Showing posts with label Kangana Ranaut interview. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kangana Ranaut interview. Show all posts
Emergency will be a tight slap on all those who think I’ve projected Indira Gandhi in a negative way-Kangana Ranaut
8:13 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Amid speculation that Kangana has projected Gandhi in a negative light in Emergency, actor discusses portraying her as a mother and someone who loved her country
Upala KBR (MID-DAY; August 30, 2024)
Emergency could well be among Kangana Ranaut’s definitive films. It not only sees her wield the directorial baton after she co-directed Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi (2019), but also holds the potential to be her most memorable role. What made her tell the story of late Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi? Was it the allure of essaying one of the most formidable figures in Indian politics? Or the desire to decode the darkest chapter of Gandhi’s political career?
The actor-director says, “I didn’t begin with the intention of making a movie on it. Since I am a socially and politically-aware person, I started reading about the Emergency. Apart from Coomi Kapoor’s book [The Emergency: A Personal History], I read Mrs Gandhi’s autobiography. Her guru Jiddu Krishnamurti had told her to stop the Emergency and she told him, ‘I feel I’m riding a beast, which I loved riding initially, but now I can’t get off it.’ This gave me an insight into somebody who had a conscience. Mrs Gandhi’s life was such a beautiful Shakespearean tragedy. There is a throne, a person destined to be the queen, her opponents, and her internal battle with her conscience.”
Ranaut’s position as a Bharatiya Janta Party member has also coloured people’s perception of the biopic. Many feel that she may have projected Gandhi in a negative light. Broach this subject, and she says, “What is it like to love your country and be loved back? That thought took over my existence. It reached a point where I was sure that I’d make the film, even if I have to sell my house to do it. I’ve been judged so much that I’m fed up. This film will be a tight slap on all those faces, who think I’ve projected her in a negative way! They didn’t even give my film a chance. It’s a week away, at least watch it [before forming your judgment].”
With the biopic, Ranaut believes she has shown Gandhi’s different facets—as a woman, a mother, and a politician. “Mrs Gandhi loved her son [Sanjay Gandhi] so deeply and then lost him! As the character, it was one of the most difficult things for me to come to terms with. Her life had so much pain, trauma and drama. I was keen to make this film because people don’t know those aspects of her.”
Directing the film, she admits, was an intense job. “My revenue took a hit. As an actor, I can do three films in a year, but as a writer-director, I can only do one film in three years. Then you’re selling your own things to pay for the film. So, I will take some time before I direct again. Selling the movie was a challenge. The protagonist is in her 60s, and everybody in the movie is wearing khadi kurta pyjamas, but luckily Zee Studios stepped in.”
Salman Khan advised me to meet Sanjay Leela Bhansali as I am someone who will fit into his films-Kangana Ranaut
8:10 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Madhureeta Mukherjee (BOMBAY TIMES; May 21, 2022)
She kicks, punches, shoots, slays, breaks bones and shatters glass — soaked in blood, sweat and revenge — Kangana Ranaut as Agent Agni in the just-released action spy thriller Dhaakad, delivers one deadly blow after another, like a true action star. The actress, who has skillfully flexed her muscles in various genres earlier, has now cracked the action space — with guts galore. In a conversation with us, she talks about her warrior spirit, how playing a hardcore action girl was cathartic and what we need to do to save our film industries. Read on...she is on fire...
We know how involved you get in creating and fleshing out your character in every film. In Dhaakad, you portray seven dramatically different looks. How much did you actively participate in creating each one of those?
I was not involved in it at all, because we had such a talented team, and Razy (director Razneesh 'Razy' Ghai) is so competent. Having directed about 400 ad films, he had such a clear and international vision. When I was approached for this film, I was wondering...will I be able to fit into this part at this age and stage? At the time when I started my career, I did not fit into the format of a Bollywood heroine, and I was always trying to find my ground and figure where I belong. I was quite jobless after Gangster. I would get offered those druggie, edgy or homeless kind of roles. When I did Fashion, also because of my body type, I was appreciated, and then I did Krrish 3. Back then, I felt that I would be offered more action roles, so maybe I could create a category for myself and be able to fit in. So, I actively trained in kickboxing and martial arts. Lekin aisa kuch hua hi nahi, things derailed for me, and I did films like Double Dhamaal. I was disoriented and stopped training. Then films like Queen happened, aur main acting mein bahut deep chali gayi, and with every character, I would try to learn accents, gain weight and lose weight. Cut to two years ago, I had put on 20 kilos, and personally, too, I have metamorphosed into an individual where there is a certain way I think and dress… (like I wear a lot of sarees now). I have come to be a certain person.
So, when this film came your way, you were in an entirely different mind space?
Yes! Razy was sitting in front of me and telling me about this role and I was thinking about those days when I wanted it so badly. And there I was, as far as I could’ve been from this character (Agent Agni). When he approached me, I was shooting for Thalaivii, and mentally and physically, I was in a different mind space. I was wondering whether I would be able to pull off all those looks, miniskirts and firing guns? It was not just the weight, there was a lot more resistance I had as a person. So, when I met him, in my mind, I was sure that I wouldn’t do it, but he didn’t give up on me. These different looks were a part of it, and my major concern was to be able to pull it off convincingly.
Florian Hurel, the make-up artiste, who worked on these different looks for you in the film, mentioned in an interview that you are one of the very few artistes who possess the courage to experiment and then own each of those not so common looks. This is evident in the way you style yourself on and off screen.
Florian Hurel was the make-up artiste and Sheetal Sharma designed the looks with the director, and to fit into their vision was my challenge. I tell this story to a lot of people. When I first met Salman Khan before Gangster, I showed him my portfolio. He advised me to meet Sanjay Leela Bhansali and said that you are someone who will fit into his films. I went to meet him with my portfolio, which showcased various looks. He went through my pictures, looked at me with great curiosity and said, “Are you a chameleon or what? You change with every look.” I asked him, “Sir, is it a good thing or a bad thing?” He said, “I don’t know, you will figure it out.” And it was such an appropriate answer because, yes, it was difficult to get a break in the industry. You don’t know what you are, and you could be anything. Once you are successful, I guess it is a boon. Razy wanted me for this part as he knew that as a spy on a mission, I could transform with every look. But for my first break in the industry, people could not slot me, and that became a challenge. So, it was good and bad. Over the years, I could not find my ground and say this is my space, which every actor has. At this stage, of course, it seems like a great thing.
Personally, are you a fan of the action spy thriller genre? Any inspirations from other women on screen who you think have pulled off action superbly?
I like action films, but the kind of grounded and raw action that you see in Dhaakad. The superhero kind of films and that kind of action is not my zone. I think Charlize Theron is somebody who looks tough and looks good doing action. You need that physicality, and you need to look convincing, and she pulls it off really well. Baaki toh thoda modelling type ho jaata hai.
During Manikarnika - The Queen Of Jhansi, you had said that it was physically the toughest role you had played. You even met with an accident while shooting, which left you with a scar on your forehead. Would you say that you had to push your limits harder for Dhaakad?
Yes, the training was really tough. There is a 15-minute long action sequence, and it is something you have never seen before in our cinema. I trained in kickboxing and other martial arts, including Jiu-Jitsu and Krav Maga, to play this part. It is a draining role, and even to be angry, it takes a lot of your energy. We shot for 20-25 nights for that action sequence, and putting in that energy for days and days is exhausting. There are times your body is numb, you have no energy left, but you have to drag yourself on set. Having said that, for me, what works is that, by nature, I am a violent person. I mean in my ideologies. I have that thought process. If we were in different times, I would probably have been a warrior. My school of thought is not — tum ek thappad maaro, toh mein dusra gaal de doongi. I believe in, mujhe khoon do, main tumhe azaadi doonga. So, my very core is right wing. Coming from that space, this part was a bit cathartic. So, it is not like it was imposed on me, I also enjoyed it. It is in my nature, only that my body was not ready for it. In KGF - Chapter 2, there is this dialogue that the lead actor Yash says, “Violence, Violence, Violence! I don’t like it. I avoid, but, violence likes me.” I would tweak that for myself and say, “I like violence and violence also likes me (laughs!).”
You have worked with Arjun Rampal way back in 2011 for Rascals ,it was in a different space and time. After all these years, how was it teaming up with him for such an intense film? In an interview with us, he said that when he heard that you were playing the protagonist, he knew you would give it your all.
The evolution of Arjun as a creative force is tremendous. When we did Rascals, I didn’t understand him as an artiste. We became good friends, and we would party together. During Dhaakad, whenever we sat together, he would talk about the film, how he could add to my character and how we could do certain scenes. It became such an inspiring experience to see how much he is consumed by the entire process and the extent to which he has grown. He is writing scripts, he wants to direct and is producing films. Also, when he was offered the part, people around him were apprehensive about him working with me, but he was so nonchalant about it. He is his own person, and I have huge respect for such people. He doesn’t roam around in herds; he takes his own call.
In a previous interview with us, you had said, “Movies with women leading the show are being made, but they are mostly small-scale films. So, if it works, it’s fine, else it doesn’t hurt the producer’s pockets to a large extent.” But now, would you say that there’s been a change — in the way people view films led by women and the budgets that back those films?
