Showing posts with label Bimal Roy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bimal Roy. Show all posts

Kamini Kaushal, leading lady in first hits of Dilip Kumar and Dev Anand, passes away

Veteran actress Kamini Kaushal, last seen in Laal Singh Chaddha, Kabir Singh dies at 98

Avijit Ghosh (THE TIMES OF INDIA; November 14, 2025)

Kamini Kaushal, who made her film debut in Chetan Anand’s classic ‘Neecha Nagar’ (1946), who sparkled as the leading lady in the first box-office hits of Dilip Kumar (‘Nadiya Ke Par’, 1948) and Dev Anand (‘Ziddi’, 1948), and who enjoyed a fruitful second innings as character actor in films such as ‘Upkar’ (1967) and ‘Do Raaste’ (1970), passed away at her Mumbai residence late Thursday night. She was 98. The news was confirmed by Sajan Narain, a close friend of the family, to news agency PTI.

Like the leading character of her last film, ‘Laal Singh Chaddha’ (2022), Lahore-born Kaushal’s career too was marked by her presence in significant moments of film history. ‘Neecha Nagar’ was a Grand Prix winner at Cannes. Raj Kapoor also acted with her in his second film, ‘Jail Yatra’ (1947).

Kaushal was the first heroine with whom Dilip Kumar formed a winning pair. ‘Shaheed’ (1948), ‘Shabnam’ (1949) and ‘Arzoo’ (1950), being three other films. In the opening credits, she was billed above Kumar in all these films, which underscores her seniority and star value at the time.

Director Bimal Roy’s ‘Biraj Bahu’ (1954), based on Saratchandra’s 19th century novel, was the high noon of her acting career. Kaushal was pitch-perfect in the title role capturing the tone and tang of a rural Bengal homemaker whose life unspools from idyllic to calamitous.

The Times of India described her performance as “dignified, refined, sympathetic, beautiful, rounded to the last nuance and shade and tone of expression, a histrionic gem of flawless perfection, the finest of her career.” It fetched her Filmfare’s best actress award.

Her second innings as a supporting actor began with Manoj Kumar’s ‘Shaheed’ (1965), where she played his mother. She became a regular in his positive nationalism films. ‘Upkar’ (1967) offered her the stand-out part of a widow torn between two sons with opposing approaches to life. Another notable role came in Raj Khosla’s superhit family drama, ‘Do Raaste’ (1969), where she played an amiable bhabhi who tries her best to keep the family from falling apart. In Ravi Tandon’s ‘Anhonee’ (1970), Kaushal delivered a deliciously wicked surprise to her fans playing the devious and plotting stepmother willing to kill for money.

Life dealt her unkind cuts. Born on Feb 24, 1927, Uma (her real name) lost her renowned botanist father, Shiv Ram Kashyap, when only 7. The five siblings -- two brothers and three sisters -- were brought up by her mother. Undeterred, she graduated from Lahore’s Kinnaird College displaying a flair for sport and plays.

Then Kaushal’s elder sister died in a motor crash and she “came to Bombay to nurse her two little nieces and her brother-in-law BS Sood who had been seriously injured. She decided to look after him as a wife for the rest of her life” wrote Sushila B Rani in the book, Stars of the Indian Screen (1952). Sood was an officer with Bombay Port Trust.

At this stage, she was offered ‘Neecha Nagar’ by Chetan Anand, who named her Kamini Kaushal. In 1954, she also acted and produced ‘Chalis Baba Ek Chor’, a comedy with a bunch of kids that flopped.

Kaushal participated actively in public life and freely spoke her mind. While inaugurating a women’s section of the Indo-Soviet Cultural Society in Bombay in 1958, she underlined the need to build closer understanding between the peoples of India and the Soviet Union. “Cinema was never my be-all and end-all,” she told TOI in 2008.

In 1969, G D Khosla committee’s report on Film Censorship spoke up in favour of celluloid kissing which created a strong conservative backlash. Kaushal supported the report. “A kissing sequence done gracefully would be a good substitute for blaring erotic songs,” she said at a Lions Club function in Delhi that year.

Making puppets was a passion in her late life. She was also an active chairperson for the Children’s Film Society of India. Kaushal floored everyone with her spirit, elegance and self-deprecating humour while delivering the Filmfare Lifetime Achievement award acceptance speech in 2015. “Ours was a quieter period…may be our eyes spoke more than our bodies,” she said. The audience connected and clapped.

But there was also a tinge of sadness. “I am missing our gang today. Most of them are gone. Just not fair. I feel very lonely here today. All of them are disappearing and going away one by one. Which breaks your heart…,” she said. Everyone stood up when she finished her speech.

Now Kamini Kaushal has joined her gang.

Restored Do Bigha Zamin to premiere at Venice


The restored version of Bimal Roy’s film will have its world premiere at the Venice Film Festival in the Venice Classics section. Meanwhile, Bandini, Devdas and Madhumati are also being restored
Niharika Lal (BOMBAY TIMES; July 13, 2025)

Do Bigha Zamin (1953) marked a turning point in Indian cinema. While most films of that era were shot within the confines of a studio, director Bimal Roy broke the mould and took the camera to the streets, paving the way for realism in Indian filmmaking. Now the film, restored by the Film Heritage Foundation (FHF), the Criterion Collection and Janus Films, will be screened at the Venice Film Festival’s Classics section.

Gulzar, who worked with Roy, spoke to us about the film’s legacy. “It’s amazing that Do Bigha Zamin is restored and will be shown in Venice. The most important element is that all of his films were based on literature. Not many people know that Do Bigha Zamin is based on a poem by Rabindranath Tagore, with the same title.”

How was the film restored
Do Bigha Zamin was restored in 4K by the Criterion Collection and Janus Films, in collaboration with Film Heritage Foundation, at L’Immagine Ritrovata and Resillion, and in association with the Bimal Roy family.

The restoration process took over three years. It began in 2022, when the Criterion Collection/Janus Films and Film Heritage Foundation initiated the project. The FHF accessed the original camera negative and sound negative, which had been deposited by the Bimal Roy family at the NFDC–National Film Archive of India (NFAI) for preservation.

However, the sound negative presented several issues, including poor audio quality, interrupted dialogues, and missing sections. The original camera negative was also incomplete. A combined dupe negative - on Dupont/Kodak stock from 1954–55 was found at the British Film Institute (BFI) which was also used for the restoration

The restoration drew from the best surviving elements the 35 mm picture and sound negatives preserved at NFAI and the 35 mm combined dupe negative from the BFI.

Bimal da was the coolest director I have ever seen: Gulzar
I started working with Bimal da, who we used to call Dada, from the film “Kabuliwala” when I was his chief assistant. I have very fond memories of that time. People would say that Bimal-da was like a married print. In those days, the picture and sound negatives were separate and when they were brought together optically to make the release print, it would be called a married print.

Bimal da would shoot two shifts in a day – 7 am to 2 pm and 2 pm to 10 pm and would then sit in the editing room working till late night at Mohan Studios. People would say that he is married to films.

Bimal da was the coolest director I have ever seen. I learnt not only filmmaking from him, but the art of patience and stamina.

I am sharing a poetic portrait that I wrote on Bimal-da.
"The softly flowing river face shrouded in the evening mists
Eyes burning in the mistiness of a tawny visage
The spiral of smoke from the endlessly burning cigarette
The faraway voice heavy with sleep.
Shadowed below unknown thoughts that flew above
A face that seemed etched out of molten wax
The sound of every new dream transforms him
Making it seem he would neither sleep, nor wake, nor speak
A silent flowing river shrouded in evening mists."

(From the book “Caged . . .Memories Have Names”)

'Do Bigha Zamin changed the face of Indian cinema: Shivendra Singh Dungarpur, director of Film Heritage Foundation
Do Bigha Zamin changed the face of Indian cinema that brought filmmakers out of the studio to begin shooting on the streets. I am so happy that we were able to collaborate with The Criterion Collection/Janus Films to restore not only Do Bigha Zamin, but other classics of Bimal Roy like Devdas, Madhumati and Bandini, which are in the process of being restored.”

Do Bigha Zamin, is an unspoken autobiography of Bimal Roy: Rinki Roy Bhattacharya, Aparajita Roy Sinha, Joy Bimal Roy
After watching Vittorio De Sica’s film Bicycle Thieves, our father hoped Indian films would follow its deeply moving humanist vision. Do Bigha Zamin, is an unspoken autobiography of Bimal Roy who was cast off from his home in East Bengal in a similar episode like the hero, peasant, Sambhu Mahato. He never recovered from this cruel separation from his beloved birthplace.

Satyajit Ray on “Do Bigha Zamin”
“With his very first film Udayer Pathe (Humrahi in Hindi), Bimal Roy was able to sweep aside the cobwebs of the old tradition and introduce a realism and subtlety that was wholly suited to the cinema. He was undoubtedly a pioneer. He reached his peak with a film that still reverberates in the minds of those who saw it when it was first made. I refer to Do Bigha Zamin, which remains one of the landmarks of Indian cinema.”

