Showing posts with label Nanak Shah Fakir. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nanak Shah Fakir. Show all posts

Sehmat wanted Alia Bhatt to play her in Raazi-Harinder Sikka

Alia Bhattand Akshay Kumar
Harinder Sikka, whose book Calling Sehmat inspired Raazi, looks back at decade- long journey of the script that travelled from SRK to Akki and finally, Alia Bhatt
Mohar Basu (MID-DAY; May 2, 2018)

A quick Google search will tell you that Calling Sehmat, the source material of Alia Bhatt starrer Raazi, is available for pre-order now. The book was taken off shelves a few years after it released in 2008, at the behest of writer Harinder Sikka, who felt that his story was meant for a big screen experience.

"I bought the rights back from the publisher and reworked the narrative and grammar. Now, the book is being republished by Penguin," says Sikka of his creation, that took him eight years and two trips to Pakistan. "This was no easy feat. I could have been in jail had I been caught. This is a story that must be told. Kashmiris aren't terrorists as how the world perceives them because of a few misguided people. They are loving and warm; the kind who will go hungry to ensure there's food on your plate," he points out.

The book's genesis can be traced back to 1999 when he was covering the Kargil war as an embedded journalist and heard about Sehmat. His story, inspired by the bravado of a young Kashmiri girl who was sent as a spy to Pakistan, caught the fancy of many a filmmaker. Sikka recalls how Shah Rukh Khan's company was the first production house to show interest. "In 2009, Samar Khan [filmmaker] came to seek the rights for a movie adaptation. It was for Red Chillies Entertainment. I didn't know it was SRK's company. But Samar objected to my demand of Rs 2 crore for the rights. He also wanted to change the storyline, which I wasn't okay with. It was then that Samar made a distasteful statement -- 'In Bollywood, we can always make a film and give you a credit in the end.' I was so hurt that I wrote a letter to SRK and he was gracious enough to ensure that Samar Khan sent an apology within 10 days."

Sikka, who has produced Nanak Shah Fakir, then found a pillar of support in Akshay Kumar. "I met Akshay Kumar during the screenings of Nanak Shah Fakir and wanted to rope him [as a producer]. It was he who invited Meghna Gulzar for a meeting about this book at his home. Instinctively, I knew that I had found my film's director." Call it a twist of fate but Sikka's first choice for director was Gulzar, who had turned the offer down in 2010, saying he was devotedly working on children's stories. Though Kumar couldn't be part of the film, Sikka maintains that he has been "a constant emotional support".

Akshay and he couldn't work out the film because NSF's release pushed Sikka into bankruptcy. "I did not want Akshay's money, though he was more than gracious. Akshay had to give his dates to another film but remained a constant support for me emotionally. After Akshay pulled out, Priti Shahani (Jungle Pictures) called me to tell that she was tracking the book."

Initially, it was a rough ride with producers Junglee Pictures, where Sikka even considered pulling out of the movie. "They weren't happy with the conditions I was putting. They felt that the money I was quoting was exorbitant. Little did they know that I had promised whatever money I make from the book and the movie, will go for charity. The book was too strong and the story too good to be missed out. I was clear that Alia Bhatt had to play the lead and Meghna would be the director. At one point, Gulzar saab told me it was time I let go of the material. But eventually, the producers kept each of these promises." Sikka adds that he donated his fee towards charity.

Ask him why he was adamant about Bhatt and he says it was Sehmat's suggestion -- one that he would've honoured at any cost. "Sehmat's way of saying yes or no was through silence. When I suggested that Alia play her, she said a silent yes. She wanted Alia to play her," says Sikka, adding, " Meghna made me meet Alia at Dharma's office in Mumbai. Only I could have told her what Sehmat was all about. It was a long delightful meeting. To her credit, Alia is sharp and caught everything. It's a life-changing role and she delved into it without qualms. I saw that my book was being respected. When the film was nearly done, Alia Bhatt asked me if she had lived up to my expectation of Sehmat's part."

Finally, question him on Sehmat's whereabouts and Sikka says, "Like an angel, she went to sleep one day and didn't wake up. She was gone. She had visited Film City where the film was being shot. I was keen that she meet Alia and Meghna, but she didn't let me tell them that she was waiting outside the set. She'll live through Alia and Meghna for years to come."

