In Hungama 2, there was a lot that was narrated, but didn’t make it to the screen-Shilpa Shetty
8:07 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

The love and fame I continue to receive is all thanks to television-Shilpa Shetty
8:22 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta


Disney+ Hotstar, with 4.75 crore subscribers, is the top streaming platform in India by a distance
8:15 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

I cannot wait to work with Varun Dhawan and Ranveer Singh-Pranitha Subhash
8:12 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

(Crisp) Movie Review: HUNGAMA 2 by FENIL SETA
11:39 PM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Hungama is a classic comic film and is in the list of ‘all-time favourite films’ of many. But Hungama 2 shockingly is a poor show. The humour is hardly there though the story has all the ingredients of a laugh-a-minute riot. However, the script turns it into a dry and unexciting affiar. The various subplots don’t come together the way it happens organically in a Priyadarshan film. Also, though one doesn’t have to look at logic in such films, it still should be convincing to some extent. Here, anything happens anytime and it’s shocking how it got passed. Meezaan Jafri is strictly okay and his comic timing is a bit off. Pranitha Subhash is quite better and manages to impress with her performance. Shilpa Shetty looks ravishing and gives a first-rate performance. But her screen time is limited. Paresh Rawal also doesn’t get sufficient screen time. Ashutosh Rana in fact is like the second lead and is quite good. Tiku Talsania leaves a mark. Johny Lever is fine in the cameo while Manoj Joshi is average. Rajpal Yadav is the funniest part of the enterprise and its thanks to him that the film doesn’t emerge as an outright disaster. The child actors are nice but they mysteriously disappear after a ‘dhamakedaar’ entry. Akshaye Khanna looks dull. All in all, Hungama 2 is an epic disappointment.
My rating - ** out of 5!
Fenil's Bollywood Talk # 683
9:00 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
A COMIC CAPER AND ROMCOM TO ENTERTAIN AUDIENCES THIS WEEKEND
While theatres are still shut, two films that were supposed to release on the big screen have now made their way on digital. These two films – Hungama 2 and 14 Phere – are now releasing tomorrow online.
Hungama 2 will be released on Disney+ Hotstar and like the first part, it is directed by Priyadarshan. But the story and characters are not the same as in the 2003 original. The sequel stars Meezaan Jafri, Pranitha Subhash, Shilpa Shetty and Paresh Rawal. The trailer has been alright but the film seems like a fun entertainer aimed at families. Also, Hungama is a much-loved film and continues to get good ratings even today. Hence, the sequel will also get viewership, regardless of the reviews.
The film has been in the news thanks to the remix of the song 'Chura Ke Dil Mera'. The original featured Shilpa Shetty in a sensuous avatar and the same happens in the remix as well. While some criticized the recreation, the discussion around the song kept the film in news.
This is also Shilpa Shetty’s first film in 14 years. All was going well and she was enjoying the promotions. However, the arrest of her husband, Raj Kundra, that too in a porn racket case led to a lot of ridicule for the actress. It is expected that hopefully, the negativity will not spill over to Hungama 2.
The other film of this week is 14 Phere. It’ll premiere on Zee5 and stars Vikrant Massey and Kriti Kharbanda. The film looks like a nice romantic comedy and the title is novel. Sadly, the buzz is negligible. Many moviegoers and netizens are not even aware that such a film is being released. The soundtrack has gone unnoticed. The film will need to be really good to get viewership and also sustain the competition from Hungama 2.
Interestingly, 14 Phere is a film that went on floors post lockdown, in November 2020. It was initially scheduled to release on July 9 in cinemas this year.
My father Jaaved Jaaferi never gives me pointers about acting-Meezaan Jafri
8:28 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

I was told Hungama 2 makers are planning to reprise Chura Ke Dil Mera. After that, I couldn’t say no-Shilpa Shetty
8:19 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Priyadarshan’s comedies have innocence; there is nothing vulgar about them-Paresh Rawal
8:18 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Shilpa Shetty remakes Chura Ke Dil Mera; sparks debate among fans
8:18 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta


We wanted to retain Chura Ke Dil Mera's original signature step-Brinda Parameshwar
8:13 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

I am disappointed as Hungama 2 is a kind of film that people will enjoy watching together-Priyadarshan
8:14 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