Raj Kapoor on “Do Bigha Zamin”
Perhaps the best compliment came from Raj Kapoor, who upon watching the film, reportedly said, “I wish I had made this film.”

We're no longer defined by the men in our lives-Vidya Balan

‘WE’RE NO LONGER   DEFINED BY THE   MEN IN OUR LIVES’
What Vidya says is echoed by an increasingly large number of people from the industry. On Women’s Day we explore how Indian cinema is reflecting this
Niharika Lal (BOMBAY TIMES; March 8, 2024)

‘Why can’t substantial roles for women be the mainstay?’
Vidya Balan, who has films like Kahaani, The Dirty Picture, Sherni, Shakuntala Devi and Tumhari Sulu to her credit, said recently, “For me, it was never a conscious decision to break the glass ceiling. I didn’t see the glass ceiling; I just saw the sky. We had Meena Kumari, Rekha, Jaya Bhaduri, Sridevi, Hema Malini, Smita Patil, Tabu – invariably, every female actor had just one or two of those (lead) films in their entire career, spanning decades. I wondered, ‘Why can’t it be the mainstay? Why can’t women be just doing substantial films?’… I think maybe the world was moving in that direction, and that’s why I had the desire in me, too. It all aligned. The universe responded with great opportunities. And today, we have a situation that is far better for women.”

‘Writers and makers are now ensuring that women characters have individuality’
A big reason for more realistic female characters is the evolved writing. Veteran writer Anjum Rajabali tells us, “Filmmakers like Bimal Roy, Mehboob Khan, Gulzar, and Vishal Bhardwaj have shown that there is enough space even in popular cinema to write individualistic, non-stereotyped female characters. In recent times, this is precisely what the newer generation of filmmakers has begun to ensure that women characters are characterized with individuality and are not stereotyped.”

Anu Singh Chowdhury, who has written Aarya and Grahan, adds, “The awareness that we need to tell our own stories has led to a lot of women pushing their way into the writers’ room by putting the proverbial foot in the door. Many such aspects have led to so many wonderful female characters now being loved and leading the show. We as writers now focus on closing character arcs of each character, and that has definitely led to adding more nuances instead of the cardboard (or stereotypes of) women characters one would often see, especially in mainstream cinema. That’s a huge win, I would say. Thankfully not just women writers, but even the male writers are becoming more aware of this.”

‘It is her decision’
Mrunmayee Lagoo, who has written Thappad, says that the film’s team had many discussions, reflections, and drew from their personal experiences to debate if ‘just one slap’ is grounds for divorce. They realized that whatever Taapsee’s character does is her decision. It can’t be everyone’s decision. Not everyone is in a position to take such a step. But for her, even if it is ‘just’ one slap, it’s not okay. Elaborating on the part of the story when the husband doesn’t even acknowledge that what he did was wrong, she says, “That period was very important for us to keep. And that’s how she decides that I don’t know what I want to do, but I know that I don’t want to be in this space with you now.”

‘Earlier, even when women had agency, they stayed subordinate to men’
Strong women characters in our films are not new. In films such as Bandini (1963) and Sujata (1959), the women characters were strong and had agency. However, writers say that the perception of what’s a women’s place in the society was so entrenched that even when strong roles were written for them, their position within the gender dynamic remained that of a subordinate, which has now changed.

“Bimal Roy always ensured that his female characters were sharply defined, had a personality and a strong sense of individualism. Whether in Parakh, Bandini, or Sujata, there was nuanced layering,” says Rajabali. However, he says that even in films like Bandini, “no matter what the woman is in life, when it concerns the gender equation, there is a certain position that she naturally occupies.”

Similarly, Shabana Azmi has spoken about how for Arth (1982), distributors insisted on changing the last scene where her character refuses to take back her unfaithful husband. She said, “Distributors said it’s a very powerful film, but you have to change the end. Hindustani mard apni biwi se maafi maang raha hai, biwi kaise maaf nahi karegi? Anyway, Mahesh Bhatt and I decided that this is what we want to do, and didn’t change the end. I won the National Award for that film.”

‘WE’RE NO LONGER   DEFINED BY THE   MEN IN OUR LIVES’

Javed Akhtar once said, ‘Aapne Kashmir ke liye toh jhagda kar liya, aap ne Urdu ke liye kyun nahi kiya?’-Gulzar

‘Urdu is an inherently Indian language.  I’m not worried about its future: Gulzar

What questions do you pose to a man whose legacy spans eight decades? But Gulzar has a way of holding forth when we meet him at his Mumbai bungalow. Dressed in his signature white kurta pyjamas, the 89-year-old, who has just got the 58th Jnanpith Award, spoke to Mohua Das about how languages adapt and endure
Mohua Das (THE TIMES OF INDIA; February 25, 2024)

Congratulations on the Jnanpith Award for your lifelong work in Urdu. Does this recognition make you optimistic about the future of the Urdu language despite talk of its decline?
I don’t agree it’s a dying language nor am I worried about its future. Jis zubaan mein aap se main baat kar raha hun, aap sun rahe hai, yeh Urdu nahin toh kya hai? (the tongue I’m speaking to you in, what do you call it if not Urdu?) The Urdu script may not be as prevalent or common today, because professionally it’s not required or popular. But the script isn’t the language itself. The language itself is still alive as it always was. Urdu literature, from the works of Ghalib to Khusro, is available in Hindi Devanagari script. Urdu is spoken daily. Even in Hindi films, isn’t it Urdu? Urdu and Hindi are essentially the same language. It’s the script that keeps varying — sometimes Devanagari, sometimes Urdu. I write in both these scripts, but my main medium is still Urdu. Secondly, let’s not forget, Urdu was born in India. It’s not foreign. Like it happens in the growth of any significant language, Urdu’s phonetics derive from various languages like Awadhi, Prakrit, Braj Bhasha, and Dakhini, yet it remains essentially Hindustani. As Gandhiji said: ‘Leave aside the Hindi-Urdu debate, call it Hindustani... because it belongs to Hindustan.’

Yes, both you and Javed Akhtar have always reiterated that Hindi and Urdu are twins...
They are indeed twins. Javed saab has very rightly pointed out that if their grammar is the same, how can they be considered different languages? I quote Javed saab when he once said, ‘Aapne Kashmir ke liye toh jhagda kar liya, aap ne Urdu ke liye kyun nahi kiya?’ (You’ve fought for Kashmir, why not for Urdu?) It’s your language, after all. However, he also acknowledges that there’s no need to fight for it because promotion of Urdu is essentially the promotion of our own Indian language. For instance, if we use English as a working language here, which comes from the UK and is referred to as the Queen’s language, are we in a constant battle over it? There’s Indian English, just as there’s American English. India, especially in terms of languages, is incredibly rich, and Urdu is a wonderful language that is inherently Indian and still very much alive and thriving.

Yet last year, a Delhi police circular banned the use of nearly 400 Urdu words in FIRs like ‘intezaam’, ‘guzarish’, ‘intiqam’, ‘mulzim’, ‘mujrim’. There’s a perception that Urdu is being punished for its association with the Muslim community…
I don’t see it as Urdu being punished. Urdu has always carried words that were originally Persian, Turkish and even from Uzbekistan. It’s fascinating how it got intertwined with our language here, and borrowed letters like ‘bha’, ‘pha’, ‘tha’, and ‘dha’ from Sanskrit. Today more words are coming in to replace Urdu words, much like how Hindi has incorporated many English terms. But should we really be banning these words? Imagine if we stopped using words like ‘railway’, ‘platform’, ‘car’, or ‘sir’ in everyday speech? If one is not prejudiced, you are able to see how language evolves over time.

Do you worry that it might be losing its secular character?
Honestly, I don’t share those concerns because they’re not entirely founded. If you meet a Tamilian from Chennai, what language do you think they’ll speak in? Tamil, right? Tamil, Marathi, Bangla — these are our classical languages, deeply rooted in our culture. Are they unsecular for not speaking Hindi? I think a few entities may be creating these fears or prejudices, but India doesn’t need to be taught secularism. Every Indian by their very nature and culture is secular. We speak a minimum of three languages and our ears encounter at least five to seven different languages every day. That is what defines Indian culture and strengthens our secular ethos. I’m optimistic about the resilience of language and the secular character of our society.

What can be done to make Urdu a part of daily conversation and culture?
One doesn’t need to make a deliberate effort. It will happen on its own. Languages are made by people. Take cinema, for instance. The language spoken in movies a decade ago is quite different from what it was 25 years ago. If you watch Bimal Roy’s ‘Devdas’ (1955) and compare it with P C Barua’s (1935), you’ll see a noticeable shift in expressions and vocabulary although it’s the same story in the same country played by different people at different times. Cinema is a great example of how people shape language. I think one needs to be open-minded, allowing language to naturally change and adapt, much like how seasons and eras define the environment around us. As our world becomes more interconnected, it’s only natural that various influences will continue to shape the Hindustani language, too.

