Showing posts with label R Balki interview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label R Balki interview. Show all posts

I told Akshay Kumar that though he was the hero of Pad Man, the actual hero was a sanitary pad-R Balki

I am not here to change the  world with my films: R Balki
Renuka Vyavahare (BOMBAY TIMES; March 5, 2024)

The Fifth anniversary of the National Museum of Indian Cinema (NMIC) in Mumbai was graced by the presence of notable dignitaries, including the Consul General of the Republic of Belarus, Aliksandr Matsukou, and Consul of Belarus, Anton Pashkov. The day saw an array of events including a guided tour for visually impaired students from The Happy Home & School for the Blind as well an enriching masterclass by acclaimed director R Balki, in conversation with D Ramakrishnan (GM NFDC).

Following the insightful conversation, cinema enthusiasts enjoyed the screening of R Balki's 'Ghoomer’. The highlight of the event was Balki’s unabashed take on content clutter, not undermining one’s talent and his penchant for addressing social issues without resorting to social messaging. Over the course of the two-hour session the Cheeni Kum director shared some wonderful insights, funny anecdotes and inspiring words for aspiring actors and filmmakers. Excerpts…

‘You can’t learn the art of scripting’
I don’t think there is a better film school than going to the set and working with several filmmakers. You learn about life. I was fortunate that I was able to get these experiences, so I didn’t feel the need to do a film school. It’s not that I did it without knowledge, I gained the knowledge. If you can go to a film school, you might probably learn things faster than I did but what you can’t learn is the art of scripting. Scripting doesn’t happen by going to a scripting school because there are a hundredth ways in which you can communicate a story.

‘If you are confident about yourself, you will celebrate your enemy’
Cinema is a tool to express a thought or a story that you have. Nobody is going to see the scale or grandeur of your movie if your story doesn’t touch them, isn’t relatable or doesn’t make them think. I prefer the term engaged, over entertained. There has to be an emotional connect. I don’t want people to be bored or switched off or be distracted while watching a film. Entertainment can be mistaken for laughing, dancing, jumping. People want to be engaged while watching a film.

When I did the Surf Excel commercial, people told me, ‘Everyone’s preaching hygiene and you are saying get dirty (daag acche hai)’! I feel if you are confident about yourself, you will celebrate your enemy. If you have the ability to defend yourself and remove the stains, why would you curse the stains? I am confident enough to celebrate my enemy which is dirt here so come get dirty. I believe cinema is also like that.

Thought behind the role reversal in Paa
I remember I had gone to Amitabh Bachchan ji’s house during Cheeni Kum. Abhishek was there with him, and he was saying some extremely wise things, which is rare (smiles). He is usually the one who cracks jokes. Amit ji was pulling his leg by saying ridiculous things. They were completely opposite to their (father-son) character. I looked at them and said, “who is whose dad!” That thought stayed with me. I knew I wanted to make a film where I will reverse their roles. That’s how Paa happened.

I don’t have a single social cause bone in my body
Terms like ‘meaningful messaging’ scare me. If you want to look for meaning in life, go to a meditation app. Why watch a film? You need to be clear about your ambition from the beginning. My thoughts in cinema have been far more frivolous than my thoughts in ads. I always think cinema is serious so why not start with a frivolous thought? Even in Pad Man, my thought was not to convey a social cause. I don’t have a single social cause bone in my body. The film did a lot for menstrual hygiene and awareness, but I didn’t make it for that. I got to make a commercial feature film where the hero of the film was a sanitary napkin. I told Akshay Kumar that though he was the hero of the film, the actual hero was a sanitary pad.

A filmmaker needs to be honest. I am not here to change the world. I am here to explore an idea that doesn’t destroy the world and gives me happiness. Even a Ghoomer wasn’t about showcasing the infallible spirit of a woman who loses her right hand in an accident and learns to bowl with her left. That’s a cinematic given. People tend to glorify anything that’s social as inspirational. It is an inspiring film; yes, but what’s the speciality in this inspiration? What new can you bring to the table is the trick. I believe when you are down and out you tend to be most creative. The biggest joy in Ghoomer was discovering that new bowling delivery in cricket.

‘I love the arrogance of artists who have faith in their abilities’
I don’t agree with this notion that everyone must work for the film and no individual should want his/her talent to stand out because filmmaking is a group work. I like working with a cinematographer like P C Sreeram because he is a rebel who likes to show off. How can you be a craftsman if you don’t want to show your craft off? How can you hire the best man for the job and tell him to listen to you and expect him to curb his instincts for the sake of the story? The story is not driving him. It’s driving the film. I love the arrogance of artists who have faith in their abilities and put their craft first. As long as your craft doesn’t destroy me, please show off your craft. As a director if I ask you to not show off your talent then I am the devil. I am killing your abilities. I love people who are determined to show their abilities. I want people to notice a cinematographer, music director, choreographer, sound-production designer for the right reasons. If people remember you for the wrong reason, then you are doing a shoddy job. You can’t expect the artists to be submerged in the film. If you look at The Godfather, it works because everybody is showing off and delivers their best. That’s why I like working with P C Sreeram sir and Ilaiyaraaja sir. They are gifted with originality, and they know it. Cinema is all about 'look at me'. When anyone says we need to work as a team and the cause is bigger than individuality, that’s the biggest bull s***. Only when all eleven players try to play their best, will a cricket team succeed.

OTT has lovely stories about common people
The presentation is a bit understated and subtle but OTT has some lovely stories about common people. I want these films to cut the walk though. I see content where people just keep walking endlessly long after the scene is over. Cut the walk! Someone is standing on a terrace and watching people aimlessly, thinking. Some filmmakers believe this creates an atmosphere. I get it and it’s their presentation but cut it faster.

I am not here to change the  world with my films: R Balki

A lot of people didn’t know a film like Chup even existed-R Balki

R Balki
Niharika Lal (BOMBAY TIMES; November 25, 2022)

Known for films such as Cheeni Kum, Ki And Ka and Pad Man, R Balki gave a masterclass on the topic ‘Negotiating Aesthetics and Economics’ at IFFI (International Film Festival of India) 2022.

‘A LOT OF PEOPLE DIDN’T KNOW MY FILM CHUP EXISTED’
Balki said that a lot of films that fail at the box office or do not do well is because people don’t know about those films. He said, “We, in the creative world, tend to live in a bubble. A lot of people didn’t know a film like Chup even existed, and I thought it had free shows and it was great. A lot of my friends whom I met after years asked me, ‘So, what are you doing next?’, and I said I just did Chup, and they asked, ‘What is that?’ I was shocked and stunned. It didn’t reach people. Whether you like or not is different, you don’t even know about it then it is a problem.”

While word of mouth publicity gets a lot of credit for several films, Balki said he hates this cliche. “Word of mouth is mythical. I wonder how it happens? People watch the film and go and tell everyone to watch it? No. It has to be worked out in a manner so that there is already excitement around the project and all they need is a little nudge to go and watch the film. I feel a lot of creativity suffers because of a lack of science. I feel there has to be a scientific process behind word of mouth to be generated,” he added.

‘I DON’T THINK WE HAVE FOUND THE SCIENCE TO MARKET OUR FILMS’
Balki said that Bollywood doesn’t have a marketing mechanism. Not minicing his words, he expressed, “The marketing strategy is somebody is creating controversy, somebody is sleeping with someone, create some boycott, some ban. I don’t think we have found the science to market our films and a lot of creative people suffer because of it. Enough investment has not gone into developing how to market films and it is really very sad. So many people are pumping in huge bucks and yet the returns are so less.”

“If you are making 100 films and 90 of them do not make money, then there is definitely something wrong with the industry. There are pundits in this industry – producer pundit, director pundit, writer pundit, trade pundit and media pundits, and they all fall flat. They fall flat and they move on with the next theory without learning a thing. There are fantastic marketing people in cinema, but somehow when they get into this zone then their entire reading of data starts sounding outdated,” he added.

Balki further said that there is no formula for how films work. “It depends upon who does what. You can’t say the audience wants it. No, the audience wants damn good work. Who doesn’t want to see a good film, song or stars saying their best lines? But we all fall flat in understanding the theory without understanding the execution,” he added.

‘SHAH RUKH IS ONE OF THE MOST CLEVER PEOPLE IN INDIAN CINEMA’
Balki said that the stars are making one fundamental mistake that they are getting caught up in the producers’ money making machine. He said, “(They think) If I want to charge this amount then I have to do this kind of work and only then will I be able to recover the money. A lot of smaller ideas could have become bigger if bigger stars would have invested in them. Some stars have experimented and have fallen flat and have chosen to not experiment again while some stars have gone for tried and tested formulas.”

He said that Kamal Haasan experimented in the 80s with films like Sadma. Talking about Shah Rukh Khan, he said, “Shah Rukh has done Dear Zindagi. He also experimented with Swades and Paheli. If those films had worked, it would have taken a different turn. He is one of the most intelligent people in Indian cinema.”

If an idea comes up then maybe we would think of a sequel to Ki & Ka-R Balki


On the film’s fifth anniversary, Kareena Kapoor Khan and Arjun Kapoor hinted at a sequel to the movie, while director R Balki expressed that there’s scope for the story to continue
Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; April 4, 2021)

Five years ago, R Balki’s Ki & Ka starring Kareena Kapoor Khan and Arjun Kapoor opened conversations about reversing socially accepted roles played by a man and a woman in a marriage. Arjun, celebrating five years of the film this week, posted a picture of a mangalsutra, which was used for the film’s shoot. “A piece of memorabilia from ki & ka!!! Missing the set and missing the on screen Ki... this film was personal as I chose it for my mom and it’s now even more personal after working with Bebo and Balki sir... I think we need a sequel, what say @kareenakapoorkhan? (sic),” he wrote. His co-star, Kareena, agreed with him and said, “A film that must be made into a sequel... only cause I want to work with @arjunkapoor and Balki once again... (sic).” The actors clearly hinted at a sequel to the movie through their social media conversation.

