Showing posts with label Ratnakar Matkari. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ratnakar Matkari. Show all posts
Dadar's Sharda theatre stripped down to its walls, activists fear prime property may be redeveloped
7:55 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Activists fear the 2.5-acre prime property on which Sharda Cinema stands may be redeveloped by the Mumbai Marathi Granth Sangrahalay Trust
Alka Dhupkar (MUMBAI MIRROR; May 8, 2019)
It seems to be the end of the road for yet another single screen theatre in the city. With the possession of Sharda Cinema in Dadar East back with the Mumbai Marathi Granth Sangrahalay Trust, which has asked the previous distributors to strip the theatre down to just its walls, activists fear the theatre will never be back. They feel that this is the first step by the trust to redevelop the prime 2.5-acre property in Naigaon, which also houses the Sangrahalay.
The 750-seater theatre, which was run by Gandhi exhibitors and distributors since the 70s, has been shut since a few weeks.
After a long legal battle, the possession of the cinema was handed back to the Sangrahalay Trust on April 22. The exhibitors have been asked to remove all the infrastructure, including chairs, projectors, air conditioners and even the ceiling, from the theatre. Prafulla Gandhi, one of the partners of Gandhi exhibitors, told Mirror that the infrastructure was removed, in accordance with the ‘consent decree’ with the Trust.
Explaining why the distributor was asked to vacate the theatre, Vishwas Mokashi, chief secretary of the Granth Sangrahalay, said, “The infrastructure was too old and hence we asked the distributor to vacate it when the lease expired. The important thing one should understand is that the property is legally in possession of the Granth Sangrahalay. This is a big achievement. The days of single screen theatre are over and hence the committee will decide the fate of this prime property in the future.”
Nationalist Congress Party chief Sharad Pawar is the chairman of the Sangrahalay and his daughter Supriya Sule is one of the trustees. Congress leader Bhalchandra Mungekar and NCP leader Vidya Chavan are vice chairpersons.
Advocate Anand Kate, a member of the committee which finalised the consent decree with the Trust, said, “In the executive committee meeting, we had recommended to the trust that we should keep the infrastructure and settle the bill. But our opinion was overruled.”
Social activist Medha Patkar and writer Ratnakar Matkari-led Mumbai Marathi Granth Sangrahalay Bachao Samiti has alleged that the Trust is not making any effort to reopen the theatre even though distributors have come forward with proposals to run it as a theatre.
Kesarinath Mhatre of Mhatre Enterprises has approached the Trust, expressing his interest to run the single screen theatre at a monthly rent of Rs one lakh. “I had submitted the proposal to Narendra Patil in 2018. The current condition of the theatre is shocking. Except walls, there is no infrastructure whatsoever. Still, I am ready to run the theatre but I haven’t heard any response from the trust after the death of Mr Patil in December.” Mhatre currently runs Amar and Sharad Talkies in Central Mumbai and Laxmi Cinema in Surat.
Dhananjay Shinde of Aam Aadmi Party and a member of the Bachao Samiti told Mumbai Mirror, “The construction is not dilapidated or weak. The theatre has a cultural relevance in the city. It is lying in dust with a damaged roof, vulnerable to the rains.”
RTI activist Anil Galgali, Sudhir Hegishte, Krishna Naik, Gajanan Desai and other members of the Bachao Samiti had a meeting on Tuesday in Naigaon and decided to start a public campaign to restart the Sharda cinema.
Since January this year, Mirror has reported about the decline in the Sangrahalay and the efforts by activists to address the disintegration of the library. The membership of the 120-year-old Sangrahalay has been dropping for the past 10 years.
Hold the applause: Funding still a huge struggle for Marathi cinema
8:25 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Mithila Phadke (THE TIMES OF INDIA; April 19, 2015)
It was the little film that could. When
Shwaas opened in 2004, it was dubbed a “breath of fresh air“ for
Marathi cinema. Shot over a single month on a budget of Rs 65 lakh, by
first-time director Sandeep Sawant, it notched up glowing reviews and
several awards. The story of a little boy about to lose his sight to
cancer and a grandfather determined to show him as much of the world as
possible before the operation, stood apart from the bloated potboilers
that had become the norm.
“It drew people's attention to the Marathi film industry, and many offbeat films were made in the following years. Funding became a little easier, producers started thinking, Okay, so something like this can also work!'“ says film critic Ganesh Matkari.
Despite the tremendous buzz Shwaas had generated around alternate Marathi cinema, it took Sawant 10 years to make his second film. The problem: funding. Sawant and his wife Neeraja Patwardhan, the upcoming Nadi Vahate's costume designer, had to raise the budget of about Rs 4 crore themselves. They approached banks for loans, and dipped into their savings to add the rest.
Finances
continue to remain a worry for independent filmmakers, despite the
rahrah for Marathi cinema every time a debut director manages to push
his film to the theatres, an actor turns producer or a corporate house
bankrolls a project. Not just Sawant, several other indie filmmakers
maintain that the much-talked-about groundswell of support for Marathi
films is actually very limited. “There is definitely a greater
interest in producing Marathi cinema today, especially the
content-driven kind,“ agrees Sawant. The problem,
he explains, is with the numbers.
The Marathi film industry churns out close to 120 movies a year. These include the masala kind like Lai Bhaari and Timepass, and the offbeat, such as Fandry, Tingya and the just-released Court. Of these, not more than a dozen actually reach audiences, says Shivaji Patil, director of the acclaimed Dhag. “From this lot, maybe two or three will be offbeat, quality films. These are the ones that get talked about,“ Patil says, adding that for every Court and Fandry, there are several that go unnoticed. Or they win awards, but can't draw audiences due to meagre marketing budgets. “A Dhag, a Gandha - how many people saw them?“ asks Matkari.