You turn 90 this year. What are you currently busy with?
I’m hoping to work on a project that’s close to my heart — compiling all my prose and poetry about Mumbai into a book. I’ve decided to name it ‘Aamchi Mumbai’.

I’ve been honoured for films songs, but a literary award is special-Gulzar

 ‘The most dynamic poetry has  come out of Northeast recently’

Natasha Coutinho (BOMBAY TIMES; February 21, 2024)

As an author, poet, lyricist, director and screenwriter, he wears many hats. But Gulzar says that the Jnanpith – India’s highest literary award – is a special one, since an honour for literature is always close to his heart. Excerpts from a chat:

‘BIMAL ROY GOT ME TO WRITE FOR FILMS’
Gulzar feels that despite a literary body of work that goes back nearly 50 years, he has received more accolades for his film songs.

“I have got appreciation for film songs, but a literary award is special. I felt that maybe my literary work wasn’t reaching people. But then, this award proves that perception wrong, and I accept it with all humility. Literature has always been my principal fascination. In fact, I didn’t want to move to films, but it was (filmmaker) Bimal Roy who held my hand while I was working in a motor garage and brought me to write for films. I did not have much work in the garage so I would spend a lot of time reading. Even after I started working in cinema, I kept writing books.”

‘TAGORE IS A CLASSIC POET LIKE GHALIB’
Even today, the 89-year-old spends a lot of time reading the works of other writers and is aware of latest developments in contemporary Indian literature. He has translated contemporary Indian poetry from 34 languages and the works of nearly 300 poets.

“In recent years, the most dynamic and assertive poetry has come out of the Northeast. I’ve also been reading authors Ashok Vajpeyi, Dilip Chitre and Kishor Kadam, who writes under the pseudonym Saumitra in Marathi. As for writers and poets in Hindi cinema, Javed Akhtar has written poignant poetry in Urdu. Nida Fazli, who left us recently, has a wonderful body of work. Prasoon Joshi is also an important name in the field.”

Gulzar’s appreciation and love for the works of Rabindranath Tagore are well documented, and he has translated two volumes of the Nobel laureate. “Tagore is a classic poet like Ghalib. The more I delved into his works the more fascinated I was.”

‘PEOPLE ASSOCIATE ME WITH ROMANCE BECAUSE OF MY WORK IN CINEMA’
Gulzar has given the film industry some of its most iconic romantic songs. “People associate me with romance because of my work in films but I see romance in everything, even in the pain and struggle, and in my love for the nation. I would like to tell people, have an affair with life, you will enjoy it.”

Nostalgia is okay to learn from, but it is not a place to live in-Gulzar

Gulzar: Why isn’t  contemporary  literature a part  of the syllabus?

Debarati S Sen (BOMBAY TIMES; January 24, 2024)

The garden at Mumbai’s iconic David Sassoon Library was filled to capacity when acclaimed writer, lyricist, filmmaker and novelist Gulzar inaugurated the literature vertical of the Kala Ghoda Arts Festival 2024 with a session called ‘Yours Truly, with Gulzar’. The conversation led by literary historian Rakhshanda Jalil revolved around Gulzar’s early days in Mumbai, his connect with the city and Marathi literature. Excerpts:

‘I did not come to Mumbai to become an actor or join the film industry’
When asked about how he first landed in the city, Gulzar said, “Bahut purani baat hai, bahut saal hue. Sann kaun yaad rakhta hai, ab toh sann yaad rakhne se umr yaad aane lagti hai. Bahut saal hue Bambai mein aaye. Before I came here, jo baat mashhur saare Hindustan mein thi, usmein yeh tha ki, when a boy would run away from home, people would assume he had gone to Mumbai to become an actor. However, I did not come to here to become an actor or join the film industry. My elder brother was a businessman here, and since Delhi was filled with refugees everywhere and it was tough to live there, I was packed off to Bambai in the Frontier Mail with strict instructions ke, ‘Gaadi se mat utarna kahin. Tum apni ghazal kehte rahoge aur gaadi chali jayegi’. Unn dino double-decker buses sirf Bambai mein the and dumanzila bus bahut badi baat thi. Bori Bunder, Chowpatty mashhoor thi,” he said as he spoke about the city. “Meri baatein bahut mamuli, mamuli si hain, koi gyaan ki baatein nahi hain,” he said.

‘I wanted to see my books in different sizes and fonts’
Gulzar was fond of the Bengali language and is well versed in it. This helped him when he began his career in the film industry. Talking about his entry into films, he shared, “Main filmon mein bahut der ke baad aaya. I used to work in a motor garage where I met Bimal da’s (filmmaker Bimal Roy) assistant Debu, who later began to live with me. In those days, I used to meet Salil da (Salil Choudhury) and Shailendra. I had joined the Bombay Youth Choir created by Kishore da’s (Kishore Kumar) first wife, Ruma Guha Thakurta. But mujhe filmon mein jaana nahi tha because literature was my passion. Books were my passion and I wanted to see my books in different sizes and fonts. I told Debu mujhe nahi jaana filmon mein. Shailendra was a little senior to me and he scolded me and said, ‘Tum kya samajhte ho? Saare unpadh hain industry mein? Bimal da ke paas kahan kahan se log aayein hain naukari dhoonte hue. Aur tumhe aisa mauka mil raha hai!’ So, I went and met Bimal da, who was a legend in cinema. He told Debu in Bangla, ‘Ei bhodrolok ki kore jaanbe Boishnob kobita ta ki’ (How will this gentleman know what Vaishnav kavita is, referring to a situation for a song in his film Bandini). Debu immediately told him, ‘Dada, he knows Bangla very well and understands everything’. And Bimal Da blushed. His beautiful face would become bright red when he blushed. Behrhal unhone mujhe bola Sachin Da se milo. Sachin Da ne mujhe tune batayi and uss pe maine likha, ‘Mora gora ang laile, mujhe Shyam rang dei de’."

‘Maharashtrian toh zaroor keh lete hain log mujhe, which I deserve after staying here for so long’
Gulzar spoke about how he slowly met and got to know the literary greats of Maharashtra. “Gradually, I got to know the Maharashtrian writers here, including some senior writers. In those days, I didn’t understand Marathi well, today I do. But itna mujhe maloom hai ki jo bhi mila, kisi ne mujhe gaali nahi di (in Marathi).”

He interacted with several Maharashtrian writers and poets, like P L Deshpande and Arun Shevate, and also translated their works, including Kusumagraj’s book. “So that’s my relationship with Marathi literature. Ab itne barson mein, deel-daul se kahin jawani me agar patle hote, toh koi mujhe Maratha kehta, lekin Maharashtrian toh zaroor keh lete hain log mujhe, which I deserve after staying here for so long.”

‘Why are only classics being taught in schools?’
Gulzar believes contemporary literature should be included in the syllabus. “Students should know about the poems and literature that is relevant. Har daur ki apni shayari hai, aaj ke students jo textbook mein nazmein padh rahein hain, that is not relevant to this time, because only classic literature is being taught. Why isn’t contemporary literature in the syllabus? Why are only classics being taught in schools? Aaj ka literature hona zaroori hai. That is important. Nostalgia is okay to learn from, but it is not a place to live in.”

Shailendra's 100th birth anniversary: As a Dalit, he had a first-hand experience of misery and caste discrimination-Sheoraj Singh


Shailendra (left) and music director Roshan. The two collaborated for the songs in films like Soorat Aur Seerat (1966). (Below) The song Awara hoon from the film Awara was a worldwide hit

Avijit Ghosh (THE TIMES OF INDIA; August 30, 2023)

For decades, Awara Hoon (film: Awara, 1951) was a passport to warmth for any Indian visiting the USSR, Turkey, Egypt, China and parts of Africa. The best-selling track even finds mention in dissident Soviet writer Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s novel, Cancer Ward (1966). And Mera Joota Hai Japani (film: Shree 420, 1955) makes appearances in films as diverse as Mississippi Masala (1991) and Deadpool (2016). The lyrics of Shailendra, whose birth centenary falls today, could remarkably create the universal from the local and the personal.

Shailendra’s life was his poetry’s wellspring. His roots lay in Dhuspur village near Bihar’s Arrah town. But he was born in Rawalpindi (now in Pakistan), where his father worked as a contractor. When his father fell ill, the family fell on hard times and shifted to Mathura where they would subsist on “a meal a day and a beedi at night,” says the preface of Andar Ki Aag (2013), a book on his previously unpublished poems.