R Balki, who directed, produced and wrote the film, said, “Ki & Ka is special because it was released around my producer Anil Naidu’s birthday.”

“Anil is no more and I miss his presence in a big way. It’s one of those films that happened organically and fast. Bebo, Arjun, and I had a great time working together. In fact, we have spoken about working together again many times after that,” said Balki.

Elaborating on the possibility of a sequel, the director shared, “I have never made a sequel to any of my films for numerous reasons. Come to think of it, when we made Ki & Ka, we had to explain a lot of things in detail. Today, if I were to make a sequel, it would be simpler to handle, with fewer explanations to offer about the way things are, because a lot has changed around us. Having said that, I don’t have thoughts of making a sequel. Only when Bebo and Arjun were talking to me recently (on the film’s fifth anniversary) did it strike me that there could really be a sequel here. Let’s see! If an idea comes up then, maybe we would think of it.”

When asked what he plans to make next, R Balki, who had directed Akshay Kumar’s Pad Man in 2018, said, “I will be starting my next film in July. I can’t talk about it yet, but I have the details underway. Let’s hope it goes as planned.”

Find me a better actor than Alia Bhatt or Ranbir Kapoor, and we’ll argue-R Balki


Shreya Mukherjee (HINDUSTAN TIMES; July 17, 2020)

The existence of nepotism in the film industry is something that nobody is denying, however, everyone does point the good and the flip side of it. Filmmaker R Balki is of the opinion that many a times, people discuss these topics for entertainment, and it’s not a genuine conversation.

“It’s undeniable that this happens everywhere. Think about the Mahindras, Ambanis, Bajajs… Their father passed on the businesses to them. Does anyone say ‘No I don’t think Mukesh Ambani should run this business, someone else should?’ It happens in every strata of society. So, it’s a foolish argument,” he asserts.

Elaborating his point, Balki says, “The question is do they (star kids) have an unfair or bigger advantage? Yes, there are pros and cons. But I’d ask one simple question: Find me a better actor than Alia (Bhatt) or Ranbir (Kapoor), and we’ll argue. This debate on nepotism is unfair to these few people who’re probably some of the finest actors. Understand that audiences don’t like actors without talent. Sometimes, they also want to see star kids on screen. I agree it’s far more difficult for an outsider to make it big in films, but talent gets opportunities.”

While casting for a film, all Balki looks for is “who is best suited for the role” and the person’s availability.

Many have used the ongoing Coronavirus lockdown to churn out fresh content. Balki, however, admits that it’s tough to write during this time. “The situation is quite bizarre. Neither Gauri (Shinde; wife and filmmaker) nor I’ve been able to visit our parents. More than making films, I’m missing not being able meet people. There’s not much free time because we’re busy thinking about a lot of other things given the circumstances,” he ends.

There won’t be a shortage of work in the film industry post lockdown-R Balki


Madhureeta Mukherjee (BOMBAY TIMES; May 30, 2020)

This week, amidst the Coronavirus lockdown, R Balki, director of films like Cheeni Kum, Paa and Pad Man, along with Akshay Kumar and a crew of about 20 people, shot a public service film in Kamalistan Studios, Mumbai. In a conversation with BT, he talks about his experience of stepping in to the ‘new normal’, how we need to work our way around the paranoia, and how compromises have to be made by a lot of people in the existing and post-corona world, for us to get back on our feet. Excerpts...

Firstly, how did it feel stepping out, getting back to the shooting floors after being homebound for over two months?
It was such an opportunity that I said…whatever it is, even if they ask me to shoot a wall, I will go and do it. I wanted to get out there. It’s a very simple and informative film, which tells people that post lockdown, their responsibility is to get back to work, but with all the protocols followed. It explains that life has to move on, but with safety measures. It was ironic that with this film, we were also going back to work.

You were the first filmmaker from the industry to step into what we now call the ‘new normal’. Was it odd to see fewer people on a set that would otherwise be bustling with activity?
You need to have people who are willing to kind of take this risk. It’s actually a risk, despite following all protocols. For Akshay, to take the first step and do it, is a big thing. Even for the cameraman Sylvester and, of course, the producer Anil Naidu, who put it all together. We cut each unit down and made it bare minimum. The first 10 minutes were a bit unsettling, like we didn’t shake hands and were shouting at each other from a distance. But soon, we got used to it. When each department is so aware and all the protocols are explained to them clearly, it is simpler to handle. The fact is, you can’t be paranoid while shooting; once the camera rolls, you have to focus on that.

One thing that has come out of this phase is the realisation that we all can do with less. Sometimes, less is good enough…
Of course, we can do with less. World over, even under normal circumstances, the strength of the shooting crew is far lesser than what we have here. The thing is, because we are such a labour-intensive industry, people fear that they will lose jobs if we go with a leaner crew. I don’t think so, because there’s so much demand for qualified, trained people in this field. Now, everyone is in a bad shape, but post lockdown, when shoots pick up, there will be so much work that we won’t find enough people. I think this industry will be the first one, which will not suffer a lack of jobs post lockdown. There will never be a shortage of work as far as this industry goes. There are so many platforms right now, everybody wants to produce, and we need new content to come in. Yes, what we need to be worried about is the theatres, because they won’t see footfalls for a while.

Do you see a shift in the kind of content the film industry will churn going ahead? Also, will we become more risk averse in terms of budgets?
Let me tell you, 95 per cent of the films that we make are medium or small-budget ones. It looks like a big-budget project only because you attach a star to it. We probably have five per cent big-budget films, where the money is also big and so is the star cast. So basically, you add a star, and it becomes a big-budget film.

And this trend will continue and only get stronger…
(Cuts in)…Unless the stars are going to understand the budgets and continue making the films that they want to make. Yes, a lot of compromises have to be made by a lot of people.

If Amitabh Bachchan skipped a word, Zohra Sehgal would ask for a “cut” and sternly tell him he forgot his dialogue-R Balki


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; May 23, 2020)

He doesn’t have a sweet tooth and even likes his coffee without sugar. “Cheeni kum” is a constant refrain for writer-filmmaker R Balki and an apt title for his directorial debut as, he points out, it was “a very romantic but sarcastic love story, without mush or meetha, without anyone uttering the words ‘I love you’ even once”.

In fact, that was the line the director used to pitch his first film to the then 64-year-old Amitabh Bachchan, his leading man of choice. To Balki’s delight, the Big B responded shortly, “write it”, and once it was fleshed out as a script, reacted with a “let’s do it”. Even Tabu, whom Balki had sounded out when she was in Los Angeles, jumped on board as soon as she returned and they’d met for the narration. She played Nina Verma, 30 years younger than Amitji’s Buddhadeb Gupta, the grouchy chef-owner of London’s best Indian restaurant. Their summer-winter romance was what made Cheeni Kum daringly new back in 2007.

Interestingly, its writer-director doesn’t consider the film particularly brave because, for him, the age difference was but just a number. “I wanted to make a film with Amitabh Bachchan, who may have been a little older by then, but, in my mind, he was still ‘the’ Amitabh Bachchan. For me, it was not the love story of an older man and a young woman, but the story of Amitabh Bachchan and Tabu who I had in mind while writing,” says Balki, recalling that at the film’s first screening at London’s Empire Cinema near the famous Leicester Square, an audience of 2000 was screaming for the Big B like they used to back in the ’80s.

Why Tabu, you wonder, and Balki explains, “It was always Tabu because she is the quintessential Indian woman — soft, feminine, conservative in her appearance, yet progressive and mature in thought— a perfect match for this caustic bachelor as she replies to his poker-faced remarks with an easy smile.”

Balki also roped in Zohra Sehgal to play Bachchan’s always-hectoring 85-year-old mother, Paresh Rawal as Tabu’s tetchy father who learns, to his shock, that his son-in-law-to-be is six years older than him, and Swini Khara as Sexy, his nine-year-old buddy neighbour. “Like Tabu’s Nina, Zohra ji’s character, too, was not intimidated by her son, neither in reel life nor in real. She knew all her lines, and Amit ji’s, too. If he skipped a word, she would ask for a 'cut' and sternly tell him he forgot his dialogue,” the director chuckles at the memory.

Balki adds that every day, the veteran actress would have a drink before calling it a night, admonishing them for being too exhausted to join her and declaring that they wouldn’t live long. “She was fantastic, so spirited, coming to shoot that scene at the Qutub Minar in 44 degrees centrigrade in a wheelchair on her 94th birthday, then, standing up and walking for the camera,” he marvels.

He’s equally gung-ho about li’l Swini, who came from a conservative household in Mumbai, but had the quiet confidence to pick up the British accent of a girl born and brought up in the UK, and dub her lines herself. “Like her character, Sexy, she was a surprise, and like the other ladies, wasn’t overwhelmed by Amitabh Bachchan.”

Paresh was equally quick to sign up, telling Balki excitedly, “I want to do this film, tell me when we shoot”, brought his phenomenal comic-timing to the sets. “His interactions with Amit ji were as hilarious for the team as they were for the audience.”

Given the perfectionist he is, did Amit ji pick up any culinary skills to play the chef? “Amitabh Bachchan takes just five minutes to learn anything, and he has seen enough chefs in his life, to play one. The first scene required him to fume at his chefs and he did it with a lot of fire. I asked for one more take… Then another. ‘What do you want me to do, not express my anger?’ he shot back and I nodded,” recounts Balki, and in an instant, his ‘hero’ knew what was required. “He faced the camera, stood quietly, and with one steely glance made his displeasure clear. After that, never again did he show any anger on camera, and shots were okayed in one-two takes.”

