Showing posts with label Republic TV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republic TV. Show all posts

Sushant Singh Rajput case: Sandip Ssingh sues Republic TV for maligning image

PM Biopic Maker Facing Drug Allegations Made 53 Calls To BJP: Congress
Mohua Das (THE TIMES OF INDIA; October 16, 2020)

Film producer and friend of actor Sushant Singh Rajput — Sandip Ssingh, who was under the scanner after he was seen taking an active lead in events following the actor's death — slapped a legal notice on Republic TV and its editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami claiming Rs 200 crore as compensation for “maligning his image in public” and for terming Ssingh a “key conspirator” and “murderer”. The legal notice demands that the channel “drop all malicious footage and articles telecast against Ssingh” and “tender an unconditional public apology in writing/video”.

Speaking to TOI on Thursday, Singh said, “Money alone can’t compensate for the image and respect that I have lost in these past four months. I’ve struggled for 20 years to build my reputation as a film producer and because of the slander campaign that the channel ran against me everyday, financiers for my future projects are backing out, and exhibitors and distributors of our new film, ‘PM Narendra Modi’, are apprehensive about giving it too many shows when they see my name attached.” Ssingh’s production company Legend Global Studio set up in 2015 has made films like ‘Bhoomi’ and ‘Sarbjit’, apart from the biopic on the PM. “Thank god for the CBI enquiry. I was waiting to get my confidence back and take the right step.”

The notice was sent through advocate Rajesh Kumar on Wednesday highlighting news items carried by the channel “with a criminal intent to extort money.” “I’ve been accused of being a drug peddler, being connected to Dawood. They ran a hashtag asking for my arrest for 50 days at a stretch while their correspondents kept stalking my car or tried entering my house. Why? I was not in hiding!” said Ssingh who claims to have known Rajput for ten years. “I met him when he was transitioning from TV to films. Being Biharis we got along very well.”

Pointing at how media speculation had led to him being “singled out” for taking charge of Sushant’s funeral, Ssingh says: “When I reached Sushant’s house on June 14, I didn’t know there was going to be no one except his sister Mitu who I met for the first time that day. There were lots of procedures and no one from the family to get it done so I had to. Was I expected to practice my body language to perform for the media?”

Ssingh says that his legal notice was an attempt to rebuild his reputation and save himself from the trauma that the channel has caused him and his mother and sister. “Will he (Goswami) go on air and apologise to me for 50 days? If he can’t, let’s fight the legal battle.”

Bollywood vs news channels: How studios, screenwriters, artistes came together over six weeks for the move

As film bodies and production houses file a suit seeking to restrain certain news channels / journalists, industry insiders hail the move, while channels say they’ll pursue the truth
Prashant Singh (HINDUSTAN TIMES; October 14, 2020)

On Monday, 38 film bodies and production houses filed a suit in the Delhi High Court, seeking to restrain two news channels and four TV journalists, from making or publishing alleged “irresponsible, derogatory and defamatory remarks” against the film industry, and conducting media trials on various issues. The lawsuit named Republic TV, its editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami and consulting editor Pradeep Bhandari; Times Now, its editor-in-chief Rahul Shivshankar and group editor Navika Kumar as well as social media platforms.

While Bollywood insiders feel it was “high time the industry fought back”, the anchors say they will “continue to fight for the truth”. Filmmaker R Balki, whose company Hope Productions is a part of the lawsuit, says: “You can’t keep defaming the industry, and indulge in name-calling just because you have a TV channel. Forget about them following ethics, there are certain guidelines that they must abide by. It’s not a ‘free-for-all’ kind of a world. So, at the end of the day, taking the legal route is the logical and correct way.”

The lawsuit was filed by four Bollywood industry associations and 34 production houses including those owned by leading actors Anushka Sharma, Aamir Khan, Akshay Kumar, Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan and Ajay Devgn, actor-director Farhan Akhtar, and filmmakers Vishal Bhardwaj, Karan Johar, Kabir Khan and Rohit Shetty, besides Yash Raj Films etc.

Director Anees Bazmee says, “This should have happened way earlier, but koi baat nahi, der aaye, durust aaye. Defaming the entire industry is not acceptable. There may be certain wrong things in Bollywood but that could be true of every industry. That doesn’t mean you will disrepute everyone and say that 90% of the industry is bad. However, I’m a bit confused as to why the suit has been filed in the Delhi High Court, and not in Mumbai.”

We reached out to filmmakers such as Nikkhil Advani, Guneet Monga, Siddharth Roy Kapur (also president of the Producers Guild of India) and Shibashish Sarkar, whose production houses are a part of the lawsuit, but they refrained from commenting as the case was subjudice.

