Showing posts with label Sudhir Kumar Ojha. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sudhir Kumar Ojha. Show all posts
How KRK, Kangana Ranaut, Abhinav Kashyap, Sanjay Nirupam, Shekhar Kapur, Advocate Sudhir SHAMELESSLY used Sushant Singh Rajput’s death for their own AGENDA!
3:08 PM
Posted by Fenil Seta
The sudden demise of Sushant Singh Rajput due to suicide left the entire industry and moviegoers stunned. But what was even more shocking is how his demise was used by people with vested interests to further their agenda or settle old scores. In this article, I’ll focus on the lies they have spread, few of which caught on and led to hatred against Karan Johar, Salman Khan etc. Moreover, I’ll take a look at their past instances which will make it clear that they can’t be trusted or that they can’t be lapped up in any way.
1. SANJAY NIRUPAM
The Congress politician put up a tweet alleging that Sushant Singh Rajput had signed as many as 7 films after he delivered the super-hit film Chhichhore in September 2019. He claimed that all these films were snatched away from him. Sanjay Nirupam didn’t explain as to how he came to this conclusion and the source of his claims. Sadly, the contents of this tweet have now gone viral.
छिछोरे हिट होने के बाद #सुशांत_सिंह_राजपूत ने सात फिल्में साइन की थी।— Sanjay Nirupam (@sanjaynirupam) June 14, 2020
छह महीने में उसके हाथ से सारी फिल्में निकल गई थीं।क्यों ?
फ़िल्म इंडस्ट्री की निष्ठुरता एक अलग लेवल पर काम करती है।
इसी निष्ठुरता ने एक प्रतिभावान कलाकार को मार डाला।
सुशांत को विनम्र श्रद्धांजलि!#RIPSushant
Surprisingly, none of the media houses ever reported all these months that Sushant Singh Rajput is losing films. If such a huge development had happened in his life, it would have made headlines or at least someone would have reported. Moreover, writer-director Rumy Jafry revealed that he was to start a film with Sushant. He said that Sushant himself wasn’t interested in working in films. In a Mumbai Mirror article dated June 16, Rumy Jafry said, “The industry knew that I was working with Sushant and two big producers sought my help to get in touch with him. I spoke to Sushant, but he wasn’t too keen on meeting them. His response was simple, ‘Sir, picture hi nahin karni hai abhi toh milkar kya karoonga. Jab agli picture commit karni hogi, tab mil loonga.’” This shows there was no dearth of work and Karan Johar or anyone else were not stopping anyone from working with him.
2. KAMAAL R KHAN
The only ‘media website’ that had spread the news on Sushant losing films is KRKBoxOffice.com. According to the tweet made on February 27 by them, the actor was banned by 7 production houses – Dharma Productions, Sajid Nadiadwala’s Nadiadwala Grandons, Yash Raj Films, T-Series, Salman Khan Films, Dinesh Vijan’s Maddock Films and Ekta Kapoor’s Balaji. This website is owned by Kamaal R Khan who is notorious for fake news and for writing rubbish about the actors that he dislikes. It is absolutely baffling that the tweet of KRKBoxOffice of all people was picked up. Yet again, just like Sanjay Nirupam, KRK didn’t give any basis of the claims he made.
In fact, KRK in the past have made several derogatory and insulting comments against Sushant. From calling him a flop actor to a non actor to an actor who’s unfit for films, KRK has not left any opportunity to pin him down, without provocation. The irony is that people are baying for Karan Johar’s blood today because they claim he insulted Sushant on his show Koffee With Karan and that in a way led to him ending his life. By that logic, KRK has done far more damage to Sushant’s reputation. Then how can people base their anger on the claims made by a man who has been ripped apart by KRK every now and then?According to our sources #Dharma #SajidNadiadwala #YRF #TSeries #SalmanKhan #DineshVijan #Balaji have banned #sushantsinghRajput! So now he can do web series or TV serials only. Superb!!— KRKBOXOFFICE (@KRKBoxOffice) February 27, 2020
KRK, moreover, even had an audacity to later put up a video where he says that he knew Sushant Singh Rajput personally and was a dear friend. In the end of the video, he’s seen shedding (crocodile) tears. It was a overreacting at its worst. How people fell for him and his claims beats me.
If your heart still beats for Kamaal R Khan, take a look at this news put up on his website post his death. It claims that Sushant Singh Rajput, before hanging himself, had hinted that he's about to end his life, and that he deleted these tweets after a few minutes. It was proved in no time that those tweets were false. Yet, KRK Box Office hasn't deleted the news or tendered an apology.
