Showing posts with label Ruchi Narain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruchi Narain. Show all posts
Andaz Apna Apna remake might be good, but there will always be comparisons-Raveena Tandon
8:46 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

All things OTT, gen Z, life lessons and more were part of the fun chat team HT City had with team Karmma Calling
Compiled by Mimansa Shekhar (HINDUSTAN TIMES; February 10, 2024)
Believe in karma? If not, the cast of Karmma Calling, actor Raveena Tandon, Varun Sood and director Ruchi Narain will make you believe in it, just as they did when they visited Hindustan Times House. The trio sat down for a fun chat with Sonal Kalra, Chief Managing Editor (Entertainment & Lifestyle, HT) and team HT City, where they spoke about the show, their journey as actors, and more. Their wit and wisdom (mostly from Tandon) made it a memorable visit.
Actor Raveena Tandon, who plays Indrani Kothari in Karmma Calling, revealed that the Indian remake of the American show Revenge came to her a decade ago, but as a television series instead of OTT. “We (Ruchi Narain and her) had to put it on the backburner then, because firstly, I was not ready to play Indrani professionally. Secondly, the dates [commitment] they wanted were a lot because TV is a longer format. Web series made it sleeker and more compact,” Tandon shared.
As season 1 ends on a cliffhanger, the buzz around the next season has already started, but there’s no confirmation yet. The Aranyak actor feels the trend of delaying the seasons of web shows should stop. “The makers and OTT platforms should bridge this gap. Investing so much in a set, breaking it down, and then again putting money into it doesn’t make sense. It’s better for business to finish everything in one go,” she said.
The 49-year-old was asked if a remake of any of her iconic films, Andaz Apna Apna (1994) in particular, would interest her, to which Tandon said no. “Once a classic is done, it is done. The remake might be good, but there will always be comparisons,” feels the actor, adding that remakes of popular songs featuring her are fine because “I end up owning it all over again”.
As the conversation steered towards the new generation, the mother of four said there’s a lot to learn from gen Zers. “I have jitters before my releases, and guess who lectures me? Rasha! Gen Z is more aware and exposed,” she asserts.
’90S ICON VS GEN Z
Tandon, who is a 90s diva, is happy that trends from that era are back. “I’m wearing all my 90s clothes again and even Rasha is wearing them. I still have the leather shirt from Sheher Ki Ladki (Rakshak, 1996),” shared the actor.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
There were certain things about Raveena that were well-suited for Indrani. One was the way she looks and the other was she has a lot of strength and conviction in herself. I felt she would be able to relate to the sentiment of Indrani. Other than that she’s not really like Indrani.
- RUCHI NARAIN, DIRECTOR
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mimansa Shekhar (HINDUSTAN TIMES; February 10, 2024)
From a video jockey (VJ) to a reality star, big screen to OTT — Varun Sood has had quite a journey. The actor opened up how the audience’s perception changed towards him. “The transition had to be evident, so I gave myself two years of not being on camera at all. I wanted people to see me in Karmma Calling and say, ‘Oh he’s an actor now!’” Sood said.
The 28-year-old, who made appearances in films such as Jug Jugg Jeeyo (2022)and web series Ragini MMS Returns, calls actors Ranbir Kapoor, Ranveer Singh and his co-star Raveena Tandon, his inspiration. When asked how Sood gets a lot of attention for the way he looks, he opined that for an actor, the craft takes precedence. “A person can be good-looking but you can’t watch them onscreen for even two minutes. One becomes endearing onscreen because they know their craft really well,” Sood added.
Having said that, he feels fame takes a toll on one’s private life. He recalls how, during his reality TV stint, a lot of things about his personal life came out. “I’m not blaming anyone; it just happened. I’m not liable to put my personal life out there,” he shared, adding, “But, right now, I’m at peace. I have enough space where I can protect my private life,” he shared.
While wrapping up, Sood was asked if he would like to work with Tandon’s daughter Rasha, who used to visit them on the show’s sets, and he replied, “Rasha is a fun person, and I would love to work with her.”
Act Two: Old filmi faces get new streaming careers
9:43 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
From Bobby to Manisha Koirala, Sushmita to Sanjay Kapoor, it’s second innings for a host of nineties stars
Sonam Joshi (THE TIMES OF INDIA; September 6, 2020)
Whatever happened to Chandrachur Singh? That was pretty much the question on the minds of those who remembered his performance in the Gulzar-directed Maachis in 1996. The role got him a Filmfare award, and plenty of critical acclaim but not too much else. Cut to 2020, the 54-year-old, who had been quietly raising his son as a single parent in Dehradun, returned to the public eye with family crime drama Aarya, which also brought back Jayant Kripalani and Sushmita Sen after a hiatus.
“My priorities were clear — I needed to be a parent. Also, I wasn’t getting the kind of offers I was hoping to get but the role Ram Madhvani offered resonated with me because Tej (who he plays) loves music and is a family man like me,” says Singh.
In the last few years, many actors who began their careers on the big screen in the 1990s and then faded away are now returning to the small screen in newer avatars through streaming platforms. There’s Sanjay Kapoor playing a father in Coronavirus lockdown thriller The Gone Game, Karisma Kapoor as a mother in Mentalhood, Bobby Deol as a godman in Aashram and police officer in Class Of '83 and Manisha Koirala as a Irani cafe owner in Maska, among others.