The experience finds expression in the slum dweller song of Shree 420, ‘Bhookh ne hai bade pyaar se pala’. (hunger raised me with love). Only someone who had experienced hunger could dream of roti (bread) as he does in Ujala (1959): ‘Chulha hai thanda bada aur pet mein aag hai/Garma garam roti kitna hasi khwab hai’ (The hearth is cold and my stomach rages with hunger/To dream of bread is so beautiful).

The book also talks about Shailendra’s real name (Shankardas Rao), his Dalit background and the caste slurs he faced playing hockey (‘Ab yeh log bhi khel khelenge’ (Now even these people will play the game) making him give up the sport.

Writer Sheoraj Singh “Bechain” says that during the Progressive Artistes era in the 1940s, many writers wrote on the oppressed. “But as a Dalit, Shailendra had a first-hand experience of misery and caste discrimination. Distress isn’t just economic but also social and cultural,” says Bechain, a Dalit, and author of the acclaimed biography, ‘Mera Bachpan Mere Kandhon Par’.

Shailendra left Mathura for Bombay where he worked in the railways and became part of the Left-cultural forum, IPTA. The story of Raj Kapoor being impressed by his poem ‘Jalta Hai Punjab’, asking him to write in his films, Shailendra’s initial reluctance, and then later writing the last two songs of ‘Barsaat’ (1949) because he needed the money has been written before. In time, he would become a regular in films of Kapoor and Bimal Roy; his lyrics seamlessly fitting into their socially-conscious narratives.

A running thread in Shailendra’s celluloid verse is his empathy with the disadvantaged. “Staying within the matrix of the film’s script and the character’s needs, he commented on society and politics of the times. And he spoke up for the last human who’s uncared for by the government, the society and everyone else,” says radio personality Yunus Khan, who is writing a book analysing Shailendra’s poetry.

Lyricist Raj Shekhar (Tanu Weds Manu) adds to the view saying while many lyricists wrote emphatically about the marginalised, one can see a distance between the writer and those being written about. “But when you listen to Shailendra, you feel that distance has been dissolved. He seems to be one of them. And that’s because he is writing from lived-in experience,” he says.

In times when poets were often prisoners of pompous words that evaded ordinary people, Shailendra was accessible even to the rural illiterate. And yet as the late songwriter Dev Kohli once said, “Like the dohas (couplet) that Kabir wrote, he could encapsulate a world in a few words.”

‘Sajan Re Jhoot Mat Molo Khuda Ke Paas Jaana Hai’ (film: ‘Teesri Kasam’, 1966) is simple yet profound. ‘Aa Chalke Tujhe Main Lele Chaloon’ (film: ‘Door Gagan Ki Chhaon Mein’, 1964) imagines a world without discord (‘Jahan Bair Na Ho’) and hope much like John Lennon’s ‘Imagine’ (1971). That he could also write, ‘Chahe Koi Mujhe Junglee Kahein’ (film: ‘Junglee’, 1961) or the fun tracks of ‘Half-Ticket’ (1962) is a tribute to his versatility.

Shailendra produced ‘Teesri Kasam’. The Basu Bhattacharya-directed film, now hailed as a classic, flopped then. The poet passed away the same year. But even today much of his poetry remains quotable and relevant, none more than the line from ‘Jis Desh Mein Ganga Behti Hai’ (1960): ‘Mil jul ke raho aur pyaar karo, ek cheez yahi jo rehti hai’ (Stay together in harmony, love each other, this is all that lives in the end). As Bechain says, “His poetry rises above caste and religion, and seeks to establish a bond between humans.”
---------------------------------------
Indrajeet Singh (THE TIMES OF INDIA; August 30, 2023)

Released in India in 1951, ‘Awara’ was first shown in Russia in September, 1954. The film was dubbed in Russian but the songs remained in Hindi. The title song became an anthem of Indian culture and friendship for Russians. Tagore, Premchand, Kabir are also very popular in translation. But Shailendra’s songs were embraced by Russians in their original form. I have lived in Moscow for six years and a witness to the immense popularity of Raj Kapoor and Shailendra.

I was told by a Russian scholar of Hindi, E Chelishev, in 2003 that he had edited a collection of poems, ‘Poets of India,’ in Russian way back in 1958. The collection also included two poems by Shailendra: ‘Janmabhoomi’ and ‘15 August.’

When Shailendra visited Moscow in March 1962, he was very happy to learn that two of his poems had been translated into Russian. Shailendra was fond of the great Russian poet Pushkin. There was a similarity between the two. Both were great poets of love and revolution. Both died at a relatively young age. Raj Kapoor used to address Shailendra as Pushkin.

The author’s monograph, Bharatiya Sahitya ke Nirmata: Shailendra, will be out Saturday
---------------------------------------
Avijit Ghosh (THE TIMES OF INDIA; August 30, 2023)

Shailendra also performed cameos in a few films such as ‘Boot Polish’ (1954) and ‘Musafir’ (1957). In ‘Boot Polish’, he lip syncs a folk song he wrote, ‘Chali kaun se desh’ (singers: Talat Mehmood and Asha Bhonsle, music: Shankar-Jaikishan). Indeed, he was a master at writing songs flavoured with folk.
Sahitya Akademi recipient poet Anamika says that Shailendra was especially sensitive to soundscapes and was all ears for the chitchat on the footpaths and the folksongs floating in the villages of Bihar, Punjab and Maharashtra. “This is what gives his lyrics an epical dimension and makes him a popular writer of chorus,” she says.

Anamika also points out Shailendra’s sensitivity to “the push and joy of women’s language especially in the folkloric mode and the subversive quality of their humour which hoots out and titillates in the same go”. ‘Paan khaye saiyan hamaar, (film: Teesri Kasam) is a case in point.

Shailendra’s some other note worthy folk songs include ‘Ho daiya re daiya chadh gayo papi bichhua’ (film: ‘Madhumati’, 1957) and ‘Lali lali doliya pe laali re dulhaniya’ (film: Teesri Kasam). He also wrote the songs of the first Bhojpuri film, ‘Ganga Maiya Tohe Piyari Chadhaibo’, 1962), including the classic, ‘Sonwa ke pinjra mein’ (singer: Mohd Rafi, composer: Chitragupt).

I don’t understand where this thought comes from ki hero wali picture zyada chalti hai. It is not true-Sanjay Leela Bhansali

sanjay leela bhansali

On Women's Day, Sanjay Leela Bhansali slams the perception that it is safer for a filmmaker to invest in a ‘hero-led story’ since the audience prefers that
Anshul Chaturvedi (BOMBAY TIMES; March 8, 2022)

Sanjay Leela Bhansali, whose last two mega projects have been focused on two very different female characters around whom the stories revolved – Rani Padmavati of Chittor and Gangubai Kathiwadi of Kamathipura – is dismissive of the sentiment that has prevailed in Bollywood over the past couple of decades that sees ‘women-oriented films’ succeeding at the Box Office as an exception, while the default setting is that you need a ‘hero’ to get the crowds in.

“Who says that the nation doesn't want to see a women-oriented story or a heroine-oriented story? Who says that they are not going to see it?” fumes the filmmaker, who is fascinated by the work of the veterans of yesteryear and how they weaved together enduring stories centred around women characters.

“There are so many shades of a woman, and this needs to be told on celluloid. I mean, just look at it from decades back Bimal Roy did it and worked on it in Sujata and Bandini. Raj Kapoor did Ram Teri Ganga Maili, Bobby. There were filmmakers who did such wonderful work. V Shantaram ji did such wonderful films on women such as Stree. Mehboob Khan did Mother India. Now why have these -women led films – become a lesser category, I don’t understand.”

He pauses and then reflects on a consistent theme in his filmography – layers and undercurrents. “There are so many layers if I have to tell a woman's story. Shyam Benegal did a lot of women-centred stories like Bhumika. They are the most beautiful characters to tell the story about. There are so many shades. Endless shades! Most celebrated directors have made films on women – from Mother India to Pakeezah to Mughal-e-Azam. Mughal-e-Azam was Anarkali’s story. Even if I make Devdas, it is the story of Chandramukhi and Paro primarily. Or you talk about Sujata and Bandini, they are all women-oriented films. The cinema of Yash Chopra they were all strong women-oriented films. Satyajit Ray made Charulata. Ritwik Ghatak’s cinema. If you look at all those films, they were all beautiful stories of women. This nation has celebrated those filmmakers. This nation has celebrated those films as the biggest hits of the country. As the most landmark films of this country.”

Prod him on why, then, has the belief that it takes a male lead to pull off a commercial hit prevailed in the industry for a while, and he rips into it. “You keep hearing that it is all a hero industry, hero industry I don't know who spread it. Where is this concept of a hero-oriented industry ki hero ki picture chalegi, wahin paisa daalo, heroine ki picture pe mat daalo where has this come from? I don’t understand where does this thought come from that in our industry, hero wali picture zyada chalti hai. It is not true! We are blaming the audience wrongly. A handful of people have just unnecessarily muddled the mind, and constantly keep imposing it on people, on the industry over the years. Especially the 80s onwards. I haven't understood where this comes from. And I hope to do my bit to change it. Padmaavat did great business, despite all the controversy. If Gangubai does well, as it is doing at the moment, more and more, then it will bring in a lot of those wonderful filmmakers who may today feel a little stifled about saying for a film that is centred around a female character kaise banayenge?”