3. KANGANA RANAUT
A day after Sushant Singh Rajput passed away, Kangana Ranaut, on June 15, once again used this opportunity to further her nepotism agenda. She accused the high honchos of Bollywood for not acknowledging his work. Her video also further strengthened the narrative that Sushant was also deprived of work.
To say that this reason drove him to suicide is too much. Also, to feel that he was not getting work from the bigger producers is a white lie, already proved above with Rumy Jafry’s quote. Sushant Singh Rajput’s last theatrical release, Chhichhore, was directed by Nitesh Tiwari, who earlier made Dangal, the biggest Bollywood hit ever. Isn’t this a feat that a director who holds the record of making the biggest blockbuster signed Sushant? Not just that, it was produced by two of the biggest banners, Fox Star Studios and Nadiadwala Grandson, the latter run by Sajid Nadiadwala! Even his earlier films like Drive (produced by Karan Johar), Sonchiriya (produced by Ronnie Screwvala; directed by Abhishek Chaubey), Kedarnath (produced by Ronnie Screwvala; directed by Abhishek Kapoor), Raabta (produced and directed by Dinesh Vijan) etc were all backed by big names.
As for box office track record, Chhichhore earned nearly Rs. 147 crore, and it was one of the highest grossers of 2019. Even Kedarnath did very well, earning around Rs. 70 crore.
Kangana Ranaut, however, will not tell you all these facts. Also, Kangana talking about bullying is ultimate hypocrisy. In the last 3-4 years, she has been in news more for her bullying than her films. It all started with Hrithik Roshan and Rakesh Roshan being slammed by her on Aap Ki Adalat, days before the release of her film Simran. A year before that, Adhyayan Suman also opened up as to how she had made his life hell.
Sonu Sood is the national hero today but if Kangana had her way, she in 2018 would have made him the national villain. This is the time when she took over Manikarnika - The Queen Of Jhansi forcibly from its director Krish. She decided to reshoot and asked Sonu Sood, who was then a part of the film, to allot dates. Sonu made it clear that Krish is the director and he’ll reshoot, provided the original director is calling the shots. Kangana, hence, replaced Sonu and told media that “Sonu refused to work with a woman director”! To make such allegations in today’s times can destroy someone’s life and career. Thankfully, Sonu Sood got spared. That he had earlier worked with a female director, Farah Khan in Happy New Year, also saved him.
Not just Krish, even Simran’s writer and editor Apurva Asrani was similarly ousted from the project. Then last year, she publicly fought with a journalist named Justin Rao, after which her sister Rangoli Chandel started a hate campaign against him on Twitter. Kangana and Rangoli have also in the past, without provocation, attacked Alia Bhatt on multiple occasions. Alia, meanwhile, has always maintained a dignified silence.
So is it fair on her part to blame Bollywood for bullying and arm-twisting when Kangana Ranaut herself indulges in relentless trolling? Such kind of attacks can also affect one’s mental health. Hence, she should be the last one on earth to talk about it.
Another thing to ponder is – how come Kangana Ranaut got films despite taking panga with Karan? If the brigade is claiming that Karan can stop Sushant from doing films, then he should have kicked out Kangana, since ‘he rules Bollywood’! Yet, we saw Kangana bagging Judgmentall Hai Kya, produced by Karan’s ally Ekta Kapoor. Her other films like Manikarnika - The Queen Of Jhansi and Panga were backed by Zee Studios and Fox Star Studios respectively. Both these studios also co-produce or present films of Karan Johar.
Lastly, her nepotism angle now also seems hollow and even laughable as she has hired both her siblings. While her sister Rangoli is her manager, her brother is now her production partner.
4. ABHINAV KASHYAP
The director of Dabangg and Besharam also jumped in to settle old scores. In an explosive Facebook post, he said that post Dabangg, Salman Khan and his family members tried to bully him and that they destroyed his career. Though he directed Besharam after that, he claims the Khans sabotaged the project because of which the film flopped at the box office. He also accused them of not allowing distributors to buy the film and hence he claims producers Reliance Entertainment had to self-distribute Besharam.
Those who didn’t know were shocked but the insiders and avid movie buffs know these claims don’t hold water at all. Firstly, during Besharam’s release, Abhinav never gave any hint that Khans were destroying him. He said then that he was asked to direct Dabangg 2 but he chose not to. He had told Komal Nahta, “It was a case of natural progression. I thought if after Dabangg, I make Dabangg 2 then I cannot get out of this Dabangg genre and I will have to make Dabangg 3 and I will have to make Dabangg 4. I will have to repeat myself over and over again. If I didn't do well then no one would give me a chance yeh keh ke ki isko toh sirf Dabangg aati hai. So, it was very important that I do something out of the box. Dabangg mein main rehta ya na rehta, Dabangg 2 banne wali thi. Arbaaz was very, very serious about making Dabangg 2, so I said don’t wait for me, just go ahead and make it. To an extent unko thoda jhatka laga ho, naraazgi hui ho, utna hi hua tha, par logon ne bahut badha chadha diya.”