When his father, the writer Ratnakar Matkari's novella was adapted for film in 2013 the team screened it for small groups from production houses like Essel Vision “They all loved it,“ says Matkari, associate director of the National Award-winning Investment. “But the matter didn't go any further.“
Financial support is relatively easier to get for middle of-the-road films like Coffee Ani Barach Kahi. “For the more serious, darker subjects production houses are hesitant.“ The budget tends to be a “safe“ one of Rs 1.5-2 crore so that the returns are assured Sawant says. His film Nadi Vahate, shot across villages in Goa and Sindhudurg, required a larger budget that producers were unwilling to provide.
Bhaurao Nanasaheb Karhade, 30, is well aware of the challenges. Earlier a farmer in Ahmednagar's Gawadewadi and then a communications student in Pune, he sold his five-acre plot of land back home to finance his film. He had approached “close to 40“ producers for Khwada, which is about a shepherd family that moves to the city. No one helped. But Karhade's family stood firm behind him, and the film, made on a budget of Rs 2 crore, snapped up two National Awards. “The first thing the companies think is business. And I don't blame them,“ he says. “But if I hadn't managed to find the money, the film would have never been made.“
Nikhil Sane, Business Head at Zee's Essel Vision, a leading producer and distributor of Marathi films, feels it's unfair to generalize. “How much support a production house gives its filmmakers and believes in the project - it depends on the company,“ he says. “We have produced films across the board--from Elizabeth Ekadashi to Timepass 2. If we were solely concerned with the returns, we wouldn't have taken on Fandry.“
The problem though, as producer Sanjay Chhabria from Everest Entertainment points out, is that there just aren't enough production houses. There are about three main players. “I can only do about 2 or 3 films in a year. We don't have the bandwidth to take on more,“ he says.
Directors Sunil Sukhtankar and Sumitra Bhave, makers of critically acclaimed films like Dahavi Fa and Astu, had approached production houses for five projects. “It's always been the same case,“ says Sukhtankar. “The artistic committee watches the film and they love it, they are moved to tears. Once it reaches the marketing department, things come to a grinding halt.“
“It drew people's attention to the Marathi film industry, and many offbeat films were made in the following years. Funding became a little easier, producers started thinking, Okay, so something like this can also work!'“ says film critic Ganesh Matkari.
Despite the tremendous buzz Shwaas had generated around alternate Marathi cinema, it took Sawant 10 years to make his second film. The problem: funding. Sawant and his wife Neeraja Patwardhan, the upcoming Nadi Vahate's costume designer, had to raise the budget of about Rs 4 crore themselves. They approached banks for loans, and dipped into their savings to add the rest.
The Marathi film industry churns out close to 120 movies a year. These include the masala kind like Lai Bhaari and Timepass, and the offbeat, such as Fandry, Tingya and the just-released Court. Of these, not more than a dozen actually reach audiences, says Shivaji Patil, director of the acclaimed Dhag. “From this lot, maybe two or three will be offbeat, quality films. These are the ones that get talked about,“ Patil says, adding that for every Court and Fandry, there are several that go unnoticed. Or they win awards, but can't draw audiences due to meagre marketing budgets. “A Dhag, a Gandha - how many people saw them?“ asks Matkari.
When his father, the writer Ratnakar Matkari's novella was adapted for film in 2013 the team screened it for small groups from production houses like Essel Vision “They all loved it,“ says Matkari, associate director of the National Award-winning Investment. “But the matter didn't go any further.“
Financial support is relatively easier to get for middle of-the-road films like Coffee Ani Barach Kahi. “For the more serious, darker subjects production houses are hesitant.“ The budget tends to be a “safe“ one of Rs 1.5-2 crore so that the returns are assured Sawant says. His film Nadi Vahate, shot across villages in Goa and Sindhudurg, required a larger budget that producers were unwilling to provide.
Bhaurao Nanasaheb Karhade, 30, is well aware of the challenges. Earlier a farmer in Ahmednagar's Gawadewadi and then a communications student in Pune, he sold his five-acre plot of land back home to finance his film. He had approached “close to 40“ producers for Khwada, which is about a shepherd family that moves to the city. No one helped. But Karhade's family stood firm behind him, and the film, made on a budget of Rs 2 crore, snapped up two National Awards. “The first thing the companies think is business. And I don't blame them,“ he says. “But if I hadn't managed to find the money, the film would have never been made.“
Nikhil Sane, Business Head at Zee's Essel Vision, a leading producer and distributor of Marathi films, feels it's unfair to generalize. “How much support a production house gives its filmmakers and believes in the project - it depends on the company,“ he says. “We have produced films across the board--from Elizabeth Ekadashi to Timepass 2. If we were solely concerned with the returns, we wouldn't have taken on Fandry.“
The problem though, as producer Sanjay Chhabria from Everest Entertainment points out, is that there just aren't enough production houses. There are about three main players. “I can only do about 2 or 3 films in a year. We don't have the bandwidth to take on more,“ he says.
Directors Sunil Sukhtankar and Sumitra Bhave, makers of critically acclaimed films like Dahavi Fa and Astu, had approached production houses for five projects. “It's always been the same case,“ says Sukhtankar. “The artistic committee watches the film and they love it, they are moved to tears. Once it reaches the marketing department, things come to a grinding halt.“
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)