Gulzar and Harinder Sikka

Supreme Court quashes 'ban' on Nanak Shah Fakir by SPGC, Akal Takht; tells states to ensure release


Padmaavat Round 2? The Supreme Court clears the film on Guru Nanak, which was stuck since 2015 due to objections by Sikh bodies; says ‘private people’ can’t curtail freedom of expression
Jaspreet Nijher (BOMBAY TIMES; April 11, 2018)

The fate of Nanak Shah Fakir, which is based on the life and work of Guru Nanak, has been in limbo since 2015. The film, which has been ‘approved’ and later ‘banned’ by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) and the Akal Takht, was cleared for release by the Supreme Court on Tuesday, with the Court stating that the CBFC’s nod was “final” and that “the freedom of expression of an artiste can’t be curtailed by a group of private people”. The film will now be released on Friday as planned — unless it runs into fresh legal or administrative roadblocks.

The movie was initially released in April 2015, and, according to reports, both the SGPC and the Akal Takht had given their nod to it at that point of time. The film’s producer Harinder Sikka had said that the Akal Takht Jathedar, Gurbachan Singh, had called the film “a fine example of the promotion of Sikh faith”.

However, four days after its release, the film was withdrawn by Sikka following protests and opposition by both the bodies. Gurbachan Singh denied approving the film, and said that he had only appreciated the project before the movie was made. The SGPC subsequently formed an eight-member sub-committee to ‘review’ the movie.

In 2016, the SGPC finally ‘approved’ the film for release, and said, “We have no objection in granting you permission to release the movie Nanak Shah Fakir.” Last month, the SGPC even sent letters asking the film to be shown in schools and to facilitate the promotion of the movie. On March 28, it issued a statement backing the film.

However, after protests from some members of the Sikh community, the committee withdrew its support the very next day, saying that it would now not allow the film’s release. The Akal Takht soon followed suit and ‘banned’ the film, after which Sikka moved the Supreme Court.

Speaking to us after the court cleared the film for release on Tuesday, Sikka said, “The Supreme Court has made it clear that individuals cannot decide the fate of films. It is the CBFC that makes the decision, and even state governments cannot interfere in its release. The film will be released, but it is up to the distributors to decide how to do it.” Commenting on the flip-flop, Sikka said, “I don’t know why the SGPC or the Akal Takht have withdrawn their approval, despite clearing the film at every stage in 2016. As recent as March 22 this year, the whole of SGPC was on stage in Mumbai for the film’s poster launch by Akshay Kumar. Their collective decision was in favour of the film. What happened at the individual level, I don’t know. Akal Takht and SGPC are institutions which should not be seen as changing their stance last minute. I have worked with them closely at every stage for one year, and to show the Guru as a light form was their decision too. As for portraying his family as humans, only the Guru was godly, not his family.”

Manjit Singh, Secretary, SGPC, disowns earlier validations and asserts, “There is much talk about the Akal Takht Jathedar Gurbachan Singh issuing an appreciation letter to the film in 2015. However, no one really knows that the actual appreciation in that letter was for the producer and not the film.” On his part, Gurbachan Singh says, “There was never a clearance for the film in its present state. The objections we had against the film back then, about giving a human representation to the family of Guru Nanak, remain. Ordinary actors cannot portray the Guru’s family members.” As for the SGPC having ‘cleared’ the film in 2016 after a sub-committee was formed to review it, Gurbachan Singh says, “Then ask those who cleared it at that time, and those who were helming the SGPC then. We never cleared the film.”

Whether they ‘cleared’ the film or not is irrelevant, as per the SC order. Coming on the heels of the Padmaavat controversy, which was a similar case of religious bodies opposing a film despite it being cleared by the CBFC, the ‘ban’ highlights the unofficial censorship filmmakers are facing. In Padmaavat’s context, the SC had stated that maintaining law and order and ensuring a smooth release was the state’s responsibility. In this case too, the SC has declared that no private bodies can ‘ban’ a film and that the mandate rests with the CBFC or a superior authority.

Whether that actually gets the film to hit theatres this Friday remains to be seen.

Akshay Kumar backs Nanak Shah Fakir re-release; to unveil new trailer on Friday


Akshay Kumar
Mohar Basu (MID-DAY; March 21, 2018)

Still from Nanak Shah FakirThree years after the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) called for a ban on Nanak Shah Fakir a week after its release, the film is set to hit the screens again. Revolving around Guru Nanak’s journey across the globe, the project will be supported by Akshay Kumar.