One can argue that Abhinav Kashyap might have said this out of fear and bullying. However, what still doesn’t change is the fact that Besharam failed not because of any negative campaign. It starred Ranbir Kapoor and came immediately after his gigantic blockbuster, Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani. Also, Reliance has a distribution network of it’s own. Hence, to claim Reliance didn’t get buyers is false. The buzz for Besharam was so high that it released in 3400 screens, as opposed to 2900-screen-release of Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani. It also opened better than Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani, earning Rs. 19.87 crore. However, the film was panned by audiences and hence it flopped. And no, there was nothing fishy about the way it crashed. The same year, Sajid Khan’s much-hyped Himmatwala also similarly bombed. In recent times, Shah Rukh Khan’s Jab Harry Met Sejal and Aamir Khan’s Thugs Of Hindostan too have severely bombed at the ticket window after opening well.
What’s also bewildering is that Abhinav claims Khans didn’t allow him to work. If that’s the case, how come Abhinav’s brother Anurag Kashyap continued to flourish? In fact, a prominent actor like Ranbir Kapoor starred in Besharam. Why did Salman and family ‘allow’ that to happen? Hence, all his claims seem made up.
5. SUDHIR KUMAR OJHA
A few days ago, a lawyer from Muzzafarpur, Bihar, named Sudhir Kumar Ojha filed a case against Karan Johar, Salman Khan, Ekta Kapoor, Sanjay Leela Bhansali etc. He claims they are responsible for Sushant’s death. The case was filed under Sections 306, 109, 504 & 506 of the IPC.
The fact that a case was filed made the anti-Karan Johar haters even surer that their campaign is justified. What the people and even the media didn’t realize is that this man is a publicity seeker who has filed several cases against high-profile people in the past. Here’s a look at other cases he has filed:
(i). 49 celebrities had written a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi over rising intolerance in India. In October 2019, Ojha filed a sedition case against them. However, the police themselves closed the case. “The SSP [senior superintendent of police of Muzaffarpur] recommended closure of the case and action against the complainant for filing a false case without any rhyme or reason,” police spokesperson Jitendra Kumar said. “The investigating officer in the case will file the final report at the local court within a day or two.”
(ii). In 2007, he filed a PIL against the makers and actors of Dhoom 2, accusing them of promoting obscenity by filming a kissing scene. According to Ojha, the case was dropped after the lawyers of the film-makers and actors declared they would not keep kissing scenes in future films (it’s highly unlikely any producer would give such an assurance)
(iii). In 2013, Ojha’s PIL against Amitabh Bachchan for promoting the consumption of instant noodles Maggi, which he described as “hazardous to health”, was dismissed by the court.
(iv). He had lodged an FIR against Anupam Kher, Akshaye Khanna and 12 others for showing Manmohan Singh in a bad light in The Accidental Prime Minister.
(v). He had filed a case against Raveena Tandon and two others accusing them of causing disruption of road traffic during her visit to Muzaffarpur on October 12, 2018
A quick look at the FIR filed against Karan Johar and others makes it clear that even this case filed by Sudhir Kumar Ojha won’t stand in court at all. Amusingly, he has listed Kangana Ranaut as witness to the case! But then looking at his past, it seems he’s fighting a case merely for publicity and not really to win or to get justice for Sushant.
6. SHEKHAR KAPUR
Finally, filmmaker Shekhar Kapur too jumped in the bandwagon. He was to make a film with Sushant Singh Rajput named Paani, produced by Yash Raj Films, in 2014-15. In 2015, the film got shelved. Shekhar told Manoj Bajpayee how both he and Sushant cried when this film got canned and that Sushant had given his blood and sweat in prepping for the part. He added fuel to the fire to the narrative that the big bad world of Bollywood was taking away films from Sushant.
What he didn’t tell however is that this isn’t the first film of his which didn’t see the light of the day. In the past, he has abandoned at least 12 films, not just in Bollywood but also in Hollywood! A few of them like Paani or Aamir Khan-starrer Time Machine never got made. In the rest of the films, someone else took over as director. Sanjay Kapoor’s debut film Raja was to be made by Shekhar. Sanjay in an interview said, “Shekhar Kapur was initially supposed to direct Prem. But the problem with Shekhar is that he is a very lazy guy, which is why he has made such few films over 30 years. He never wanted to start it and that led to my frustration.”