Casting director Abhimanyu Ray, who worked on Aarya and Class of '83 after himself taking a decade-long break from the movie industry, says Bollywood has often been judgmental towards actors perceived to be carrying baggage. “Filmmakers are afraid of taking chances and often actors are cast by what they’ve been seen in,” he says. “The downside is you get tired of seeing the same face portray the same characters again and again.” Talking about the positive response to Aarya, he adds, “These people have existed; it isn’t as if they were pulled out of a Pandora’s box, but the question is why have such good actors been forgotten?”
Ray also attributes this to mainstream actors’ aversion to web series until recently. “Many would think it would be a step down for them,” he says. “So one had to dig deeper and find actors who are talented but haven’t been around for a while.”
Actors are also willing to play their age now, and open to sharing the screen with other actors rather than hankering for the central role, says Karishma Kohli, who directed Karisma Kapoor along with an ensemble cast of Dino Morea, Shruti Seth and Sandhya Mridul in Mentalhood. “I was in awe of Lolo and stood with my jaw open on the first day of the shoot,” she recalls. Mentalhood’s casting director Aadore Mukherjee, who recently cast Bhagyashree and Sharon Prabhakar in a film and series respectively, credits “better content and good scriptwriters for bringing back actors to our screens”.
For viewers, seeing these familiar faces in a new avatar often invokes curiosity and nostalgia. Casting director Seher Latif, who picked Koirala for Maska, says the web offers freedom from box office pressure, thus opening up opportunities. About Koirala, he says, “We felt it would be a nice meaty role we’ve never seen her in before, and she also relished the challenge of working on the Parsi diction.”
Actor Sanjay Kapoor, who essayed the role of a father to a grown-up son in the series The Gone Game, says web series allow for more character development by virtue of their length. “The digital medium has given a platform to many actors who couldn’t make a mark in films, including me — I’m getting this kind of recognition after 25 years.”
Kapoor, who had shifted from acting to production due to lack of good roles, already has two other web shows on the cards. “The opportunities have definitely increased and I can do a greater variety of roles than a decade ago. Every character gets their due because of the longer format,” he says.
The fact that actors like Sushmita Sen and Lara Dutta can play leads in their 40s, something unheard of in mainstream films, also indicates a lesser degree of ageism and gender bias on OTT platforms. “When I narrated the script of Hundred to Lara, she said she’d never thought she’d be getting such a meaty role at this age,” says showrunner, creator and co-director Ruchi Narain. She points out that it is also difficult to tell the stories of strong older women in films “where everything other than a story of a young hero is considered fringe”.
Madhvani, who had worked with Sen on a commercial, says he approached her because she embodied the qualities of Aarya: “A woman who is confident, strong-willed, graceful, poised, someone who loves her family and children and would do anything to keep them safe”. He feels that for the audience to be invested in the characters and the relationships, the correct casting is of prime importance. “Tej’s character needed to be someone who was charming, innocent and lovable; Chandrachur had all these qualities along with a certain purity.”
Veteran actor Jayant Kripalani, 70, who plays Sen’s father, says it was the opportunity to play an underworld drug don that drew him to the role. “Web series are definitely a lot more adventurous and take risks with stories,” says Kripalani, who has been working on Bengali OTT shows in the last couple of years. “They fall somewhere between theatre and TV, giving an actor scope to do things they couldn’t do in front of a camera but could in front of a live audience.”
However, Ray adds that it is important that filmmakers keep thinking in imaginative ways. “It shouldn’t be the case that the actors who are now getting popular are used again and again,” he says.
Sonam Joshi (THE TIMES OF INDIA; September 6, 2020)
Whatever happened to Chandrachur Singh? That was pretty much the question on the minds of those who remembered his performance in the Gulzar-directed Maachis in 1996. The role got him a Filmfare award, and plenty of critical acclaim but not too much else. Cut to 2020, the 54-year-old, who had been quietly raising his son as a single parent in Dehradun, returned to the public eye with family crime drama Aarya, which also brought back Jayant Kripalani and Sushmita Sen after a hiatus.
“My priorities were clear — I needed to be a parent. Also, I wasn’t getting the kind of offers I was hoping to get but the role Ram Madhvani offered resonated with me because Tej (who he plays) loves music and is a family man like me,” says Singh.
In the last few years, many actors who began their careers on the big screen in the 1990s and then faded away are now returning to the small screen in newer avatars through streaming platforms. There’s Sanjay Kapoor playing a father in Coronavirus lockdown thriller The Gone Game, Karisma Kapoor as a mother in Mentalhood, Bobby Deol as a godman in Aashram and police officer in Class Of '83 and Manisha Koirala as a Irani cafe owner in Maska, among others.
Casting director Abhimanyu Ray, who worked on Aarya and Class of '83 after himself taking a decade-long break from the movie industry, says Bollywood has often been judgmental towards actors perceived to be carrying baggage. “Filmmakers are afraid of taking chances and often actors are cast by what they’ve been seen in,” he says. “The downside is you get tired of seeing the same face portray the same characters again and again.” Talking about the positive response to Aarya, he adds, “These people have existed; it isn’t as if they were pulled out of a Pandora’s box, but the question is why have such good actors been forgotten?”