The adoration made me feel like a fraud-Dilip Kumar


THE TIMES OF INDIA (July 8, 2021)

On being Dilip Kumar
I used to feel disturbed about the adoration of the crowds, and I felt that I was cheating them in some manner. I felt like a fraud…this was getting to be a serious problem, so I decided to seek psychiatric help. The question was of reconciling the filmi personality of Dilip Kumar with my own.

On film-makers
The film-maker subsists on a paltry 15% of the box-office turnover. Even this is the share only when the film is a success. And how many films are successes? Out of 100 films released, only 6 or 7 are hits…do you know how great film-makers like Bimal Roy and Mehboob fared? Bimal Roy died within 15 days of the attachment of his house. Mehboob died in debt. So did Debaki Bose.

Why he never made films after Ganga Jumna
It’s painful to look for financiers, deal with them, pay high rates of interest and at the end, expose yourself to the indignity of going through censorship. Members of the Censor Board do not realise that as a quasi-judicial body, they owe an obligation to the better picture maker...my own film was hanging fire for more than 6 months.

On living with Saira Banu
I think I’m a much pampered husband – she calls me jaan…we never had a disagreement which lasted a whole day, and she has put up with a lot of nonsense from me. You know, she’s a very good Dilip Kumar customer, or “fan”, and seeing me at close quarters has not diminished her enthusiasm for him.

On what he regrets
I deeply regret that I never learnt to sing, because I love music. I did learn to play the sitar, but just a little bit. I learnt a bit about a lot of things. Ultimately I've come to the conclusion that one has to be a master of something. I’m just a jack of many trades.

On his work
If people believe that I’m a great actor, it’s nice. But I don’t agree…the great ones are Ingrid Bergman, Paul Muni, James Stewart, Robert de Niro, Dustin Hoffman…

(From interviews to TOI, Filmfare and Gentleman)

Dilip Kumar always used his voice effectively, modulating it to the situation-Vyjayanthimala


Priya Menon (THE TIMES OF INDIA; July 8, 2021)

Vyjayanthimala Bali, who was cast opposite the thespian in four of his landmark films – Devdas, Madhumati, Naya Daur and Ganga Jumna – says working with him was an education and an experience that forged a lifelong association.

“When Bimal da asked me to play Chandramukhi (for Devdas), I was in awe because I would be acting with the Tragedy King. But he made it very comfortable,” says Vyjayanthimala, who at 86 continues to pursue her passion for Bharatanatyam.

The first scene she enacted with him was simple enough. “The line was ‘Aur mat piyo Devdas’ (Don’t drink anymore, Devdas). I had to say it when Devdas walked in drunk. The camera was to capture Devdas and then follow him and turn its focus on me when I spoke that line with an expression of anguish and helplessness.”

She thought it would be easy. “As the technicians announced readiness to shoot and Bimal da looked at me to know if I was ready, I realised Dilip sahab was not on the sets. An assistant told me he was taking brisk rounds of the studio to get that tired, weary look and he had instructed them to start the camera when he would stagger in with beads of real sweat on his brow and a look of exhaustion.” 

Vyjayanthimala says that was the precise moment when she began to panic. “Here was an actor who took so much trouble to endow realism and here was me who had not done any preparation and was all set to face the camera. When it started and I saw the incredible perfection of Dilip sahab’s performance, all I could do was helplessly speak the line: ‘Aur mat piyo, Devdas’. The helpless look on my face was what Bimal da wanted.”

In ‘Madhumati’, he hears a voice and goes in search. A girl’s face emerges from the fog and he asks: “Who are you?” She replies, “Madhumati.” The scene was brilliant in the way it was conceived and performed, recalls Vyjayanthimala. “Dilip sahab always used his voice effectively, modulating it to the situation and the best moments in ‘Madhumati’ showed how well he used the texture of his soft voice to enhance the suspense and mystery.”

For him, she says, it was all about timing. “He said interaction is more important than action, ie, the way you react to the other character. And that the timing of any gesture – even a nod of the head – matters. I was able to do it because my Bharatanatyam foundation helped me emote and have quick reflexes,” she says.

Vyjayanthimala left the industry, but continued to share a bond with Saira Banu. She remembers the time when she met them in 2017. “I went to Mumbai with my son Suchindra to receive an award. Saira sent a car, and I visited Dilip sahab. He had attendants around him and Saira tried to coax him awake, saying, “See who has come, Dhanno (Vyjayanthimala’s character in ‘Ganga Jamuna’) has come. He opened his eyes, it was just a flicker. Saira asked me how he looked, and I said he looks as good as he did in ‘Madhumati’. I met them again in 2019 but he was very quiet.”

(Includes excerpts from Dilip Kumar: The Substance and The Shadow by Udaya Tara Nayar)

When director David Lean told FTII: ‘Something’s wrong with your teaching’


Avijit Ghosh (THE TIMES OF INDIA; April 22, 2021)

New Delhi: Oscar-winning British film director David Lean visited Pune’s FTII (Film and Television Institute of India) campus in the early 1960s, watched a bunch of short films made by the students and tersely told the teachers, “Something is wrong with your teaching,” reveals a new book brought out to celebrate 60 years of the institution.

The attention-grabbing nugget is part of an article written by Hindi film director Sriram Raghavan (Johnny Gaddaar, Andhadhun) following a conversation with actor-director Asrani. Both are FTII graduates. Asrani, who belonged to the first batch, was in the campus when the Oscar-winning director made his visit.

Lean (Lawrence Of Arabia) made his remark after noticing that the diploma films made by the students were derivative in nature. “I can tell you which shot is from which German or Czech or French film. You should watch the films of V Shantaram and Bimal Roy too,” he said, according to the article.

For the record, FTII went on to produce many first-rate directors and actors: Adoor Gopalakrishnan, Shaji Karun, Subhash Ghai, Jaya Bhaduri, Shabana Azmi, Naseeuddin Shah, Om Puri, Rajkummar Rao, to name a few.

Raghavan further writes that Lean had come to India on a holiday with his fourth wife Leila Matkar who had relatives in Kolhapur. At that time the sets of Dr Zhivago were being erected in Madrid. “He was dressed in a bush shirt and pants and was wearing Kolhapuri chappals,” Asrani told him. 

Interestingly, the British filmmaker’s name also figured in the interview of award-winning Malayalam film director Shaji Karun (Piravi). He had applied for a seat in FTII’s cinematography course and was quizzed about his views on the photography in David Lean’s films.

“The simple confidence that soon I would be on the train back home gave me the audacity to openly expose my lack of knowledge of the subject,” says Karun self-deprecatingly in the book, “Being FTII: Perspectives on the Film and Television Institute of India.”

I want my women to talk about things not related to men, romance, or marriage-Renuka Shahane

Kavita Awaasthi (HINDUSTAN TIMES; January 23, 2021)

“This year has started with a bang for me,” says actor-director Renuka Shahane, whose directorial venture Tribhanga released recently on an OTT platform. “I’m happy with the response to the film, the performances and that people related to what I tried to portray in the story. Indian stories are unique and they need to be shared with the entire world. My characters might have an education which is westernised but their choices and manner of living are rooted in Indianness, which is lovely to celebrate,” she says, adding her next film, too, might be about three women.

Often people feel female directors are able to highlight women’s issues pertinently, But Shahane doesn’t agree. “Directors like Gulzar, Bimal Roy, Guru Dutt have represented women beautifully. I think is it about being a sensitive human. It is not that women directors can’t represent men well, so the converse is also true. I feel I am still a work in a progress, as a writer or director. The stories I can believe in and understand are the ones I would like to share. I want my women to have names and talk about things that are not related to men, romance, or marriage, for heaven’s sake!” she says.

There has been a change in cinema over the years and in the last few years, content has become king across platforms. Talking about it, she says, “With OTT platforms, now there’s a space one wanted, to push the envelope in terms of content, without thinking about economic viability of a project. The more content we have, the more audience there will be for it - that’s a win-win situation. They will then expect good content even from mainstream films.”

Though I am not shrewd and manipulative, I survived in the industry for almost six decades-Birthday boy Dharmendra


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; December 8, 2018)

For years, he had nurtured the dream of becoming an actor, even confiding in his mother that he wanted to run away to Mumbai. She had stopped him, saying if he did, his strict schoolmaster father would turn her out too and suggested that he send out applications to film producers from Punjab instead. Dharamendra or Dharam Singh Deol as he was known then, had laughed at how ‘bholi’ she was. But soon afterwards, he saw an ad for the Filmfare talent-hunt contest inviting participants from across India, and filled out the application. He was shortlisted for the auditions and subsequently picked out as the winner by filmmakers Bimal Roy and Guru Dutt. And his dream of coming to (then) Bombay was realised.

