Showing posts with label Savdhaan India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Savdhaan India. Show all posts

I didn’t want to use my famous surname for work-Shehzad Shaikh


Jaspreet Nijher (BOMBAY TIMES; May 9, 2026)

Actor Shehzad, popularly known by his surname Shaikh, is in fact a Babi by lineage. Yesteryears’ star Parveen Babi is his step-grandmother—a detail he calls “incidental” rather than defining, insisting his journey is shaped by persistence, not privilege. “I am a nepo kid, but that’s not how I wanted to be known,” says the actor, currently shooting for Ganga Mai Ki Betiyan in Chandigarh, in a conversation with us. Excerpts:

You started in hospitality, and then you moved into acting. How did that transition happen?
I grew up in Saudi Arabia and moved to India for higher studies, graduating in hospitality with a top-paying job. Though I always wanted to act, coming from a family of lawyers, I never expressed it openly. After a stint at a five-star hotel in Mumbai, I moved to Gujarat to start an energy-saving business, but it shut down. I then worked as a stockbroker until the market crash, followed by a brief stint as cabin crew when the airline also shut down—forcing me to rethink my path.

Amid all this, when did you get into acting?
My neighbour, actor Nawab Shah, once challenged me to prove my interest in acting by giving me a contact number. I took it seriously, dressed in a suit, introduced myself as offering “acting services,” and began auditioning. Eventually, I got a call from a casting director to play lead in an episodic in Savdhaan India. I started from the bottom — no contacts, no connections and did episodic like Savdhaan India, Adaalat, Gumrah, and similar formats.

I got my first big break with the Qubool Hai. After that, I did a film which was a great learning experience, but I ended up spending two years on that project, which slowed my career. That’s when I realized that films and web series weren’t always viable from a business perspective for me at that stage. So, I decided to return to TV and came back with Bepannaah, followed by Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai.

Around the same time, Vikram Bhatt cast me in a web series Anamika, with Sunny Leone. He offered me another film, 1920: Horrors Of The Heart, but my first producer, Gul Khan felt I was ready for a full-fledged lead role on TV. I respected that, apologized to Vikram sir, and quit the film shoot to do Sindoor Ki Keemat as lead.

After that, I did Mehndi Hai Rachne Waali, which also performed very well, especially in North India. Then last year, I experimented with a limited-series format—Zyada Mat Udd.

No one quits films for TV, but you did...
See, I realized early that television is my bread and butter. It gives you daily visibility, you enter people’s homes every night, which no other medium offers at this scale. By doing films, my visibility is once or twice a year. But through TV, I am in your homes every day, you can’t ignore me (laughs).

Atul Kulkarni’s new show Faraar Kab Tak inspired by real-life crime cases


Atul Kulkarni hosts Faraar Kab Tak, which is inspired by real-life criminal cases that have been solved in India
Mohar Basu (MID-DAY; March 2, 2021)

Bringing real-life fugitives to the forefront, Atul Kulkarni’s new show Faraar Kab Tak is the new call of justice. The actor will host the series that is inspired by real-life crime cases. Factual information traced from real First Information Reports (FIRs) form the show’s spine. Each episode showcases the story from two perspectives — the police and criminals. 

“The one thing that stood out for me is how real the show is. It has been inspired by stories that have shaken the core of the justice system, criminals who have committed some of the most heinous crimes and then disappeared off the face of the earth, to be found many years later. Being a new channel, the thought process of Ishara is different from the rest. I took up the project because I respect this unique vision,” says Kulkarni.

Indian television has seen a fair share of shows rooted in real-life crimes, be it Crime Patrol, India’s Most Wanted or Savdhaan India — Mumbai Fights Back that was hosted by Kulkarni. But the senior actor asserts that Faraar Kab Tak tells the stories responsibly without falling prey to sensationalism. “It’s not dramatised unnecessarily. It is riveting and will have you at the edge of your seat, but because of the content and not the dramatics. Secondly, the stories the channel has picked are untold and unheard of.”