It is high time… kyun ki uss chhote se budget mein aap kya karenge? Woh 20-30 crore mein social message wali films ban sakti hai. They will mostly be offbeat films, not mainstream. The budgets are not to show off that we have so much to spend, but so that we get more creative freedom. Today, if Razy has brought in an award-winning DOP, Tetsuo Nagata, for Dhaakad along with the kind of action crew that we had, it is because we could monetarily back that scale. This is the liberty that every artiste wants. We also need a good budget for a woman-led film, so that we can deliver.
Which also helps in achieving pay parity that has been a larger ongoing discussion in the industry for years. You seem content with what you are being paid for your work now, right?
Yes, of course. For me, it was important to feel that I am well paid, and not exploited. Don’t I go to a set and give my 100%? There are so many injuries that I have taken upon myself for these roles. So, just because I am a woman, not getting paid as much as my male counterpart is a very sad and unfortunate reality. Ab mere saath aisa nahin hota hai.
You recently made your OTT debut with the reality show Lock Upp. Do you want to explore this space further, with different kinds of content?
Yes, sure. The medium also gives you a global platform and being a creative person to have that is great. I would love to explore it more.
There is a lot of talk about pan India stars and pan-India movies lately. Actors from the South and Bollywood have been expressing that we should represent our cinema to the world as Indian films and not Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, etc. We should be one united film industry. Your thoughts?
I had said this long ago, that we should bring India together with our movies. While growing up, I didn’t know much about people from the South and their culture, but today, when we see their films, we get to know so much about them — what they eat, what they wear. Movies expose us to that. I was more exposed to American culture through their movies, over South Indian films or, say films from the North East. Cinema only brings us together. It’s high time that we come together and save our screens rather than let Hollywood take over, like what happened with the German and French film industries. We need to save our industry, and for that, we need to come together as one force.
Do you wish to be India’s new action star?
Hopefully!
Yes, it is about Sushant Singh Rajput, but it is also about my life-Kangana Ranaut
8:19 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

After Sushant’s death, I turned to understand what happened — and that was when I realised my perceptions were also wrong, what he had actually gone through, and I was overcome with guilt and shame: Kangana Ranaut explains why she is so vocal about seeking #JusticeForSushantSinghRajput
Anshul Chaturvedi (BOMBAY TIMES; July 24, 2020)
When you first heard the news that Sushant Singh Rajput has died, what were your thoughts?I have to admit that I was not following Sushant and his career. I don’t follow anybody. But my first reaction was shock, sheer disbelief. To me, he was (at that point) just another star, very promising and very talented. I would admit that at first, it looked like an impulsive thing that he might have done. I thought maybe because everyone is locked down, and this is a very unusual situation, so maybe that got to him? I was not thinking about all the layers.
Sushant and I, we never really crossed paths. But we were always really close, you know. For example, when he was new, we had a common friend called Sandip Ssingh. He even came to one of my birthdays I think, my 25th birthday, with Ankita Lokhande. I remember speaking to Ankita that night and not him. Later, I knew that he was doing Ram-Leela, and then he did not do it. I used to get all the updates. Kamal Jain, who was the producer of Manikarnika, worked with Sushant in the Dhoni film also. Every now and then, he used to talk about Sushant. When I was learning horse riding, he used to say that he organised the training for Sushant also. He used to wake up at 4am and finish the training at 6am. Once at Kamal ji’s office, I had reached and Sushant had just left. There was some kind of connection, but nothing direct.
(After his death) I called Kamal ji, and I spoke to him. And Ankita being a dear friend, I spoke to Ankita. I spoke to Sandip. Because that’s what you do, right? You try and understand what just happened.
Kamal ji told me that Sushant spoke to him days ago and said, ‘Make a big film with me. Kamal ji, you have to announce a big film with me. Everybody has banned me.’ That’s what he said to Kamal Jain. From there, I was very curious about this situation.
And then I understood his personality. I asked Kamal ji, how he was, I asked those regular questions — was he into drugs or a sex maniac as people had portrayed him? I had read blinds about him that he is having sex with anything that moves. And Kamal ji was like, ‘What rubbish! He was a genius, no drugs, he was very health conscious’ and all of that. And one thing he said — that he was very ambitious. But he wasn’t thick-skinned. If you are ambitious and thin-skinned, how is that gonna work?
When I spoke to Ankita, she said right from the beginning, there was so much humiliation that he could not take it. This is how she summed it up. She said that I knew this boy since he was working in serials, he became a top actor there, and then he did auditions after auditions, rejections after rejections, and then he got into the big bad world of Bollywood. (Then) every filmmaker wanted this boy from Bihar, they were fighting for his dates and he was so grounded. But one thing that she also said about him was that he was not thick-skinned. He would sit on Twitter when he was new and would fight with fans, asking ‘Why did you think that about me? Why did you say that about me? I am not this person that you are saying.’ Ankita told me that she used to tell him ki abhi ye toh hoga na. Everybody will have their perception of you, why are you so bothered about it? He just could not take that, he could not take what people thought about him. She said, over a period, the bad PR, the ganging up, the public humiliation, he just could not take it. He has had enough — that’s what she said.
I want to be very honest. I can’t say that Sushant came and told me all this but I gathered my perception of him and I understood that he was trapped, jaise Abhimanyu ko chakravyuh mein ghera jata hai. And a few personality traits of him did not work for him, one of which he mentioned, that he cannot express himself.
I spoke to Abhishek Kapoor ji and he said, ‘Kangana, woh shaheed ho gaya.’ I am quoting these people because I cannot tell you the whole conversations, but everyone summed it up in their own way. Abhishek in his interviews said that he was not the same boy from Kai Po Che by the time of Kedarnath. He had changed. Woh ghut gaya tha, he said, he had changed, they had choked him way before he actually choked himself.
At what point of time did it come to your mind, after absorbing all of this, that you need to speak about and talk about his case in the public space, in the manner you have been doing?
See, I don’t want to be standing on some high ground and be like, I always knew Sushant. No, I did not. And to be honest, when I would read these blinds after blinds, news after news that he is a rapist, he is a sex addict, he is doing drugs, he is beating up his directors, I remember thinking vaguely, ‘What is up with this boy? He needs to get control of his life.’ That was my perception of Sushant — but when I actually went deeper into the matter, I was taken over by an unbearable amount of guilt and shame. The kind of trap that they laid for him and the prejudice of an outsider, I saw it from (the perspective of) an outsider, who has been called a witch, a whore, what not. When I actually got to know about him, I was taken over by a strong sense of guilt and shame. And I recorded my first video, and I was shaking. I remember I was on the verge of crying because everything was clear to me that what had happened and honestly, it was just spontaneous.
How do you respond to the charge, frequently raised this week, that you are using Sushant to fight your personal battles and target people in the industry whom you are not on good terms with?
Someone like me, who has said no to Yash Raj Films, to Khans’ films, to Bhansali films, to big brands that have fairness attached to them — I could have done a lot for promotions. An actor gets more noticed for wearing a fancy dress than for acting in a film. The kind of media culture that we have here and internationally, it is influenced by the Kardashians. You don’t need somebody’s death to promote yourself. People can just do a TikTok video and have 10M followers. I can do Instagram or Twitter if I want to. I can do so much to promote myself.
About taking revenge from my enemies — I have always been vocal about that from Day One. I don’t need to ride on someone’s shoulders to take revenge.
Nobody has the right to tell me that you stop talking about your enemies because we will only talk about Sushant. Yes, it is about Sushant, but it is also about my life, because these people are still ganging up on me. I will talk about my enemies because maybe, we have lost Sushant, but there is still hope for my life. I will talk about it! You can’t tell me that now you shut up because you are still alive.
So for people to say that I am taking revenge from my enemies, of course, I am! Is there any doubt about it? One does not have to be a genius to figure that out. I want to live, I want to survive, I want to make it big. I won’t let people trap me, ruin me. I will do everything to fight them. So, I think it is a very lame argument to say that you should not be talking about your enemies.
The people who you often refer to as the power centres — none of them have engaged with your charges. On the other hand, we’ve been seeing a sort of a sharp, public digital spat between you and many who, themselves, are also ‘outsiders’. Why is that happening?
They are not gonna dirty their hands. None of them are addressing what I spoke about. Right now, if they talk, they will be trolled. So, who do they send? These outsiders. So they know which lives are valuable for them and which are not.
If I am talking about some points about how he was killed, you talk about those points na. Why are you talking about what I said ten years ago? Yaar, ten years ago my issues were different. Ten years ago, I did not know English, I was a skinny, frizzy-haired, scrawny-looking girl. People mocked me, made fun of me, but nobody was threatened by me. Forget my ten-year-old videos, yaar. Let’s talk about Sushant Singh’s murder!
So they are coming and saying that ten years ago you were saying this, of course, they are gonna get trolled. Of course, they are gonna lose their reputation. But they will not send their own talent to do that. These people are only turning outsider against outsider, because they don’t want to dirty their own hands. I had put such big charges on them, why are they not coming out in public and talking?
What does ‘B-grade actor’ mean?