Dharamji, who turns 83 today, is still just as passionate about films – he describes the medium as his “beloved” and asserts that he didn’t come here to make money or buy bungalows and cars. “I wanted to act so I could make a place for myself in people’s hearts. I rented an apartment initially and bought a Fiat car for Rs 18,000 (pictured on top) just before the release of my first film. I drove straight to the studio to give Bimal da the good news and took him out for a spin. He was very happy for me and assured me that I’d go far,” the actor reminisces, pointing out that though he’s not shrewd and manipulative, he’s survived in the industry for almost six decades and delivered over 100 hits with a lot of hard work and a “little bit of talent”.

Rajkumar Santoshi, a self-confessed Dharmendra fan, attributes the actor’s longevity as much to his versatility as to his innate goodness which his face reflects on screen, along with his honesty and simplicity. The filmmaker owes his break as a director in Ghayal to Dharam ji who put his trust in a rank newcomer who’d assisted Govind Nihalani and belonged to a different school of filmmaking. Santoshi’s original producer had dropped out because he wasn’t happy with his choice of hero, first Kamal Haasan, then, Sunny Deol. “Sunny took me to Rajasthan where Dharam ji was filming J P Dutta’s Batwara for a narration. He liked the story as much as Sunny had and asked me curiously if I was related to filmmaker P L Santoshi whom he knew well. On learning that I was his son, something I hadn’t divulged, he embraced me and told us to go ahead. Ghayal was the first film he lent his name to as a producer. It got us plenty of rewards and awards,” he says.

Santoshi goes on to point out that though a hugely under-rated actor, Dharamji’s range of histrionics in the films of the ’60s and ’70s had matched that of Dilip Kumar and Amitabh Bachchan. Four of Hrishikesh Mukherjee’s films alone – Satyakam, Anupama, Guddi and Chupke Chupke – had showcased his talent in diverse performances. “He was the only one to stand up to the Rajesh Khanna popularity wave in the ’70s with hits like Mera Gaon Mera Desh, Samadhi and Sholay, in which, despite Sanjeev Kumar and Amjad Khan having author-backed roles and Amitabh Bachchan at his brooding best, Dharam ji managed to stand out with his ‘soocide’ act atop the water tank,” Santoshi, known as an actor’s director, says, adding that his comic timing is also impeccable, as seen in Sholay and Pratigya . “When he serenaded his heroine with a 'Rafta Rafta' or a 'Yamla Pagla Deewana', he made the romance seem real and while he was flexing his muscles as a He-Man, there was a vulnerability to him that made you want to protect him. Not to forget, he was voted among the 10 most handsome men in the world at one point, he didn’t need cosmetic surgery and his hair is his own. Today, he’s still a very good-looking 83-year-old man,” he asserts.

Dharamji’s cousin, Guddu Dhanoa, says he’s proud to have a brother who’s so handsome. “At airports and other public places, I could see waves of adulation and admiration follow him, along with cries of, ‘Dharmendra... Dharmendra,’” says the director of films like Ziddi, Bichhoo and 23rd March 1931: Shaheed featuring Sunny and Bobby. “I was so proud to have such a handsome brother, one who visited us in Delhi when I was still in school, bringing with him hordes of fans into our home who wanted to speak to him and touch him. Army jawans came in trucks and blocked our lane so he could not run away. He was at the height of his stardom then, and I’ve heard when because of date problems there was talk of him dropping out of Sholay, the price per territory for the film fell from Rs 25 lakh to Rs 12 lakh,” says Dhanoa.

When I ask Dharam ji who only this year was seen in Yamla Pagla Deewana Phir Se, for the reason he has remained in people’s hearts for so long, he typically replies with a shayari he had just penned, “Mauka diya muqaddar ne, dil-dimag ek hue, neki bhi saath hui, mehnat aur mashaqqat ke, manzilein tai hoti gayi, aur hum surkh-ruu hue.”

Balraj Sahni would come for shoots with cops, returning to the Arthur Road Jail after pack up-Amrit Shah


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; May 10, 2018)

On December 14, 1961, Rabindranath Tagore’s birth centenary (he was born on May 7, 1861), Bimal Roy’s Kabuliwala, based on a short story by the Nobel Laureate, opened in the theatres. I watched the film as a teenager, on Doordarshan, and it was made unforgettable by Balraj Sahni who lent warmth and dignity to the Kabuliwala who in Kolkata befriends five-year-old Mini, who reminds him of the daughter he’d left behind in Afghanistan. There’s a heart-breaking poignancy in the Pathan’s story as just before he is to return, he gets into a scuffle with a neighbour who ows him money, and accidentally kills him. After an eight-year jail term, he comes with dry fruits for Mini, to find her in wedding finery, all set to go off to her father-in-law’s home for real. He realises then that even his daughter, whose palm imprint he carries, must be all grown-up too. It is at this crucial point, that Mini’s father decides to give the money kept aside for lights and a band, to the kabuliwala so that he can go back home to his own daughter.

On Tagore’s 157th birth anniversary, when I quizzed Amrit Shah, Roy’s long-time associate, about Sahni, he revealed that he’d first made the actor’s acquaintance at the Communist Party Headquarters he’d go for his meals where as a student council member. “After the party was banned, he was arrested and would come for shoots with cops, returning to the Arthur Road Jail after pack-up,” says Shah, who on Sahni’s request, let his Bengali director-friend, Prabhat Mukherjee, share his apartment for a couple of years. “By the time he started working on Kabuliwala, he was a big name.”

Shah adds that when the film was nearing completion, as was his habit, he went to Roy with a proposal to send to distributors asking for advance (Minimum Guarantee). To his surprise, the producer insisted they sell it on a simple commission, as they were flush with funds thanks to the overflow they were getting from Madhumati and Sujata. “There was no arguing with Bimal da so I informed the delighted distributors that they’d only have to pay for print and publicity,” he says.

Buzz is, after seeing the rough cut, Roy reshot certain scenes directed by Hemen Gupta, perhaps because he wanted his tribute to Tagore to be perfect and true to his craft. Shah won’t comment on this but acknowledges that the film was a failure commercially and cost their company big money. “Bimal da was unperturbed, moving on to his next project,” he marvels.

Roy’s son, Joy, who was around six then, recalls a hideous apparition from a dream sequence and two little boys playing the tabla. “They were Nikhil Ghosh’s (Padma Bhushan tabla maestro) sons, Nayan Jyoti and Dhruba Jyoti,” he smiles. Sonu, who played Mini, was his neighbour who lived in the bungalow across and came to play with him. “One morning, baba came down and whispered something in her ear and Sonu raced home. Five minutes later, she was back with a “Yes”. I presume he’d offered her the film and she returned with her parents’ consent. That was the only film Sonu ever did, moving away after some years,” Joy flashbacks, adding that by a strange coincidence a week ago, he made the acquaintance of her young nephew at his gym and learnt that Sonu was living in the US. We tried getting her to share her memories with us but she stayed out of reach.

However, Gulzar saab, who penned “Ganga Aaye Kahan Se, Ganga Jaye Kahan Re” which with its philosophy of universal acceptance, informs that he landed this opportunity after a song by his friend and the film’s original lyricist, Prem Dhawan, was rejected by Roy. Since they were recording the songs first, they needed an immediate replacement. “I was assisting dada by then and he asked Salil da (composer Salil Chowdhury) to get me to write one. I’d penned “Mora Gora Ang Lai Le” for Bandini aur mera reputation ban gaya tha. I demurred, even calling up Prem who begged me to do it or else Bimal da would stop him from going off on a tour with IPTA,” he narrates.

Gulzar saab had seen Rajen Tarafdar’s 1960 National Award-winning Bengali film, Ganga, and suggested to Chowdhury that they do something along the lines of his composition “Amar Dubaili Re”. The music director who was playing ping pong in the bedroom listened absentmindedly till the sound of Roy’s station wagon had him scurrying upstairs. The filmmaker watched him playing the piano silently from the door and Chowdhury nervously blurted out that he was wondering if they could do something on the lines of “Amar Dubaili Re”. Roy responded sardonically, “Dubane ke liye itna nahin sochna padta hai, gana banao,” and walked away.

“Salil da continued playing till he heard Bimalda’s car drive off, then told his assistant Kanu Ghosh to write the song with me and went back to his ping pong. 'Ganga Aaye Kahan Se' was on the same metre as the earlier song and five decades later, reminds us of a Kabuliwala and his story that still strikes a chord,” says Gulzar saab.

