaughter. I could be in love with my phones. Every two seconds I am looking at them. We are all married to our phones. Romance has different connotations...’ But what about male female romance? Does he have infatuations?

“It is not the age for that now.” Tell him romance is ageless and he agrees, “Yes, I am envious and sad that I am not young enough to play the leading roles with girls like Deepika (Padukone), Kangana (Ranaut), Vidya (Balan), Alia (Bhatt), etc.’

PIKU
His role as Deepika’s eccentric father in 'Piku' was well appreciated. Congratulate him about it and he chooses to be modest. “I think on moments like these you should give credit to the person who thinks and writes such characters. I would give all credit to Shoojit (Sircar, the director of the film) and Juhi (Chaturvedi, the writer).

Tell him his role role of an eccentric character needed a lot of restraint as there was a danger of it going overboard and he nods in agreement. “That’s a very good observation because most of the times when we do caricatures, we tend to go overboard. What worked for us was that we were all made to be immersed in this world, a typical, conventional Bengali home in CR Park, Delhi. There is no story as such. It is just how people converse. Most of the Bengali community in Delhi stays in CR Park, if you notice that happens everywhere. Every community builds its own area if they are out of their home state. So there was this setting of the house, which was so typical. The whole ambience of the house, the photograph of the maa… we didn’t feel like we were playing those characters, we were those people. I actually wanted more Bengali in the film, but some of the portions, there were some lovely scenes like where there is a banter between Moushumi (Chatterjee) and me had to be sadly edited out. The producers felt that they didn’t want anything to go over the head for Hindi speaking audiences.”

Set up
Shoojit’s film set-up reminds him of a Hrishikesh Mukherjee movie. “I doubt that I have felt anything like this after Hrishida. And that’s wonderful for Shoojit because Hrishida had that capability of walking the middle path, not too left and not too right. I would also like to give credit to the audience for having noticed the undercurrents and also having gotten attached to it.”

He says it’s time we recognise the intelligence of the audience, “We should be kicking ourselves now. We have a wonderful audience which is so ready to patronise different kind of stories. But we are still stuck on thinking that only those typical extravaganzas do well.”

Bachchan says he’s familiar with the Bengali culture that worked in his favour. “I have lived and worked for seven years in Kolkata and since Jaya and my in-laws are Bengalis, you pick up on little things.

Akshara Hasan and Amitabh Bachchan in Shamitabh
This success, which he says came as an absolute surprise to the team, must have been a relief after the debacle and disappointment of his last film, 'Shamitabh'.

“I don’t know what went wrong with 'Shamitabh'. Balki (director of the film) and I did have a chat about it wondering what went wrong. I had loved the concept which was unique and different. But I am happy I did the role, in fact, I am just grateful that I still get to do such challenging roles. It is funny that when you are younger and playing lead roles, you don’t get the opportunity to play such diverse roles. As a leading man, you are just romancing a girl, doing action and that’s about it,” he says with a broad smile. “This is just a wonderful time. Not only do I get the satisfaction of doing things that I have not done before but also being on the same frame with the actor of younger generation. They are all fabulous. I really feel that by far the actors of Indian cinema are the most fascinating talent. Every actor is an evolved actor and when we entered films, we were so lost. I am not evolved even after 46 years and still learning. But these youngsters know bang on from the first film. They find it very odd that I don’t have a manager or a stylist and they say, why do you do things yourself? Who reads the scripts for you? And now I realise we carried all the responsibilities all this while and they have diluted their pressures so easily by delegating work. There is a method in what they do, whereas we just went on with whatever came our way. Look at Kangana, she is incredible in 'Tanu Weds Manu Returns'. I would struggle to do something like that. Look at the other actors around her in the film, everyone is absolutely marvellous.”

Bachchan’s next film, Bejoy Nambiar’s 'Wazir', is produced by Vidhu Vinod Chopra and Rajkumar Hirani. “I don’t have the permission to talk about it, but I can say this much that I am on a wheelchair throughout the film and Farhan Akhtar plays a cop. There are some relationship issues which are common to both parties. Technically Bejoy is very sound. The dramatic thriller will release in October.”