(Pause) People like us, when we come from outside, we are enamoured by them. And that’s what even Ankita told me about Sushant. He wanted to be accepted. She said, “Kangana, Sushant was exactly like you… he was very intellectual, he would not gossip about anyone, and was very invested in what he did. He had that small-town personality.” But she said that “the only difference was that he wanted to be accepted. You somehow have gotten over that urge.”
It is true that in the beginning, even I wanted to. I went through that phase where I straightened my hair, I stuffed my lips with botox, I started to do films like Rascals, I wore a bikini — I wanted to be desperately accepted. I went through that. I wanted to be on the cover pages of magazines. I wanted to win awards. But it is not going to help. I was still B-grade and they did not accept me.
So I want them to know. When Swara Bhasker says that ‘I’m Sonam Kapoor’s best friend’, that’s not how the world perceives her. No! No matter how much Taapsee Pannu says that everybody loves her, and she has gotten equal opportunities, no! People do not perceive her as somebody who is an equal to an Alia Bhatt or Ananya Panday. No! So that’s what I try to convey — that no matter how much you try and fit in, you are not fitting in. If you are not seeing it, let me show you — in their world, you are still B-grade. I have been through those galis, I know where it goes! So that’s what I try to convey to them. If you think you are fitting in and now you have also become insiders, no, you’re not.
-------------------------------
In 2017, you and Sushant were being considered for a movie by Homi Adajania?
Yeah. I still remember that day when Homi called me to his office. I was about to step out and I was given the legal notice that Hrithik Roshan had sent me about criminal charges. In a dazed state, I went to Homi, and he narrated me a love story and I could not just focus on it because I was so shattered. I told him I would revisit it, but nobody knew my state of mind. After that, for one year, the kind of filth that I faced, the kind of butchering that I faced, I didn’t sign any film that year, but I vaguely remember that story. It was a love story about an urban couple.
When this whole thing happened, it occurred to me that if I had done that film, would our lives have been different now? I don’t know. I just don’t know. It is so unfortunate at so many levels. Would I be his friend and would I have given him a perspective for not longing for acceptance? I don’t know what I would do on finding such an amazing person.
That was so unfortunate and this makes me feel so bad. Had I done that film, what would our lives be, I don’t know. I can only think about it.

Right now, I am not certain which medium I will make content for-Kangana Ranaut
8:13 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

The actress talks to BT about the current content space, and how the dynamics could be different post lockdown
Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; May 27, 2020)
Last week, Kangana Ranaut released a video, which showcased a poem penned by her called Aasmaan. The actress, who featured in the video and shot it herself, used sky as a metaphor for emotions and perceptions. Last year, Kangana, who made her foray into direction as the co-director of Manikarnika - The Queen Of Jhansi, announced that she would be backing an ambitious project titled Aparajitha Ayodhya as a producer. The film would have rolled out towards the end of 2020, if the ongoing Coronavirus pandemic hadn’t put a speed breaker in its path.
When we asked about her plans to direct a full-length feature film again, the actress told BT, “We will see how cinema and theatre business goes and where we stand post the lockdown. I got huge success as an artiste. I have established myself as a content creator and launched my production house this year. I understand that the digital space is becoming big. Do I have to now look at a future as a content creator because that medium is for actors, not superstars? I’d say that it’s a different medium, and these things will be evaluated in due course. I am comfortable being a big star who gets seetis, and a content creator who works behind the scenes. Right now, I am also not certain which medium I would make content for. Films were quite dramatic when they were meant for theatres alone, but with the changing dynamics, we can’t say how content will shape up. It’s early to decide which way to go.”
She added, “As a creative person, I feel there is still a lot for me to achieve and learn. Manikarnika - The Queen Of Jhansi gave me a different kind of success. If I was just an actor who came from a small town and became a star, I would be anxious with the theatrical business running into quandary at the moment. My stardom came at a high price and I have created all of this myself. I have my own company today, and I was on my way to make Aparajitha Ayodhya, and I am open to wherever life decides to take me from this point onwards.”
On the surface, my poem Aasmaan is about love, but deep within it’s about perceptions-Kangana Ranaut
8:16 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; May 20, 2020)
Kangana Ranaut, who is spending the Coronavirus lockdown with her family in Manali, has been penning poems these days. Recently, she recited one of them, titled Aasmaan, and even shot a video for it at her beautiful home in Manali. In a chat with BT, the actress spoke about what drew her to pen her thoughts and how her extended stay around the mountains is making her reflect on her journey so far. Excerpts:
What inspired you to write and share this poem?
I have been writing poems since I was 15 years old. I thought this is a time when I can share what I have written, with the hope that it helps people during the lockdown. I wrote this poem a few days ago and shared it because I feel it is relevant to the times we are in. On the surface, it’s about love, but deep within, it’s about perceptions.
What is the idea behind the video that you have shot?
A lot of people speak, write and understand Hindi, but people in some parts of the country, who understand the language, don’t necessarily speak, read or write it. So, I decided to recite the verses I had written. Also, I was missing the atmosphere of a shoot. My assistant, Rizwan, is here with me. I made a call sheet, with time allocated for hair, make-up and steam-ironing clothes. We pretended to be like a little unit working on a set. It was a good change to be able to shoot things the way I wanted to because there were no commercials involved.
This is possibly one of your longest stays in Manali after you became an actor. How have you made use of the time you are spending in the beautiful home that you built for yourself a few years ago?
Yes, this is among my longest stays here, and I am enjoying it. This year, I complete 15 years of living in Mumbai, and now I feel more like a Maharashtrian. I had lost touch with the mountains that I grew up around — given the tremendous struggle that I have been through, working incessantly and mentally never being on a break. In my journey, I never took the time out to sit back and think about things. It was a crazy marathon that I was running. While being in Manali, I got a chance to introspect and reflect upon everything that has happened in my journey so far. The lockdown is quite strict here, but my house is in the green zone, so I do get a chance to move around a little and revisit the places that I used to go to when I lived here.
Do you plan to share more poems and videos?
I am a professional artiste, and I want to keep something for commercial purposes, too. The verses can become a poem, a song or the thought behind a film. You can do a lot on social media for people, but you can’t bring it all out there. For some of it, people have to wait and watch.

I told myself, I am like [a] post pregnant Kareena Kapoor-Kangana Ranaut
8:19 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

En-route to losing the 20 kilos she had gained for her next film, Kangana on withdrawal symptoms, and missing her heels
Sonia Lulla (MID-DAY; April 29, 2020)
We don’t expect the usual Kangana Ranaut candour in an interview largely about how many squats she packs into her regimen. But the actor isn’t one to offer the ordinary.
Unbowed by the heft of her battle against the bulge, Ranaut is playfully self-deprecating when chronicling her 20-kilo weight-loss attempt.
“I didn’t expect to gain 20 kilos,” she says of her endeavour to emulate J Jayalalithaa in the actor- politician’s upcoming biopic, Thalaivi.
“When Kareena [Kapoor Khan] was pregnant, she gained 16 kilos. I told myself, I am like [a] post-pregnant Kareena Kapoor!” she exclaims at one point, before breaking into a laugh. “I never remember feeling so unfit. At one point, I needed to support myself with my palms to stand up off the floor,” she says at another, before the ever-so-slight quiver in her voice reveals the moments that triggered her badly.
“I was unable to carry my weight in heels, and that almost left me in tears. One thinks they’ll eventually adjust, but, I couldn’t walk in my own shoes! Usually, I can run in them, but now my feet would swell. I didn’t know how to handle it.”
Train, but gain
The diligence with which she had kept tabs on the weighing scale as it climbed by 10, 12 and 15 kilos was rendered redundant after a few weeks of lull. “[The makers] told me to start losing weight so that we could shoot [Jayalalitha’s] younger portions, and that’s when I noticed that I had gained 20 kilos. I wondered if I had gone too far, and questioned if the decision to take the hormone injections was appropriate.”
It was towards the close of 2019 that Ranaut had first admitted to leaning on hormone supplements to add bulk to her hips and thighs, to emulate her muse. Unlike the misshapen built acquired by Bollywood’s top brass of actors gaining weight for cinema, Ranaut’s avatar, though voluptuous, had to resemble the shapely and nimble-footed bharatnatyam dancer that Jayalalitha was. “I had to do bharatnatyam for two hours, yoga for one, and still gain weight in a desirable manner. The mild hormone dosage helped [me] gain weight around the hips. Bharatnatyam involves a lot of leg work, so the dancers tend to [gain weight in this region]. Also, I needed to put on so much weight because I am tall. At 5’ 8", I had to ensure that the [bulk] was visible on my frame.”
Winning the race, slowly, steadily
Currently nestled in picturesque Manali, Ranaut decided to make the most of the lockdown by taking along her trainer of several years. Under the guidance of Siddhartha Singh, founder of iSweat, she has shaved off seven kilos, and continues to crawl, jump and jog off the rest. “We are focusing on workouts that encourage movement for a long duration of time, instead of those involving shorter intervals. The idea is to keep movements sustainable by not rendering her breathless, so that more calories can be burnt. The evening functional training sessions last 45 to 75 minutes, and are coupled with a 20-minute morning walk in her 100-metre driveway,” says Singh, attributing her body’s positive response to the regimen to her consistent yoga practice.