Films were sold on Dilip Kumar's name; in certain cases, he had no option but to intervene-Amrit Shah


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; January 11, 2018)

Cinema was an integral part of my growing up years. My mother would drag me to the theatres to see Roman Holiday, Quo Vadis and Spartacus. And on Sunday evenings I was allowed to park myself in front of the TV and catch a Hindi movie and Doordarshan was my introduction to Navrang, Hum Dono, Chalia and Devdas. Thereafter, every time I met Dilip Kumar, I’d remember him as Devdas slurring drunkenly, “Kaun kambakht hai jo bardasht karne le liye peeta hai, main to peeta hoon ki bas saans le sakoon.”

Amrit Shah, filmmaker Bimal Roy’s manager however reveals that while the actor was always in character through the making of the 1955 film, he never saw him inebriated. “Devdas might be drunk but Dilip Kumar never was,” asserts the nonagenarian, who goes on to recall how on the day of the film’s premiere in Kolkata, while the press was watching the tragic love story, Roy rushed Dilip Kumar and Suchitra Sen to New Theatres Studio where he shot a scene of Parvati returning home after her nuptials with a zamindar years older, to learn that Devdas has been drinking heavily. Since she still loves him, when they run into each other on the staircase, she stops for a brief chat, hoping to wean him off alcohol. “Even though the film was on the verge of being unveiled, Bimalda felt that the connecting link between two scenes was missing and when he got his actors together, he grabbed the opportunity to shoot it. It went by in a flash but he still incorporated it into the film later. That is the kind of meticulous director he was,” narrates Shah who’d joined Bimal Roy’s production company just six months before and remained close to the family even after his death on January 8, 1966.

During Madhumati which was filmed in Ranikhet and Ghorakhal in the Nainital district, Shah and Dilip Kumar lived under the same roof, in adjacent six-by-eight-feet rooms with a cordoned-off bath. The village was devoid of amenities, including bare necessities like electricity, tea, milk and even water. But there were no airs or starry tantrums from the leading man when he was asked to bathe rather than shower with a bucket of hot water or given a stringed ‘khatiya’ to sleep on. “He would eat meals with the unit, never missed his call time and after shooting, we’d often sit together and chat about everything, from cinema to religion,” narrates Shah, recalling how once, with the boldness of youth, he had quizzed the actor on rumours of his interference on the sets and how he had ghost-directed some of his films. “Yusuf bhai asked me if I had ever seen him give Bimal da instructions or even suggestions. But he admitted that in certain cases he had no option but to intervene if unsatisfied with the director, because films were being sold on his name and as the ‘hero’ he couldn’t afford to disappoint his fans.”

That shoot was an eye-opener for Shah. He flashbacks to a drive from Delhi to Nainital, that took them past a famous temple. They had to drive across a river over a sheet which served as a makeshift road. Halfway down it, the car slipped and stalled. Dilip Kumar’s fans instantly spotted him inside and crowded the car. Even as visions of mob violence flitted through Shah’s mind, he stepped out and spoke to the star-struck devotees. While doing so, he casually rested his hand on the car and tried to push it. Instantly, everyone around gave him a hand and car was back on track. “Smiling at his fans, Yusuf bhai got into the car and we crossed the river. But after about 100 metres, he asked the driver to stop and reasoned that pilgrims came to the temple and to the river every day to pray and we were passing by without stopping,” narrates Shah. To his surprise, the actor got out again, walked down the river bank, and scooping up some water washed his hands and feet, closed his eyes and prayed before proceeding to shoot for his paranormal romance drama with Vyjayanthimala playing three characters. Madhumati bagged nine Filmfare Awards, including best director for Bimal Roy.

Bandra gets Bimal Roy Path

Natasha Coutinho (MUMBAI MIRROR; January 9, 2017)

Bimal Roy, the man behind classics like Do Bigha Zamin, Parineeta, Sujata, and Bandini, now has a road in Bandra named after him - Bimal Roy Path. It was inaugurated on his 51st death anniversary on January 8 by Priya Dutt. The signboard has been designed by John Abraham's brother, Alan.

Bimal Roy's son, Joy, who has lived on Mount Mary Road all his life, still finds it hard to believe that a part of the road has been named after his father who moved there in 1954. “It was an important time in his life because that's when he started his first production, Do Bigha Zamin. It's a huge honour,“ he exults, recalling that his father was so unhappy with the way Kabuliwala had been shot that he spent the Rs two lakh in his bank account to reshoot the film, reasoning that he couldn't release a film he was unhappy with.

The family had been trying to get the road named after Roy when Sunil Dutt was MP. After he passed away, it was passed to his daughter, Priya, along with MLA Baba Siddiqui and Councillor Asif Zakaria. “Six months ago, I learnt that there's a proposal in the BMC to name the road after my father,“ he informs.

Directing? I am working towards it-Boman Irani

Enlarge Image
Boman Irani is currently hosting a five-part weekly series on late director Bimal Roy
Chaya Unnikrishnan (DNA; February 1, 2016)

To commemorate Bimal Roy’s 50th death anniversary Zee Classic is screening five iconic films made by the filmmaker. These include Do Bigha Zamin, Madhumati, Sujata, Bandini and Devdas. Versatile actor Boman Irani who has been roped in to present the classics will be sharing facts and trivia about the filmmaker. Here we get Boman to talk about his favourite Bimalda movies, the characters he would like to play and more...

Tell me about hosting The Bimal Roy Festival?
There was a time during the Doordarshan days where even with limited air time — four hours of programming — we used to get to see one classic every week. Today, with 180 channels and round-the-clock programming on each channel we don’t get to see one single classic film. It’s a crime to not show what we have as treasure and legacy. And if this continues, it will be forgotten forever because nobody will go out and buy them. When I got to know that Zee Classic has taken the initiative, I wanted to be a part of it. Not only has the quality of Bimal Roy’s cinema been an inspiration for the filmmakers of that generation who went on to make good films, it will be a learning for today’s young filmmakers too, and that for me is the best thing.

Which among his films is your favourite?
All his films are great, but the first one I saw when I was a kid was Do Bigha Zamin. I was thoroughly moved by the film, and the performance of Balraj Sahni. Back in the fifties the director had recreated the era so authentically. We talk about how we have better actors today, but Balraj Sahni did it back then. He was highly educated, a sophisticated man who had returned from England, and he played a rickshaw puller with so much authenticity! It was a great inspiration for me. Besides Do Bigha Zamin, I love Madhumati and of course, his Devdas is a yardstick for all Devdas films and Dilip Kumar’s performance is the reference point. Bimal Roy’s Bandini and Sujata were reflective of the society in those times. It was controversial then and is probably even today. But he was brave enough to make them. What’s more, they were not limited to a specific audience, they were palatable to the masses and entertaining. That was really the mark of that man.

Which of the characters from his films would you like to play?
A classic is a classic. I would feel bad to answer that. It’s a scary thought. But yes, all his five movies (that will be shown on the channel) can be remade — they are great timeless stories. And if there’s one character I would love to play, it would be Balraj Sahni’s from Do Bigha Zamin. I want to live through the emotions, enjoy the pain and hard work of that character.

You will now be seen in the third installment of Housefull. Which kind of comedy film and role do you find more challenging — over-the-top humour or realistic?
All the roles have to be challenging. Even in a Housefull 3 I must be challenged in some way because I am creating a character. You just can’t land up on the sets and perform. I have been privileged to work with some great directors and do a variety of films — those which are realistic with social messages as well as out-and-out entertainers. If I say I want to do only socially relevant films, I will be sitting at home for the rest of the year. I am willing to do any kind of film provided there is a spectrum for me to perform, whether it is Jolly LLB or 3 Idiots. I can’t say I will do only relevant cinema because at heart I am an entertainer.

Of the characters you have played so far, which ones have the maximum recall value?
There are three characters that get most talked about - Asthana (Munnabhai MBBS), Khosla Ka Ghosla’s Khurana and Virus from 3 Idiots.

Which are you most fond of?
Khurana. What happened was early in my career I got to play several characters based in Mumbai. Khurana was the first one from outside Mumbai. It was an alien character to me. The film was based in Delhi and I had to make Khurana as acceptable to Dilliwalas as to anybody else. That was a challenge. And, when a Delhi guy came up to me and said you have lived the Dilliwala perfectly, I felt very proud and still do.

What do you look for when you are offered a role?
What is important to me is the story. If the story is good, the character automatically improves and if the story is not good, no matter what you do your character won’t be remembered. So, I would rather go for an interesting story than a character.

Any plans of turning director?
That has been the plan for a long time. I am working towards it, soon there should be an announcement.

50 years after, Bimal Roy lives on, thanks to documentary on Kumbh Mela


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; January 8, 2016)

Today is Bimal Roy's 50th death anniversary. The filmmaker who bagged two National Awards, the International Prize at Cannes and 11 Filmfare Awards, with Madhumati taking home five, passed away on January 8, 1966, at the age of 54. After his untimely demise, the family retained his office at Mohan Studio in Andheri till they were told to vacate the premises by a builder. That's when his son, Joy Bimal Roy, visited the bungalow adjoining the studio, on the first floor of which was his baba's editing room and library where he kept stock shots and live sounds.