Ask him if he’s proud of his baritone and the way he modulates his voice, and he says with a hint of a blush, “What baritone? A lot of guys have voice like mine.”

Has it ever worked against him? “I like it if my a voice can be put to good use. There have been instances when I tried to go away from the voice, like in 'Agneepath', but it worked against the film. I had to redub the voice, because the audience started attacking the theatre owners thinking something is wrong with their sound system. I try and use my voice for social causes, I am more than happy to do that,” he says just before bidding us adieu in that very sexy voice.

R Balki and Amitabh Bachchan team up yet again?

Enlarge Image
DNA (May 7, 2015)

Undeterred by the non-performance of Shamitabh, director R Balki and Amitabh Bachchan are all set to do another film together.

This would be their fourth collaboration. According to a source close to both, Balki is planning a “wild wacky comedy” and “out-and-out fun film” with the Big B.

Says the source, “It’s become a habit for Balki and Big B to think out of the box. That won’t change because Shamitabh didn’t do well. They’re already working on another completely unexpected idea. I can tell you this much. This time audiences are going to be even more shocked than when Mr B romanced Tabu in Cheeni Kum.”

Fenil's Bollywood Talk # 352


AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2015

The first quarter of the year is about to get over and have been pretty okay. The first quarter of 2014 had delivered hits in the form of Queen and Ragini MMS 2 and also a 100-crore grosser – Jai Ho. However, 2015’s first quarter has been poor. Films that were expected to fetch good numbers like Alone, I, Dolly Ki Doli, Shamitabh, Khamoshiyan, Roy etc turned out to be huge flops. What surprised many was how some of the films were made on an insanely huge budget. Hawaizaada and Shamitabh turned out to be disasters thanks to the costs involved. Both these films hardly attracted viewers and got entry into the list of ‘biggest disasters of recent times’. Roy opened well and might have recovered going by the opening weekend numbers. Sadly, the content was outright disappointing. It started dropping from Day 4 heavily, that left many shocked.

Thankfully, few films made a mark commercially. Baby opened on an average note but held up very, very well. Badlapur attracted people despite the violent theme. Same goes for NH10. Dum Laga Ke Haisha had a very poor opening. But it was a fabulous film and hence sustained beautifully, even during weekdays.

However, a big commercial hit is missing in the first quarter. The industry has suffered many such setbacks previously but sadly, lessons are never learnt. And everyone has to make an effort. The makers on their part should make films on reasonable costs (which is very much possible). This also includes not overspending on publicity. For instance, NH10 was made in 3-4 crores and almost 8-9 crores were spent on publicity. It is said that the film would have opened with similar numbers if the makers had spent even half the amount on publicity. Hence, correct and impactful marketing is the key. Just by going all out is not a guarantee that people will throng to see the film. And more important than the cost is the fact that makers should invest in good scripts. The success of NH10 and Dum Laga Ke Haisha has proved how people are ready to see different subjects. The multiplex wallahs on their post should bring costs down on an immediate basis. It’s shocking to see tickets priced at 300-400 bucks during weekends, for all kinds of films! Theatre owners should realize that they are bound to lose a chunk of audience by having such inflated ticket rates. Thirdly, the audience should be smart as well. There are times when genuine efforts go unnoticed just because those films weren’t ‘typical entertainers’. Audiences should realize that they should invest their hard-earned films on good films, whether or not it’s entertaining in the conventional manner.

However, there’s a lot to cheer. The next quarter promises some fabulous films like Detective Byomkesh Bakshy, Dharam Sankat Mein, Mr X, Gabbar Is Back, Piku, Mastizaade, Welcome Back, Bombay Velvet, Dil Dhadakne Do, Hamari Adhuri Kahani etc. Hope good times are here and they are here to stay!


I hate being a producer-Abhishek Bachchan


Sarita A Tanwar (DNA; March 26, 2015)

Most actors these days are also full-time producers. They have productions houses (see box) and produce films regularly for their banners. Some of these films feature the actors, in some they’re simply the producer.

Abhishek Bachchan is a reluctant producer. He’s produced Paa (2009) and Shamitabh (2015). That’s a big gap between two films. And that’s not about to change anytime soon.