Her high metabolic rate may afford her many luxuries, but Ranaut won’t abuse what she has been blessed with. For as long as Singh can recall, she isn’t swayed by food that has little nutritional value, and prefers “home-cooked meals”. “Kangana is attuned to her body’s [nutritional] needs. If she craves something, she’ll have it in limited portion, or cook a [healthier] version of it at home.”
That her body had become complacent with the additional weight also began to work against her, making the weight-loss process more demanding than both she and Singh had anticipated. “It was difficult. I had to undergo detox. I was affected by the sugar withdrawal, and felt like I was in rehab. For over six months, I was perpetually hungry, and had mood [swings]. The weight wouldn’t budge. Also, at 33, things are not as easy [as they were when I was younger].”
Asked if she will do it all over again if a film demands it, her response is prompt, but not very assertive: “No, yaar!” she says. “It’s not worth it. My cholesterol level was quite high this time. In my 30s, I don’t enjoy doing this.”
Singh on principles he uses to train Ranaut
- We’re targeting the anterior and posterior muscles at once. We use the driveway to do short jogging sets, shuttle lunges, back crawls, and jumping jacks.
- Usually, I avoided exhausting her because actors have to work for the rest of the day, and can’t be dealing with aches and pains. I had to be mindful of not targeting the muscles that she would be using for her action films, like Manikarnika.
For instance, horse-riding employs a lot of leg work, and hence, when she was learning it, I’d only do weight-less leg workouts with her. Similarly, when she was training in sword- fighting, and using her upper-body muscles, I’d have to shift focus away from her shoulders and arms [in the gym].
- With physical activity currently limited, she is consuming only two to three meals a day. The morning jogs that she takes help in activating her metabolism.

I started working at 17... I have taken panga since that age-Kangana Ranaut
8:23 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Madhureeta Mukherjee (BOMBAY TIMES; January 21, 2020)
She took to the battlefield as the braveheart Queen of Jhansi, and now, with the slice-of-life sports drama, Panga, Kangana Ranaut is all set to up her game. And this time with jumps, dives, skill and tact on the playing field. In the film, she plays a 32-year-old mom, who chases her dream to be a kabaddi player. Much like the Kangana we know, who dares to dream big and fight every hurdle along the way. In a chat with BT, she talks about her real-life pangas, precious relationships and her idea of an ideal partner. Read on...
There is a song in Panga with inspiring lyrics, which says, Man ki jo sune, hai wohi changa. Lele, Lele Panga. Is that the mantra you live by?
I think so, and I would like to believe that I only listen to my heart and what I feel is right. I left home at an early age, so I didn’t have any overpowering figure in my life — a father figure or anyone else like that. I started working at 17, so I have taken panga since that age. Even back then, I did what my heart told me to. It could probably be the most immature thing to do, but I still did it. I thought, why should I pretend to be someone else? Why should my reactions be like my father’s or anyone else’s whose experiences are different from mine?
So, you have taken responsibility for all your choices and decisions, right or wrong...
Yes, always! When I left home, it was a very decisive moment in my life, because there was obviously a feeling like… what if it doesn’t work out. But then, I told myself…Whatever the consequences are, deal with it alone. Your parents didn’t sign up for this, so don’t turn around and go back to them’. It is not that my parents would object if I went back, but I knew that, hereon, I have to take 100% responsibility for whatever happens in my life. I have seen hard days; there were days when I slept hungry, and my parents could have easily afforded a meal for me, but I didn’t go back. I felt that it was unfair. I had chosen a path, so I had to figure it out and stick by it. Over the course of time, it becomes your second nature. You become that person.
When Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari (director) approached you with this film, you were going through a difficult time in your life. So, what convinced you to take on this role, knowing that the project will be very demanding?
Ashwiny met me during a dramatic phase of my life. In my mind, I had completed Manikarnika - The Queen Of Jhansi (2019), but I got to know that the studio was not okay with the film and wanted to bring another director on board. Eventually, I took over. I left a film called Imli and was also toying with the idea of not doing Panga. At that time, I thought I was not in the headspace to do this film, but Ashwiny told me that she would help me through it. I was shooting two units and would sometimes land on the Panga set, thinking, ‘Where am I?’ It was very unlike me. I was so lost, and she helped me through it. She is one of the most organised people I know, and her homework is on point. We both are very passionate about our work and operate from a place where we are on our own.
Panga focuses on how a supportive family can play a huge role in helping you achieve your dreams, however implausible they might seem. Your family is a big support in your life, likewise, you are like a rock-solid support system for them, too, right?
I have seen both the sides. I have also seen how miserable your life can be without your family. Initially, when I started out, my family did not support me and that was probably the worst phase of my life. Even though at that age I must have felt… to hell with them, over time, I realised that there are only those many people in the world who will be there with you all along. That’s when I decided to mend my relationship with them and be close to them, because the distance had become way too much. I wanted to nurture our relationship and have people around me, who I could share my life with. That’s precisely what we are talking about in Panga, too, that building a relationship with your close ones is everyday work and a process. Even now, while my family and I are there for each other, we can’t take it for granted. We have to work on it and invest in it emotionally, every day. I also think that I could go back and mend my relationship with them because of my success.
Could you explain that?
It would have been very unfortunate if I was not successful, because the kind of person that I am, it would have been difficult for me to mend the relationship. I am not someone who is good with failures, especially when I am dealing with people. When I fail, it does not change my perception of me, but when I look into people’s eyes and see their perception shift, I can’t take it. I completely block myself out and don’t meet anyone. I don’t think that it is anyone’s business to judge me like that. I am sure that I would not have gone back to my family if I had failed, because of my own ego, no matter how much they would have tried to help me. I am sure that I would have made a different life for myself. I am not here for people’s drama, with anyone throwing lines at me like, ‘Kaha tha humne tumhe (laughs!).’ I wouldn’t let anyone do that to me. Now, at least I can say, ‘Maine kaha tha tumko…’
You recently said that after seeing the relationship that Ashwiny and her filmmaker husband, Nitesh Tiwari share, you feel that marriage is not such a bad idea, after all? What are your reservations about marriage?
When you have so much going for yourself, you tend to get thoughts like… ‘The world needs me, why should I belong to one person (laughs!)?’ Also, with time, you can become compulsively independent in the way you live your life and operate, and the way you create your personal space. Then, marriage seems like a trap. When you are functioning better on your own, than with a partner, then, marriage doesn’t make sense, right? As partners, you should function doubly better. I see that Rangoli (sister) and her husband function well with each other. Emotionally, financially and spiritually, I should do better with my partner than I am doing on my own. If two people are doing doubly well together in these aspects, I am open to marriage. Even if it does not double up, it should not bring me down from where I am. I can see how Ashwiny and Nitesh function beautifully together and enhance each other. They are raising a lovely family together. When I see that, I think, ‘Okay, this works. This is how it should be.’
Panga also highlights an important thought in the context of our society — that a woman has no reason to stop dreaming and pursuing her dreams irrespective of her stage (marriage, motherhood) in life. While there has been a huge change in urban India, do you think films like these will bring such conversations into focus in smaller towns of our country?
A mother is the person who is most taken for granted in the family. When we were growing up, we didn’t know where the food came from, when the utensils were cleaned and how we got freshly laundered clothes every day. Everything was functional because of my mom. When I started running my own house, I had a team of four people doing all the work, and yet, it seemed a lot. My mom would do so much more for us, all by herself. We start believing that our mothers don’t have emotional needs or dreams of her own. Now, my when my mom opens to me, I can see that she is so vulnerable, and she has always been this way, but we didn’t see it. That is what should change with the film — we need to humanise our mothers; we most often don’t do that. Jaya (my character) is so much my mother, I dedicate this film to her.
How was your equation with your on-screen husband, Jassie Gill? While talking to BT, he said, ‘Mujhe bada dara ke bheja tha set pe, lekin jaisa suna tha waisa kuch hua nahi’. The film also boasts of some fabulous actors like Richa Chadha and Neena Gupta. How was the energy on the set with so many fabulous actors?
Even Ashwiny would get calls where someone would tell her, ‘She (Kangana) will destroy your film’. Jassie would get calls saying, ‘Tumhe toh bhagwan bachaye’. I think these are petty games that people play. It’s a bubble that bursts, because within 12 months, I am releasing two-three films. So, I don’t think that too many people believe in this narrative. Jassie is multi-talented, he is a fabulous singer, too. A director’s energy translates on to the entire set. Ashwiny was so homely and positive that it rubbed off on all of us. Even with someone like Richa, we may have different political beliefs, but that does not come in the way while working. The realm of art is such that it rises above political beliefs. I was the happiest to know that Javed Akhtar sir is writing the lyrics. For me, it is an honour to be working with him, even though our political ideologies are different. When I become a producer, I will pledge to never be coloured by any prejudices or people’s personal choices. Whether it is your belief, sexuality, colour or caste…how does it matter and why should it matter when you are working on a film? That is the kind of standard and behaviour I stand up for.