Balki remembers that the day they were shooting the now famous scene (August 27, 2006), when en route to Nina’s apartment for an intimate dinner, Buddha stops at the drugstore and blushingly asks for a condom, they learnt Hrishikesh Mukherjee, one of Amit ji’s favourite directors with whom he had a long and personal connect, had passed away. “Amit ji was distraught, but professional. He went to a corner, composed himself, returned to face the camera, gave the perfect shot, then, vanished. That’s what makes him the Amitabh Bachchan,” Balki concludes.

Nobody has our language of cinema around the world-R Balki


Filmmaker R Balki loves the unique way of storytelling that Bollywood films have, and does not want them to give up on their originality to compete with Hollywood
Kavita Awaasthi (HINDUSTAN TIMES; February 24, 2020)

He has a number of critically-acclaimed and commercially successful films to his credit, but even after 13 years as a filmmaker, R Balki feels there is a lot to learn. “Cinema is huge and vast and it keeps changing. There are so many people telling so many wonderful stories. What’s unique about Bollywood is that we have a distinctive way of storytelling and a unique language. We should try to take that forward and not try to be like the West — of course, not in terms of technology which we should improve on — but I mean in terms of storytelling,” he says, adding that at times, we curse certain kinds of Hindi films and wonder when will we up our standards or win the Oscars, “which is wrong”.

“I feel there is a lot of originality in Bollywood. Nobody has our language of cinema around the world. So, why should Bollywood change? That’s our originality and why are we hell-bent on being something else? I am sure a film with our originality and our voice can make a mark in the world as the world too wants to see unique stories. Look at the Academy-Award winning film Parasite,” he says.

The filmmaker, who has directed and written Cheeni Kum (2007), Paa (2009), Shamitabh (2015), Ki & Ka (2016) and Pad Man (2018), admits that simplicity has always worked for him as a storyteller. “Not having too many complications in the story works. The only film that didn’t work at the box-office was Shamitabh, perhaps because the concept was good but we tried to pack in a lot in the film which backfired,” he says. Ask him about his next project and he says, “I love watching films and never itch to get back to direction. I am working on a script, let’s see how it goes.”

Balki doesn’t follow a plan neither does he have a goal to make a movie every few years. “I let a thought stay with me for a long time before I decide I should put in that one year writing it and another year making it. Filmmaking is a laborious process and I would rather not take things forward unless I really feel for the subject at hand,” he concludes.

Even after so many films, it is never easy to get Amitabh Bachchan on board for a project-R Balki


Kavita Awaasthi (HINDUSTAN TIMES; February 12, 2020)

He has directed Amitabh Bachchan in three films — Cheeni Kum (2007), Paa (2009) and Shamitabh (2015), yet filmmaker R Balki says it is never easy to get “Mr Bachchan on board for a project or a film. It never was and never will be”.

It’s been five years since his last Bachchan and Dhanush-starrer, Shamitabh released and talking about it, Balki quips, “It feels like it flopped just yesterday (laughs). It is not always about whether a film works or not, but it’s more about what you remember about the journey. Shamitabh was special as we did something no one had done before. We may have gone wrong but we still cherish the experience. It was an ode to the greatest voice in Hindi cinema, that of Mr Bachchan. I am sad that the film didn’t work because of what it paid tribute to.”

Shamitabh is the story of a speech-impaired aspiring actor Dhanush who gets a chip fitted in his larynx to enable him to speak with someone else’s voice. A failed actor played by Amitabh Bachchan provides the voice, leading to stardom and eventually, ego clashes.

“Dhanush was fabulous in the film and so was Akshara Haasan. This was the first film where we recorded the dialogues before canning the shots, which was quite unusual. Dhanush had to act to the dialogues, and they were like the background composition. The techniques were novel and it was painful to shoot,” recalls Balki.

Though the filmmaker-actor duo have had a great working relationship, Balki admits that he always looks for something unique in a role or story before taking it to the senior actor. “My motto is to make a special film with him and push the envelope. Otherwise, why make it at all? Our associations worked because I never think too much about how a role or a story starring Amitji would work out,” he says.

Balki is currently working on a script and rumours are that his next directorial will star Bachchan. Ask him about it and he says, “I am writing a script, let’s see how it goes. Only once I finish the script, will I think about the next step. I have written scripts with actors in mind, but not every script takes that path. For the current script, I am not thinking of any actor right now,” he concludes.

I disagree that Mission Mangal is a woman empowerment or woman centric film-R Balki and Jagan Shakti


Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; August 5, 2019)

Together, they are a two-men army. On one side is R Balki, a powerful ad filmmaker, who graduated to Bollywood with critically acclaimed movies like Cheeni Kum and Paa. On the other side is Jagan Shakti, who assisted Balki and director AR Murugadoss over the past 14 years, and is now ready to make his directorial debut with Mission Mangal. Over to the duo, who has steered the film and made it a reality...

Jagan has been working with you since 2005. Balki, at what juncture did you realise that he’s ready to helm a film by himself?
I met Jagan through a common friend. From Cheeni Kum (2007) to Pad Man (2018), he’s held different designations in my directorial team. The only time he wasn’t on my team was when I made Ki & Ka (2016). For me, he’s been a part of this little family I have at work. Over these years, I’ve realised that he’s very capable. Since my wife Gauri (filmmaker Gauri Shinde) and I make fewer films, he also worked with Murugadoss. I would describe Jagan as a creative person, who can also be destructive, like most creative minds are. To answer your question, he was going to make another film years ago which didn’t work out. I was concerned about him, as he was somewhat frustrated.

Is that when you decided to produce Mission Mangal instead?
Balki: While working on Pad Man, Jagan came up with an idea on the launch of the Mangalyaan. His sister Sujatha works at Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) as a scientist. He worked hard to develop the idea, and initially, we even toyed with the thought of making it in another language. However, eventually, we decided that the film needs a big scale and making it in Hindi might be the best option. The thought was to make an emotional movie about a space mission that we’re proud of; something that has human elements, unlike Hollywood films like Gravity (2013), which are more fiction and fantasy. I met Akshay Kumar and he, too, seemed interested in the idea. However, his question was, ‘What am I doing in this film?’ I told him that it’s just an idea and we’d flesh it out. Over the next three months, I worked with Jagan and our writers. Together, we created a set of fictitious, yet strong characters, who would narrate the story of one of modern India’s greatest achievements. We’ve kept the scientific aspects and the flow of events as close to reality as possible.

Along with Akshay Kumar, the film is headlined by five strong women characters (played by Vidya Balan, Sonakshi Sinha, Taapsee Pannu, Nithya Menen and Kirti Kulhari). You are known to make films with strong women characters, and going by the trailer of Mission Mangal, this story, too, seems to be driven by them...
Balki: Akshay is the hero of this film, and so are the five women, who play characters that are as strong and as important as his. He’s a superstar with no herogiri to do here, but he’s at the centre of the story, while substantial parts are played by strong artistes, who happen to be women. Once we completed our script, everything fell into place. This was the first film I narrated to Vidya Balan after Paa (2009) and she was ecstatic. Just like her, I wanted each and every character to have a place of its own. I’d like to believe that we’ve achieved that. I must add that Jagan added a lot of muscle and elements to every character.
Jagan: Balki sir and I had this very interesting line that we had planned to give Vidya’s character. At some point, we wanted her to say that it’s science that makes me a scientist, not my gender. It was a powerful line, but we didn’t find the right point to place it.
Balki: I disagree with the thought that Mission Mangal is a woman-empowerment film or a woman-centric film. These are just phrases or concepts that we latch on to. It’s rare and nice to see so many women on a single film poster. It must have received a lot of attention, but this film is led by Akshay Kumar, like Pad Man was. That was about sanitary napkins, but the story was led by Akshay’s character. So, I disagree with the notion that we’ve made a woman-centric film. And why should I attempt to empower women who are already far superior and more powerful than men? Do they even need it?
Jagan: To me, they are all scientists at ISRO. In fact, even the women who work at ISRO, including my sister, don’t think that they are any different from their male colleagues. Gender doesn’t get into the way of their everyday work, which is complex and challenging. For them, a sari or shirt doesn’t matter — all that matters is that you are a scientist who can aid India’s space program. There were thousands of people involved in the Mars Mission; we’ve created seven-eight characters to front their story. To us, this is a thought-empowerment film. If you believe in yourself, nothing is impossible. Akshay sir’s character is not empowering anyone in the film; he’s just working with them.

Jagan, at any given time, there were at least three top stars on your set. Did it get difficult to handle so many A-listers in your first film? Isn’t it a hefty cast to justify in terms of screen time?
Jagan: It didn’t get difficult and the credit for that goes to the script. Initially, everyone presented their views on their characters and the situations, but once they came on board, they were clear about what they were doing. My cast came with no starry baggage and they didn’t treat me like a first-time director. We knew that there was room for on-the-spot improvement. That was inevitable with such big names on board and I’d be foolish to not take their inputs; in fact, I grabbed the inputs by the collar. But there was a rhythm that no one could break because that could impact the overall film and take away from what we intended to say. No one could add or eliminate lines because it was written in a certain manner. Fortunately, everyone got their parts correctly. Balki sir and I had even rehearsed the scenes before putting them into the script. And none of the actors were vying for extra screen time. The film is bigger than that for them. Today, nearly every actor knows that a character is far more important than screen time.

When you guys started shooting, there were reports of a court case being filed by an NRI filmmaker, who had claimed that this film is based on her story, titled Space Moms...
Balki: The story of this film belongs to ISRO and it’s across every platform in the world. People have made films, documentaries, features on this subject and everything around it. The film is about a mission and the sacrifices people have made for it to be a success. ISRO belongs to everyone and no one can claim to own this story solely.