My next with Akshay Kumar is a comic thriller-Priyadarshan
9:21 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Most stars in the South film industry are disciplined-Paresh Rawal
8:23 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

I am not some Shah Rukh or Salman Khan who has the luxury of choosing films-Meezaan Jafri
8:13 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh see a rise in film shoots amid the pandemic
8:29 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta


Image: Meezaan Jafri, Paresh Rawal, Shilpa Shetty take off to Manali to resume Hungama 2 shoot
7:54 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Shilpa Shetty consistently strives to be better-Priyadarshan
8:34 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta
Bombay High Court quashes ban on film & TV shoots for crew aged 65-plus
8:19 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

‘Condition Is Discriminatory, Arbitrary, Violates Right to Dignity’
Rosy Sequeira (THE TIMES OF INDIA; August 8, 2020)
Mumbai: In a relief for film and television cast and crew aged over 65 years, the Bombay High Court on Friday struck down a condition in two state government circulars that barred them from shoots. The court observed the condition is discriminatory, arbitrary and violates their right to live with dignity.“Having permitted the film industry to operate and open, subject to conditions, the introduction of the impugned condition that places absolute restriction on persons above the age of 65 years from carrying out their occupation or trade, whilst not similarly restricting persons of the same age who are engaged in other trades or occupations permitted to operate and open, would amount to an unreasonable restriction and hence a violation of their right under Article 19 (1) (g) (right to practice any profession) of the Constitution,” said a bench of Justice Shahrukh Kathawalla and Justice Riyaz Chagla.
The judges quashed and set aside the condition in the May 31 and June 23 government resolutions (GR) to restart the media entertainment industry as part of ‘Mission Begin Again’. It stated that “any cast/crew member above the age of 65 years will not be allowed at the site”.
The verdict was delivered on petitions by artiste Pramod Pandey and Indian Motion Pictures Producers Association, both represented by advocate Ashok Saraogi.
The judges held there is discrimination in the disparate treatment of persons who are aged 65 years or above in the film and TV industry and in the other permitted sectors and activities.
They further said the condition failed to consider relevant material—relaxation in the ministry of home affairs (MHA)’s May 30 order and the state government’s May 31 order. The state’s reply had said the condition is based on these two orders that require persons aged 65 years and above to stay home, except for essential or medical purposes.
The judges agreed with amicus curiae senior advocate Sharan Jagtiani that unlike the mandatory nature of guidelines issued in the previous lockdown phases, MHA’s May 30 order was advisory.
While the MHA order had contained relaxations, there was no corresponding easing with regard to film and television in the state’s May 31 GR. This aspect was not considered by the state, especially in addressing clarifications in the June 23 GR. Rather, in its July 25 reply to the court, it stated if the Centre relaxes this condition, it will issue a similar relaxation.
The judges noted having concluded the condition is discriminatory and arbitrary, they are satisfied that absolute prohibition violates the petitioners’ right to live with dignity under Article 21 (right to life).
They mentioned government pleader Poornima Kantharia’s submission that no coercive will be taken against those above 65 years who choose to remain present on sets.
--------------------------
Court sets aside conditions in two government resolutions that bar cast and crew above 65 from shoots
Sharmeen Hakim (MUMBAI MIRROR; August 8, 2020)
Observing that there is “discrimination” in the treatment of people above 65 years in film and TV industry, the Bombay High Court has set aside conditions in two government resolutions that bar cast and crew above 65 from participating in shoots.
The ruling will come as a boost to senior citizens in the entertainment industry, who were barred from earning a livelihood due to the state government’s restrictions, issued on May 31 and June 23. The government orders were challenged by a 70-year-old actor named Pramod Pandey.
A division bench comprising justices Sharukh Kathawalla and Riyaz Chagla held that the decisions to bar those above 65 from the entertainment industry, while allowing them to take part in other day-to-day activities—taking public buses, going to offices, etc—were against Article 14 of the Constitution, especially since they failed to provide a solid reason for the discrimination.
The state claimed that its guidelines were based on central government directives.
However, the bench relied on the submissions of the amicus curiae, senior advocate Sharan Jagtiani, to say that central and state government orders dated May 30 and 31 relaxed their general conditions, making restrictions on those above 65 years advisory in nature.