Initially, there were stories about Ashwiny and you not getting along, but she cleared those rumours and even says that today, you both are close friends and there are no pretenses whatsoever…
Personally, I feel that most people I work with and have an equation with, are 100% sweet on my face, but then they talk differently when they go into the media space. I never expected Ashwiny to speak so highly of me, because I have learnt this lesson in the industry that if you are an outsider, it suits their narrative to talk about you in a certain way. Even Ashwiny was surprised to see how some people met me so warmly, but behind my back they were different people. She comes from such a positive place that there were never any insecurities with her.

I have no time for people with any kind of baggage-Kangana Ranaut
8:31 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Kangana Ranaut on why marriage is not a compulsion right now, the struggle to rehabilitate sister Rangoli Chandel after an acid attack and how nepotism can only end with action, not empathy
Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; January 20, 2020)
Your upcoming film, Panga, is about surmounting hurdles and pursuing dreams. For a small-town girl with no godfather in the film industry, how difficult was it for you to chase after a Bollywood dream?
It wasn’t all that difficult for me because I left home when I was only 15. And the minute I broke away, I could breathe freely and operate like a single, independent entity. There was no explaining to parents, no listening to the bitter city experiences of family elders and no societal pressures tying me down. I could take risks, telling myself that the worst thing that could happen was failure and I was ready for the consequences. It was harder for my character, Jaya Nigam, because as a mother she couldn’t abandon her child or walk away from her marriage. But at 30, she wants to chase her dream of being a kabaddi player because dreams are not limited by age. For me, it was an insight into a life very different from mine, where it was important for the family to understand that this woman, till now, has only given, and expected nothing in return. Jaya doesn’t have a choice. She has to raise a family but is unwilling to compromise on this dream. She has to strike a balance between the two, and that’s how it should be. Today, fortunately for me, I’ve got my family back. But I know that somewhere success had a huge role to play in the reconciliation. Had I not made it in films, I might have lost out on both my family and my dream, and that would have been devastating.
Alone, in a big, heartless city with no family support; how terrifying was it for the teenager Kangana?
Well, I fell into bad company straightaway. Some people took advantage of the fact that I was alone and couldn’t confide in my parents, and I’ve experienced the worst a person can go through. It toughened me up and made me the person I am. But I wouldn’t want my children to go through such extremes. I would want to be there for them.
Marriage and children, is that a dream now?
When I was in my 20s, I was desperate for a family. I felt incomplete and thought my own people would make me feel complete. With time, I have come to realise that this is not true. So, right now there’s no compulsion to be a wife and a mother. I’m at a phase when I’m just beginning to enjoy my life. If someone can add to it, I’m fine, but if, as a woman, I am expected to ensure he’s emotionally stable, enhance his spiritual growth, be lucky and bring him financial windfalls and take on the responsibility of a home, children and family, then, I’m not up for that. At the moment, I have no time for people who come with any kind of baggage.
Why not?
Well, for the longest time, we’ve been emotionally scarred by what happened to my sister Rangoli (Chandel) after the acid attack. It took a long time, but finally, she is happy, with a child all of us dote on. Her husband’s business is doing well and my mamma, who was grappling with some health issues, is fully recovered. Also, the half-a-dozen cases filed against me have been dismissed as the allegations couldn’t be proved. My brother Akshit and I have just launched a production house and we’re starting from scratch, we aim to do some good work. This is a wonderful time for all of us; I’ve never felt so good. The world is respectful; there’s a lot to do and give. And for the first time, I can think about myself. Let me be a little self-centered and enjoy what I have earned. I don’t have the time and energy to invest in another family. That can come later.
Have you seen Chhapaak, in which Deepika Padukone played an acid attack survivor?
No, with my own film, Panga, coming up, I haven’t had the time but I will watch it for sure.
How difficult was it to deal with the acid attack on Rangoli?
It was horrific! You are hurt if your loved one gets even a scratch or a pimple, so, you can imagine the kind of pain one would feel to see their face melt. Outward appearance is far more important to a woman than a man, and taking that away from her is a fool-proof way of isolating her from the world. I was just 19, on the threshold of a bright career, when the attack happened and it was a long, hard struggle to deal with this kind of perverse, sexist cruelty. Financially too, I was not strong back then. Girls around me would feel depressed by a bad hair day or because a meal was not to their liking. I was grappling with something far more real and yet had no time to sit and cry. I did tacky films, took on roles I did not deserve, accepted guest appearances, so my sister could be treated by the best surgeon in India. It took 54 surgeries.
Your mentor, Anurag Basu, recently described you as a strong, ambitious girl and says he’s proud of where you have reached.
Anurag is my godfather. He just picked me, auditioned me and gave me a break. There were people around, like Gangster producer Mahesh Bhatt, who wanted Chitrangda Singh, because he thought I was too young to play the mother of a five-year-old kid. He was right, too, because I was still a minor then. But Anurag believed in me and fought for me.
He also worked a lot on me. I was a theatre actor, but Anurag didn’t want me to act. He wanted me to surrender myself to the camera. The foundation of my acting, which is strong, subtle, natural and universally appealing, comes from him. I will always be building on that. He’s one of the best directors we have and I have only taken from him, not added anything to his life. I hope someday I get the chance to give something back, too. I feel a karmic connection with Anurag and I’m sure we are going to collaborate again and create some great work.
Pooja Bedi’s daughter Alaya F, who debuts as Saif Ali Khan’s daughter in Jawaani Jaaneman, recently said that being a star kid “we are privileged even in our struggles”. As someone who brought the term nepotism to the fore, what do you feel about this disparity in the industry?
One day I was thinking that as a star kid, what would it take to empathise with an outsider and say we understand the exploitations they go through. The important thing is not just to imagine but also empathize and work towards ending the culture of exploitation of outsiders from a position of power.
You’ve started your own company and you are in a position of power today. Will you put an end to this nepotism culture?
I think nepotism is completely based on the fact that people, who are not as deserving, get a chance, as opposed to those who deserve it. Because of such practices, most people are lagging behind. I will always go for the person who is best suited for the job, that’s the basis of my work ethics. I want the best for my project, without personal gains or emotional pressures. I’ll be doing myself a favour working with deserving people.
Panga will be your second Republic Day release after Manikarnika last year...
Yes, Republic Day has been lucky for me and I hope that continues. The ability to keep the family together while retaining her individuality is something a mother does so wonderfully. And I’m grateful to Ashwiny (Iyer Tiwari, Panga director) for giving me the opportunity to live this role and experience.

I had to take mild doses of hormone pills to look the part in Thalaivi-Kangana Ranaut
7:57 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Thalaivi actor Kangana Ranaut discusses gaining weight to play Jayalalithaa, employing prosthetics for features that her transformation couldn't address
Upala KBR (MID-DAY; November 25, 2019)
Netizens didn't exactly go gaga over Kangana Ranaut's first look as Jayalalithaa in the late actor-politician's upcoming biopic, Thalaivi. But Ranaut is a picture of calm as she addresses questions on her commendable transformation in A L Vijay's directorial venture."[When aping a person for cinema], actors usually get the apparel and appearances on point, but not the physical transformation. Vijay wanted me to resemble her as closely as possible. She [Jayalalithaa] endured a drastic physical transformation in her life. Having grown up as a Bharatanatyam dancer, she had an hour-glass figure. Then, when she joined politics, she had an accident which demanded that she be injected with huge doses of steroids. While we could not depict all of that, we did take measures [to resemble her during these phases]."
Having previously spoken about her struggle to gain weight, Ranaut says that for this film, she put on six kilos. "That was needed so as to look voluptuous, especially around the belly and thighs. Since I am tall and skinny, and my face is angular, not round, I had to take mild doses of hormone pills to look different. Of course, I also started eating foods that promote weight gain."
For the features that the pills couldn't address, Ranaut sought aid from Jason Collins, who has worked on the prosthetics for big-ticket Hollywood actioners like Blade Runner 2049 and Captain Marvel. "His team made a structure that was suitable to make me look voluptuous. During the portions showcasing her as a young politician, we aimed to only make my face look fuller. As for the rest of the body, it took the team seven hours each day to acquire the look. The hands had to be re-done, and different kinds of pads were used for different parts of the body."
But even as the makers worked diligently to address the physical nitty-grittys, Ranaut, as vociferous as she is, knew that it was acquiring Jayalalithaa's soft-spoken demeanour that would be the toughest feat to achieve. "She was strong-willed; I am fiery. Acquiring her demeanour [was a challenge]. It's a body language that I am being introduced to for the first time."
Rangoli does consult me when she writes about my colleagues and the industry-Kangana Ranaut
8:31 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Kangana Ranaut - controversy's favourite child - on tussles with the media, social media wars courted by sister, calling out wrongdoers and mixing nationalism in arguments
Sonil Dedhia (MID-DAY; July 28, 2019)
Not one to suffer silently, Kangana Ranaut believes in facing things head-on. After an ugly public spat with a scribe, she sits down with mid-day to explain explain why a personal squabble became a public brawl. The actor, who just released Judgementall Hai Kya, talks about the controversies she courts, mixing personal issues with nationalism and trying to not succumb to public pressure.