Jagan, let’s talk about the research that you’ve put into the film. Balki had mentioned earlier in the interview that you put in a lot of hard work before the film went on the floors...
Jagan: My sister Sujata helped me understand a lot of things and also directed me to the right people at ISRO. I interviewed at least 30-40 scientists, who worked on the mission and their contributions are immense. I have 1,800 hours of audio recording, which came in handy while trying to make science palatable for a regular cinegoer.
Balki: People will come to the theatre for an experience; we have to pass on knowledge without making it seem so. We had to find simpler ways to decode complex scientific things. We used every-day examples to explain the goings-on of space and blend it with an emotional and thrilling story.
Jagan: For instance, you see Akshay sir explaining a space concept by using the example of making puris. We are educated to understand science, but in a film, it has to be interpreted differently. In reality, ISRO scientists had not done it this way; this is how we’ve fictionalised the story a bit.

Did you have to get your script vetted by ISRO?
Balki: We have all seen the documentaries and the material available in the public domain. But knowing too much can also get into the way of writing a script. So, drawing that line was essential while writing the film. You see, we were not learning to launch a rocket while making this film. Each time we hit a roadblock or we needed to check on facts, Jagan would reach out to the ISRO officials. Also, we didn’t set out to make a salute-your-flag Independence Day film. The nation has already saluted the scientists for their achievement. Our job here was to write an enjoyable film that will leave you feeling charged and inspired.

Balki’s films have a certain sensibility. Was there ever a creative clash or conflict at any level of execution?
Jagan: I pushed my way through things (laughs!). There were times when I succeeded and times when I didn't. There were times when he came around an idea that he had initially rejected, and there were times when I withdrew my thoughts. If you have a convincing argument, sir is never egoistic about it, he takes it in the right spirit.
Balki: Jagan is an enthusiastic person with a commercial bent of mind. But I sincerely believed that this story didn’t need any seeti-bajao moments. I believe the film is Jagan’s vision; I’ve helped him shape it appropriately. I didn’t even go to his set for more than three days, but I’ve shouted at him like I’ve done for no other film of mine. Gauri sometimes would come down heavily on me for that; she’d make me realise it’s his film (laughs!). Two people can never direct a film and that’s the reason I limited my contribution to the script; it’s the first time I’ve worked on a film that I’m not directing. I helped him write it to ensure that it stays true to the vision he had when he came to me with it. I never let him forget the image of those women at ISRO celebrating the Mars Mission. You get your chance to make your first film just once, and it has to be nothing but perfect. It doesn’t matter if it’s the biggest hit of the year, if it’s not perfect, you will live with that feeling all your life. If I can stop a mistake, I should. Jagan’s been that mentee who has put up with me silently.

Radha Bhardwaj is welcome to read Mission Mangal script-R Balki

R Balki and Radha Bharadwaj
After US-based director alleges Mission Mangal borrows from her screenplay, producer Balki says real-life incident can have several interpretations, asserts Vidya-starrer is an "original" narrative
Mohar Basu (MID-DAY; November 23, 2018)

A day after US-based filmmaker Radha Bharadwaj moved the Mumbai High Court to stall the production of Mission Mangal, the film's producer and writer R Balki has rushed to the defense of his ambitious space drama that revolves around India's 2014 Mangalyaan Mars Mission. In a report published by mid-day yesterday, Bharadwaj alleged that the film - featuring Akshay Kumar and Vidya Balan, among others - infringed on the copyright of her original screenplay that she had shared with Atul Kasbekar in 2016.

Pointing out that the mission was in the public eye and hence, could have piqued several filmmakers' interest, Balki insists that he and director Jagan Shakti created an "original screenplay" based on the information that was available in the public domain. "There are always many claimants when it comes to a film based on a real-life incident. I am sure many scripts have been written on the Mars Mission. But ours is an original screenplay. We have taken the core of the story and added fictional characters to make it an interesting screenplay. Only ISRO can claim rights to the core story. I urge Radha to come to my office and read our script. I am certain she will find it refreshing. She hasn't even read it, so how can she make such claims?"

In her account, Bharadwaj said that she had shared the original screenplay with Kasbekar in 2016, in the hope of finding financing for the film. In violation of their NDA, Kasbekar's team had apparently shared the script with Balan - one of their clients - and had confirmed that the actor had read it.

But Balki insists that Shakti has been working on the story since 2015. "Jagan has been living with this vision for three years. I have been helping him in developing the screenplay. People can be upset with their interpretation of a story not being executed, but it is silly to try and stop another interpretation that 'is' being executed."

Quiz him on Bharadwaj's allegations that Kasbekar's team had negotiated Balan's deal for Mission Mangal, and the filmmaker says, "Atul Kasbekar does not know of this film. Jagan and I met Vidya personally, and not through Atul. I don't even know if Atul handles her account. Neither were we aware of who else had approached Vidya with stories on Mangalyaan." On her part, Bharadwaj recently completed the shoot of her directorial, Space MOMs, which is based on the same subject.
-----------------------------
Hiren Kotwani (DNA; November 23, 2018)

US-based filmmaker Radha Bharadwaj has filed a lawsuit alleging Mission Mangal, which is being produced by R Balki as well as Akshay Kumar and directed by Jagan Shakti, which is based on the screenplay of her venture, titled Space MOMs. Mission Mangal is inspired by the women scientists who worked on India’s 2014 Mars Orbiter Mission aka MOM. The cast comprises Akshay Kumar, Vidya Balan, Sonakshi Sinha and Taapsee Pannu among others.

Radha claims that she had registered her screenplay with the US Copyright Office in 2016, after the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) had notified her of its support for her movie and arranged for her to interview several of its engineers. Two years ago, she had begun talks with Atul Kasbekar’s company, Ellipsis Entertainment, to produce her movie. According to the filmmaker’s lawsuit, the production house claimed that they had shared the script with Vidya, who had read it. However, due to creative differences, Radha terminated her relationship with Ellipsis Entertainment and found funding for her film elsewhere.

She acknowledges that ‘the full details of the origin of this project were not known to Akshay Kumar, Fox Star (that is also backing Mission Mangal) or its US Parents’. But in her lawsuit, she alleges that Atul’s team violated the contract by sharing the script with Vidya, who is now a part of the cast of another film that is using her idea.

It also states that Atul’s team negotiated the deal for Balki’s film. Radha also claims that Mission Mangal is being rushed into production to jeopardise the commercial prospects of her project, Space MOMs.

“My film is a celebration of women, of India, and of India’s ancient heritage of scientific achievement and female empowerment,” says Radha, who was born and raised in Chennai. “It was conceived, written and directed by a woman. My film has a female producer and a female financier and executive producer. All of the lead actors are women. And now the Bollywood Boys Club, with its female enablers, wants to shove all these women aside and grab this project for a male producer, male director, and male star, all trying to show how supportive they are of women.” The lawsuit further alleges that even the publicity for Mission Mangal seems to be copied from that of Space MOMs, which was publicly announced on September 8, 2018.

However, Balki refutes Radha’s allegations. The filmmaker states, “Firstly, Atul Kasbekar does not even know of this project (Mission Mangal). And Jagan (director) and I met Vidya personally, not through him or anybody else. I don’t even know if Atul is her management person. We are not even aware who else had been approached with stories on Mangalyaan.”

Asserting that like every film based on a real-life incident, there are always many claimants, he adds, “I’m sure many scripts have been written on the Mars Orbiter Mission. But ours is an original screenplay that I have helped Jagan with. He has been living with this vision for three years! We have fictionalised a lot of characters to make it an interesting screenplay out of a core story that only ISRO can claim rights to. Nobody else. People can be upset with their interpretation of a story not being executed, but it is silly to try and stop another interpretation that is being executed.”

The PadMan director further says that Radha is welcome to read the script. He states, “She hasn’t even read it... how can she claim this? It’s very silly and wrong. Radha, please come over and read it. I’m sure you will find it fresh and refreshing.”

According to a well-placed industry source, “It’s wrong in every way to suggest that Atul’s team shared the idea with Balki. Why would one production house share a script that they weren’t making with another company? Most aspects of Mangalyaan mission are in the public domain. And anyone can come up with a script on any aspect.”

Reacting to Radha’s allegations, Tanuj Garg, Managing Partner, Ellipsis Entertainment, says, “Ellipsis is not connected with the film that is currently under production in any way. To allege that ‘we leaked the script is plain ridiculous, laughable and preposterous. In any event, the subject is in the public domain. We will take steps to defend us in accordance with the law.”

Pad Man is my most mainstream film-R Balki

R Balki and Akshay Kumar
Nayandeep Rakshit (DNA; February 5, 2018)

Whether it’s Cheeni Kum, Paa or Ki & Ka, R Balki has opted for unconventional subjects, which haven’t been attempted in Bollywood before. Continuing the tradition, his next directorial, Pad Man, deals with a topic — menstrual hygiene — that’s considered a taboo in the society. This is also the ad filmmaker-turned-director’s first biopic, a genre which, he admits, he isn’t too comfortable with. He tells After Hrs why he readily took up Pad Man and how he would do a masala film, only if it’s done his way...

When you were making Pad Man, were you apprehensive that people would take offence to it, since the film talks about menstruation?
No. I never thought about it. An objection to this film would be an objection to women. It’s as fundamental as that. But I’m so touched by the effort that our government, as well as that of other countries, are making to create awareness about menstrual hygiene. It’s a universal issue.