“In our view, there is discrimination in the disparate treatment of persons who are 65 years of age or above in the film or television industry and in the other permitted sectors and activities. The same is not based on any intelligible differentia and no explanation to this effect is to be found in the reply of the state government. The impugned condition, therefore, cannot be sustained in view of the well-settled principles enunciated under Article 14 of the Constitution of India,” the bench said.
The bench further said that for a restriction to be reasonable under Article 19 of the Constitution, material would be required to support the distinction.
“Having come to the conclusion that the impugned condition cannot be sustained on account of it being discriminatory and arbitrary, we are satisfied that the absolute prohibition as regards persons above the age of 65 years who earn their livelihood from the film industry (which is allowed to operate), is a measure that violates the petitioner’s right to live with dignity under Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution. And the restriction imposed by the impugned condition in relation to a specific sector or industry that is now allowed to operate, cannot constitute a valid procedure established by law,” the bench held.
The court, however, said that general advisories recommending all those people above 65 years not to venture out for their own good would apply to cast and crew of the film industry as well.
Actor Pandey, represented by advocate Ashok Saraogi, had said that the state government’s decision had brought people like him to the brink of starvation.
The government, represented by pleader Poornima Kantharia, however, said that the guidelines were issued for the benefit of those above 65.
--------------------------
With their productions starring veterans, filmmakers cheer as HC revokes state government guideline banning artistes over 65 on set
Upala KBR (MID-DAY; August 8, 2020)
The state government's regulation that barred actors and technicians over 65 years of age from shooting, as a precautionary measure amid the Coronavirus pandemic, had come under heavy fire from some stalwarts of the industry. On Friday, the Bombay High Court dismissed the regulation after a petition was filed by the Indian Motion Pictures Producers' Association (IMPPA) and senior Bollywood actor Pramod Pandey.
The move comes as a relief to several filmmakers, including Nikkhil Advani, who has envisioned his next, Mughal, with Shabana Azmi as one of the leads. "We are thrilled as several of our productions were being spearheaded by some superlative senior talent. Kanwaljit Singh [69] features in my production that is being directed by Kaashvie Nair. Fortunately, we can now have him on set when the shoot begins by the month-end," says Advani.
Priyadarshan, whose in-the-works Hungama 2 features senior talent, observes that the regulation would have hindered the industry that has veterans Amitabh Bachchan, Naseeruddin Shah and Azmi, among others, at the top of their game. "If these stars couldn't work till the situation improved, it would have resulted in huge losses for the producers," he says.
Hungama 2 director Priyadarshan compelled to resume shoot by September
8:39 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Hungama 2 director Priyadarshan compelled to resume shoot by September as child actors are growing up, threatening film's continuity
Upala KBR (MID-DAY; July 22, 2020)
Unlike other filmmakers who are tackling the seemingly Herculean task of seeking a fresh set of dates from stars and reworking their films' schedules, director Priyadarshan finds himself in a unique dilemma. Besides Shilpa Shetty Kundra, Paresh Rawal, Meezaan Jafri and Pranitha Subhash, the cast of Hungama 2 includes five child actors who are pivotal to the narrative. In the four months since the shoot was halted due to the Coronavirus lockdown, four child artistes — aged between eight and 11 — have been growing steadily in height. Worried that their growth may pose a continuity problem, the filmmaker has decided to resume work on the comedy by September 15."At this age, children grow up rapidly; there are changes in facial structure and height. While the physical changes that have happened in the past four months will not make a huge difference on screen, it will be difficult [to retain continuity] if we have to wait for some more months. Fortunately, only a song has to be shot with them," says Priyadarshan. The director, who returns to Bollywood after seven years with the comic caper, will be heading to Kullu and Manali with the cast and crew for the final 15-day schedule. Following precautionary measures, the unit will self-quarantine before commencing the shoot.
The four children aside, an 18-month baby is also part of the sequel to the 2003 hit, Hungama. Producer Ratan Jain informs, "Thankfully, we had completed filming the baby's portions in Ooty in March. The four children will be required only for four days on the set."
The producer adds that the Himachal Pradesh government has assured him that shoots can be conducted in the hill stations, in adherence with the state's safety guidelines. "The songs and sequences require us to film on the streets of Kullu and Manali. Considering an outdoor schedule is not possible during the monsoon, we are likely to resume work from September 15," adds Jain.