Edited excerpts from the interview.
You have, in the past, brazenly called out your colleagues from the industry. Why did you feel the need to pick on a journalist?
People believe money is equivalent to power but I don't think so. If you can influence hundreds, that gives you power. Media is not interested in reporting real issues about environment, water harvesting or social issues. Media refuses to cover events when it is about planting trees or social work because according to them, 'Isme masala nahi hai. Yeh nahi bikta hai. [There is no meat in the news and it won't sell]'. That hurts.
You could have called the journalist and had a private discussion, like you've done in the past. How did this tussle escalate so much?
I am thick-skinned enough to take a joke on myself. I never felt bad when I was being trolled for my English or criticised for a bad performance. Recently, Shobhaa De wrote something about my film, I messaged and asked her when she was going to watch it. I don't voluntarily get into fights, that's not who I am. After the success of Manikarnika - The Queen Of Jhansi, we invited the media home for an interaction and the journalist in question [reporter from PTI] was also present. He created a scene because according to him I was late. I asked my manager if I was tardy and was informed that the journalist had just arrived. He refused to talk when I reached out to him. There has been a furore over this one event, which was designed to be candid. Journalists asked me questions like 'Tum mental ho kya? [Are you mental?]' and 'Ye mental wala role would come naturally to you. [Does the role in the film come naturally to you?]' When you remove one clip from an hour long discussion, it would seem like I am at fault. I told the journalist, 'Tum toh dushman ban gaye humare and so on'. I haven't crossed any line and my intention was never to shame him or make him a national villain. I am aware of the consequences my actions can have and hence, I am responsible. At the same time, I don't want him to pin me down on a stage.
You referred to his comments on social media. Isn't an individual entitled to his or her opinion?
It is not a criminal offence to have an opinion, to make fun or mock someone on social media, but then, do not expect respect. If I was a lousy actor, do you think anyone would have given heed to my issues?
It is often observed that you mix personal issues with nationalism.
I don't think so. It didn't bother me when he trolled me on a personal level, but when you mock a martyr [Rani Lakshmibai] it becomes a matter of national concern. Everyone has the right to criticise, but there is decorum to do it. You cannot make a joke about national heroes. How am I living up to my reputation, if despite being a public figure I don't call out people when they do something wrong? Actors have guidelines and are crucified for saying the wrong thing, then why are journalists exempt from it.
Saying 'no comments' is always an option, don't you think you could have avoided this controversy/person if you had not engaged in it?
I could have said, 'I won't answer your question', but that would involve explaining to everyone, 'why'. And when I tried to explain, he started an argument. You have to shake people, up who've lost perspective, especially when you've had a personal rapport with them. I won't feel the need to call out a person, who is incapable of their work. It only comes for a person who I feel has the potential. The media has always been supportive and I know they don't dislike me. However, you cannot deny that there are journalists working under the diktat of other celebrities and public relations agency to tarnish my image. I don't think I have done anything wrong by calling them out. In fact, I am standing up for things that could be a detriment to my career, but I will always do so when I know I am right. Personally, I wear my individuality with a lot of ease but I know several actors have a manufactured image.
There is a perception that you dictate your sister Rangoli Chandel on what to tweet. Is there any truth to it?
No, she does it on her own. She is into social media and keeps track of news and what other celebrities have said. She does consult me when she writes about my colleagues and the industry, and at times I censor them (laughs).
During every film release, the topic of discussion revolves more around the controversy rather than your work. Do you feel people no longer wish to talk about your work?
It is a deliberate strategy, which also happened during Tanu Weds Manu Returns (2015). I had planned preview shows for my friends and colleagues in the industry but no one showed up. Isn't that insulting? Back then I had said, 'these young actors feel threatened to come and watch my film'. People said my performance was the best double role but no one from the industry appreciated it. We all know who won the Best Actress award that year [Deepika Padukone for Piku]. These things don't happen organically and that is precisely what I am fighting for. Is it uncommon for a filmmaker to leave a film mid-way for other commitments? Manikarnika is the third highest grossing women-centric film that has garnered over Rs 150 crore worldwide, but it was beautifully concealed by a section of the media.
After Effects Of The Media Fight
When asked if the tussle with media out her in an odd spot with producer Ekta Kapoor and co-star Rajkummar Rao, she said, she doesn't talk on their behalf. "I am sure it's a little unsettling for everyone as they don't know my history with the journalist. They have been co-operative and noticed that it was a deliberate attempt to create a stir."
My retaliation is out of desperation-Kangana Ranaut
2:12 PM
Posted by Fenil Seta

After creating a storm in Mumbai, Kangana is calming herself in Coimbatore. She answers queries on her angst, clarifies her generalisations about “the media”, defends her outburst as a desperate response to pressure, and says no, criticizing her is not being anti-national
Anshul Chaturvedi (BOMBAY TIMES; July 19, 2019)
For someone who speaks often of yoga, meditation, spirituality, why are you so angry, so angsty, so recurrently?
I think angst is different, passion is different and anger is different. Anger and angst are when a person holds a grudge against something and that becomes a part of their personality. Passion is something where a person involved is so intense that whatever they say or do that may seem obsessive, but it is not necessarily anger. I do not see myself as an angry person, because if I were an angry person, I would not be able to create so much in life in terms of creativity. Am I passionately intense? Yes. Sometimes the way I demand or the way I do things, even as a director or as an actor, it may be a little overwhelming for the other person, but it is not anger. It is the intensity of my emotions. Now, talking about the example of the person I had the confrontation with, some people even called it abuse. I still look back at it and I don't find it abusive or even angry. Confrontational? Yes, it is. Very confrontational. Was I hurt? Yes. But was I abusive or derogatory? No. I tend to get very hurt with people, especially the people who, like I said with the said person also, there have been some interactions, some heartfelt conversations, there has been some personal time spent. From that aspect, did it lead to very intense hurt in me? Yes. Is it an expression of that hurt? Absolutely. If you find it angsty, maybe that is how people are seeing it, but I do not see it as angsty or angry at all. But hurt? Yes, very hurt.
You have spoken recurrently of ‘one section’. But that ‘one section’s’ definition is not clear as you went about ‘ bikau media’, ‘liberal media’, ‘ deshdrohi’ and much more. You do understand that ‘the media’ as a generic punching bag phrase is just as inaccurate as using ‘Bollywood’ as a single fit-all phrase. What is the issue? You have had a more than fair deal from the press through your career.
The press has played a very big role in building my brand. They are the very basis, the foundation, of my career, my brand. There was no prototype to me. The press has voluntarily placed me at the place which they did, which has been generous on their part, because the press before that did not give such sort of respect towards actors – only to stars.
Personally, I have much to thank the media for; I have been the media’s darling throughout. It is just a section of the media who have ganged up on me, people who I have raised a voice against, and these people have collectively formed a Guild. When it was formed there were hardly some 15-16 people, they were particularly those people, some of whom are not even proper, working journalists.
There are also paid PR agencies who have run an agenda against me. I however agree that just using ‘the media’ is not the correct way to talk of the people I have an issue with. I only have a problem with the people who are abusing the advantage of being part of the liberal media, but who don’t do anything that the liberal media across the world is doing. The media is taking up great causes. But there are a few people who are abusing the words liberal and secular left, right and centre. You can’t call yourself liberal if you are going to mock Environment Day or the issues that the liberal media upholds. I can handle objective criticism. Even if I practice some other ideology, do I not have the ability or the intelligence to understand the perspective of the other side? That is the only way I can strengthen my own perspectives in life. I definitely have that much vision. Whatever the communication skills I may lack, I understand how important the opposite perspective is to see the loopholes in your own thinking, your own ideology.
If you think that there are people who are not fair, there are people who for years have run a campaign against you and therefore you think they are either fed by your opponents or they dislike you – if they say they don’t want to cover you and you come out with a video saying that you are very happy that they don’t cover you, then why would you also say I will issue a legal notice for not covering me?
So what happened is these 15-16 people who formed the Guild became admins and I said that’s great. But now these people turned this into ‘media versus Kangana’ and they have now added 200-300 people, and there is pressure on my producer as they are not covering my film either. If they have banned me, I would love that, there is no problem in that, but they have turned people against me, and they have said that this is for our (media’s) welfare, so now they have multiplied in numbers thinking that it is for their welfare. But the only purpose of that Guild is to be after me! They are not doing anything for the welfare of journalism.
But how is that your problem, what they do for other journalists or not? How is that relevant to your dealing with them?
If you want to ban somebody, ban somebody, why are you taking the entire media and making it into Kangana vs the media. It is not Kangana vs the media. It is me versus those people supported by the movie mafia. These people are worse than the movie mafia. So it is not me versus the media. I do not have any problem with the media. I have mentioned that I have great friends in the media. I am an actor who has got so much media support. Why should I compromise on that? I have said in every interview that there is nothing I love more than criticism and my best friends are real, true, genuine media. I said that without an opponent, an ideology cannot exist, why should I not have critics? If I have only 16 people who hate me, there are several others who like me. I do not want any misunderstanding between them and me. I just want to keep those 16 away in a way that they are not around me at all.