Here, sanitary pads are considered an object of luxury and not a necessity in villages, whereas, in a few countries, condoms are distributed for free. Do you think that will change?
It will. Cinema is a powerful medium. When people say that, ‘Pad Man is coming’, they are telling a word, which they never said before. But ask those same people to request for a sanitary napkin at a store and they’ll start whispering. I also believe that there is a huge problem of affordability. A lot of women who want it, can’t afford it. There is lack of awareness, too. People don’t understand that pads are more hygienic. It’s supposed to protect you from diseases that a cloth cannot because despite washing it repeatedly, there will still be germs. So, the basic purpose of sanitary napkins is misunderstood. It’s not a lifestyle choice, it’s a necessity. It’s a luxury today in a lot of people’s houses only because it’s been made out to be a luxury.

How did Pad Man happen?
I was approached to make this film. Twinkle Khanna had interacted with Arunachalam Muruganantham earlier as she wanted to write a book. Akshay Kumar and she (Twinkle Khanna) met me and I thought it was a great opportunity. I normally don’t like making a biopic because I get scared thinking whether I’ll be able to do justice to that person. At the same time, I knew the opportunity to make a film like this would never come again. I said yes in 24 hours! Then, it was funny. Twinkle went on to write her book and I went on to write my film. Finally, we arrived at two different interpretations of one man, his life being the common thing. We both finished at the same time as well. So he’s got two people writing for him. It was a natural story waiting to be told. I needed to make sure those emotions came across really well because eventually, it’s a love story.

You have a certain sensibility and treatment in your films. Do you think that prompted Akshay and Twinkle to approach you?
The cast wasn’t in place at that time. Even Akshay wasn’t sure. But he just asked me, ‘Do you want me to do the film? I don’t have a problem not doing it’. I felt that you could see the character in him completely. Pad Man is probably my most mainstream film because all my movies have largely been urban-centric. Of course, the tonality and the way I write doesn’t change but the genre and setting of this emotional love story is so far-reaching than anything else that I’ve done. It’s because of the nature of the story. It’s funny that something that people consider a taboo subject is actually my most mainstream subject ever.

But it’s commendable for a superstar like Akshay to do Pad Man...
Yes, it’s brave that he’s making such choices. Last year, I loved two films —The State vs Jolly LLB 2 and Toilet - Ek Prem Katha, both of which starred him. He has a great reach today and he can do any kind of movies. Akshay has got an absolute new tone in his films now. I’m so happy to have him play my leading man because when you watch Pad Man, you’ll know why he’s perfect for it.

As a director, is it difficult to find novel ideas?
I just try and see what I haven’t thought of before. I also watch a lot of films. I think there is a certain zone and tone that every director has. I know enough to say that. If you’re doing something that’s not original, then there’s no point in doing it. Yes, the subjects might have been dealt with somewhere else. But I should not know. That’s my only condition before starting a film. If I know it and I’m asked to do it, then there’s a problem.

Do you critique your own films?
I have done such s**t. I try and forget my movies as fast as possible, in fact, just a day after the release. I loathe my films. It’s not just one scene or two scenes. I cannot stand my own work.

Why?
When you are making a film, you go through so many emotions and by the time it opens in cinemas, you’re sick of it. You lose emotions, not objectivity. The sentiments with which you write a movie are non-existent by the time you release it. I’m quite disconnected that way.

Have you ever thought of breaking the norm and doing something completely different?
This is something totally different. I don’t want to do something out of my sensibility because then, it won’t be me. I don’t need to prove anything to anybody that I cannot do this. Even if I do a masala film, it will be with my style and sensibilities. It can’t be made with Manmohan Desai’s sensibilities because I’m not him.

So are you saying you’re averse to that kind of cinema?
No. What you know is what you do. I do only things which I know I can do. For example, I love Welcome. I roared with laughter while watching it. What madness! Even Rowdy Rathore is one of my favourite movies. Putting such calibrated nonsense is an art and if a film bores me, it’s boring regardless of what people think. There are interesting and boring movies. You only do the ones that you can.

We are trying to do away with menstruation related shame; not make it ultra cool-R Balki


R Balki on the stigma attached to menstruation, getting Akshay Kumar to wear a sanitary napkin and convincing Amitabh Bachchan to do a cameo\
Natasha Coutinho (MUMBAI MIRROR; January 10, 2018)

Two years after tackling a gender-bender in the Kareena Kapoor and Arjun Kapoor-starrer Ki and Ka, filmmaker R Balki returns to the marquee with another unusual subject that strives to bring the stigmatised topic of menstruation into the mainstream. Excerpts from an interview:

After Cheeni Kum, Paa, Ki and Ka, you’re carrying forward the tradition of telling unusual stories with Pad Man...
Tackling subjects that haven’t been touched upon before has always been the biggest motivation for me. Filmmaking is a laborious process. If you have to spend one year on it, it better be something that has never been done before.

In some parts of India, women aren’t allowed to enter temples and even the kitchen when they are menstruating. Will this film help change such obsolete practises?
The film doesn’t preach, it’s an entertainer that talks about beliefs and rituals that have been followed for years without much thought while menstrual hygiene has been ignored. We are creating awareness about that.

Did Twinkle Khanna, who debuts as a producer with the film, offer any inputs?
A film is made by a team of people. Twinkle was the one who first met Arunachalam Muruganantham (the real-life Pad Man) and thought it was a good idea to make a film on him. I had never done a biopic before but I like writing my own stories so I figured I could at least write a script based on the idea. Swanand Kirkire and I have co-written the script.

The script is reportedly inspired by Twinkle’s short story from her book, The Legend Of Lakshmi Prasad.
No. Her story and the film are different adaptations of Muruganantham’s life. The story and the script were worked on simultaneously.

Let’s flashback to your first meeting with Arunachalam Muruganantham?
It was hilarious. I wish I could make a seven-hour movie to incorporate all his stories. He told us about his struggles and there were so many lateral thoughts. He’s a very simple man. Akshay spent a lot of time with him too but he didn’t ape Mr Muruganantham’s mannerisms, choosing to interpret his personality in his own way instead. That is Akshay’s remarkable achievement – he’s given it a new feel without losing the spirit of the character.

The trailer shows Akshay trying on a sanitary napkin. It’s very unusual to watch a mainstream hero attempt something like that.
Nobody was willing to try his pads, so Mr Muruganatham decided to do it himself. It’s a part of his story and we had to dramatise it to capture it in its full glory.

What was it like shooting in the small town of Maheshwar in Madhya Pradesh?
It’s beautiful and wonderfully maintained, including the Ahilya fort and Narmada river. It is a worthy role model for other Indian villages and small towns. We wrote the film there and have shot it in the interiors.

Why Sonam Kapoor and Radhika Apte for the female leads?
People see Sonam as a fashion diva but here she plays a character that is possibly the most difficult one in the film because it demanded tremendous sacrifice in terms of helping the protagonist. Radhika is already known as a great performer and in real life, she’s the opposite of the conservative woman she plays. For her to get into the skin of the character was a revelation. Both Sonam and Akshay bagged National Awards while shooting for this film,. It was the second last day of our shoot and all of us ate a lot as part of the celebrations.

In the film, the protagonist has been put into a North Indian milieu as opposed to the real-life story’s South Indian. Any particular reason behind transplanting the story?
I fictionalised it because it would be difficult to have a South Indian man speak pure Hindi. It would have been equivalent to mocking the language. Pad Man is not about South or North but about a person’s achievements.

Amitabh Bachchan has been a part of all your films. Is a reunion on the cards soon?
He has played a cameo in this film; it is an important part.

Reports claim that Kangana Ranaut will play an amputee in your next that also features Bachchan.
This is all fabricated news. I’m not making any such film.

Back when you made Cheeni Kum, risqué subjects were few and far between. You are still on that brave and bold path.
With these films, especially Pad Man, we are trying to do away with the shame attached to themes like menstruration. But at the same time we are not trying to make it ultra-cool.

You are reportedly producing a film for wife Gauri Shinde with Sridevi in the lead.
That’s also a figment of someone’s imagination. Why would we hide it if it was true? I’m really upset when I read all this.

Pad Man clashes with Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmavat on Janaury 25. Worried?
Our film was supposed to release on Republic Day from the outset. It’s a free country and if people insist on a particular day, nobody can stop them. However, it is silly to clash in a small industry; there are enough dates for everyone. It’s not the wisest thing for films to clash.

I don't like anything I have made-R Balki

R Balki
R Balki never meant to be in advertising. And now, after 30 years he retires to filmmaking. Here, the 52-year-old takes us on a trip down memory lane
Aastha Atray Banan (MID-DAY; August 14, 2016)

Advertising moghul R Balakrishna, or Balki's  journey in advertising began in 1987 when he responded to an advertisement by Mudra Communications, asking applicants who wanted to work as interns to send in 100 words about them. "I only replied because it had a logo that looked similar to the logo that appeared at the end of the television serial Buniyad. So, I thought it was Ramesh Sippy's company. But it turned out to be an advertising company. I got conned into it," he says.

Balki, 52, who announced his retirement from the industry last week, feels that AG Krishnamurthy, the founder of Mudra, had probably decided to "save him from himself" while selecting Balki for the programme. "AGK and another gentleman called Nagananda Kumar thought that people in advertising could be trained. So, six of us were put together in a house in Ahmedabad. And all we had to do was watch movies and write about them and show Kumar. We did this for 180 days!"

Unable to get out of the house as he was down with a viral fever, Balki who completes three decades in the advertising industry, recalls his journey.

'I almost quit after 1 year'
In 1990, a person from Ahmedabad called Ranjan Thomas (who has passed away), came to the Bangalore office. He must have been a very passionate person, but I was very dreamy. Under him, I started thinking that I was not cut out for advertising. He used to say 'how will you make movies, if you can't be successful in advertising'. I think it was my repeated failure to understand what he was saying, that made me feel like I should quit. But, my manager, R Sridhar, told me 'you just need to get away from this environment' and sent me to Hyderabad. There, a gentleman called Bal Deshpande made me feel like I was a Creative Director, and I was given freedom. I made lot of mistakes, but I also gained a lot of confidence.