In 2015, Nanak Shah Fakir producer, Harinder Sikka, had a tough time procuring the green light from the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). After the movie hit screens, the SGPC protested against it and demanded major alterations, forcing the makers to pull the film out from the theatres in a week.

Kumar cheered for the project when it bagged three National Awards in 2016, encouraging Sikka to rope him in as the goodwill ambassador for the movie. The actor will take a break from the ongoing schedule of his next, Kesari, to unveil the new trailer of Nanak Shah Fakir in the city this Friday.

When contacted, Sikka said, “It is kind of Akshay to support our film and launch its trailer. His help means a lot to us. Our movie spreads the message of love and goodness. It follows Guru Nanak Devji’s journey across the globe, spreading the message of Ik Onkar, equality of all religions, castes and genders.”

Meet prosthetic artist Preetisheel Singh, who gave Alia Bhatt chubby cheeks & Ranveer Singh a curly mop

Giving Alia Bhatt chubby cheeks and Amitabh Bachhan a toothless sneer is all in a day’s work for makeup and prosthetic artist, Preetisheel Singh
Kunal Guha (MUMBAI MIRROR; December 10, 2017)

Preetisheel Singh’s lab in Andheri resembles a serial killer’s lair. Topped with prosthetic hands, deformed heads and assorted limbs, her desk could pass for a cannibal’s buffet spread.

She lifts up one of the bald prosthetic heads and explains how each hair has to be punched in individually to create eyebrows. An electronics engineer, 34-yearold Singh learned about SFX makeup and prosthetics at Cinema Makeup School in LA. “That’s when I learnt how one can completely transform a face,” says the artist who has designed the looks of characters in films such as Bajirao Mastani, Mom, The House Next Door and Padmavati. While working on a commercial, recently, she even plumped up Alia Bhatt’s cheeks and gave Ranveer Singh a curly mop.

When she started out though, Singh had a tough time getting a break. Things changed when her debut film Nanak Shah Fakir won a National Award. It was a challenging project, she says, “with war sequences, which required severed heads, injured limbs and hands — I got to create everything I had learnt.”

Singh soon bagged the makeup duties for films such as Haider, Hawaaizaada and Bajirao Mastani. “When I first met Mr Bhansali, he gave me one piece of advice — ‘makeup shouldn’t look like makeup; it should blend in with the character’.” Bajirao Mastani, Singh says, made her a master in crafting the bald look. “Almost everyone in the film was bald and none of the actors, apart from Ranveer, shaved their heads. Preparing bald caps was tedious and took over two-and-a-half hours per character.” Attention to detail was crucial. “The seam of the cap had to be invisible — if it wasn’t, it would have taken double the expense and effort to hide it in post-production.”

Singh feels a crucial part of her job is research. “Padmavati is set in the 12th to 13th century, back when women used natural pigments to stain their lips, and the shades were consequently lighter. I had to make sure you wouldn’t be able to see the foundation or any colour on Deepika’s face; it had to look like naturally flawless skin.”

Prosthetics, she says, can also influence an actor’s interpretation of a character. When she created Nawazuddin’s teeth implants for Mom, it altered his diction as the teeth were crooked and spaced out. “Nawaz felt it added an edge to his character,” says Singh, who also donned the dentist’s coat to craft Amitabh Bachchan’s look in 102 Not Out, in which the actor will be seen playing Rishi Kapoor’s onscreen father. “He has a tooth missing, thus reveals his gums when he smiles.”

Designing a character’s look also requires deliberating about details such as the effect of time and circumstances. “Bajirao Mastani and Padmavati are set in eras when people travelled for months, on horseback, exposed to trying weather. For the characters’ skin to reflect this, it had to have sunburned patches and mixed textures.” For her next, Vikramaditya Motwane’s Bhavesh Joshi, an action thriller that has “a lot of blood work, swollen eyes and broken noses,” Singh had to apply this vision to wounds. “If a character is injured today, what will the swelling look like on the fourth day? It can’t disappear and it can’t be fresh — it will become yellowish or greenish, instead of deep purple.”

While most directors have a clear vision, some allow experimentation, she tells us, offering House Next Door as an example. The horror film’s producer and actor Siddharth wanted to break away from the predictable, “chalk-faced makeup”. “So, I designed one with rotten, decayed flesh; she has a disease which causes hair loss, revealing the gashes on her scalp,” says Singh, who learnt from Hollywood SFX designer James Kagel, the man who designed Chucky, the terrifying, doll from the iconic Child’s Play series.