"This was in 1999 and it was there that I discovered half-a-dozen reels tagged Kumbh Mela. Baba had started a film, Amrit Kumbh Ki Khoj Mein, based on Sameresh Basu's novel, Amrita Kumbher Sandhane, and ma would fondly speak about some scenes from it, including one in which a father is separated from his son. Thinking it was that film, I started watching the negative and discovered it was one-hour footage of the Kumbh Mela in Allahabad and the negative was in perfect condition," says Joy.

He decided to edit and curate the footage as a documentary tribute to his father but didn't have the funds till Yash Chopra approached the family for the overseas video rights of Bimal Roy's films. When Joy told him about the Kumbh footage which he could incorporate as a bonus, Chopra allowed him the use of his editing facilities and his editor. Joy cut a 11-minute documentary which begins early in the day and ends with an aarti on the Ganga at night, with shots of pilgrims arriving by train, bus and on foot all day.

Since it was silent footage, he had to decide on the sound and after toying with the idea of using orchestra and even Indian classical music and Marathi folk, Joy was put in touch with a sound engineer, Arun Nambiar, who came up with the idea of using music from his father's own films. Arun left for Bangalore after two days, but Joy took his idea forward, using music from Devdas for the train shots and Madhumati for the mela sequences.

"There's a scene of a pandit speaking which I matched with a scene of another pandit speaking in Parakh. I have used one song, Kabuliwala's "Ganga aaye kahan se" since Kumbh is all about the Ganga," says Joy.

Not many in India however saw the documentary as it was only attached to the overseas DVDs. Joy did premiere it in January 2000 during an exhibition of his father's photographs at Mumbai's Nehru Centre. But the film arrived from Adlabs only on the morning of the screening, and when he played it, he discovered to his shock and horror that the sound was not in sync. "There's a technical issue when you transfer sound from film to video. So the "Ganga" song at the beginning started after the boat had passed and played on in the end after the aarti had ended, spilling into the title credits. I was so disappointed that I never looked at the film again. I did not even have a copy of it. But then my nephew and a journalist from Kolkata told me that it was available on YouTube. When I watched it, I realised it was a perfect print with the song in sync," says Joy who's finally happy he unveiled one of his baba's last footage on screen.

Sadhana did away with Sadhana cut for Parakh-Bimal Roy's daughter Rinki Bhattacharya


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; December 29, 2015)

Since Christmas Day, when she bid adieu to the world stage, a lot has been written about Sadhana — her films, fashion trends and fringe. But few remember her in Bimal Roy's 1960 political satire, Parakh, whose theme resonates even half a century later when political rivals use every trick in the book to woo voters, when elections have turned into a farce and democracy disappoints.

Roy's daughter, production and costume designer Yashodhara, admits that the late owner of Evergreen Decorators, Mohammed bhai, took her by surprise when she visited him for some artefacts, by suddenly talking about Parakh. He sighed over the fact that no one, not even the intelligentsia or the media in the '60s, had understood this path-breaking film, far ahead of its time, even though it bagged three Filmfare Awards, including best director for the visionary Roy, best supporting actor for Motilal and best sound for George D'Cruz.

Yashodhara's brother, Joy, points out that his baba had been a pioneer even in his craft and perhaps was the first to employ the 'freeze' effectively in the scene when the postmaster of Radheypur calls a panchayat to reveal that he has received a cheque in the mail from philanthropist JC Roy with instructions that the money should go to the most deserving person who'll use it to benefit the village. The initial skepticism evaporates when he announces the amount — Rs 5 lakh — and the camera freezes on the faces of five "incorruptible" residents — the zamindar, priest, contractor, doctor and school teacher — who will vie for the booty. The ploy sparks off greed and also inspires sudden acts of charity while ripping apart morality in the small community.

The film is based on a Salil Chowdhury story, but Rinki Bhattacharya, another of Roy's daughters, admits to strong parallels with one of Mark Twain's short story, The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg. However, five decades later, Salilda is remembered not so much for his story as for his score.

From Lata Mangeshkar's devotional prayer with its melancholic tinge and marvellous choral arrangement, "Mere Mann Ke Diye", to Manna Dey's "Kya Hawa Chali, Babu Rut Badli" with its baul beats and the breezy, "Mila Hai Kissi Ka Jhumka", Parakh has some rare gems. But "O Sajna, Barkha Bahaar Aai" is undoubtedly one of Lata's most hauntingly beautiful songs. The evocative black-and-white frames and the masterful play of light and shadow on Sadhana's classically perfect face making it ethereal storytelling. The song, which also has a Bengali version, "Na Jeona, Rajoni Akhono Baaki", still drenches one in a shower of melody.

The late composer's wife, Jyoti, recalls him restlessly strolling up the down one morning, notebook and pen in hand. When she urged him to sit down, he told her that he was working on a song and after a while hummed a few lines to her. "I liked it and also the girl on whom 'O Sajna' was picturised. Sadhana dropped in at our Perry Cross Road home once for a cup of tea but didn't speak much," she reminisces. Her elder daughter, Aloka, remembers how her younger sister, Latika, after hearing 'Mila Hai Kissi Ka Jhumka' on the music countdown show, Binaca Geetmala, began to think of it as her song and would get angry if anyone else hummed it."

Rinki, who was Sadhana's age, remembers the actress as being "formal and distant", also a fashion icon in her tight churidars, short kurtas and Audrey Hepburn fringe. "She was most unlike baba's heroines and ma wondered if she could pass off as a Bengali village girl," reminisces Rinki, who'd overheard some of her baba's colleagues telling him that she was more apt to play Seema than the glamorous Sadhana. "But there was no question of me acting in a film and he was certain Sadhana would do a convincing job. She did, going through a complete transformation for Parakh even doing away with her fringe or the "Sadhana cut" as it came to be called. My late husband (Basu Bhattacharya), who assisted my father would tell me that it was a problem keeping her hair off her forehead. They had to pull it back and pin it up."

Yashodhara adds that her father would get second hand clothes or buy new ones of cheap quality and pass them over to the dress man, Kishen, with instructions to make them "purana". This meant that saris were stretched, never ironed or starched for that "lived in" look.

But even minus her glamour, Sadhana was an alluring partner for Bengali babu, Vasant Choudhury, who played the schoolteacher and left Rinki star-struck when he visited their home in Mumbai. She was later told that the actor's girlfriend, who was her age, had confided in a friend that she hoped Rinki wouldn't impress him too much.

We learn in Rinki's book, The Man Who Spoke in Pictures: Bimal Roy, that once when his hero dropped by, Roy who had just returned from the Cairo, laid out some neckties and curios and asked him to pick one each as a gift, before driving him to the studio. En route, both chain smoked, but it wasn't till they reached the studio that Vasant learnt that the filmmaker had been puffing on an artificial cigarette he'd picked up in England. It was his way of cutting down on the cancer sticks and staving off the dreaded disease.

Bimal Roy died on January 8, '66, at the age of 56, from lung cancer.

Our film industry is patriarchal-Sharmila Tagore


Veteran actress Sharmila Tagore talks about gender bias and everything that has changed with our cinema
MUMBAI MIRROR (October 22, 2015)

Sharmila Tagore insists Bollywood still has a long way to go when it comes to gender equality. “We live in a patriarchal society which reflects in our film industry. Although we had lengthy roles in our time, only the sacrificing heroines would go on to become popular,“ she points out. The National Award winning actress agrees that actresses are getting meatier roles today but argues that male dominance still trumps in the end, with the “male gaze“ influencing the way characters and stories shape up in the movies. She gives the example of Piku about a girl who looks after her father, a concept that wasn't there in her time. “The way Deepika Padukone's character presents herself is much better than we did. But the second half of the film sort of perpetrates patriarchal rules,“ notes the 69-year-old veteran.

Sharmila, who ruled in the 1960s-'70s, believes multiplexes have given a platform to new-age, experimental directors and lead to the rise of directors like Sujoy Ghosh, Shoojit Sircar and Dibakar Banerjee. Today, the film industry has become more systematic in the way it operates and handles its finances. “Everything is organised today, actors work in one film at a time while we used to do four-five films simultaneously and were unable to experiment. But our hearts were in the right place and everybody worked passionately. We had wonderful directors like Bimal Roy, Hrishikesh Mukherjee and Raj Kapoor,“ she adds.

She admits that it raised many eyebrows when in 1963 she joined the Hindi film industry, given her surname and the fact that she had started out with a Ray film, Apur Sansar. “Many wondered why I was joining Bombay films since they were looked down upon as mindless entertainment,“ she reminisces but adds that even while working in Mumbai, she continued to do Bengali films like Nayak, Aranyer Din Ratri: Days and Nights in the Forest. “My last Bengali film, Antaheen, released six years ago. I never intended to stop expressing myself in my own language,“ she concludes.