'People started buying my little stories'
I came back to Bangalore in 1990 and almost became the de facto Creative Director, a year after I had decided to quit. My first big campaign was in 1992 for Williams Shave Foam. I had a beard so I wanted to figure out how I could sell a shaving foam to a man with a beard. So, a guy stars singing 'I don't want to shave' and that turns into 'I want to shave'. I thought that was cool. I'd day dream about someone walking up to me and handing me a suitcase full of money to make a movie. Then I realised that it was happening in advertising as well. People were coming up to me and I was tailoring my dreams to suit their product. They were buying my little stories.

'At Lintas, it's all about team work'
I quit Mudra because after Sridhar quit, I wasn't happy with the management. I stayed at home for some time and then Lintas came calling. These were two very different agencies. At Mudra, we were the challengers, and we fought multi-national companies. Lintas was a well-oiled machine, set in its ways. It was hard to create a creative culture there, and that was a different exercise. But then I started enjoying myself there. I remember sitting in a room with Arun Iyer discussing an ad for a detergent. I was telling him that I want two kids, and I want to recreate the scene from Sadma when Kamal Hasan behaves like a monkey to make Sridevi laugh. Then Arun said, "you know a child who is crying starts laughing when the mother hits the table that he got hurt from." And that's how Daag Achche Hain came to be, where the child starts beating up the puddle of mud. It's always about team effort at Lintas.

'I hate all my work'
When asked what my favourite campaign is, I can never find an answer to give. I don't like anything I have made, and I am very sure of that. Who does that? Who can look at their own work? I always find mistakes. Maybe at the time I made them, I would have been gung-ho but after that, I only find bad things. Anyway, it's time to advertising a rest and work on my movies now. We have spent the last two years planning this transition — meetings with clients happened as I was the face of most brands. Teams took over and Arun Iyer and Amer Jaleel became National Creative Directors with two agencies under them. Now, I can concentrate on making one film a year instead of one in four years. It was said that don't leave till you are absolutely indispensable. Well, now I am done. I am truly dispensable.

Some of Balki's campaigns included Surf Excel's Daag Acche Hai and Tata Tea's Jaago Re
Some of Balki's campaigns included Surf Excel's Daag Acche Hai and Tata Tea's Jaago Re

Writing is a lovely holiday-R Balki


Having ended his advertising innings, R Balki shares how some of his best work was actually his worst
Kunal Guha (MUMBAI MIRROR; August 14, 2016)

Sipping on coffee at his Khar office, adman and filmmaker R Balki has a visibly relaxed aura. It's been less than a week that he officially announced his exit from MullenLowe Lintas Group, where he held the position of chairman and chief creative officer. "Ever since Joe (Joseph George) was made CEO, two and a half years ago, I had discussed about quitting and we have been planning this transition," he says. Having been with the agency for 22 years, preceded by a seven-year-stint with Mudra, the maker of films like Cheeni Kum and Paa now wants to become a full-time filmmaker. "Ever since Cheeni Kum, I had asked Lowe for a contract of nine months, so I could make a film every year in the remaining three months." The plan, however, didn't work, as his second film Paa materialised after a gap of three years. Having juggled his job and films in the last decade, Balki admits that he joined advertising by accident. "I got into advertising thinking I was joining films. When Mudra first advertised for trainees, I thought it was Ramesh Sippy's company, as the same logo used to come at the end of every Buniyaad episode."

Balki admits to being a passionate film buff. "I always knew I would make a film. When people asked how, I'd tell them, 'I will be walking on M G Road (in Bengaluru, where he hails from) one day and someone will hand me a suitcase containing one crore rupees'." His "blind and foolish theory" came true when he joined advertising. "Because people have brand problems and I have stories to tell. So, the M G Road theory actually happened to me in advertising," he smiles, admitting that his film career wouldn't have taken off if he hadn't carved a name in advertising. "Anybody can think of an idea, but when you're in advertising, you're a vending machine, doing it everyday. They will insert a coin and an imaginary bottle has to come out. That discipline of living happily with insecurity, not knowing about your next idea, is what advertising teaches you," says the 52-year-old.

Though many of his ideas elevated products to brands, he admits to have sometimes disappointed himself. "While working on a commercial for a car brand, we were briefed with only photographs and not the actual car. In the pictures, it looked like a wagon kind of thing, like two cars in one. So, we signed Amitabh and Abhishek Bachchan, assuming the car could accommodate both easily. We didn't see the actual car till we were in Lonavala for the shoot. When the car arrived, Mr Bachchan screamed, 'Abhishek, what's that thing!' The vehicle was nothing like the picture. It was my biggest mistake, not seeing the product before working on the creative. I wanted to cancel it, but it was only 10 days away from the launch. The ad turned out fine, but I still regret it."

Balki shares that there are a few ideas he regrets and "always feels it could've been done better". "When I had just joined Lintas, we worked on an ad for Pepsodent, which had a guy playing a ghatam and another playing with his teeth, finally the ghatam breaks, but the teeth don't. This commercial won many awards and was hailed as a creative piece of work but it was a completely wrong brand idea. Colgate was the brand associated with strong teeth, while Pepsodent had a different brand image," he reveals.

Running over an idea for the second time, Balki feels, can "make even a good idea seem like the worst". "This is why I switch off the TV when I see my film playing. I will find some fault in its execution and squirm, thinking, 'how could I have written that or shot it like that'."

Today, Balki wants to invest all the time he can, in writing — a process he admits to enjoy thoroughly. He hopes he can make a film a year. Being a labour-intensive job, "doing anything else would be near impossible". "Writing is a lovely holiday. On a vacation, the most difficult thing to do is to figure out what to do. If you know, you're writing, it's the best vacation. Unless, if you're watching cricket or Wimbledon."

Marriage, the way it is defined, makes it a flawed institution-R Balki


Madhureeta Mukherjee (BOMBAY TIMES; March 31, 2016)

He writes lines that creates brands. He sells ideas that tell a story. At the core, his thoughts are simple, but his movies lather up fresh images and frothy emotions, probably with more jhaag than the detergent he advertises.

R Balki doesn't dish out the usual Bollywood broth; in fact, there is nothing usual about his stories. Not even the lead pair or their romantic ramblings. So what, if there's cheeni kum or a little less masala in his plot¸ he's known for his rare recipes. And his movies leave a delectable aftertaste that lingers. Call it an acquired taste if you please. His next, Ki & Ka starring Kareena Kapoor Khan and Arjun Kapoor, is about breaking gender stereotypes. Balki does that best ­ break stereotypes. No wonder, he cast a man who reeks of machismo, Arjun, in a role of a doting, domesticated hubby. Wearing apron, mittens, et al. “In our country when we see a man doing feminine stuff, we always think he is a bit of a woman. Arjun is all masculine, and when he does gentle stuff there is no chance of questioning his masculinity,“ Balki says.

He's an ideas man. Does he ever know when an idea is not working? He's quick to admit, “Eighty per cent of the time your idea works and you get a license to be in the creative field. Twenty per cent of the time, even if you start without an iota of doubt, you will fail. But in advertising it is much simpler, as the next opportunity comes to redeem you much faster. In movies, it takes a wee bit longer.“

He adds, “People don't see ideas, they see a film. For the filmmaker it is about the idea, though often you can have a superb idea but a boring film.“ For someone who sees daily churn of creative ideas, he is overtly critical about his own work. He explains, “I analyse a lot before making a film, not once it is done. I never watch my ads or my film. In fact, if I know my movie is playing on television, I switch the channel. I am deeply embarrassed with everything I have ever done in my life. When you finish a film you feel like you are the genius of the century, three days after that you start remembering things you have done.“

He pauses and adds, “I am objective about my work. After I finished Shamitabh, I got the best review from the usher at a multiplex. He told me, 'Sir, films need some reaction like mast tha, boring tha, sad tha. But you haven't given them a vocabulary, and it's not a very positive thing.' By that he meant that two people had died pointlessly and the whole film had become insignificant for no reason. It was such a superb way of looking at it. When you leave the audience without words, they don't know how to react when asked about the film. That is a dangerous thing. So now on, it's simple ­ no one will die in my films ever again (laughs).“

He has set his benchmark high, so when Shamitabh didn't evoke the response he expected, it must have deeply affected him. He expresses, “One way is to question if you were right, and if you do that you are dead. The other way of looking at it is...okay some people disagree, so what? I was going on to the path of questioning myself, but I saved myself that pain. I am surrounded by the right people who tell me when my work is s**t. They even tell me that 'don't be s**t for too long'.“

Balki is not the kind to resort to empty hyperbole. He's modest, even self-deprecating. But I am sure there is a creative arrogance in the man too. “My only arrogance is that I can write and I won't stumble for a script. The decision to write is what takes time. I don't make magnum opuses, or construct palaces, so I never shoot for more than 45-50 days, as it gets too painful. And I start feeling distant from the film. My stories are very people centric, so I like to be in that zone.“

Talking about zones, there is one he loves being in and it's called the Amitabh Bachchan zone. I have met innumerable Bachchan fans. Then I met Balki. A fan who takes his idol for granted. Hold on, he has an explanation for that too. Like a child on a sugar-high, he excitedly says, “People hesitate to say things about icons like Ilaiyaraaja, PC Sreeram and Amitji. For me it is much simpler to disagree with them than with anyone else from the industry. It's not that I am over familiar with Amitji, but I can take him for granted. Besides these few people I mentioned, and Gauri (Shinde) too, I never take anyone else for granted. I am not a director who likes to see Amitji doing what he has not done before. I want to do with him what I want to see in him ­ as a fan. I have grown up watching his films and it is easy for me to write for Amitji; the tone of Hindi changes while writing for him. I could write his drunken scenes, arrogant lines and witty lines in my sleep.“