Singh had to be careful while creating prosthetic flesh pieces required in the film. “Normal clay has sulphur, and silicon reacts with sulphur, so we use prosthetic clay for sculpting. Besides, silicon sets at a certain temperature, needs to be handled using latex-free gloves, and is sensitive to humidity,” she says, adding that an understanding of chemistry is a must in her field.

Yet, interestingly, the better she is at her job, the less you’re likely to notice her effort. It’s a plot twist that amuses Singh. “My reference library has all sorts of fake moustaches, rotting bodies and interesting faces. People would think I’m a sick person if they went through my computer,” she laughs.

Nanak Shah Fakhir producer Harinder Sikka stands vindicated


Delhi HC revokes the ban on the film
Mohar Basu (BOMBAY TIMES; June 8, 2015)

The journey of Nanak Shah Fakir has been exasperating for the film's producer Harinder S Sikka. After the draining experience of shooting, the film's release ran into troubled waters and a two-month ban in Punjab was slapped on it because Sartaj Singh Pannu claimed to be the sole director and managed to bring a stay on the release from the Delhi High Court. But Sikka believes that the film has the blessings of the Providence and it was almost a miracle that Pannu was put in place by the court in a 43-page ruling on May 22.

According to Sikka, Pannu attempted to hamper the film by trying to procure a stay order on its release by claiming to be the director and by also demanding authorship rights. But he didn't get any relief from the law.

Asked about the turmoil following the ban and his plans of re-releasing the film, Sikka says, “The judgment is a wake-up call for all the mischief mongers. It was challenging to navigate through shark-infested Bollywood waters. The response to the film globally was overwhelming and humbling. It was temporarily withdrawn so that the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee's (SGPC) appointed team comprising learned members of great repute, can appreciate the historical facts. We are not sure about the date of re-release yet. We're in talks with distributors and re-releasing it will require another five to six crores. Our aim is not to make profit from the film. So, we want to take time and ensure our future strategy to be as neat as possible. We are looking at releasing the movie in 40 countries next.“

Tom Alter stages solo protest in Delhi theatre against 'copyright violation' by Nanak Shah Fakir producer


Ankita Bhatkhande & Sanyukta Iyer (MUMBAI MIRROR; April 18, 2015)

Nanak Shah Fakir, the Guru Nanak bio-pic, released on Friday. And the battle over its creative rights took a dramatic turn. Sartaj Singh Pannu, who claims to be the director, has taken producer Harinder Sikka to court for allegedly usurping his directorial credit. The case was filed in Delhi High court in November 2014. A judgement is expected on Monday. The film opened three days earlier with Sikka mentioning Gurunanak Shah Fakir, the Almighty, as the director.

Tom Alter, part of the film's cast, protested the exclusion of Pannu's name from the credits by standing outside a theatre in Delhi with a board which announced, "The film is directed by Sartaj Singh Pannu. In the holy name of Guru Nanak Ji, let the truth prevail."

When quizzed, he said, "More than the legal battle this is my way of showing my dissent to this gross case of injustice and copyright violation to Pannu by the production company. I've seen him working hard. It's sad that the film has released without his name." He was the solo protester at the spot.

Pannu said that the producer had always wanted to hog the entire credit and treated him as an assistant on the sets. "I spent two-and-a-half years on the Rs 35 crore project only to find that Sikka had released the trailer online with his name as the director. I have 60 testimonials from my unit, imcluding Tom Alter, Arif Zakaria and Adil Hussain in my support."

Sikka however insisted that Pannu was thrown out on October 25, 2013, for his abusive behaviour, unwillingness to shoot a song and for putting up a website mentioning himself as the writer, director and producer. "Why should I not release when all the film associations, IMPPA, IFTDA and FWICE, have not objected to the release?" he argued.

The message of Nanak Shah Fakir is relevant for all eras-Arif Zakaria


Hiren Kotwani (BOMBAY TIMES; April 17, 2015)

While Nanak Shah Fakir is a biopic on Guru Nanak, his teachings of Ik Onkar (there's but one God) in the film are depicted through the voice of his friend, companion and disciple, Bhai Mardana. A Muslim fakir from an impoverished family of rebab (a music instrument played at weddings and special occasions) players, he accompanied the Guru throughout his 'Udasis' (travels) spanning 40,000 km over 25-28 years.