A full list of the films he ditched can be read here.
CAN BOLLYWOOD BE COMPLETELY ABSOLVED?
Surely not! Sushant Singh Rajput’s demise is a time for introspection and what has gone wrong. But the actor has not left behind a suicide note and most people abusing Karan Johar and others did not know Sushant Singh Rajput personally. Here’s hoping people look at facts and don’t fall for any lie they see on social media. And if you still want to bash them, please do by all means. But then, please leave poor Sushant out of this. It’s no longer about him and using his death to troll them is highly unjustified.
And finally, have a look at those who were close to him. Till date, no one out of them have raised any finger towards Karan Johar or any other filmmaker. Rohini Iyer, publicist and Sushant’s close friend, wrote two explosive posts on Instagram (part 1, part 2) wherein she completely squashed the hate campaign going against Bollywood. Some of her note-worthy quotes were: "He rejected your parties, you didn’t shun him", "He was an outsider and he never cared about being am insider. That’s because he had a life beyond films. The industry was a small part of his life, he had many worlds beyond that", "He didn’t care about awards. He walked out of an award function just cos he got bored. This was even before they announced his best actor award", "He broke every rule and burnt bridges sometimes just to light his way" and "I just want everyone to know and remember him for the person he really was. Not this manufactured version the peddlers are trying to sell".
Sushant Singh Rajput’s sister too wrote a beautiful post and hasn’t blamed anyone. His father, in his police statement, has done the same. According to reports, even close friend Rhea Chakraborty has ruled out any agenda. So it’s upto you now. Would you believe these people, who knew him very closely and therefore knew him better? Or would you like to believe an opportunistic politician, troublemaker actress, publicity-hungry advocate, serial film ditcher etc for whom Sushant’s death was just another way of grabbing attention? The choice is yours.
Case against Ekta Kapoor, Karan Johar over Sushant Singh Rajput’s death
8:34 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

HINDUSTAN TIMES (June 18, 2020)
A criminal case has been filed against directors Karan Johar and Sanjay Leela Bhansali, actor Salman Khan and producer Ekta Kapoor, among others, for their alleged involvement in late actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s demise.The case has been filed by advocate Sudhir Kumar Ojha from Muzaffarpur, Bihar, under Sections 306 (abetment of suicide), 109 (punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence) 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace) and 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), reports ANI.
“In the complaint, I’ve alleged Sushant was removed from around seven films and some of his films were not released. Such a situation forced him to take the extreme step,” said Ojha.
The allegations didn’t go down well with Kapoor, who took to Instagram to say she was “beyond upset”. “Thanku for the case for not casting sushi....when Actually I LAUNCHED HIM...” she wrote.
Earlier, Maharashtra home minister Anil Deshmukh had said Mumbai Police would probe a ‘professional rivalry’ angle to Rajput’s death.
Police close sedition case against celebs for open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi
8:33 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
MUMBAI MIRROR (October 10, 2019)
Closure has been ordered for the sedition case lodged here against close to 50 renowned personalities, including filmmakers Shyam Benegal (pictured), Mani Ratnam and Anurag Kashyap besides historian Ramachandra Guha,who were signatories to an open letter seeking PM Narendra Modi’s intervention in rising cases of mob lynching.
Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, Manoj Kumar Sinha said on Wednesday that direction to the effect has been issued to the Sadar police station in the town where the FIR was lodged last week upon the complaint of a local advocate Sudhir Kumar Ojha.
“Closure has been ordered for the sedition case. A closure report will be submitted before the court in due course,” Sinha said.
Although the SSP did not elaborate further, police sources claimed that during investigations it was noted that Ojha’s allegations were “mischievous” and “lacked substance”. Notably, Ojha had filed a petition before a court here in July soon after news reports of the open letter came out.
The CJM, Surya Kant Tiwari, allowed the petition filed under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code in August and upon receiving intimation of the same on October 3, the police lodged an FIR under IPC sections invoked by the petitioner, including the one for sedition.
The petitioner had also named as “witnesses” Bollywood figures Kangana Ranaut, Madhur Bhandarkar and Vivek Agnihotri and alleged that those named as accused had brought disrepute to the country.
The development had triggered nationwide outrage, evoking criticisms from top opposition leaders like Rahul Gandhi and close to 200 other celebrities asking how an appeal to the Prime Minister could be construed as seditious.