Ray also attributes this to mainstream actors’ aversion to web series until recently. “Many would think it would be a step down for them,” he says. “So one had to dig deeper and find actors who are talented but haven’t been around for a while.”
Actors are also willing to play their age now, and open to sharing the screen with other actors rather than hankering for the central role, says Karishma Kohli, who directed Karisma Kapoor along with an ensemble cast of Dino Morea, Shruti Seth and Sandhya Mridul in Mentalhood. “I was in awe of Lolo and stood with my jaw open on the first day of the shoot,” she recalls. Mentalhood’s casting director Aadore Mukherjee, who recently cast Bhagyashree and Sharon Prabhakar in a film and series respectively, credits “better content and good scriptwriters for bringing back actors to our screens”.
For viewers, seeing these familiar faces in a new avatar often invokes curiosity and nostalgia. Casting director Seher Latif, who picked Koirala for Maska, says the web offers freedom from box office pressure, thus opening up opportunities. About Koirala, he says, “We felt it would be a nice meaty role we’ve never seen her in before, and she also relished the challenge of working on the Parsi diction.”
Actor Sanjay Kapoor, who essayed the role of a father to a grown-up son in the series The Gone Game, says web series allow for more character development by virtue of their length. “The digital medium has given a platform to many actors who couldn’t make a mark in films, including me — I’m getting this kind of recognition after 25 years.”
Kapoor, who had shifted from acting to production due to lack of good roles, already has two other web shows on the cards. “The opportunities have definitely increased and I can do a greater variety of roles than a decade ago. Every character gets their due because of the longer format,” he says.
The fact that actors like Sushmita Sen and Lara Dutta can play leads in their 40s, something unheard of in mainstream films, also indicates a lesser degree of ageism and gender bias on OTT platforms. “When I narrated the script of Hundred to Lara, she said she’d never thought she’d be getting such a meaty role at this age,” says showrunner, creator and co-director Ruchi Narain. She points out that it is also difficult to tell the stories of strong older women in films “where everything other than a story of a young hero is considered fringe”.
Madhvani, who had worked with Sen on a commercial, says he approached her because she embodied the qualities of Aarya: “A woman who is confident, strong-willed, graceful, poised, someone who loves her family and children and would do anything to keep them safe”. He feels that for the audience to be invested in the characters and the relationships, the correct casting is of prime importance. “Tej’s character needed to be someone who was charming, innocent and lovable; Chandrachur had all these qualities along with a certain purity.”
Veteran actor Jayant Kripalani, 70, who plays Sen’s father, says it was the opportunity to play an underworld drug don that drew him to the role. “Web series are definitely a lot more adventurous and take risks with stories,” says Kripalani, who has been working on Bengali OTT shows in the last couple of years. “They fall somewhere between theatre and TV, giving an actor scope to do things they couldn’t do in front of a camera but could in front of a live audience.”
However, Ray adds that it is important that filmmakers keep thinking in imaginative ways. “It shouldn’t be the case that the actors who are now getting popular are used again and again,” he says.
There were so many aspects to my character's persona in Hundred that intrigued me-Lara Dutta
8:24 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Talking about the emotional turmoil of a cop in Hundred, Lara Dutta on why she picked the web show for her comeback
Shaheen Parkar (MID-DAY; May 3, 2020)
Last seen in Welcome To New York (2018), Lara Dutta Bhupathi is back on the scene with the web series, Hundred, which marks her digital debut. "It just fell into place. I wasn't actively looking for anything. I thought it would be interesting to be part of the web culture."
The offer landed in her lap rather suddenly. "Though I have known Ruchi [director Narain] for years, we never spoke about working together. I always wanted to be directed by a woman. I like her work, so, I thought I'd give it a shot when she made the offer."
At odds with the roles she has played in Bollywood till date, her character in Hundred was age-appropriate. Dutta's Soumya Shukla is a cop, a part she has never played before. "The experience was educational. I needed to get the body language and nuances on point. I even met a couple of women DCPs to get a better insight."
Digging deep into her character, Dutta says she hasn't explored a role that is as layered as this one. "[She is] ambitious, unapologetic and frustrated, and also faces issues in her marital life. There were so many aspects to her persona that intrigued me."
What also drew her to the show was co-star Rinku Rajguru, best remembered for Sairaat (2016). "We are generations apart. I thought we would make for an interesting combo. We come from different worlds."
Shooting for the Hotstar web series in different locations of Mumbai was an eye-opener. "Despite living in Mumbai for 25 years, I didn't realise how much more there is to the city. I got to see the gritty underbelly as we shot in real locations."
Despite hubby, tennis champ Mahesh Bhupathi, being her sounding board, she refers to daughter Saira as her biggest critic. "She is excited to see me on screen, but also keeps critiquing."
In our society, there isn't enough education on consent-Gurfateh Pirzada
8:07 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

A week after the release of Kiara Advani-starrer Guilty, newbie Gurfateh Pirzada on making his debut with the role of rape accused
Mohar Basu (MID-DAY; March 14, 2020)
In an industry that is quick to stereotype actors, picking a role with shades of grey for a debut offering wouldn't be considered an ideal choice. But, discussing last week's Netflix release, Guilty, newbie Gurfateh Pirzada says he couldn't have asked for a better launchpad.