Goswami, during his show on Monday night, stated that he and his team will continue to look for the truth. “Let them do what they can, the truth will come out and the drugs connection to Bollywood, for those who have come together today [referring to the suit], the truth there also will come out. Our pursuit of the truth will only become stronger, intense and more focused,” he said on his show.

Navika tweeted: “If fighting for justice invites court cases, bring it on. All the A-listers can come together but India will continue to fight for the truth. You can’t intimidate us and can’t take away the viewers who believe in us. Let truth prevail,” tagging Aamir, Shah Rukh and Johar in her tweet.

Shivshankar too, tweeted, tagging Salman, Aamir, Devgn, Johar and Kangana Ranaut; “Cases against journalists of Times Now that have only sought justice for those who are wronged are a bad precedent. The mighty may think they can weaken the resolve of the fearless, but they are wrong.”
--------------------------
After 34 production houses file a lawsuit against Times Now, Republic TV for 'irresponsible' reportage, plaintiffs tell mid-day how studios, screenwriters, artistes came together over six weeks for the move
Uma Ramasubramanian, Mohar Basu (MID-DAY; October 14, 2020)

Over the past four months, Bollywood was a sitting duck as a section of television anchors — who believe that the loudest is the truest — referred to it as "druggies", "scum" and "the dirtiest industry in the country". On Monday, in an unprecedented move, four cine bodies and 34 studios — including Aamir Khan Productions, Ajay Devgn Ffilms, Shah Rukh Khan's Red Chillies Entertainment and Zoya Akhtar's Tiger Baby Digital — moved the Delhi High Court, seeking to restrain Republic TV and Times Now from making "irresponsible, derogatory and defamatory remarks" against the industry. The lawsuit sought a direction to Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami and journalist Pradeep Bhandari, Times Now editor-in-chief Rahul Shivshankar and group editor Navika Kumar, instructing them to restrain from interfering with the right to privacy of persons associated with the industry. It also called to pull down all the defamatory content published by them against Bollywood.

One of the key plaintiffs reveals that in early September, artistes and filmmakers discussed taking action against the vilification of Bollywood. "A prominent association requested other bodies to join forces and take measures. Finally, a few weeks ago, the cine bodies — including Cine & TV Artistes Association, Producers' Guild, Indian Film & TV Producers' Council and Screenwriters Association, which boasts 31,000 writers — teamed up at the behest of filmmakers. After numerous discussions with prominent artistes and producers, they unanimously decided to seek legal recourse. Now, the industry is speaking up together as their dignified silence was being misconstrued as an admission of guilt," says the plaintiff.

The lawsuit stated that the industry is not asking for a blanket gag order against these channels' reportage of the Sushant Singh Rajput death case. Another plaintiff says, "We're not questioning the factual reporting of the case, but we want them to stop the media trial. The industry is made up of hardworking individuals and they are all being viewed derogatorily because of this smear campaign." If other cine bodies or individuals want to vouch support, provisions will be made for them to legally join the suit.

mid-day reached out to DSK Legal's senior advocate Anand Desai, who filed the lawsuit. He refused to comment as the matter is sub-judice.

Rahul Shivshankar and Arnab Goswami

Top film houses move HC against 2 news channels

Red Chillies Entertainment, Salman Khan Films, Aamir Khan Productions are among top Bollywood producers who have joined as plaintiffs in the suit.
Richa Banka (HINDUSTAN TIMES; October 13, 2020)

New Delhi : Many of Bollywood’s biggest production houses and industry bodies came together on Monday to move the Delhi High Court seeking to restrain two television news channels from making or publishing alleged “irresponsible, derogatory and defamatory remarks” against the film industry.

The lawsuit — filed by four industry associations and 34 production houses, including those owned by Shah Rukh Khan, Aamir Khan, Salman Khan, Karan Johar, Ajay Devgn, Akshay Kumar, Anil Kapoor, Farhan Akhtar, Rohit Shetty, Vinod Chopra, and Ashutosh Gowariker — also asked for the channels to be barred from conducting a “media trial”.

The Film & Television Producers Guild Of India (PGI), Cine & TV Artistes’ Association (CINTAA), Indian Film and TV Producers Council (IFTPC), Screenwriters Association (SWA), Yash Raj Films, and Reliance Big Entertainment, were among the other petitioners.

The petitioners sought directions against Republic TV, its editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami and consulting editor Pradeep Bhandari; Times Now, its editor-in-chief Rahul Shivshankar, and group editor Navika Kumar, as well as social media platforms.

“The plea comes in the wake of these channels using highly derogatory words and expressions for Bollywood such as ‘dirt’, ‘filth’, ‘scum’, ‘druggies’ and expressions such as ‘it is Bollywood where the dirt needs to be cleaned’, ‘all the perfumes of Arabia cannot take away the stench and the stink of this filth and scum of the underbelly of Bollywood’, ‘This is the dirtiest industry in the country’, and ‘cocaine and LSD drenched Bollywood’,” read the petition, filed by law firm DSK Legal. The matter is likely to be heard this week.