The actor-turned-host, who has creatively invested in the show, hopes it will leave a strong social impact, awakening viewers to the realities of crimes. “It will make people realise the need to be alert and sense a problem in advance. Criminals don’t look a certain way or behave differently. Often, they are people among us, those we meet everyday. Crime rate has shot up and we need everyone to be abreast so that they can be safe.”

Sushant Singh not ousted from Savdhaan India over his participation in anti-CAA protest?

Sushant Singh at the protest in Kalina
Amid rumours that Sushant Singh's participation in anti-CAA protest led to ouster from Savdhaan India, sources at Star say the decision has nothing to do with his stand on the issue
Shaheen Parkar (MID-DAY; December 18, 2019)

Twitterverse expressed its disappointment yesterday as another episode indicated that there was no room for dissent in the country. Sushant Singh, who has been the face of Savdhaan India for several years, suggested that his participation in the students' rally at Mumbai University to condemn the police crackdown on Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, had led to his ouster from the TV show. However, when mid-day investigated further, it was discovered that Singh was informed well in advance that his contract expires on January 15.

When Singh announced his exit from the show yesterday, a social media user asked whether it was the "price" he paid for "speaking the truth". He replied, "A very small price my friend (sic)," thus alluding that his anti-CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act) stand had influenced the suits at Star Bharat to arrive at the decision.

However, a source from the channel says, "Sushant knew that his contract expires on January 15. He has completed the shoot of this season's episodes. So, his tweet came as a surprise to us. There is no correlation between the protest and his exit." Over the past fortnight, there has been news of the show undergoing a revamp. "We are likely to bring in a new host," says the source, adding that Singh has not been responding to their calls since he posted the tweet. The channel officials are planning to take legal action against him for seeking mileage from the students' agitation. They are likely to release an official statement today.

Snapshot of  Singh’s tweet

If I were Aanand L Rai’s lucky charm, then I would have been part of Zero-Jimmy Sheirgill


Tanvi Trivedi (BOMBAY TIMES; August 23, 2018)

After starting his career with lead roles in big budget films, Jimmy Sheirgill has created a happy space for himself doing character and supporting roles. Be it A Wednesday, Special 26, or the Tanu Weds Manu and Saheb Biwi Aur Gangster franchises, the actor has essayed many diverse and interesting characters in an industry where it is easy to get lost doing insignificant roles. Jimmy, who played Bagga in Happy Bhag Jayegi (HBJ), is now geared up for the release of its sequel, Happy Phirr Bhag Jayegi (HPBJ), which will see him reprising the role. In an interview with BT, he tells us how he is happy to pick and choose films, his equation with filmmakers Tigmanshu Dhulia and Aanand L Rai, and why he loves doing light-hearted, funny films. Excerpts:

You are all set to play Bagga once again,in HPBJ. It’s interesting to note that most of the characters you have essayed — be it in Saheb Biwi Aur Gangster, HBJ or the Tanu Weds Manu franchise — end up losing the girl they love. Do you have an affinity for such characters?
I am playing Bagga again, but the situation will be different. While HBJ was set in Pakistan, this time around, I am pursuing the girl in China, and it will take the fun and humour to another level. I enjoy doing light-hearted roles, though I started off with intense roles. Also, I do what is offered to me. When I am offered roles where I don’t get the girl, the makers ask me, ‘Ladki chahiye ke dialogues?’ and I choose the latter (laughs!). Jokes apart, I am not in a position to ask them why I don’t get the girl in the end. Having said that, I have done a few films like that, too.

You have been a part of most of Aanand L Rai and Tigmanshu Dhulia’s films. While you are undoubtedly a talented actor, it’s jokingly said that they consider you their lucky charm...
If Aanand L Rai and Tigmanshu Dhulia considered me their lucky charm, I would be part of all their films. I did Aanand’s first film Strangers in 2007, and we have been friends since then. However, there is no truth to the rumour that he keeps repeating me in his films. If that was the case, I would have been part of the upcoming Shah Rukh Khan film, Zero, too. Aanand’s production house is home for me. More than a good director, he is also a great human being and when you click with someone, it is easier to work with them. Similarly, I have not been part of Tigmanshu’s Paan Singh Tomar or Raag Desh. They call me when there is a role that suits me.