Last week, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar was urged by his former associate and currently RJD national vice president Shivanand Tiwary to intervene and get the case annulled.
Tiwary made an impassioned plea pointing out that those named as accused included Guha, who was among the countrys intellectuals to have lavished praise on the Bihar Chief Minister a number of times.
Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Sushil Kumar Modi, who is also a senior BJP leader, came out with a statement earlier in the day clarifying that his party or the Sangh Parivar did not have anything to do with the sedition case.
The Deputy CM also dubbed Ojha, whom he did not mention by name, a “serial litigant” by whom he was also named as accused in a case a few years ago.
Closure has been ordered for the sedition case lodged here against close to 50 renowned personalities, including filmmakers Shyam Benegal (pictured), Mani Ratnam and Anurag Kashyap besides historian Ramachandra Guha,who were signatories to an open letter seeking PM Narendra Modi’s intervention in rising cases of mob lynching.Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, Manoj Kumar Sinha said on Wednesday that direction to the effect has been issued to the Sadar police station in the town where the FIR was lodged last week upon the complaint of a local advocate Sudhir Kumar Ojha.
“Closure has been ordered for the sedition case. A closure report will be submitted before the court in due course,” Sinha said.
Although the SSP did not elaborate further, police sources claimed that during investigations it was noted that Ojha’s allegations were “mischievous” and “lacked substance”. Notably, Ojha had filed a petition before a court here in July soon after news reports of the open letter came out.
The CJM, Surya Kant Tiwari, allowed the petition filed under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code in August and upon receiving intimation of the same on October 3, the police lodged an FIR under IPC sections invoked by the petitioner, including the one for sedition.
The petitioner had also named as “witnesses” Bollywood figures Kangana Ranaut, Madhur Bhandarkar and Vivek Agnihotri and alleged that those named as accused had brought disrepute to the country.
The development had triggered nationwide outrage, evoking criticisms from top opposition leaders like Rahul Gandhi and close to 200 other celebrities asking how an appeal to the Prime Minister could be construed as seditious.
Last week, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar was urged by his former associate and currently RJD national vice president Shivanand Tiwary to intervene and get the case annulled.
Tiwary made an impassioned plea pointing out that those named as accused included Guha, who was among the countrys intellectuals to have lavished praise on the Bihar Chief Minister a number of times.
Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Sushil Kumar Modi, who is also a senior BJP leader, came out with a statement earlier in the day clarifying that his party or the Sangh Parivar did not have anything to do with the sedition case.
The Deputy CM also dubbed Ojha, whom he did not mention by name, a “serial litigant” by whom he was also named as accused in a case a few years ago.
How are we maligning the Prime Minister by writing a letter to him?-Shyam Benegal
8:13 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Shyam Benegal defends his stance as FIR lodged against 50 personalities, including Anurag, Konkona, Aparna Sen, for their open letter to Modi over mob lynching
Sonil Dedhia (MID-DAY; October 5, 2019)
"How are we maligning the Prime Minister by writing a letter to him," questions Shyam Benegal, shocked at the recent turn of events. On Thursday, an FIR was lodged in Muzaffarpur, Bihar, against 50 celebrities — including Anurag Kashyap, Aparna Sen, Konkona Sen Sharma, Mani Ratnam and Benegal — for having written an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in June, expressing their concern over the rampant incidents of mob lynching. The case was lodged after an order was passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate Surya Kant Tiwari on a petition filed by Bihar advocate Sudhir Kumar Ojha. In his petition, Ojha stated that the letter "tarnished the image of the country and undermined the performance of the prime minister" besides "supporting secessionist tendencies".
Benegal is appalled that their attempt at a dialogue with the prime minister has been coloured by negativity. "The PM is the foremost public figure of our country, and we never made any personal comment. We live in a democracy, and freedom of speech is a constitutional right. We voiced out [a problem] that we thought needed the prime minister's attention."When mid-day reached out to Sen, she termed the FIR — that was lodged under sections of the Indian Penal Code, including those relating to sedition, hurting religious feelings and insulting with an intent to provoke breach of peace — as "blatantly ridiculous". "Our letter had nothing that can be misconstrued as anti-national, seditious or one that maligns anyone. It was a politely written letter, appealing to the prime minister to stop lynchings because we thought that minorities, including Hindu Dalits, need to be protected. We are within our rights to say this to our elected prime minister."
The letter appealed that the lynching of "Muslims, Dalits and other minorities must be stopped immediately." It emphasised the need for strong action from Modi. "You have criticised lynchings in parliament, but that is not enough. We feel that such offences should be declared non-bailable," it read.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