"Performances are key in films like this one. People are talking about it. Also, I am interested in scripts that encourage a positive shift in mindsets. It was an ideal start to my career because young people will learn from this," says Pirzada.
Slipping into the role of a college hottie in a film headlined by Kiara Advani, he plays the part of VJ, who thrives on people's attention. "He likes being liked. I needed the audience to fall in love with him. He is a nice guy, but a single night makes evident everything that is wrong with him. Ruchi [Narain, director] didn't want him to feel guilty [about his acts]. I had to showcase him as one who is oblivious to the fact that he has crossed the line. [When] a girl throws herself at him, VJ fails to understand at which point [the intimacy] stops being consensual. [In our society] there isn't enough education on consent. We hope the film [makes evident that] consent is not [based on] perceptions."
In a previous interview, and referring to her last release, Kabir Singh, Advani had apparently suggested that the makers wondered whether giving the protagonist Kabir a happy ending would invite controversy — which it eventually did — owing to his abusive nature. In contrast to that offering, Pirzada's VJ is seen "accepting his punishment". Asserting that actors must "mirror what's happening in society", he says artistes must encourage offerings that bring such conversations to dinner tables.
"The discourse around the #MeToo movement will shift, one film at a time. I hope our movie created the fire needed for this discussion."
After playing meek girl in Kabir Singh, Kiara Advani takes on dominant role in Guilty to avoid being stereotyped
8:39 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Upala KBR (MID-DAY; June 28, 2019)
Kiara Advani has little time to bask in the box-office success of Kabir Singh. The actor has dived headlong into the shoot of Netflix's original, Guilty, in Delhi. The web film, produced by Karan Johar's Dharmatic and marking her second digital outing after Lust Stories (2018), sees her as a rebel musician who stands by her boyfriend when he is accused of rape. Turns out, Advani was keen to explore a headstrong character after having played the submissive girlfriend in her recent outing.
A trade source reveals, "Karan was one of the first people to recognise Kiara's talent and of late, has become invested in her career. When the final script of Guilty was ready, Karan Johar thought that the lead character — who is rebellious and has a don't-give-a-damn attitude — would be a change of pace for her. Kiara too understood that the Ruchi Narain-directed film will give her the opportunity to drive the narrative as the script unfolds from the woman's perspective.
The material gives her enough scope as an artiste — while she starts out as an opinionated girl who believes in her boyfriend's innocence, doubts arise as she delves deeper into the incident. So excited was she to slip into the part that she offered to colour her hair ash-blonde instead of sporting a wig, to achieve the grunge look."
Netflix remained unavailable for comment.
20th Jio MAMI Mumbai Film Festival with Star opens today with stellar line-up
7:51 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Top of the line talent and a robust #MeToo programme at the fest which runs from October 25 to November 1
MUMBAI MIRROR (October 25, 2018)
With Jio MAMI 20th Mumbai Film Festival with Star celebrating a milestone, it’s hardly a surprise that this year the festival will rise beyond anything it has done before. From the vast selection of films that will screen to the talent that will attend, Mumbai will play host to India’s most exciting and leading film festival. While the festival celebrates films from India and across the world, MAMI Mumbai Film Festival is not just about the films but the discussions and conversations that surround it. So, while you are planning your week’s itinerary, here’s our top 5 reasons to make the festival a part of your week!Smriti Kiran, Creative Director, said, “It is a very difficult time. We move into a celebration of cinema with a broken heart but with a resolve to keep the conversation going. The lineup this year is the best we have managed both in terms of talent and films. We are hoping that this 20-year milestone is the starting point to a new chapter both for MAMI and for the industry.”
Incredible line-up of films…
The ‘World Cinema’ category will screen 64 films from 43 countries in 37 languages and include 14 female directors, ranging from Chile, Kazakhstan, Egypt, Canada and Poland to some closer to home from the subcontinent such as Philippines, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Singapore, in languages like Azeri, Icelandic, Hebrew and Guizhou Dialect to Sinhala, Swahili, Tagalog and Wayunikee. While the category is known to feature some true masters of cinema like Lee Chang-dong, Paweł Pawlikowski, Jafar Panahi, Jean-Luc Godard, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, Jia Zhangke, Alfonso Cuarón, Hong Sang-soo and Hirokazu Kore-eda, the festival will also celebrate favourites like BlacKkKlansman (Cannes Film Festival), Sorry to Bother You (Sundance Film Festival), Rafiki (the first Kenyan film to be selected at Cannes Film Festival), Berlinale winner Mug by Małgorzata Szumowska and Sundance winner The Miseducation of Cameron Post by Desiree Akhavan.
Local heroes: Indian filmmakers
The selection this year is a cauldron filled with India’s delicious cultural diversity. It spans multiple states and languages including Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Hindi, Punjabi, Bengali and Gaddi. This special edition of the festival marks the return of a host of creators from the Jio MAMI with Star family. Aadish Keluskar (his film Kaul won the Young Critics Choice Award in 2015) returns to the competition section with his latest Jaoon Kahan Bata Ae Dil and Rima Das returns with her third feature Bulbul Can Sing — a coming of age tale and her third consecutive feature at the festival after Man With The Binoculars (2016) and Village Rockstars (2017).