For a long time, you have been termed as an underrated actor. However, over the past two decades, you have always had a steady string of releases. Do you still feel that you are underrated?
There’s nothing wrong in being called an ‘underrated’ actor. I take it as a compliment. As long as they don’t call me someone who is desperate for roles and will do any trivial role for money, it should be okay. Having said that, sometimes you do films out of friendship, too. I had to keep working because I can’t afford to not do so, it’s my rozi roti. Also, I am a workaholic and if I don’t work, I will go mad. But, I am happy that over the years, filmmakers have given me roles that stood out. I did not have to force anyone to give me roles. And, I don’t care if I am offered lead roles or supporting characters. At the end of the day, what matters is how the audience remembers your character or dialogues when they step out of the cinema hall. If I am remembered for a supporting role, it will be worth it.

Were you unhappy that your recent release Saheb, Biwi Aur Gangster 3 did not work?
It is sad that the film did not work, because we had worked so hard on it. It feels bad when someone says, ‘We liked your work, but not the film.’ I think there was a world that revolved around the Saheb and Biwi, which was created in the first two films. There was a certain madness in the earlier films, and an evil factor, too. All that was missing in the third film, but for me, it was a great experience.

You have also carved a niche for yourself in Punjabi films…
I am happy that it is a flourishing industry now. I do one film a year in Punjab.

Along with films, there was buzz that you were being considered to host the TV show, Savdhaan India. But apparently, they found you too expensive…
All those were just talks. They came to meet me, expressed their interest and then suddenly, they disappeared. Now, we are actors and we have allotted dates to various projects, so we can’t start shooting for something suddenly. The rumours of me being expensive are false. Talks did not reach that stage. I would love to do a TV show if there is a correct time and approach from the makers.

Nepotism is a common topic of discussion in Bollywood these days. As an outsider who has made it on his own in Bollywood, what are your views on the subject?
It is a great phase for Bollywood right now. There are new writers, who are scripting a variety of roles. On one hand, you have a Varun Dhawan doing a commercial film and on the other, he does a film like October. The same goes for Alia Bhatt. As for nepotism, I have always maintained my stand. If I have a son who wants to enter films, I will invest all my energies to see that he gets a decent launch. Now, whether he becomes a successful actor or not will depend on him. What is wrong in promoting your son who is keen to work in films? Problem is, people always feel that the grass is greener on the other side.

TV doesn't need to be censored anymore than it already is: Indian television industry hits out at Pahlaj Nihalani


The Indian television industry hits out at Censor Board chairman Pahlaj Nihalani for his recent comments about exercising censorship on the small screen
Neha Maheshwri and Reza Noorani (BOMBAY TIMES; April 27, 2017)

The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) chief, Pahlaj Nihalani, has stirred up a hornet's nest by calling for censorship on television. He recently said that many TV shows, especially crime-based ones like Crime Patrol and Savdhaan India, are “crossing limits“ by showing the most gruesome and heinous crimes in graphic detail.

He added, “Why are filmmakers required to get a new censor certification for their films to be shown on television when the rest of the content made especially for television gets to go on air unchecked? This free flow of content in television must stop. It's affecting the natural psychological development of young minds. Parents are worried.“

Nihalani's statement has met with unanimous opposition from the television industry, which argues that there's already an effective mechanism of self-censorship in place. As actress Pooja Gor, who has also hosted a segment of Savdhaan India, observes, “For years now, TV content has been in tune with what is acceptable to family audiences. In fact, it's the only medium that is already producing filtered content because of its vast reach. And that's precisely why movies have to be certified before being telecast and not shows. As far as crime shows are concerned, the portrayal of incidents is very realistic. These gruesome and heinous crimes have happened in reality - women have been raped and brutal murders have happened. Restricting content on crime shows is not going to change reality. At least, the said shows are conveying a message of caution to the people.“

SELF-REGULATION: THE KEYWORD
TV producers, too, echo Pooja's opinion. Producer Yash Patnaik, who shot a 'kissing scene' between the lead couple of his show Jana Na Dil Se Door, says that while Nihalani is entitled to his opinion, he can't generalise the medium.