Does he see himself growing as a producer in the coming years? He confesses he has ideas for the films he will act in, but says he’s clueless about what he will produce in the next couple of years. “As a production house, there is no place for ‘three years down the line’. I don’t see myself as a regular production house. I don’t want to become a studio. I want to make the kind of films that can inspire me at any point of time to produce.”

He further adds, “I don’t like production. I hate being a producer. Very honestly. I enjoy the pre-production part of it, but once the film goes on the floors, I absolutely hate it. Predominantly because when I did Paa, I was very conflicted between being the producer and the actor. The actor in me wanted to do one more take, but the producer in me kept saying ‘Okay, we are running out of time’. I didn’t like that. I like the idea of setting up a budget, putting the project together.. I enjoy that process.”

AB Jr has no plans to produce a film right now, but never say never. As he says, “If I feel creatively inspired to make a film, I will produce it.”

I have so many friends in the industry; Tanuj is only one of them-Akshara Haasan


I have so many friends in the industry and he is only one of them
Sanyukta Iyer (MUMBAI MIRROR; March 10, 2015)

Her much-hyped debut, R. Balki's Shamitabh, crashlanded at the box-office but Akshara Haasan is still reaping the benefits of working with superstars Amitabh Bachchan and Dhanush. "I will flag off three big banner, Bollywood films this year, but please don't ask me for details," pleads the 23-year-old who has absolutely no regrets about starting out with a 'small' part in the male-dominated project. "Shamitabh was a stepping stone of sorts and today I'm being offered strong female leads."

Of late, the grapevine has been buzzing about an upcoming film with Sridevi. Akshara shrugs off the rumour saying, "I would love to work with her but we have not signed a film together."

And what about a film with sister Shruti? "I'm definitely up for it, it could be a Hindi film or a South movie, but I need to connect with the role and Shruti on-screen," she reasons. "I would also love to work with my parents (Kamal Haasan and Sarika Thakur) at a later stage."

She was often spotted on the sets of her mother's film, Purani Jeans, where she got friendly with her father's Ek Duuje Ke Liye co-star, Rati Agnihotri's son Tanuj Virwani. They have since been spotted together at events and are said to be going steady. "I have so many friends in the industry and he is only one of them," she says shortly.

Badlapur is too dark to succeed commercially at the box office?

Films made on dreary subjects tend to do less than stellar business. Should revenge drama Badlapur be worried?
Subhash K Jha (DNA; February 19, 2015)

Enlarge ImageVarun Dhawan-starrer Badlapur, out this Friday, make no mistake about it, is a revenge drama and director Sriram Raghavan says there are no breaks in the protagonist’s grim determination to get even. No pauses for laughter or, God forbid, item songs. “When you’re telling a story about a wronged hero you don’t digress. It trivialises his mission,” he reasons.

But how do you sell this ‘realism’ to the masses, fed on a regular diet of fantasy, farce and skin? Anurag Kashyap’s Ugly tried — it was called his best work to date by critics and viewers alike — but was a box-office failure.

Then came Neeraj Pandey’s Baby, a slick thriller on global terrorism, starring Akshay Kumar. The film did well, critics loved it, but trade experts felt it should have done much, much better.

R Balki teamed up a third time with Big B for Shamitabh. It left the audiences cold. Admits Balki, “Especially the last 20 minutes where the film turned into a tragedy... that killed the film. The audience doesn’t want to emerge from the theatre heavy-hearted. They want to feel good about life. The response I got from the audiences when I visited the theatre was, ‘Heavy hai’. The audience doesn’t want anything heavy.”

A few months after Badlapur, Anushka Sharma’s gritty NH10 follows. If the trailer is any indication, it will be a fast-paced, nail-biting escape thriller, and in equal doses ‘dark’ and ‘heavy’.

Will Badlapur buck the trend, though? While he admits dark isn’t the flavour of the season at the B-O, critic Raja Sen adds, “While such films have always been a hardsell, this one seems to be both dark and sexy.
There is a visceral appeal to this hard actioner. We all hope that Sriram can deliver.”

THE BIG QUESTION
Varun Dhawan ’s the quintessential chocolate-boy hero. Will he successfully trade in the grin for the grim?