Arif Zakaria, who plays Bhai Mardana, says it's a complex role even on paper. “It is one man narrating another man's story. The film portrays how he understood the Guru going through various situations and thought processes. The audience understands Guru through Mardana's expression. He's a chronicler of the Guru's life and also the narrator of the story,“ he says.

Part of the preparation, to be simple and calm while shooting, came from staying a few days at an ashram in Pune. Besides, the actor also had to lose weight, as his character ages from 20s to the 70s. “Mardana was about 20 when he met Nanak, who was around 10. Also, in those days, people would walk long distances to reach their destinations. So, I had to have that weary and tired look,“ says Arif, adding, “It's not easy to look 20. Thanks to our makeup artistes, we've managed to do that convincingly.“

Asked what he thinks the audience would take away from the film, the actor says it's the 'oneness of human beings'. He explains, “The film talks about brotherhood among fellow humans and respect for women, which Nanak propagated. The message is relevant for all eras. In a way, it's also a beautiful road trip of Guru and Mardana... it's about how they discovered life. While it was in a much more internal process with Nanak, it happened spiritually for Mardana by the end of his life.“

Nanak Shah Fakir, produced by Gurbani Media Pvt Ltd, releases today.

Fenil's Bollywood Talk # 355


WILL EMRAAN GET BACK IN THE BIG LEAGUE WITH MR X?

Emraan Hashmi, at one point, was one of the most bankable stars of Bollywood. But his attempts to do something unconventional didn’t really bear fruit. Many thought that once he gets back in the masala films zone, he’ll reconsolidate his position. But sadly, even so-called commercial films like Raja Natwarlal and Ungli flopped miserably. Now all eyes are on Mr X – it’s in a way make or break film for the actor.

Mr X is produced by Vishesh Films and directed by Vikram Bhatt. It’s a 3D film and deals with a protagonist who is invisible. However, it’s not like Mr India where the protagonist used to go invisible at will. Neither it is like Hollow Man where the lead character turns invisible after a lab test gone wrong. That’s what the makers have claimed and have assured that the film isn’t a copy or anything like the 2 films in question. Songs are melodious and have gradually caught on. Amyra Dastur, Emraan’s co-star, looks quite pretty and supposedly also has a pivotal role in the movie.

However, the excitement of the film is limited and the film can score only if the response is positive. Hence, a poor to average opening can be expected. Also, the entire Mr India-Hollow Man inspiration stories might prove detrimental. The film has to be genuinely unique and different. Otherwise, it will be definitely ridiculed by the netizens and as things are today, such things can go viral which might spell doom to the film.

Emraan is a great actor and here’s hoping Mr X works, especially for him!
-------------------------
The other 3 releases of the film are Margarita With A Straw, Marathi-Hindi-English film Court and Nanak Shah Fakir. The first 2 films have made a lot of noise at various film festivals. Hence, the buzz is very positive for these films despite the fact that the excitement is limited as both the films are sans stars and are not typical entertainers. Margarita With A Straw deals with cerebral palsy and has Kalki Koechlin play the leading role. It is directed by Shonali Bose and it promises to not be just another film on disabilities. The film has several intimate scenes and thankfully, all of them got passed from the revising committee of the Censor Board.

Court on the other hand comes at a great time as it just won a National Award. Again, it promises to be not just another courtroom drama. As evident from the promos, it attempts to present a real picture of courts function in India, without drama. However, those who have seen the film assure that it’s quite engaging.

Lastly, Nanak Shah Fakir is about the life of Guru Nanak as seen from the eyes of Bhai Mardana, the first Sikh of the world. Buzz is very limited but as evident from Chaar Sahibzaade’s success, film on Sikh history can do wonders. Hence, it won’t be write to underestimate Nanak Shah Fakir.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE MR X, MARGARITA WITH A STRAW, COURT OR NANAK SHAH FAKIR AND WHY?


Nanak Shah Fakir is not a movie about religion but more about spirituality-Harinder Sikka


Mohar Basu (BOMBAY TIMES; April 7, 2015)

The upcoming film Nanak Shah Fakir, presented by Gurbani Media Production, derives from the monotheistic idea Sikhism bases itself on Ik Onkar (there's only one God) is the crux of their philosophy. Based on the life and teachings of Guru Nanak, the film propagates a larger universal message of harmony.