Yash adds, “We are a free country and the audience has every right to decide what they want to watch. The TV fraternity is extremely responsible when compared to other mediums. Both producers and broadcasters follow the SNP (Standard Norm Practice) diligently. We don't air foul language, nudity and violence the way other mediums do. Just as censorship is expected on what we show, there also needs to be restraint on what we talk on public forums. It's extremely irresponsible of anyone to generalise the medium and degrade it. Let's have some respect and dignity.“

Sudhir Sharma, who has produced shows like Na Bole Tum Na Maine Kuch Kaha and Baawre, adds, “There is already a lot of pressure on us. We are answerable to our broadcasters and viewers. If another body jumps in to dictate terms, that will be the end of creative freedom on television. We don't need more advice on how to make shows and which lines to not overstep.“

Now, the question arises that despite makers being conscious about the content they dish out on the small screen, is there a body regulating it? Every broadcaster has an SNP team keeping a close tab on the content airing on their respective channels. The makers are expected to adhere to the norms and regulations set by these teams. Director-turned-producer Ravindra Gautam, whose show Meri Durga is currently on air, informs, “TV content is monitored by the channel's SNP team, which makes sure that it adheres to all the self-regulatory content guidelines laid down by the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF). Any complaint regarding the content can be made to the Broadcast Content Complaint Council (BCCC).“

HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH ON TV?
Ravindra says, “TV should get as bold as society. However, ironically, we are still in the 70s' saas-bahu zone. That's the reason the medium finds it difficult to resonate with the youth. That's also the reason why web series are attracting more youngsters. Bold doesn't just mean sex; it's also about the mindset. We live in an era when we are abhorred for showing a consummation scene after marriage. An actress fears such a scene could be the death knell for her career. In fact, TV needs to get bolder or it will seem regressive. We need to introspect why the youth is more hooked on to the internet and web series. That's because we don't explore unconventional content on TV. The government and the channels should be supportive.“

BOLD ONLY POST 10
Actor Ronit Roy, who has dabbled in both films and TV , says that he believes censorship begins at home. He says, “I don't know about other people's houses. but in my home, we guide our children on what to watch and what not to. Anyway, the bold shows, which have adult content, like Bigg Boss, are broadcast after that time. And in my opinion, it is right because children should be asleep by that time.“

In the past, there have been several instances of broadcasters being summoned by the BCCC for going bold. A representative of the channel is summoned by the body to address and answer viewers' complaints and queries regarding the content. Producer Vikas Gupta says, “I had shot a kiss between two members of the same sex, but the channel didn't approve of it. They were of the opinion that it might get into a legal wrangle and also hurt sentiments of the audience.“

He adds, “Yes, we do produce risqué content, but that's aired after 10 pm when kids are asleep. I wouldn't know why Mr Nihalani has made a statement like that, because we already have a strong censorship system in place. We are answerable to our broadcasters and there are strict rules in place. Unlike movies, where a Befikre can have several kisses but a James Bond film can't, the rules are uniform on television. Also, we run tickers when such shows are aired, so that people can share their opinion with us. TV doesn't need another body interfering with what we show. It doesn't need to be censored anymore than it already is.“

CRIME-BASED SHOWS ARE NOT JUST FOR ENTERTAINMENT
Nihalani's major grievance is with crime-based shows airing on TV currently. He said, “Television soaps, reality shows and crime shows are crossing all limits. Shows like Crime Patrol and Savdhaan India show the most gruesome and heinous crimes in graphic detail. Real-life people are named in the fictional recreation of crime stories. Women are raped in incestuous attacks, housewives and minor girls are shown to be violated. If the same content was shown in any film, we at the CBFC, would have to clamp down heavily on the content.“