#MeToo Programme at the Festival….
The #Metoo movement has taken the country by storm and is fast gaining momentum. Jio MAMI Mumbai Film Festival with Star stands in solidarity with the movement and with the complainants. The festival not only supports the movement but would like it to continue to evolve into a more nuanced discussion that brings clarity and solutions.
The #MeToo programme at the festival is curated by filmmaker Ruchi Narain. There are 3 conversations and one workshop planned as part of the programme. The speakers include Aamir Khan, Parvathy, Kabir Khan, Anjali Menon, Shonali Bose, Renuka Shahane. The workshop on Sexual Harrassment at the workshop will be conducted by Anusha Khan and Asiya Shervani. The discussions will be moderated by Ruchi Narain and journalist Deepanjana Pal.
Masters and masterclasses…
While the Mumbai Academy of Moving Image (MAMI) will screen over 200 films in the coming week, one of the biggest highlights of the festival this year are the Masterclasses by some of the world’s most renowned and accomplished personalities in film. Filmmakers Darren Aronofsky, Sean Baker and Lucrecia Martel will talk about their work and interact with the legions of fans they have in the country.
Experience India gold and world premieres…
The prestigious India Gold section is the exclusive competition category for the latest Indian films from across the country. Jio MAMI with Star will premiere 8 top of the line Indian Films in competition this year. This includes three world premieres with Ridham Janve’s The Gold-Laden Sheep and The Sacred Mountain, Aadish Keluskar’s Jaoon Kahan Bata Ae Dil and Vinit Chandrasekharan’s Buddha. Watched by a Jury of esteemed film personalities from around the world, the India Gold Selection is a platform that has premiered breakout films like Chaitanya Tamhane’s Court, Gurvinder Singh’s Chauthi Koot, Raam Reddy’s Thithi, Rima Das’ Village Rockstars, Shlok Sharma’s Haraamkhor and Avinash Arun’s Killa.
11 women filmmakers join hands to empower #MeToo survivors in Bollywood
8:13 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Natasha Coutinho (MUMBAI MIRROR; October 15, 2018)
After Producers Guild of India and the Screenwriters Association, who have set up anti-harassment committees in the wake of #MeToo in Bollywood, 11 women filmmakers have joined hands to lend support of the movement.
Alankrita Shrivastava, Gauri Shinde, Kiran Rao, Konkona Sen Sharma, Meghna Gulzar, Nandita Das, Nitya Mehra, Reema Kagti, Ruchi Narain, Shonali Bose and Zoya Akhtar, released a joint statement on Sunday. “We are here to spread awareness and to help create a safe and equal atmosphere for all in the workplace. We have also taken a stand to not work with proven offenders. We urge all our peers in the industry to do the same,” the statement read.
Lipstick Under My Burkha director Alankrita feels that #MeToo has come to India as a cry against a system that has failed women. “It is about social change against toxic masculinity and normalised misogyny. I think we all felt the need to let the women in the industry know that they are not alone and ended up reaching out to each other to make it happen. It is a shout-out to our peers to come together to create a more equitable film industry. The Women in Cinema Collective is already doing some fantastic work in the Malayalam film industry. I hope that we can work towards forming a solid network of female filmmakers who can be a voice of change,” she said.
Dear Zindagi director Gauri Shinde is positive that more women filmmakers from across the country will join in and make it a substantial movement, while Ruchi Narain who has written Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi and directed Kal: Yesterday and Tomorrow, told Mirror, “Too many men have abused their power to prey on, assault and intimidate women for too long. We want to add our support to the voices of these women and others who are yet to come forward, so they feel empowered and safe in their lives and jobs to stand up for themselves. The balance in the business needs to change and move towards equal opportunity.”
After 'S Durga', 'Nude' director Ravi Jadhav plans to move High Court over IFFI fiasco
8:02 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Meanwhile,
following in the footsteps of chairperson Sujoy Ghosh, editor Apurva
Asrani has also resigned from the jury of the IFFI Panorama section
against the dropping of the aforementioned films; Vivek Agnihotri
counters allegations
Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; November 15, 2017)
Mumbai Mirror (November 11) was the first to report that the 13-member jury for the 48th International Film Festival of India’s (IFFI) Panorama section was upset that Ravi Jadhav’s Marathi film Nude and Sanal Kumar Sasidharan’s Malayalam thriller Sexy Durga (now retitled as S Durga) were dropped from the final list of 26 feature films issued by the Information & Broadcasting Ministry without consulting them. Two days later, the chairperson of the jury, Sujoy Ghosh, resigned in protest. On Tuesday afternoon, National Award-winning editor and a senior jury member, Apurva Asrani too resigned. “I stand with the chairperson of the jury. We’ve had a responsibility towards some very sincere films, and somewhere we have failed them. My conscience won’t allow me to participate in the festivities in Goa. However, I wish all the other films good luck. Each one of them has been made with a lot of love and no controversy should take away from that,” Apurva said.