If I start composing as well, there will have to be two Shrutis-Shruti Haasan


Shruti Haasan on singing Stereophonic Sannata in Shamitabh
Lakshmi V (BOMBAY TIMES; February 13, 2015)

Stereophonic Sannata must be very special for you, given that you've sung for Ilaiyaraaja. Also, your sister Akshara Haasan debuted with the film. How did you land the offer?
It's indeed a special song for me.(Director) Balki sir called me up and said that he and Raaja sir wanted me to sing for the film. This happened months ago when I was shooting in Mumbai. So, I immediately went to Chennai to record it. I sung the track at Raaja sir's studio.

The song is based on one of Ilaiyaraaja's Tamil hits, Aasaya Kaathula Thoothu Vittu, which incidentally featured Rajinikanth.
I wasn't looking at it that way. For me, the Tamil song is an iconic one, a number which I love listening to. I felt honoured to be a part of its Hindi version.

How was the experience of recording this Hinglish number?
I'm glad they chose me for this number. I was amazed with the fact that the same composer who came out with the Tamil original years ago could redo the song so effectively to cater to today's listeners. And Raaja sir has made this new version equally successful, which, obviously, is because of his brilliance. I'm happy to add whatever flavour I could to this song.

Did you have inputs?
Not at all. Not to Raaja sir.

Did he have anything to say to you after the recording?
As long as he doesn't say something is wrong with the way I've sung, I'm happy (smiles).

You started your music career with Ilaiyaraaja when you sang for him in Thevar Magan. From then to now, do you find any difference in his style of working and music?
Honestly, I am in no position to comment on his method of working or music. It was an honour for me to start my career with him and sing for him today. I'm not in any position to analyse his style. I can just say he is a genius.

You've had two releases this year already - ­ Joganiyan (Tevar) and Stereophonic Sannata. How do you strike a balance between acting and singing?
Both are my passion, and I could do it, all thanks to time management. I know I can't have a full-time career in music when I'm acting. I have a slew of releases lined up for this year alone. So, I'm happy I am able to at least dabble with playback singing.

Does it leave you with any time for composing?
Nope. Not at all. I am doing seven films this year and it's difficult to manage them alone. If I have to start composing as well, then there will have to be two Shrutis!

You have collaborated with artistes like David Kushner of Velvet Revolver fame and Assamese composer Joi Barua. What do you think of the non-film music scene in India?
It has grown and improved in the last few decades. In the 90s, alternative music was hugely popular and so many such albums had released. And these days, there are more venues for musicians to play and people to listen to such kinds of music. Then there's the influence of the digital media. It's a huge platform where people freely share music, leading to its increasing popularity.

Has international music influenced Indian films?
Ours is a globalised country and there's great mix of what we hear and like from other countries. Indian music is deep, rich and comprehensive. So, the influence of world music is finely balanced.

Do you have plans of dabbling with classical music on screen?
I haven't thought about it till now.I'm trained in classical music. So, at some point, I hope to try my hand at it.

Dhanush's next Hindi film is an ‘intense love story’ with Aanand L Rai

Enlarge Image
Subhash K Jha (DNA; February 10, 2015)

Praise has come Dhanush’s way for his role in the just-released Shamitabh. The actor, who’s back in Chennai, says he’s busy with promoting and shooting his Tamil films till March.

“Mani Ratnam sir texted me to tell me how much he liked Shamitabh. Such praise means a lot to any artiste,” gushes Dhanush, adding that he chose Shamitabh to be his second Hindi film after being offered several scripts. He says, “I am aware I am not a conventionally good-looking hero. I did not see myself fitting in the 33 scripts that came to me before Shamitabh did. It was only with Balki’s film that I felt an immediate empathy.”

He is now all set to start his third Hindi film. “It is a very intense love story, the kind I haven’t done so far. When I heard the script I felt this would take Aanand (L Rai) sir and me beyond what we’ve done in Raanjhanaa. We start this film after he completes Tanu Weds Manu 2, most probably in December.”