So, does that mean he has a creative understanding with Mr Bachchan, too? “No,“ he exclaims, “I don't have any understanding of the way he is or what he is thinking, but I have a very good understanding of how he is as an actor. During Shamitabh, Amitji was very grouchy throughout the film. I asked him if there was a problem, and if I have killed somebody? He looked at me and said, 'I am in character.' After Shamitabh, I swore that I would never again write a serious film for Mr Bachchan.“

Balki balks at the word 'inspiration'. “How do I know what will inspire me? To me, that inspiration is called 'luck'. I was staring at a tree when I thought of Ki & Ka. I was travelling in a cab and I thought of Shamitabh. I am just lucky that ideas fall into my lap. I can't call myself a genius for that. I only use my skills to shake that luck.“

Well, I take that bit with a pinch of salt and we move on to discussing what the most shocking thing about gender stereotypes is? “The fact that we are still discussing it.“ He asserts, “The fact that we still find it so cute to see a man at home, while the woman is working. I think men and women are compelled to do certain things fearing what the society will think of them. Society is not feeding or clothing you, so who are they to comment on your life?“ Ki & Ka makes marriage appear cool. It gives us a fresh take on an institution that is often a hot topic of debate in young circles. “My point is that you should never be able to say if two people are married. You should see a couple and think that they are in love and are having an affair. Why can't marriage be as cool as romance? Marriage, the way it is defined, makes it a flawed institution. If it is defined as something else, maybe it will make things better. You can't force two people to be bound just because of a legal bond. I believe you should have annual renewals of the marriage contract (laughs).“

Well, how much of the 'Ka' does he see in him? “Well, Gauri and I both work, and we do our share for the house. People say they don't take their work home, but we take all our work home. We talk and fight about it, too. Our life is films. Sometimes, I cook and put the clothes in the washing machine. The way the house looks is completely Gauri's territory. She wants my advice and then she will reject it (grins). I can't show that I am not interested, as that will upset her. Often, I don't show that sensitivity, so Gauri's statement to me is, 'I wish you were some of the characters you write'. I always tell her I can't put myself in my characters, because I am already living myself. I would write about what I want to be and can't be.“

I have no clue what kind of movies work-R Balki


Paa director Balki, ahead of his next release, a love story that challenges established gender roles work
Aastha Atray Banan (MID-DAY; March 6, 2016)

"After Shamitabh, I got umpteen calls and messages from Amitji and Jayaji, saying you better not wait another four years to make a movie. Start now!” laughs writer-director R Balakrishnan, 50, better known in the film fraternity as Balki.

It’s been a year since Shamitabh released, and his next film, Ki and Ka, will be out next month. “I told them I was tired, I wanted to take a break. But they said, no way! Make a movie now. So, I sat right here…” he says, throwing a look around the Khar office he operates from, “ and thought of an idea — a love story.” Starring Kareena Kapoor and Arjun Kapoor, Ki and Ka follows what happens when established gender roles are reversed. Kareena plays an aggressive professional, while Arjun is a docile house husband, who chooses to “be this way, when he could have been whatever he wanted”.

With Ki & Ka, Balki is seeking to challenge the slots we have created in our minds and society. “I wanted to show a different side to love. I like starting my movies at a point different from anything seen before. How does a man express his love for a woman when he is doing what a woman does?” Before he casted for the film, he came across a picture of Kareena and Arjun in a magazine, and realised they would fit the bill. “I wanted a hunk of a man, as masculine as can be. And a girl who is the epitome of femininity. When someone who is out - there manly performs a feminine role, the audience could feel disconcerted, but eventually, they’ll relate to the characters. It turned out to be a fun, light movie.”

Balki, who is known for telling thought-provoking, but simple stories — Cheeni Kum and Paa — wants the audience to walk out of cinemas feeling, "Maybe, we could live like this too."

And yet, he doesn't know what works for the audience. With decades of advertising experience (he is behind the hugely popular ‘daag ache hain’ campaign), and as Chairman and Creative Director of Lowe Lintas, you’d expect him to know what the audience ‘will buy’. “I actually don’t. Nobody does. Some movies work, some don’t. God knows why Paa worked and Shamitabh didn’t. It’s a matter of what the moviegoer wants at that moment.”

He says it’s the same for advertising. “For instance, we made a Pepsodent ad in 2001. A musician played the ghattam, which is a matka played like a drum. A kid played the same kind of music by drumming his fingers on his teeth. This idea didn’t gel with the audience; they thought it was a Colgate ad, because Pepsodent had never associated itself with the image of a strong teeth, germ fighting toothpaste. I thought it was a brilliant ad, but it didn’t work.”

What he is clear about, though, is that Bollywood needs entertaining movies. “[We need] movies that engage people. But what engages people also changes every two years, so, it’s not like we are making better movies now than we were before.” He picks a subject “that’s trippy”, and then justifies the trip by being disciplined about making it. “Pick a subject people are curious to know more about. That’s how you’ll reach out to everyone. That’s the aim.”

Whole crux of Ki And Ka is captured in that one cameo of Amitabh Bachchan-R Balki


Filmmaker R Balki discusses breaking stereotypes with his new film, the success of his simple cinematic formula and why he doesn't ask wife Gauri Shinde for advice
Sanyukta Iyer (MUMBAI MIRROR; February 7, 2016)

Seated in his favourite lazy boy, a pillow supporting his lower back, R Balki doesn't look like he has been bed-ridden for the past two days. We introduce him to his fan Ishaan Gupta, a branding maverick, entrepreneur and film buff, who is all geared up to ask the filmmaker enough questions to last half an hour. And as the Mirror photographer captures them in conversation, Balki has only one request: "Please make sure my large tummy isn't in the frame..."

Gupta has spent the previous night watching Balki's directorial debut Cheeni Kum from 2007 for the umpteenth time. He begins the interview by asking Balki to reveal his recipe for unravelling magic on the big screen. The ad guru and filmmaker replies that he owes his mind set and approach to cinema to his parents, who have gifted him an "absolutely normal life". "There was not one blip — I never felt poor or rich or hungry or extreme sorrow. So in my films, I don't have that personal angst to draw from, so I always have to imagine it. I was never beaten or unloved, so I do not feed off from my unhappiness. I owe my films to the normalcy of my life," he says.

Gupta is keen to know more about Balki's ad days. "Advertising was always my way of telling stories. I grew up in Bangalore and moved to Mumbai in 1999 and have been telling stories here ever since," Balki smiles.

"One day, my partner and I were working on a Lifebuoy advert and I went for a loo break, when a great idea struck me. I messaged the idea to Amitji (Amitabh Bachchan), with whom I had worked on a couple of ads and he sent me 'hmm' in response," he laughs. When that 'great idea' translated into Cheeni Kum, both Bachchan Sr and Tabu agreed to do the movie. Balki scripted each scene, keeping the two actors in mind.

Balki's love for Bachchan is no secret. "Can you tell us a bit about the special love and close bond that you share with Amitabh Bachchan? He's been a part of all your films," asks Gupta. "Every time my father, who doesn't stay with me, watches Paa, he sheds a tear and gives me a call. Your stories don't have extravagant sets and locations but they have Mr Bachchan."

The question makes Balki's eyes twinkle. "I am a huge fan of Big B," he replies. "He is the epitome of great acting and is the greatest star of all time. I wish I could get ideas for him all my life, but that's not possible because he has done it all."

Balki confides that his April Fool's day release Ki and Ka will feature not only Big B but Jaya Bachchan as well, in a special appearance. "Big B is a key part of Ki And Ka because the whole crux of the film is captured in that one cameo," Balki says.

Ki and Ka has already generated interest through it's poster featuring Arjun Kapoor and Kareena Kapoor Khan — Arjun plays a stay-at-home husband, while Kareena plays his wife, a chic corporate woman and the family's breadwinner. Balki explains that he didn't want to meet real-life house-husbands to understand what their lives were like. "I did not want reality. I wanted the film to be aspirational — in the sense, I wanted people to look at the big screen and say, 'I want that life'."

Gupta asks him about the filmmaking process, which Balki describes as laborious and time-consuming, leaving him with little to no time for anything else.

"Filmmakers are in it for the money. Some want fame, while others want to collaborate with actors. I do it for the idea that I have. I want to tell a story which, to the best of my knowledge, hasn't been seen or heard before," he smiles.

At the end of the day, he tells Gupta, no filmmaker is completely satisfied with his-end product. "Economics overtakes the film... Today, nobody has the luxury of shooting for an entire year. By the end of the 50th day, I get tired and bored and usually press the breaks. Every director is disappointed at the end of a film."

Gupta asks him what he loves about making movies. Though he enjoys film editing, he is quick to add that he abhors anything that calls for an attention to details — be it pre-production, or touching up his final product. "All that's kich-pich — the thousand meetings, the clothes and the co-ordination. Advertising should have taught me better," he laughs.

Many of Balki's films feature child actors, although he doesn't have children of his own. "I love kids as long as they're somebody else's," he guffaws. "This is also a dialogue by Arjun Kapoor who plays the 'ladka' in my film." He continues to explain, "I believe that growing up is a facade," he continues. "I think people are forced to say and do the right thing..."

Prod him about seeking advice from the women in his life, especially his wife, filmmaker Gauri Shinde, and Balki laughs. "I have only questioned the men," he exclaims. "Women have an opinion on everything after the task has been completed. Gauri often does that ... she says 'This is wrong, that is wrong'..."