Producer Harinder S Sikka narrates how came upon the idea. “I was in the Indian Navy till 1993. In 1999, during the Kargil war, I went back to the war zone as a journalist. It was at the battlefield that I picked up a story of a Kashmiri Muslim woman. She was a spy for India and married a Pakistani. Her job made her responsible for the elimination of her husband and father-in-law (both in notable positions in the Pakistani army). She was in depression when she was brought back. A noble saint cured her. I wrote a book Calling Sehmat on her. When I went to her to buy rights of this book for a film, she insisted I make it on Guru Nanak. A Muslim lady wanting to make a book on Guru Nanak is not something I was expecting,“ says he.

Shooting the film was extremely draining for Harinder Sikka, both monetarily and emotionally. He says, “I was taken to the cleaners by thugs from my team. They would quote exorbitant amounts, taking advantage of my lack of expertise in this field. But it was balanced out by people who unconditionally supported me. When I was facing problems with my Gujarat schedule of the shoot, Narendra Modi, who was then the CM, extended his support. In Maharashtra, Uddhav Thackeray promised me his help. Uttam Singh (music), Resul Pookutty (co-producer and sound designer), A R Rahman (score mentor) and Pandit Jasraj came on board without a single penny. The people who tried to steal our film and sell it in the black market were unsuccessful.“

In films, songs are usually born out of the story, but in this case, the story was constructed around eight hymns that Guru Nanak wrote 500 years ago. Co-producer Samar Sikka informs us that Singh took the songs to Abbey Road Studios in London for mastering. Rahman was recommended by Pookutty and the Oscar-winning maestro mentored the film's sound. The film's original score is done by Finnish composer Tuomas Kantelinen.

There were miracles on set while filming. “When we shot in Leh, the sun was up all along despite low temperatures. In Maharashtra, the set was intact despite a downpour,“ said Sikka.

Hardliners might have raised objections, but Sikka's intention is to address communal harmony with the film. “Guruji's story is incomplete without Bhai Mardana who is a Muslim. This isn't a movie about religion but more about spirituality,“ says Sikka.

As for showing Guru Nanak in human form, director of photography A K Bir carefully constructed the face shots digitally. He adds, “Nanak exalted his mental vision to an ethical ideal beyond the conception of Hindu or Mohammedan.“

Actor Arif Zakaria says, “Playing Bhai Mardana was gratifying and daunting. The core simplicity of the man and his blind belief in the message of his 'friend' Nanak compelled Mardana to sacrifice everything.“

Gitanjali Sehgal is the associate prodcuer of the film that also features Puneet Sikka, Anurag Arora and Shraddha Kaul in prominent roles.

I respect Resul Pookutty, but have sent him a legal notice-Sartaj Singh Pannu


Sartaj Singh Pannu has taken the producers of an upcoming film, including the sound artist, to court
Sanyukta Iyer (MUMBAI MIRROR; March 27, 2015)


Director Sartaj Singh Pannu has filed a case in the Delhi High Court against the producers of the film Nanak Shah Fakir — Oscar winning sound artist Resul Pookutty and Harinder Singh Sikka. He has alleged that Sikka has wrongfully taken credit as the director of the upcoming film, claiming that it was him who helmed the biopic of Guru Nanak Dev.

"A case has been filed by me against Gurbani Media Entertainment, in Delhi High Court. I respect Resul sir, but since he is a co-director of the company, he too has been sent a legal notice," Sartaj told Mirror.

It was actor Tom Alter, who plays a pivotal role in the film, who introduced Sartaj to the producers.

"I came on board as the director in October, 2013 and spent two-and-a-half years on the Rs 35-crore project only to realise that Harinder Sikka released the trailer of the film online and mentioned himself as the director of the film," says Sartaj, who has filed the case with 60 testimonials from members of the unit, a signed affidavit from Tom Alter and is also supported by Arif Zakaria who plays Mardana and Adil Hussain, who plays Rai Bhullar in the film.

The film's screenplay and dialogues have been written by Sagar Sarhadi, whose repertoire boasts of Yash Chopra classics like Silsila and Lamhe and Sartaj claims, "Even he hasn't been credited in the film."

When contacted Resul Pookutty said, "I am aware that the final case hearing is on April 7 and I abstain from further comment as the matter is subjudice. Also, I am aware of the contract between the parties and as per that, there was more than one director."

The film that has music by A R Rahman, has been caught in multiple controversies since it was announced in 2012. Sikh community had slammed it and the Sikh Students Federation is demanding a ban on its release on April 17, in Punjab.