Back injury forces Amitabh Bachchan to skip event at last minute; Abhishek fills in for him

Abhishek and Amitabh Bachchan
Sonali Joshi Pitale (MID-DAY; February 9, 2015)

Abhishek Bachchan was supposed to attend the opening ceremony of the weeklong Kala Ghoda Arts festival on Saturday evening. But Abhishek Bachchan turned up in his place. Reason? A back sprain forced Big B to back out of the event at the last minute.

A source says, “Amitabh Bachchan had committed to be present at the opening ceremony with his Shamitabh co-star Akshara Haasan. However, that morning, he ended up hurting his back during his regular workout. He was then advised bed rest and could not attend the opening gala of the festival.”

With Big B retiring hurt, son Abhishek decided to fill in for his father and made an appearance in the evening along with Akshara. A source says, “The Bachchans are known for their professionalism and punctuality.
Mr Bachchan did not want to create problems for the organisers by pulling out of the event at the last minute. So, since Abhishek was present in town for one of his commitments in the afternoon, he headed off straight to the festival inauguration.”

While Sr Bachchan’s spokesperson confirms the news, the actor also announced it online in a post that read: “Pulled back muscle at gym .. arrgh ... will not be going for opening of KalaGhoda fest .. in bed resting pain ..

Movie Review: SHAMITABH by FENIL SETA


One of the most fascinating lessons in science for me was the idea of symbiotic relationship. Ask.com sums it well: “A symbiotic relationship occurs when two organisms, individuals or groups of people work together by helping one another with the intent of getting help in return. In a symbiotic relationship, the two people or groups of people live together to provide the greatest benefits to one another.” Shamitabh rests on this idea and has a very novel and unique premise that could have made for an engaging and one of its kind film. Very unfortunately, the direction is not consistent and worse of all, the film goes downhill completely in the finale. A good idea gone haywire!

The story of the movie: Daanish (Dhanush)
lives in Igatpuri and is a crazy movie buff. He aspires to be a Bollywood hero despite being mute. One day he reaches Mumbai and tries his best to meet top directors but fails to do so. Akshara (Akshara Haasan), an assistant director realizes that Daanish has the potential but thanks to his handicap, she doesn’t feel that he can make it big. However, she chances upon a new, revolutionizing technology that can help Daanish get a voice. Amitabh Sinha (Amitabh Bachchan), a reclusive alcoholic, becomes Daanish’s voice. However, the challenges are not done yet.

There’s no denying that Shamitabh is trying to say something different. The beginning is terrific and Daanish’s childhood portion is hilarious and very well thought of. Same goes for Piddly – there’s more to the song than just Amitabh singing in the bathroom! And it’s bloody awesome! And the entire idea of a mute hero being voiced by someone else is innovative and it results in some great moments. Also, the film doesn’t bore at all and keeps one engaged. However, the direction is great at places and not-so-good otherwise. Amitabh’s conversations with himself don’t make the desired impact. Also, the film has lot of cinematic liberties which are convincing to an extent but after a point, it becomes too much. And lastly, the finale is very disappointing and unjustified and looks out of place in a film that is quite happy and positive.



However, there’s no denying that both Amitabh Bachchan and Dhanush have performed exceptionally. Amitabh Bachchan as always delivers an impactful performance and plays the difficult role with ease. He compliments Dhanush very well and looks quite dashing in the shabby, disheveled look. As expected, R Balki once again extracts the best out of Big B! Dhanush however leaves an even bigger mark. He not only performs but also adjusts to Big B’s voice and it all comes out very well. Also, there are scenes when he expresses just through his eyes and expressions and he is just amazing. Akshara Haasan looks cute and gives a nice performance. Also, she holds on to her own in front of two big stars like Big B and Dhanush. Master Shubham Tukaram Param is terrific as the young Daanish. Ajay Jadhav (the guy in the graveyard) raises laughs at places. Asif Ali Beg (doctor) and Uday Tikekar (Akshara’s father) are quite good. Rajeev Ravindranathan (journalist; the Mutravisarjan guy in 3 Idiots) is decent. Sonamoni Jayant Gadekar (Daanish’s mother) is fine. The film has lots of special appearances and the ones who stand out are Javed Akhtar, Mahesh Bhatt, Rekha, Ekta Kapoor, Prahlad Kakar and Swanand Kirkire.