“We are seeking an apology and stay on the kind of coverage that’s being done on news channels,” said Ramesh Taurani, board member, IFTPC.

Amit Behl, senior joint secretary of CINTAA, said the film industry comprised hard-working individuals and couldn’t accept being collectively labelled with allegations. “All of us stand united against attempts to defame the entire filmmaking community,” he added.

The petition came after roughly four months of media controversy over the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput in his Mumbai home on June 14.

The incident is currently being probed by several government agencies — including the Central Bureau of Investigation, Enforcement Directorate and Narcotics Control Bureau. Some sections of the media have blamed Bollywood stars for the death of the 34-year-old actor and, based on private chats and messages, implied that some top film stars and producers were part of a drug ring.

Kumar and Shivshankar said they did nothing wrong.

“Cases against journalists of Times Now that have only sought justice for those who are wronged are a bad precedent. The mighty may think they can weaken the resolve of the fearless at Times Now but they are wrong,” Shivshankar tweeted.

“If fighting for justice invites court cases, bring it on. All the A-listers can come together but India will continue to fight for the truth. You can’t intimidate us @TimesNow & can’t take away the viewers who believe in us. Let truth prevail,” Kumar tweeted.

“Even after the case involving the unfortunate death of actor Mr. Sushant Singh Rajput (which appears to have triggered the diatribe against Bollywood) was transferred to the CBI, these defendants indulged in what could be aptly described as a frenzy suggesting that the CBI would start making arrests,” the petition read.

The petition said it didn’t seek a blanket gag order on media reportage in the Rajput case but wanted an injunction on publication of material that violated applicable laws.

The plea said Bollywood was a huge source of revenue, foreign exchange and employment. “The livelihood of persons associated with Bollywood is being severely impacted by the smear campaign being run by the defendants,” the petition said.

The suit alleged that the defendants conducted and published private investigations and effectively acted as courts to condemn people connected with Bollywood as guilty based on alleged evidence, making a mockery of the criminal justice system.

“The privacy of the members of Bollywood is being invaded, and their reputations are being irreparably damaged by painting the entire Bollywood as criminals, seeped in drug culture, and making being part of Bollywood as synonymous with criminal acts in the public imagination,” the plea read.

The suit contended this was not the first time legal action was initiated against the defendants and some of them were penalised earlier for alleged irresponsible reportage and defamatory content.

The petition came days after actor Rhea Chakraborty – Rajput’s girlfriend – got bail in a drug case. Chakraborty’s lawyer also threatened to take action against people who implicated the 28-year-old actor in Rajput’s death and the drug racket.

Others who have filed the suit are Screenwriters Association (SWA); Aamir Khan Productions; Ad-Labs Films; Ajay Devgn Fflims; Andolan Films; Anil Kapoor Film and Communication Network; Arbaaz Khan Productions; Ashutosh Gowariker Productions; BSK Network and Entertainment; Cape of Good Films; Clean Slate Filmz and Dharma Productions.

The list also included Emmay Entertainment and Motion Pictures; Excel Entertainment; Filmkraft Productions; Hope Production; Kabir Khan Films; Luv Films; Macguffin Pictures; Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment; One India Stories; R.S. Entertainment (Ramesh Sippy Entertainment); Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra Pictures; Red Chillies Entertainment; Reel Life Productions; Reliance Big Entertainment and Rohit Shetty Picturez.

Why parallels can be drawn with Kunal Kamra airline row and Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s slapping incident


The internet exploded on January 28, 2020, after comedian Kunal Kamra, known for his critique on government, uploaded a video wherein he is criticising Republic TV co-owner and news reporter Arnab Goswami in an IndiGo flight. Throughout the length of the 1 minute 50 seconds long video, Kunal can be heard taking on Arnab and the latter being completely oblivious to it, wearing earphones and using his laptop. After he uploaded the video, Kunal also put out a statement wherein he claimed that he apologized to the pilot and the on board crew members for his behaviour. The video, as expected, went viral and evoked mixed reactions. Some congratulated him for his what they called bravado. The rest found it in a very bad and cheap taste.

Trouble arose when IndiGo put out a statement on the night of the same day that they have suspended Kunal Kamra from flying on their airline for six months as he indulged in ‘unacceptable behaviour’. Around 30 minutes later, Hardeep Singh Puri, the Union Minister for Civil Aviation, who was tagged by IndiGo in their statement tweet, made a response to their tweet stating, “Offensive behaviour designed to provoke & create disturbance inside an aircraft is absolutely unacceptable & endangers safety of air travellers. We are left with no option but to advise other airlines to impose similar restrictions on the person concerned”. One more hour later, Air India followed in the steps of IndiGo and suspended Kunal Kamra. They were joined by SpiceJet and Go Air the next day in putting indefinite restriction on the stand-up comedian.