Lauding Sujoy for his courageous act, Sasidharan took to the social media to inform, “I am also doing my bit, I have filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala against the unprecedented, illogical and unconstitutional decision taken by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.”
After being denied censor exemption twice, his film had been finally cleared by the Censors after he agreed to change the title from Sexy Durga to S Durga and screened at the MAMI (Mumbai Academy of Moving Images) Film Festival. His advocate, Manu Sebastian, told Mirror, “We have filed a writ petition today challenging the decision of the I&B Ministry for excluding our film from Indian Panorama. The case was heard today and the court has sought an explanation from the government on Thursday. In this case the jury’s decision was final and if the ministry cannot provide a satisfactory explanation, their decision can be ruled as arbitrary action.”
Meanwhile, Jadhav admitted that he has been in touch with Sasidharan and is following in his footsteps. “I have applied for a censor certificate today and am also planning to move the Bombay High Court, asking for an explanation from the ministry for dropping Nude,” he said. He added that there is a likelihood of the ministry arguing that it was rejected because it was not a technically complete film. He refuted it saying, “I sent a screener to the Directorate of the film festival three months ago and we were ready with a DCP of the complete film but no one asked for it. We are ready to showcase the film at any point.”
Meanwhile speaking to Mirror on condition of anonymity, a jury member said that till late on Tuesday, the ministry had not reacted to either Sujoy and Asrani’s resignations. He went on to inform that some jury members have now written to the ministry pointing out that in wake of the chairperson’s resignation, they would wish it to reconsider its decision, watch the two disputed films in the same light as the jury had seen them and then arrive at a decision in consultation with the jury. “We’re awaiting a response to that mail too,” added the member.
Filmmaker Nikkhil Advani and another jury member when quizzed on the subject, told Mirror, “It’s extremely sad that we were not informed about the exclusion of the films. I respect the stand that Sujoy has taken but, more importantly, I am requesting the persons concerned to watch the films in contention and take an informed decision, preferably in consultation with the jury members.”
When asked if he would be attending the festival, Advani said that he was uncertain, as he might have to attend a shoot of a show he is producing. “However, the important thing is that 19 other films have also been chosen whose filmmakers have worked extremely hard to tell some very relevant stories and we need to champion these films along with the films that have been so unfairly left out,” he asserted.
Filmmaker and jury member Ruchi Narain who had earlier told Mirror that the final list that had come out does not match the list submitted and she personally felt that Nude and S Durga were stunning quality films which festival audiences would really appreciate, echoed Advani’s views.
“I respect Sujoy’s decision as chairperson, his actions speak volumes, more than words can say. But as a jury member I won’t be resigning,” she stated, pointing out that they spent a month choosing films and while these two did not make it to the final list, there were others films too selected by them. “I don’t want to take away from the merit of the other films that we select and that are being shown. Right now, the controversy is around Nude and S Durga but there are other good films that need to be watched and lauded so I don’t wish to officially disassociate myself from the Panorama.”
Vivek Agnihotri, convenor of the preview committee of IFFI, said, “If Sujoy and Apurva are within their rights to resign and Sanal to move court, then even the minstry is within its rights to choose 20 of 22 films selected by the jury. Nude came with the rider from the jury itself that it was an incomplete film. So I don’t understand what the controversy is about. IFFI is a Government of India initiative.”

Mumbai Mirror (November 11) was the first to report that the 13-member jury for the 48th International Film Festival of India’s (IFFI) Panorama section was upset that Ravi Jadhav’s Marathi film Nude and Sanal Kumar Sasidharan’s Malayalam thriller Sexy Durga (now retitled as S Durga) were dropped from the final list of 26 feature films issued by the Information & Broadcasting Ministry without consulting them. Two days later, the chairperson of the jury, Sujoy Ghosh, resigned in protest. On Tuesday afternoon, National Award-winning editor and a senior jury member, Apurva Asrani too resigned. “I stand with the chairperson of the jury. We’ve had a responsibility towards some very sincere films, and somewhere we have failed them. My conscience won’t allow me to participate in the festivities in Goa. However, I wish all the other films good luck. Each one of them has been made with a lot of love and no controversy should take away from that,” Apurva said.
Lauding Sujoy for his courageous act, Sasidharan took to the social media to inform, “I am also doing my bit, I have filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala against the unprecedented, illogical and unconstitutional decision taken by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.”
After being denied censor exemption twice, his film had been finally cleared by the Censors after he agreed to change the title from Sexy Durga to S Durga and screened at the MAMI (Mumbai Academy of Moving Images) Film Festival. His advocate, Manu Sebastian, told Mirror, “We have filed a writ petition today challenging the decision of the I&B Ministry for excluding our film from Indian Panorama. The case was heard today and the court has sought an explanation from the government on Thursday. In this case the jury’s decision was final and if the ministry cannot provide a satisfactory explanation, their decision can be ruled as arbitrary action.”
Meanwhile, Jadhav admitted that he has been in touch with Sasidharan and is following in his footsteps. “I have applied for a censor certificate today and am also planning to move the Bombay High Court, asking for an explanation from the ministry for dropping Nude,” he said. He added that there is a likelihood of the ministry arguing that it was rejected because it was not a technically complete film. He refuted it saying, “I sent a screener to the Directorate of the film festival three months ago and we were ready with a DCP of the complete film but no one asked for it. We are ready to showcase the film at any point.”