Ilaiyaraaja’s music is quite nice, though it hasn’t topped the chartbusters. Piddly is interesting but the best is Ishq E Fillum. Sha Sha Mi Mi is quite catchy. Background score is quite impressive as well. P C Sreeram’s cinematography is topnotch. Urvi Ashar and Shipra Rawal’s production designing is great and the idea of a house with a ‘Now Showing’ board is too good. R Balki comes up with a great story, although climax should have been different. Screenplay is effective but could have been a tighter at places and devoid of few cinematic liberties. Dialogues, like in any R Balki film, are sharp and witty. Direction is fine but it could have been better. Big B’s monlogues could have been shorter or better executed. Also, few things are left unexplained. Why does Akshara love and wear only black clothes? Why does she say that Daanish is a dangerous driver? R Balki has given gems in the past in the form of Cheeni Kum and Paa and Shamitabh surely nowhere near these films.

On the whole, Shamitabh rests on a unique and interesting premise and is laced with some outstanding performances by Amitabh Bachchan and Dhanush. But the film has lot of cinematic liberties and worse of all, the climax totally fails in making the desired impact. Just like in a symbiotic relationship that the film is apparently sourced from, there has to be a symbiotic relationship between the first and second half of a film as well! A bad second half in a film that has a great first half is not done. This one is only for die-hard fans of the principle actors!

My rating - ** ½ out of 5!

Fenil's Bollywood Talk # 345


WILL BALKI-BACHCHAN MAGIC WORK ONCE AGAIN WITH SHAMITABH?

Director R Balki debuted with the film Cheeni Kum in 2007 which was loved for its superb writing especially. Paa, released in 2009, was equally great and viewers were stunned to see Amitabh Bachchan’s unrecognizable look. And now Balki is back with Shamitabh, which like his previous 2 films, also star Amitabh, along with Dhanush and Akshara Haasan. The promotions of the film started very late but have been great nevertheless. The audio trailer was an interesting idea but the content was quite weird! Then, instead of coming up with the trailer, they unveiled the song Piddly. It didn’t give out any idea about the film but made for an interesting watch. And then came the teaser! It was interesting and the theatrical trailer was even better. It raised hopes for the film but at the same time, it didn’t give out much about the premise. All 3 actors look great and it’ll be great to see especially the chemistry of Amitabh and Dhanush. Songs are quite novel (Sannata, Lifebuoy, Piddly of course, etc) and should pick up once viewers see the film.

The buzz for the film isn’t widespread but nevertheless, it will ensure the film starts on a good or average note at least. After that, it’s the content that will decide if it can sustain. It has no competition as such with the previous week releases underperforming or failing miserably. Balki has always given interesting, out of the box films and here’s hoping Shamitabh fulfills expectations!


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE SHAMITABH AND WHY? DO LET ME KNOW!

Diwali and Pongal come every year, but we have to really wait for a Rajini film-Dhanush


Chandna Arora and Saloni Bhatia (BOMBAY TIMES; February 5, 2015)

After Raanjhanaa, Dhanush read 33 scripts before saying yes to Shamitabh. During a recent visit to Delhi, we spoke to him over breakfast, where he was not eating South Indian food as we were expecting, but was happily enjoying aloo paratha with dahi. Excerpts:

Your doing a Hindi film generated quite some buzz the first time around, and your second choice in this unfamiliar language was sure to be keenly analysed. What was it about Shamitabh that you chose this film to be your second Hindi project after Raanjhanaa?
It's definitely not about moving to another language or establishing myself somewhere else. After Raanjhanaa, there were many scripts - 33, to be precise - in a period of about eight-and-a-half months. But then I felt it is not for me, some scripts I felt were not good enough - none of them, actually . Then I thought, should I do a film just to do a film? Maybe not. I didn't mind waiting. I'm very happy I waited. After eight-and-a-half months, I got a call from R Balki, who called me over to his office. He narrated the script, and when he was done, I knew, this is it, this is my second Hindi film. The script was really new. These days, you can't really say that you have a new story because every story has already been told. It's all about how gripping your screenplay is. But when this man had a new story to tell, it really fascinated me. He has come up with a very fresh concept. He also told me that Amitji is there in the film, so then I said, 'Okay'.