Annup Sonii, who hosts Crime Patrol, rebukes this claim and says, “The medium follows certain thumb rules while making the content. I can vouch that the team of the show has never crossed the line. Even the graphic details are mostly symbolic. This is something that's happening around us. The motive behind recreating these incidents is to inform people that crime is not a solution. Ramayan mein agar Ravan nahi dikhaayenge toh Ram ki achhai ka kaise pata chalega? Also, censorship is equally vested in the hands of viewers, who, if offended by any content, can stop watching it. That will be signal enough for the broadcaster and the channel to pull up their socks and look into what they are dishing out. We are anyway adhering to strong censorship values and don't need another body intervening in our creativity.“

Sushant Singh, the host of Savdhaan India, adds, “I would like to say that the age of censorship is over. It's a lost battle.What next? Ban the internet? What we show on these shows is the harsh reality - minors getting raped, crimes being committed by close relatives... We can't turn a blind eye to something that's happening around us. Will clamping down the portrayal bring down these incidents? On the contrary, a number of victims have gathered courage to report about the injustice done to them due to the message that our show conveys. The only way to curb crime is by raising your voice and fighting back.“

NO NEED FOR FURTHER CENSORSHIP: SHABANA AZMI
In response to Nihalani's comment on censoring TV content, Bollywood actress Shabana Azmi, who is part of BCCC, says, “At present, there is a BCCC board that addresses the complaints made by the Information & Broadcasting Ministry and public. It has members from within the industry and fields of social science, including representatives from women's, minorities' and children's commissions headed by Justice Mudgal. I have been on board since its inception and know how it works well. It comprises a liberal and sensitive group of people and there has always been complete compliance from the con tent team whenever the BCCC has objected to something. The council has held interactive workshops with creative teams in Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad and Kolkata to sensitise them and hear their compulsions. It works well and should continue. There is no need for further censorship.“

FILMS GIVEN MORE LEEWAY THAN TV
Actor Ram Kapoor, who generated quite a buzz following a kissing sequence with his co-actor Sakshi Tanwar on the TV show Bade Acche Laggte Hain five years ago, says, “I am baffled by this man's statement. What is he talking about? Doesn't he know that TV is censored anyway? I am currently doing a web series and I've never experienced this kind of creative freedom on TV. We ponder over everything multiple times before airing it on the small screen because it's viewed by families. It's morally right to restrict the content on TV and channels are aware of the norms that they need to follow. If there is any decline in the viewership owing to offensive content, it would mean decreased ratings and no channel would want that. Forget risqué content, a kiss between Sakshi and me created such an uproar; that should be enough for Nihalani to know that TV follows stringent guidelines. We can't afford to hurt people.“

Sarika to anchor Savdhaan India

Sarika
Shaheen Parkar (MID-DAY; April 16, 2016)

Sarika is all set to turn TV show host with Savdhaan India, which deals with real-life crime stories. Talking about her third stint on TV — the first two being in the Amitabh Bachchan-starrer Yudh (2014) and in the Bipasha Basu- hosted Darr Sabko Lagta Hai (2015) — she admits that it was an enjoyable experience. “It’s non-fiction yet, there is an element of cinema and the combination is interesting,” she says.

The actress is taking on the subject of medical crime in the series from this weekend and explains that such subjects need to be handled with care. “It is a sensitive subject and needs to be treated carefully — right from the performance to your costumes. Everything has to be in tone with the issues we are talking about, so there is nothing loud or over the top,” she elaborates.

The show’s director Sanjay Tripathy had earlier directed Sarika in his film, Club 60 (2013).  When I came on board for the show, I thought of her as anchor,” informs Tripathy.

Sarika adds, “When Sanjayji called me for this show, I was on board with no questions asked because Club 60 team is like family and me doing this show is an extension of that experience.”