If you say people are biased against you, okay, they may have had a history with you, but when you bring in the word ‘anti national’ and you bring it more and more in the context of Manikarnika,how is that valid? Mangal Pandey was as eminent a freedom fighter as Rani Lakshmibai. Aamir made a film on him. It did not work. But now if you say that Mangal Pandey the film does not work, or smirk at his role, does that mean we are insulting the memory of martyr Mangal Pandey and should apologise to Aamir Khan?
No, not at all. Let me explain myself. A martyr, who is a national treasure, belongs to everyone. Everyone has a right to make a film (on them). I have not given money to anyone to get the rights, it is in the public domain, so the film belongs to everyone. Whatever said and done, criticise it in a way like critics do or write as an ordinary person or as a viewer that it is a bad film, it is acceptable. But not doing any of this, but only distorting the name of the martyr, that is not okay. You can’t distort Bhagat Singh, or Manikarnika and that too without saying what is the problem with the film. All I am trying to say is that what gives a person a right to troll a martyr’s name just because the person is a journalist? Is it acceptable? Why has it become a fashion to disrespect and to mock a national hero and why should it be acceptable? It is okay to not like the film. But the only thing the tweet said was that going by the controversy with the director, the next film should be called Manikarnika ha ha ha… At least should show respect to the martyr. If I, being a celebrity, will overlook these things, aaj isko chhoro, usko chhoro, aage badho yaar, mere bahut controversy ho rahe hain, what kind of individual will I become over a period of time?
So when I found that gentleman, I asked him arrey, what do you do, yaar? How in any way have I humiliated or abused that person? I personally feel that vendetta, an agenda has come out now. The video is just about that.
People from Bollywood not turning up to your premiere is not part of insulting the memory of a martyr, is it? Using the word ‘ sasta copy’ for another actress has nothing to do with national integrity. You cannot fight all your battles holding the national flag, because not all these issues are about the country and nationalism, are they? It’s become very confusing what all are you angry about. You seem to be angry about everything.
Of course, I am angry about people taking digs at me, but that is personal. I personally feel that nobody should be ultra-sensitive and if you take a dig at anyone, you should be ready to receive it, too. But that is personal matter, it is not a national matter. I cannot address the nation on personal trolling. But when I am doing something on Environment Day, you are making fun of me, making fun of something that I said about animal cruelty, cow slaughter, then, you are connecting it to an individual, not realising that animal cruelty is something that liberal media is taking up in a big way, worldwide. These are the three things I addressed in the video. I am talking about things related to this person. If I am addressing the nation, it is only on those issues, that is not my personal rona dhona.
Not just ‘a few media’, many otherwise neutral people are concerned about, and disappointed with the hostile tone and language that has been used by you as well as your sister lately. I hope you’re aware of that.
In my defence, I tried even personally getting in touch with PRs who send negative news about me. People ask me why are they spreading such things about you. It’s okay if you don’t want to work with me or I don’t want to work with you, but we can also come to a point where you just let me be. Why can’t you just let me be? My retaliation is out of desperation. It is easy to think that somebody is getting hostile just because they have nothing better to do, but I must also get the benefit of doubt that there must be a situation where if she is reacting this way, she must have been pushed against the wall.
I am okay with the biggies not working with me, having their own circles, which is why I am doing my own thing, but they are not letting me be. From all corners, they are always trying to suppress me or hit me. Every day I am fighting five to six news pieces. Either I have had a fight with Ekta or I have ruined Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari’s set or I have taken the producer’s money for Manikarnika… There are a series of news items each day. It is exhausting to a point that on some days, I have broken down in tears thinking when this will stop? And it is true that nobody talks about my work anymore, because all these things go on and on and on. Ashwiny says she wants to work with me for another film, (Manikarnika writer) Vijayendra Prasad is working with me for another film called Jayalalitha, Prasoon (Joshi) sir is doing my next film… Who are the people working with me who have all these issues with me? Manikarnika was such a huge success, my performance was appreciated, but nobody talks about it. Only negative news is carried about me. Has anyone thought about that? I know who is spreading it, I know who is carrying it, I know who is investing time and money in it. So will I not retaliate? Will I not do anything for my own survival? Of course, I will. Even if I look desperate in that, I will do it because I am being bullied like that. I am very clear about who these people are. It’s not that there is nothing and I am just lashing out. There have been a series of nasty stories just to discredit me.
These people need to know that they cannot just go on and on doing what they have been doing. It is very difficult to wake up each day to eight or ten news stories damaging your business, ruining your future projects. It is just too much to take every day.
Isn’t it irresponsible to get off on this personal battle track when you have a movie coming up? Everything that happens impacts your co-actor, producer and many others...
I have never been this calculative in life… if I keep quiet, then I don’t have the right to say anything to anybody. If I say, on this platform, it is okay to let go of a martyr’s name’s distortion because it works for me to do that right now, then I’m a fake, then I am not the person I think I am. It is my natural response to that person. And to many like him, who abuse their position.
If I believe in some things and if I express that, what is wrong? I do not believe that movies are more important than humans. I was dealing with a cancer that was spreading across my work system. Like my Panga co-star who told me that there would be calls every day, saying don’t work with Kangana, she will make your life miserable. People get calls to not work with me! During the whole film, she must have been expecting a showdown. ‘Kangana will take away your film, she will humiliate you’, blah blah… and at the end she said, ‘But you have been like my younger sister’. The harassment is incessant, it is continuous. How am I supposed to react to it? Am I not supposed to do something? I really do not know what the right way is. It is not a matter that can be taken to court, because people can call people and say, beware of her, and things like that (laughs)! But it is happening from all quarters and from everyone, and it is making my work environment so suffocating.
You relish confrontation, don’t you?
I personally feel that confrontation is like detoxing. When you detox yourself, it’s not the most enjoyable thing, but you have got to do it. I look at confrontation like that – at times, you just need to do it. It’s definitely tricky, and it makes things very unpleasant, but I feel there is no harm in confrontation. It can even lead to betterment of relationships if the other person has the sensitivity and the perception to receive the treatment you are giving. To put it out there – there’s no harm in it. You are actually showing your vulnerability to them. But it is also the best way to deal with it when somebody is giving you the treatment — whether it is a layered treatment, silent treatment, or whatever. I make sure that I tell the person that it is having an effect on me. Why shouldn’t I? Why should I silently suffer? So, yes, I do believe in confrontation.
And is that something that the Isha Foundation — where you are at the moment — also believes in?
(Laughs) No, the Isha Foundation doesn’t agree with it. They say I spend way too much time getting hurt and feeling hurt and thinking about who said what and all that. And also that, most of my time goes in this, so I should just let it pass. But at the same time, I am happy to be an alive human being who has responses to events. To my credit, whatever I am... I am an original out there. I am not a borrowed idea, I am not a fake. I can guarantee you I am not that person who will talk the talk and not walk the walk.
Do you agree with the extremely aggressive language your sister Rangoli uses on social media on your behalf?
I do not want to speak on her behalf, because obviously nobody knows the inside story, the way we have to deal with things. What I can assure you is that, more than anything else, it is a retaliation because we do not have a system, which is set to deal with things in any other way. We tried to approach people, we tried to have conversations to see if a middle ground can be found. But that kind of approach was not entertained at all. So, there is a lot of desperation in that tone, and I would not judge her. It also needs to be seen that in 14 years of my career, unless she really had to enter the battlefield, she has not done that. If that was not the last resort, she would have had an account years back to tweet on these issues. This is not the first crisis I have been in, and she is not a Twitter person at all. She feels that there is no other way and that is the only platform she has. If that was a strategy, she would have been doing it for years, but it’s been only for a few months.
How do you see this panning out?
I have made a very clear point to the gang that was after me and to an extent, I have made them conscious of their actions. If you are going to only spread venom about me, it is easy to see that it is being led by one PR team… I hope awareness has come there. They can of course criticise me, they can write about me, against me, but they cannot butcher me like they used to, or character assassinate me, lie about me. All of that is not acceptable.
I personally feel that there are a lot of people who got hurt about the fact that after becoming very strong in my acting career, I went onto a filmmaking career, and gradually into production. When that shift finally happens and I am settled there, this kind of opposition and resistance to my growth will also lessen. And I feel that then, there won’t be so much friction. It’s just a shifting thing that people are resisting at the moment. It’s momentary.
That’s a very measured, calm tone, as compared to your recent belligerence.
That’s because I am in the ashram!
Maybe you should stay there more often?
(Laughs!).
------------------------------------
THE GUILD VS KANGANA
At a press event for her upcoming film Judgementall Hai Kya, Kangana called out a journalist for this 2018 tweet about her film, and accused him of “harming” her brand and running a “smear campaign” against her – a charge that he vociferously denied.