As expected, the ones who hate Kunal Kamra to the core for being extremely critical of BJP, went into a celebration mode over these bans. The rest of them and even the more neutral ones were left shocked. Rightfully, many netizens reminded that graver acts have been committed by our politicians particularly on flights. A recent example is of BJP MP Pragya Thakur, who didn’t allow a SpiceJet flight in December 2019 to take off for 45 minutes because of a seat issue. A video is out showing disgruntled passengers blasting her for using her VIP status in an unfair manner. SpiceJet, however, took no action against Pragya. Then, 3 years ago, the case of the then Shiv Sena MP Ravindra Gaikwad slapping an Air India employee and even beating him with his shoes is unforgettable. The politician even bragged about in front of the media. He was put in an unofficial no-fly-list by airlines for around 9-10 days. He later stated in the Parliament that he regrets what happened and then went on to lie that he only slightly pushed the employee and that he never attacked him with his chappals! This white lie was enough for Air India and others to forgive him.

More and more analysis of the incident came to light as the day passed yesterday. It was revealed that neither Arnab Goswami nor IndiGo crew made any formal complaint against Kunal Kamra. Hence, this act of IndiGo suspending him was against the rules. Same goes for Air India, SpiceJet and Go Air, who shockingly and hastily also announced a suspension on Kamra though the incident didn’t take place in their aircraft! Arun Kumar, director general of Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), on record made it clear that the said ban is a clear violation of rules. A few hours, DGCA backtracked and claimed that such a ban doesn’t violate any rules. However, a quick Google search on the rules makes it clear that no due process was followed.

As I read through the material on this controversy and discussed it with friends, I was transported back to an incident that occurred 3 years 1 day before this incident. It took place in Jaipur where blockbuster and reputed filmmaker Sanjay Leela Bhansali was filming for his ambitious period film Padmavati On January 27, 2017, protestors, belonging to an organization called Sri Rajput Karni Sena, descended on the sets and slapped the director. Their grouse was that Bhansali was distorting history. The film was based on brave Rajput queen Padmavati who committed ‘jauhar’ before she could be captured by Alauddin Khilji. The members of this violent organization made this attack on the assumption that there exists a romantic dream sequence between Padmavati and Khilji. Later, it came to light that no such scene existed in the script in the first place.

As expected, many right-wing fanatatics were overjoyed on hearing about the attack on Sanjay Leela Bhansali. They felt ‘he deserved it’ for messing up with history. Most of the industry remained silent. But the rest of the film personalities and most of the netizens demanded strict action against the attackers. Lokendra Kalvi, the founder of Sri Rajput Karni Sena, even admitted in front of the media that his men carried out the attack. However, the pro-attack group argued that no action should be taken since Bhansali never lodged a complaint. Also, the then Rajasthan CM Vasundhara Raje, also from BJP, never reacted to this attack though it occurred in her state. Again, the reasoning given was that how can she or Prime Minister Narendra Modi react to such ‘trivial matters’!

Now, let’s come back to Kunal Kamra row. Even here, as we mentioned above, Arnab Goswami never lodged a complaint. The same goes for the airline staff. Yet, the government in the form of Hardeep Singh Puri jumped in to criticize Kunal’s behaviour and ‘advised’ other airline to also ban him! To all those who got away by giving ‘no-complaint-means-no-action’ theory during Bhansali row, I’d like to ask all of them – what is your defence now?

It’s pretty clear why the government felt obliged to come in the defence of Arnab. The veteran reporter is known to be extremely close to the government. Most of the times, he is seen singing praises of BJP and defending its policies and criticizing the rest. There have been few instances when guests on his show have made it clear that he’s a BJP stooge; to which Arnab has blasted them and reiterated that he is a fair journalist. However, all these claims of Goswami can now go out of the window as anyone can make out that the government has come out to teach his ‘enemy’ a lesson on his behalf!

What Kunal Kamra did is unacceptable. Those supporting him will be upset if tomorrow the same treatment is meted out to their favourite anchors like Ravish Kumar or Barkha Dutt. They claim that even a Republic reporter did the same in a flight with Tejaswi Yadav but this is just making a whataboutery comment. Also, the manner in which they trended #BoycottIndigo and #BoycottAirIndia was foolish, especially since this same lobby was seen laughing over futility of a similar campaign #BoycottChhapaak two weeks back! However, one can’t deny that airlines have just bowed down in front of the government in placing these bans. They might get away now but in future, when a neta would indulge in such a behaviour (or even worse) and they’ll let him off, they’ll be taken to task by the netizens.