Meanwhile speaking to Mirror on condition of anonymity, a jury member said that till late on Tuesday, the ministry had not reacted to either Sujoy and Asrani’s resignations. He went on to inform that some jury members have now written to the ministry pointing out that in wake of the chairperson’s resignation, they would wish it to reconsider its decision, watch the two disputed films in the same light as the jury had seen them and then arrive at a decision in consultation with the jury. “We’re awaiting a response to that mail too,” added the member.
Filmmaker Nikkhil Advani and another jury member when quizzed on the subject, told Mirror, “It’s extremely sad that we were not informed about the exclusion of the films. I respect the stand that Sujoy has taken but, more importantly, I am requesting the persons concerned to watch the films in contention and take an informed decision, preferably in consultation with the jury members.”
When asked if he would be attending the festival, Advani said that he was uncertain, as he might have to attend a shoot of a show he is producing. “However, the important thing is that 19 other films have also been chosen whose filmmakers have worked extremely hard to tell some very relevant stories and we need to champion these films along with the films that have been so unfairly left out,” he asserted.
Filmmaker and jury member Ruchi Narain who had earlier told Mirror that the final list that had come out does not match the list submitted and she personally felt that Nude and S Durga were stunning quality films which festival audiences would really appreciate, echoed Advani’s views.
“I respect Sujoy’s decision as chairperson, his actions speak volumes, more than words can say. But as a jury member I won’t be resigning,” she stated, pointing out that they spent a month choosing films and while these two did not make it to the final list, there were others films too selected by them. “I don’t want to take away from the merit of the other films that we select and that are being shown. Right now, the controversy is around Nude and S Durga but there are other good films that need to be watched and lauded so I don’t wish to officially disassociate myself from the Panorama.”
Vivek Agnihotri, convenor of the preview committee of IFFI, said, “If Sujoy and Apurva are within their rights to resign and Sanal to move court, then even the minstry is within its rights to choose 20 of 22 films selected by the jury. Nude came with the rider from the jury itself that it was an incomplete film. So I don’t understand what the controversy is about. IFFI is a Government of India initiative.”
Children's Day special: No country for children's films?
8:00 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
While a thousand films are made annually in India, barely 30 are children’s flicks and only a handful of them get a decent release. And no, we’re not ‘kidding’
Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; November 14, 2017)
Gulzar leads the pack of torchbearers of children’s content across literature and films in India. While mainstream Bollywood has a countable number of movies that cater to children, Hollywood studios have continued to flood the Indian market with their animated and feature content aimed for the knee-high audiences, year on year. Odds are possibly stacked against desi filmmakers, which coaxes them to think more mainstream and adult entertainment.
For example: In the 1960s, Satyajit Ray toyed with the idea of making Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne. The fantasy adventure took several years in the making and on release, it worked commercially and also won the Best Picture Award at the National Film Awards in 1970. It took over three decades for Shwaas, another child-focussed film, albeit in Marathi, to win this coveted award. Moreover, it was also India’s official entry for the Oscars. Incidentally, the first film to ever win the National Award was Shyamchi Aai (1953), which revolved around a poor child and his mother. While it’s often debated whether a film made for kids only centres around them or appeals only to them, what is indisputable is that children’s cinema in India is not only underfunded, but is also under-evolved and under-consumed.
Not surprising then, that Indian filmmakers claim that lack of funds, poor distribution and exhibition machinery, and the general apathy of parents towards children’s content are together responsible for the despicable condition of the genre that continues to remain out of bounds for them. Hollywood, of course, continues to milk it, quantitatively and qualitatively, with its far superior content. About a dozen movies are released in India annually: The Jungle Book, Finding Dory, Boss Baby, the superhero franchises and many more.
Amole Gupte adds, “Sniff!!! was treated like a lawaris bachcha; a child buried before it could even breathe. The studio I partnered with had no faith in the film, although it backed some good adult films like Shubh Mangal Saavdhan and Newton. They didn’t bother marketing Sniff!!! or even letting it run in cinemas for more than a week, although we had floods in Mumbai that week and a curfew in the North, which means the footfall was low at cinemas anyway. When I showed it to children at pre-booked shows, they applauded it. I’m aware a lot of critics didn’t like it, but Sniff!!! was designed for kids and they liked it. Sometimes, adults have to keep their adult perspective aside. As a filmmaking industry, I have realised that we don’t respect children. We’ve failed them. You ‘kid’ them into watching what you, as adults, want to consume. As an adult, you get the scale of visuals you paid for and the child gets to see some fantasy. The fact that we use phrases like, ‘Don’t kid me or kid it down, yaar’ in our daily lingo shows how dumb we think kids really are when that’s not the case. If mainstream comedies are what we expose our kids to, how do we even expect them to engage in something that’s remotely meant only for them? They won’t know how to appreciate that. The only other bracket of films they can possibly enjoy is the fare that comes from Hollywood; though not every animated film or a film with kids is for them.”
