Dhanush on Sonam's beauty and traces of Rajinikanth in him
Priya Gupta (BOMBAY TIMES; February 7, 2015)

Balki said that the best thing about you is how you are an original.
I try my best to stay original. To have such phenomenal actors and legends all over the country and not having any traces of them in you, having your own originality, is a task. Sometimes I get comments about people saying that I have mild traces of Rajinikanth sir here and there, which I gladly accept. Any actor who has been a fan of Rajini sir and who has grown up as that cannot act without mild traces of him.

Akshara told me how you transform as soon as the camera comes on.
See, my general knowledge is bad. I don't even know how to fill a cheque. I can speak only Tamil, my English is bad, I don't know any other language. I don't know who's the president of which country. You ask me about politics and I wouldn't know anything. I'm uncomfortable everywhere. I'm very shy and am an introvert. At a party, it will probably take me one hour to go say hi to a person or probably at the end of the day, I'll choose not to say anything and leave. I have major stage fright. Give me a mike, I'll blabber something and run away. If you suddenly ask me to dance in front of the public, I won't be able to. But there is this one place where I am really, really comfortable that is in front of a camera — a movie camera, not a still camera. I'm very scared of still cameras. I'm really confident and in my comfort zone only in front of a movie camera and feel that that is where I belong.

Why not still cameras?
It captures something and does not move forward. With a movie camera, I can still get away with getting something wrong. With a still camera, the pose is going to be like that forever. What I admire about Sonam Kapoor is that she is amazing in front of a still camera. It's unbelievable how comfortable she is in front of a still camera. I think one needs to be so beautiful to be at such ease because she doesn't need to focus on a particular reaction, she is going to look good anyway. For me, I have a million restrictions. I even work on how I look while crying or laughing.

Superstars are finally taking notice and action against people who use and misuse their names to promote films
Bharati Dubey (MID-DAY; March 31, 2014)

With Rajinikanth’s film Kochadaiiyaan releasing round the corner, a film titled Main Hoon Rajinikanth has just been announced by filmmaker Faisal Saif. He is not the only one — nor the first one — to be cashing on or using an actor’s name in a film. There have been instances in the past too.

Faisal defends himself saying that his film will only be a tribute to the legendary actor. “It is about Rajnikanth and you will get to see those things which you have only read it as SMS jokes. The comedy is on the lines of The Dictator and Borat,” he says. When asked if he sought permission from the superstar, he says, “We are not making a film on Mahatma Gandhi or any historic figure. My film is also not a biopic. It is a tribute and for that we only need his blessings. We want our film to be a pleasant surprise for him.’’ Trade analyst Komal Nahta rubbishes the claims that it is just a tribute. “The filmmakers are obviously cashing on the actors or at times even characters’ popularity. The idea is to get instant recognition and attention. We easily remember movies titled Basanti Ki Shaadi Honeymoon Gabbar Ka, because of the popularity of those iconic characters. It is a ploy to get publicity,” he says.

Filmmaker Janki Vishwanathan’s film Yeh Hai Bakrapur which is slated to release in May too has a ‘Shahrukh’ in it. The filmmaker has been seeking audience with the Shah Rukh Khan because a goat in her film is named after him. She justified it by saying, “Since the goat is the protagonist of the film, we went hunting for the right goat. We ‘auditioned’ at least 400 goats before we found the right one. Call it a divine coincidence but the goat that was approved was called Shah Rukh. I was told the goat responds to that name since he was one year old. I thought best not to change the name.’’ She adds, if you go to the goat market in Bidar which falls on the border of Karnataka and Maharashtra, most goats there are either called Shah Rukh or Salman. “I wanted that trend to be reflected in my film. Not so long back there was this goat called Saifeena, which was sold for Rs 4 lakh. I won’t be surprised if there is a goat named Sachin in the market too. The reason is to show how things in rural India works.” she says. She is keen on showing the film to SRK because she wants the actor to know that “there is no malice intended” and that she utmost respect for him.

We don’t know how Shah Rukh is taking this piece of news, but Salman Khan was evidently not too happy when a filmmaker, Muazzam Beg, launched his film, Munna Bhai Sallu Bhai on Salman Khan’s birthday on December 27 last year. Salman Khan’s office is said to have promptly sent mails to Beg warning him against misusing the star’s name. Beg had to shelve the film. He says, “ Our story was about two fans of these actors. We had shot 30 per cent of the film, but decided to shelve it after the warnings came,” he says. In hindsight, he says he should have sought Sallubhai’s permission before even starting the film.

Some time back, Madhuri Dixit, who was then living in the USA, got anxious when Ram Gopal Verma announced a project called Main Madhuri Dixit Banna Chahti Hoon, without speaking to her about it. Her then business manager Rikku Rakesh Nath explains, “We took an objection to the title and only after we understood what the script is, and gave him a No Objection Certificate did he begin shooting.” Whatever the intention of the filmmaker, do these dramatic naming result in more business? No, says Nahta. “It just becomes a point of discussion for a while and then some front benchers get taken in, but that’s about it.”