Calling the Ayushmann Khurrana-Bhumi Pednekar-starrer Dum Laga Ke Haisha one of his favourite films of 2015, Balki explains that he derives maximum relief from his films when no one loses money. "Reduce budgets and be the small chasing the big. Like Tanu Weds Manu Returns did. I always want to retain my license to make movies and don't want anyone to face loses," he signs off with a smile.

Madhuri Dixit probably grew up on Maggi-R Balki


R Balki talks about the Maggi controversy and the defends its brand ambassadors

Subhash K Jha (DNA; June 4, 2015)

Balki who has directed many ads with some of the biggest celebrities of Bollywood thinks the current campaign against a noodle brand and its ambassador Madhuri Dixit is highly suspicious.

"As far as I know, Maggi has been in the market as a prime food item for many decades. We've grown up on the Maggi culture. How come it has suddenly become so controversial? Why was it found to be so harmful all of sudden when it has been in the market for nearly 40 years?" questions Balki.

"Nestle has a long-held reputation for delivering impeccable food products. This sudden campaign to discredit the multinational seems highly motivated. As for blaming the models, it's totally unfair. The models are not scientists who can analyze the ingredients in a product they endorse. Madhuri Dixit probably grew up on Maggi. She would have never imagined it would come to this."

As a leading ad maker what precautions does Balki hope to exercise after this controversy?

"None at all! There is nothing that can be done to ensure we only work on products with fully verifiable content," says Balki.

My wife Gauri is both my emotional anchor and tsunami-R Balki


Priya Gupta (BOMBAY TIMES; February 4, 2015)

R Balki, 50, may not have a great memory but he is certainly original. He is hugely emotional and highly innovative and is amongst the few men who consider women not just equal to men, but in fact, better. Ahead of his upcoming drama Shamitabh, he talks to Bombay Times about the original Amitabh Bachchan, his reasons for staying away from advertising awards and why Gauri is both his emotional anchor and tsunami. Excerpts:

How did you come into advertising?
I am a Tamilian, born and brought up in Bengaluru. I never knew what advertising was, but was always interested in telling stories and wanted to make films. My father used to watch a lot of movies and he used to take me with him to see a lot of films, but I never liked films till one day, an aunt who was our neighbour, forced me to see a Tamil movie with her, which had Ilaiyaraaja's music.Something happened to me and I started loving it. I then saw Moondram Pirai, the original of Sadma in Tamil, and decided that I wanted to make films. The closest film institute to Bengaluru was Chennai, so, I went there but I didn't get admission there as I walked out of the institute as I didn't like the people who interviewed me. They expected me to be an Encyclopedia and started asking me questions about who shot that particular scene in a particular film. I had come to tell stories and not remember who did what. I was always fascinated by computers, so, went on to doing an MCA, but got thrown out of college for not attending as I was always just watching films. One day, I saw an ad in the paper asking me to write 100 words on the person I was. What interested me was that the logo in the ad I had seen was of Mudra, the same logo that would come at the end of the serial Buniyaad that was co-produced by Mudra and Ramesh Sippy. So, I comfortably assumed that the ad was from Ramesh Sippy and that the Mudra logo belonged to him. I had been a big Ramesh Sippy fan for him having made Sholay and Saagar and decided to go to the Mudra interview, hoping to meet Ramesh Sippy there. The HR head Nagananda Kumar met me and said, 'You need to be groomed for advertising.' Starting MICA in Ahmedabad was his idea as he believed that people could be trained for advertising and thus, I was packed off with 6 boys as the first guinea pigs for starting MICA in Ahmedabad. We watched three films a day for 6 months and while of course, I did not get to meet Ramesh Sippy, I got fascinated with advertising. Advertising gave me the chance to solve problems for a client with a solution through my story and the client was paying for it. I got addicted to it and after 14 years, I finally met Ramesh Sippy at an advertising function and told him how he was the reason for me to be in advertising.

Talk about your father?
My father was in the housing department of LIC, but never had a house himself. He wanted to always be a lawyer, but could not due to all his responsibilities. He had studied law and can you imagine, the day he retired he took up practising law and till today at 77, he is doing that and works from 9am to 9pm. It's fascinating to see how a man can change his career at the age of even 60. Life almost begun for him the day he retired.

Who do you love the most in the world?
My wife Gauri (Gauri Shinde). She is both my emotional anchor and tsunami. It takes an incredible human being to put up with me. She is not any less or docile, she has all the idiosyncrasies of a creative person like me, but she has the ability to put up with another tantrumatic person and she does it while being herself and that is an achievement. She looks better than me. She is a better human being than I am. She is a far more sensitive person than I am. She is definitely a better filmmaker than I am. I met her in Lintas where she was working in the films' division and we did a film together. I fell in love with her and, of course, chased her and she said yes and she regrets it from that day. She can see something happening three miles away that I can't see even a feet away. She will say, 'This is going to happen' and I will say, 'Rubbish, you just get hyper'. And it will happen. And she will say, 'See, I told you' and I say, 'Never tell me as I will make the same mistake again.' I am more a rebel than she is. But she is far more clear about life than I am. I am in the category of people that consider men less than women. As I feel for men it's just bravado for nothing. We are weak, we don't have the strength of women, we might be just a little heavier than women, but they have more brains and are more beautiful and the entire world power is with them.

What was the worst period of your life?
After seven years of being with Mudra, I had a problem with the manager who had come as the new branch head. I was the creative head of Bengaluru and could not see eye to eye with him. I called Mr Krishnamurthy, who I respected a lot, to tell him how I wanted to leave due to that manager. Mudra was my life at that time. He tried to sort out things, but couldn't, so one day, I sent him a message saying, 'I am going as I can't take it anymore.' He sent me back a message saying, 'Go. Speak to you after one year.' I got damn hassled. Someone had told me you can go as he could not do anything about it as he needed that person more than he needed me. For three months I just sat at home like a zombie. I didn't know what hit me as I thought I was indispensable. I finally joined Lintas and have since been there for 20 years. But I learnt that you may think something is your own, but they may not think so, and you always need to have that at the back of your mind that it is somebody else's.

What makes you stay away from advertising awards?
Advertising is not a piece of art that you will judge. You cannot compare two creative solutions without understanding the problem. I once went to Cannes as a judge. There are only very few people who are capable of understanding whether something is genuinely creatively lateral. I did everything to make the jury understand how creative the Thanda Matlab Coca Cola campaign was, given the context of India and its popularity, but they refused to understand it and instead gave an award to a creative-looking ad instead. I realised that it was futile being part of such a jury. We were the first advertising agency to have taken a stance to stay away from advertising awards.

When you take a stance and stick to it, it becomes your positioning. Today, the agency loves that as they know that we are positioned as an agency that is real. I am not against awards, it's just that I don't value it. I always say it is just an excuse to have free booze for one night. Awards would have been valuable if you are considered a more creative person as a result of getting it or if it led to the agency getting more business. None of the two happens as otherwise we would not have grown as an agency.

Who can hurt you?
Gauri can hurt me. Amitji can hurt me tremendously. PC Sreeram can hurt me. Ilaiyaraaja can hurt me. My parents fortunately never hurt me and have never given me any angst in my life.

Talk about your fascination for Amitabh Bachchan?
Everyone is a fan of Amitji. But what I find fascinating about this man is his ever-lasting personality. He always looks so cool. Even in his 70s' movies, when he walks with bell-bottoms and his dog collars standing up, he looks so cool. Today, guys are not as cool as what he was then. A lot of it is God gifted, a lot of it is maintained but a lot of it he has grown, and like how. The combo of it is lethal and you will not see that again in a long, long time. I don't think anybody is as popular as him even today. He is the most want to touch man in the country and is a 72-year-old. I swore to him that I will never write a serious or khadoos or dramatic role for him ever again in my life as he takes his role too seriously. I have suffered his khadoosness for one year and every time I ask him what is wrong, he says, 'I am in my role.' So, I will only write comic and slapstick roles for him now. He is one of the most sensitive persons I have met in my life. He gets hurt very fast. It shows on his face as he withdraws. On the last day of shooting Paa, we kept his look very secretive and one of the TOI photographers got it and it came in Bombay Times the next day. So, the next day, in front of people he told me how he felt that I had leaked it out. I lost it and sent him a really harsh message. He sends me back the most touching message saying, 'Why is it that I am always wrong.' It was a painfully written message and I knew that the man was genuinely hurt about having hurt me.

Will you make a film without Mr.Bachchan?
I wish I can keep finding ideas for making films with him. I have already got several parts of him in my films. I don't want to force-fit him into ideas just to work with him. I have taken his voice in Shamitabh. He is actually a kid who is sarcastic and that part of him I used in Paa. In Cheeni Kum I used the part of him being khadhoos and the adult who is sarcastic. All throughout the shooting of both Cheeni Kum and Shamitabh he has behaved like a khadoos with me as he was in his role. People ask me how I have lost weight so much, I said, 'Just work with Amitabh Bachchan for one film.' Amitabh Bachchan is the best weight-loss programme in the world. He is so much in the role so you are always on tenterhooks. But in Paa, he was always like a kid, so I put on weight. But I also know that if there is one person who makes me more comfortable than me myself, it is him.

Each of your films seem to be concept based and extremely original.
I don't want to make a great film or a funny film. I want to try an idea that has not been done before. That is my trip. I am also a fan of people who have tried something different and have originality written all over them. For instance, Amitji is an original. You can't have another Amitabh Bachchan. Ilaiyaraaja is an original. PC Sreeram is an original, Sridevi is an original. People ask me what I like the most about Dhanush. It is that he is an original. Being original is a rare commodity in our industry and that is what I am hungry for.