Was the film's name given after you and Amitabh Bachchan joined the movie, since the title is derived from your names?
I think the name was already there. I think it's a coincidence that 'Sh' from my name and 'Amitabh' from Amitji's name made up the title. But the title has some other significance. Nobody other than Balki can think of a weird title like this. I am not called Dhanush in the film, that I can tell you.

Who is the guy you play in the film?
This guy is an aspiring actor from a village, who is mute. He needs a voice, and Amitji gives him his voice. Akshara plays the part of bringing these two talents together, and then begins the clash of the egos.

Given your devotion to Ilaiyaraaja's music, how does it feel to have him compose for your Hindi film?
Forget Shamitabh, any film that I do, any shot that I give, is inspired by his music. His music is everything for me, my heart and soul. I was not brought up to be an actor - I derive my pain, love, joy and happiness from his music.That's how much he means to me. Shamitabh is blessed with Ilaiyaraaja sir's music. He doesn't make songs just to make an album. He tells his version of the story through his songs. Watch out for the background score of Shamitabh, it's going to be phenomenal.

You have earlier said that you are slightly unaccustomed to giving so many interviews while promoting a film.
This is really tough, I don't know how everybody does it. I think I give about three-four interviews per film down South. It's not like I'm having a tough time, it's just that I am not used to it. There are four-five common questions for every film. Those tire you out.

There is a scene in the trailer where you are dragging Bachchan by the collar. How difficult was it for you to do such a scene?
I would like to correct that. The character in the film was pulling another character by the collar. If I think 'Oh no, I am pulling Amitji by the collar,' then I won't be able to do justice to the character. So I went there without any hesitation. I didn't have any kind of reservations. For all of us who have worked in the film, the film is bigger than everything else. I give major credit to Amitji because if not for him and his generosity and the way he made us comfortable, we probably couldn't have done it. He was kind and patient.

It's difficult for the film audience of Hindi cinema to understand how stars are revered in the South ­ we don't understand, for instance, how there can be temples of an actor!
Trust me, nobody in the South also understands this.

But is there still a difference between the way fans look at actors in North India and fans in South India look at stars there?
Yesterday, we went to a mall in Delhi and you should have seen the kind of crowd that had gathered to see Amitji it's pretty much the same down South also. If Rajini sir goes to a public place, that is what would have happened. The only difference that I have seen is in the first-day-first show celebrations. You should see it for yourself, there is no way for me to explain that. It's a celebration that they have for the films of the top five-six stars. There's Diwali, there's Pongal, and there's a Rajini film. Diwali and Pongal come every year, but we have to really wait for a Rajini film, so it becomes bigger. It's a festival for us.

What about younger stars, people of your generation ­ do you feel like stars?
They definitely make us feel like stars. The unconditional love from the fans and their support, the way they make us feel special, we are grateful and honoured. It's nothing to that extent though, probably one or two per cent of what a demigod is.

You have said you're painfully shy and have stage fright. Doesn't confidence come with fame?
Probably that (the love of fans) gave me confidence in front of the camera. I come from a very humble family - my father used to walk 7 km to save a rupee to feed us. And we are four children, he could feed us only one meal a day till I was about seven or eight. From there, he has brought us till here. I've seen every stage till I reached here, so that's why probably I am confident now, because I have seen how that life is.

What is Balki like?
Balki is a weird man. I don't know where his thoughts come from. When he narrated the story, I thought, how does this man come up with all these things? He is a great craftsman and a sound technician. He knows exactly what he wants. He is one of the finest filmmakers in the country, and a very weird man! Without his guidance, I don't know how I would have done this character. I'm very thankful to Balki for giving me Shamitabh and for believing that I could carry off Amitji's voice. That kind of majestic voice in this tiny frame is something no one could have imagined. I don't know with what confidence he approached me.

Amitji said that he suggested your name to Balki...
It's a great honour for me that he knew me and my work. If I am not wrong, Balki asked Amitji who this film could be done with in the South, and he said Rajini sir and Dhanush, and then Amitji said why not Dhanush here also. That's very generous of him.