Back on the home turf, apart from Sniff!!!, Ruchi Narain’s Hanuman Da Damdaar was the only other film that catered to little ones this year. When asked about the odds piled before a filmmaker backing children’s content, Ruchi points out that animation of international quality is expensive and the budgets in India for animation films are not even a small percentage of the Hollywood counterparts.
Even though the current scenario of kids’ films seems bleak, future holds some hope. Vishal Bhardwaj, known to back children’s content, is constantly working on stories that can please a tot. Ruchi is also planning her next animation film for kids. And Amole, despite his last experience with Sniff, is raring to make an even better children’s film that before. He sums it up saying, “The only thing left out of a child’s plate is his or her share of entertainment. Even cartoons like Oggy And the Cockroaches are Bollywood comic caricatures of stars which don't satisfy kids. It’s such a shame! We don’t know how to respect our children. What you sow is what you will get. How can you expect kids’ cinema to work wonders here when it lacks basic encouragement from the parents in the audience? You want a desi Harry Potter without investing in it. I have been fighting a losing battle. In an insecure industry, children’s cinema comes below regional cinema in the pecking order. I am not Alice in Wonderland. I know making my next kids’ film will not be easy but my conviction in that cinema is full, not token. I don’t ‘kid’ the audience.”
Original Lakdi Ki Kaathi girl Urmila Matondkar to launch new version
8:01 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Shaheen Parkar (MID-DAY; May 16, 2017)
Urmila Matondkar will come out of her self-imposed hibernation on Thursday to launch the new version of the Lakdi Ki Kaathi track from her 1983 film, Masoom. The iconic children’s track is being reprised in Ruchi Narain’s animation flick, Hanuman Da Damdaar, which has Salman Khan, Kunal Kemmu, Raveena Tandon and Chunky Pandey doing voice-overs.
Written by Gulzar with music by RD Burman, the original was sung by a bunch of kids. The rehashed version has been composed by Abhishek Arora and crooned by a few child singers.
Ruchi, who scripted Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi (2005) and directed Kal – Yesterday And Tomorrow (2005), says she was initially apprehensive about approaching Urmila to unveil the song. “To my surprise, she agreed. Both the film and song are special to her.”
Ruchi recalls how Urmila had offered help to her, a complete stranger, when she once faced ticket issues at the Mumbai airport. “She came to my rescue as a co-passenger even though she did not know who I was.”
Urmila has been away from the scene since long and secretly tied the knot with Kashmiri model- turned-businessman Mohsin Akhtar Mir in March 2016.
Hanuman Da Damdaar, which has a voiceover by Salman Khan, to release on May 19
8:03 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
BOMBAY TIMES (April 11, 2017)
On the occasion of Hanuman
Jayanti today, the poster of the upcoming animation film, Hanuman Da
Damdaar, will be released. Interestingly, Salman Khan has lent his voice
to the grown-up Hanuman in the film, which has been written and directed
by Ruchi Narain (writer of Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi and director of
Kal: Yesterday And Tomorrow).
Scheduled to release on May 19, the film narrates the story of Hanuman. It begins at a point much before he meets Lord Ram - a time when he was oblivious of his strength, mettle and purpose in life. Ruchi says, “It was while working out the release calendar that we realised that our first look launch was coinciding with Hanuman Jayanti. With this kind of blessing, we're sure this summer will be truly damdaar.“
Scheduled to release on May 19, the film narrates the story of Hanuman. It begins at a point much before he meets Lord Ram - a time when he was oblivious of his strength, mettle and purpose in life. Ruchi says, “It was while working out the release calendar that we realised that our first look launch was coinciding with Hanuman Jayanti. With this kind of blessing, we're sure this summer will be truly damdaar.“
Salman Khan to lend his voice for Lord Hanuman in Hanuman Da Damdaar
8:08 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Salman Khan, the Hanuman bhakt of Kabir Khan's cross-border drama, now lends his voice for the lord in an animated feature film
Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; August 6, 2016)
"He's the kind of actor who once he gets the ball, runs with it and always scores. His improvisations had us in splits. He'd look at us and ask, 'Zyada ho gaya kya?' And we'd assure him he was just great. Sometimes, in between shots, he'd croon, 'Main hoon Hanuman tera'," Ruchi reminisces with a smile, pointing out that only after he'd finished his day-long dubbing did they get down to animating his character so it would reflect his 'performance'.
Many are surprised when they learn that the writer of Hazaaron Khwaishain Aisi, Sudhir Mishra's love triangle set against the backdrop of the Emergency, is now directing an animated film for children. She points out that it's because she feels Indian kids are deprived of good animated content despite our rich mythology and its trippy characters.
In December 2007, Anurag Kashyap had directed an animated film, Return of Hanuman, for his daughter, Aaliyah, and her pals after she complained that his films were all about cops and men being beaten up. It had Hanuman take birth on Earth after seeing a village boy being bullied. Despite a 'schoolboy hero' Maruti, the film touched on serious issues like global warming. "Anurag took Hanuman into the fiction space, my story is more a mix of mythology and fiction," says Ruchi who has been working on her fantasy adventure for three years now. "Everyone knows about the Ramayan, but legend has it that there was something called the Hanumad Ramayan which is lost to us. This is what I imagine Hanuman's story to be like."
The film releases towards the year end with Bajrangi's blessings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)