After the event, a section of media formed a guild and demanded an apology from the actress for her behaviour, and later decided to impose a ban on her getting any coverage. Kangana’s sister Rangoli then tweeted a video of the actress in which Kangana was quite hostile and called journalists words such as “ deemak”,further saying, “ Muft ka khana khaane pohonch jaate hain press conference mein... You think incompetent, rotten, pseudo-journalists like you can harm my status? Arey, nalaayko, deshdrohiyo, bikau, tum logo ko khareedne ke liye laakho bhi nai chahiye, tum log to itne saste ho ki `50, 60 mein bik jaate ho.” Kangana also said, “I request you people with folded hands to go ahead and ban me, kyuki main nahi chahti ke meri wajah se tum logo ke ghar mein chulha jale.” However, she subsequently also sent a legal notice to the guild for trying to ban her “illegally”. The validity of the notice is unclear. The standoff continues. The guild has also had support from entities such as the Press Club of India, which released a statement saying “we are aghast, anguished and shocked at the incident involving an actress of Bollywood using uncivilised, uncultured, filthy and abusive language against the media persons.”


No matter what kind of ups and downs my films go through, I take complete onus of them-Kangana Ranaut
8:51 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Kangana Ranaut shares with BT her thoughts on Mental Hai Kya’stitle being changed to Judgemental Hai Kya,why the change was incorporated and the reason she attended the screening held for the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC)
Renuka Vyavahare (BOMBAY TIMES; June 30, 2019)
After much discussion and thought, the title Mental Hai Kya has been changed. Your thoughts?We are glad to get another perspective from the CBFC. They didn’t ask for any cuts as such, the word mental is being replaced and that’s the only change. They felt that the word ‘mental’ could come across as harsh to people who may be battling mental illness. Apparently, you can’t even call it mental illness. It should just be called, illness. The guidelines are clear. I think the word mental was banned last year. They have a long list of dos and don’ts and we are more than happy to be educated on this front and to incorporate the changes. We are also happy that the CBFC has fast-tracked this case, because we are so close to the release date. This will help us launch our promos and kickstart our activities around the film on time. We are definitely changing the title, but it has to be something that sounds similar because the movie shouldn’t lose its personality. There’s already a buzz that’s generated and marketing money that has been invested. Hence, it will be something like the previous title.
The makers have announced that the film is now renamed, Judgemental Hai Kya…
Since the protagonist’s name is Bobby, we were wondering if we go could back to it. This film was originally called Bobby (that was the working title), but we realised it wasn’t giving anyone a glimpse into what the subject is all about. There was also a discussion if we can retitle it as, ‘Bobby Mental Hai Kya’ or ‘Bobby Crazy Hai Kya?’ We didn’t choose any of these. Bobby felt like a different film altogether. Big money has been invested on marketing the film, so why let it all go down the drain? There were also funny suggestions like, ‘Sentimental Hai Kya’. They were not okay with ‘Temperamental Hai Kya’ either, as it suggested that people who fight illnesses may have a bad temperament. So, I guess settling for Judgemental Hai Kya is a good idea, as it doesn’t rub anyone the wrong way.
You were part of screening held for the CBFC that happened a few days ago. Not many actors are involved in this aspect of a film’s journey. What made you take this initiative?
There is a lot of hoopla about how I take responsibility for my films, but nobody talks about how I see them through. No matter what kind of ups and downs my films go through, I take complete onus of them. Which actor will sit for six hours in a discussion (with the CBFC) and try to make things work? I did it for Manikarnika - The Queen of Jhansi as well. Ekta Kapoor and Jeetu sir (Jeetendra), the makers, told me, “It is extraordinary how you take complete responsibility of your film. Nobody would do that. We are impressed.” Sometimes people can look at the positive aspects also. It’s a selfless act. I also saw Manikarnika - The Queen of Jhansi through. I directed that film and had a long discussion with the Censor Board back then, as well. I have immense respect for the CBFC as a government body. There was this hoopla going on about censorship and other films, where people were behaving like victims. I was the first one to say that you cannot completely disregard a government body. I meant that. I went there (attended the screening) to ensure things don’t spiral into something that will bring disrespect to either party.
Did you accept the change immediately or was there any healthy debate and discussion on why the title should be changed?
There was no bad blood. Our point was that the term ‘mental’ is part of textbooks. Be it mental disorders, mental illness or mental asylum. If you go by the meaning in the dictionary, the word mental is related to the brain. The slang that people use for ‘mental’ isn’t a part of the dictionary, but it has been incorporated in the list of dos and dont’s by the psychiatrists. You cannot use the word ‘mental’ as a slang. When they put this point across, we were trying to negotiate. But given the sensitivity of the topic, we decided to change the title.
NOW, IT’S JUDGEMENTAL HAI KYA
Meanwhile, the official spokesperson of Balaji Motion Pictures, said, “Given the sensitivity attached to the issue and our intention of not offending or hurting anyone’s sentiments, we have decided to change the title of our film Mental Hai Kya to Judgemental Hai Kya.The film will hit theatres on July 26, and it has been cleared with a U/A certification and minor changes, which we are happy to comply with.”

One smear campaign was started by Karan Johar’s gang against me by paying reviewers-Kangana Ranaut
8:38 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Kangana Ranaut on ‘nepotism gangs’ launching ‘smear campaigns’ against her, why her sister is on social media with guns blazing while she isn’t, and plans to kick off an action film shortly
Natasha Coutinho (MUMBAI MIRROR; June 15, 2019)
After the sartorial rigours of the Cannes Film Festival, Kangana Ranaut headed home in Manali for some downtime. On the work front, the actress is gearing up for the release of Prakash Kovelamudi’s Mental Hai Kya, which reunites her with her Queen co-star Rajkummar Rao. Then, there’s Panga, her first project with Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari, which she will resume shooting for next month. In this conversation, the actress opens about work, family and outliving ‘smear campaigns’. Excerpts:
How is it going in Manali?
It’s been a while since I came here. I was here briefly for New Year’s... me directing Manikarnika - The Queen of Jhansi was unexpected and it took time as it was a massive project. Then, I jumped into Mental Hai Kya and Panga. After Cannes, I found myself tired all the time from travelling and the kabaddi matches that I was shooting for Panga in night shifts. The quality of air and water in Manali is so amazing, you recover quickly.
You aren’t on social media but your sister Rangoli Chandel has been making news by standing up for you during controversies…
When Rangoli was in Mumbai, she wanted her social environment to be pleasant, she has a family and her husband was working in the city at the time. Now, she has no f**ks to give and I like that kind of freedom. I don’t sit on her head and tell her what she should say. She is her own person and she has quietly observed all these industry people. Being an ostrich, keeping our eyes shut, has not helped us at all. So now she is completely at it. (laughs)
Any plans to make your own social media debut?
There are so many problematic things in the world and I’m a very conscious person, I’m very aware. I don’t want to be on social media and be bothered about problematic things that social media doesn’t provide solutions for. I can’t invest so much time on something that doesn’t deal with an issue. Rangoli says that people have taken advantage of my absence on the social media. She says that though I have helped people build hospitals and gifted a Rs two-and-half-crore flat to my yoga teacher, nobody knows about these things as I don’t talk about it. Sometimes she makes videos of me to share online. I find it funny, but she feels it’s important. In my past relationships I never made videos and even that went against me... Today, everything must be proved with photos and videos. How do I become a person who records and documents everything, so no one questions me tomorrow? I can’t live like that, it’s strange.
Recently, Rangoli also revealed on Twitter that Hrithik Roshan’s sister, Sunaina, has been calling both of you.
It is true that Sunaina and I were always good friends and so was her family. Now they claim differently. Yes, she has been in touch with me, but I don’t want to take advantage of her family dispute. Sunaina is still a friend but I will not hit somebody when they are down.
When do you resume work on Panga?
We will first release Mental Hai Kya. Prakash Kovelamudi is a new director but is good at his job. For Panga, I will be shooting the last of my portions in seven days next month.
What about Jayalalitha biopic Thalaivi?
That film will be in Hindi and Tamil and we begin by the year-end in Chennai. After that I am doing an action film that I will announce soon. Following that I will begin work on my next directorial (first being Manikarnika).
Manikarnika has made it to the Bucheon International Fantastic Film Festival…
It’s surprising because we never sent any entries to any film festival. We always thought the film is relevant to India, but it resonated with international audiences as well. When it released, I felt there were deliberate campaigns to kill it. Something like this validates the universal appeal of Manikarnika. So many people watched it but were hiding just because they didn’t want to speak about the film. Now, it seems like a sweet Cinderella story that has happened to us.
The film was mired in controversy. Your co-actors Mishti Chakraborty and Sonu Sood spoke negatively about you, and a video of you on a wooden horse was released.
I know who released that video. Two other actors of the nepotism gang were also learning horse-riding at the same place as me. They practised for one day and got so sore that they didn’t return. I was galloping and doing all sorts of stunts. The wooden horse was only used for close-up shots. Just because they cannot ride a horse they got jealous of me and released the video.
I rode a horse in Rangoon too, it’s not new for me. Mishti said she was asked to speak up, but who is making her speak? It’s all about ganging up against me. Sonu and I share a personal trainer. Again, situations were manipulated to force people to speak against me. Some trade experts were forced to show our film’s collections as half of the actual numbers. All the people who pretend that they don’t have PRs send the maximum number of mails against others. One smear campaign was started by Karan Johar’s gang against me by paying reviewers. When I talk about it, people think I sound like a loony character, but what option am I left with?

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)