Showing posts with label Farooq Sheikh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Farooq Sheikh. Show all posts

We had a thriving indie cinema movement, that space has disappeared today-Richa Chadha


Neha Maheshwri (BOMBAY TIMES; April 10, 2026)

At a time when the lines between mainstream and independent cinema continue to blur, casting choices have become a key point of debate within the industry. Actress-producer Richa Chadha has weighed in on the conversation, questioning the growing tendency of independent films casting commercial faces even when they can’t guarantee box office or add meaningful value on the festival circuit.

Highlighting what she sees as a contradiction in the way indie projects are being mounted today, the actress says, “If an actor isn’t opening a film theatrically on a Friday and doesn’t add any real weight at festivals, then what exactly is the advantage of casting them in an independent film?”

Richa, who backed the Indian- French co-production Girls Will Be Girls which premiered at the 2024 Sundance Film Festival, also points to the economic reality behind such decisions.

She says, “I am not suggesting anything, but with trained actors, you are at least assured that performance quality will be maintained. There is a commerce behind indie films too. Some stories don’t need big faces to pull crowds. It is more economical to sign on an actor who brings credibility without creating a huge hole in the budget. Without taking away from any actor’s ability or worth, if indie films are to truly survive in 2026, we have to understand that audiences want quality stories with credible actors, and filmmakers do not want to put a strain on the budget.”

Drawing from the past, she adds, “In the 1980s, we had a thriving indie cinema movement, and actors like Farooq Sheikh, Amol Palekar and Shabana Azmi were stars in their own right. That space has disappeared today. If the industry continues to wait for a nod from a handful of top male actors, on whose already tired and busy shoulders films are mounted, all the best to you. There won’t be enough output.”

Even when I go back to Mumbai penthouse, I have to remind myself that 'Tu Dilli ka middle-class ladka hai'-Aanand L Rai

Aanand L Rai on filming Dhanush-starrer Tere Ishq Mein, absence of romance on screen: 'Current generation doesn't want to get hurt'

Anshul Chaturvedi (BOMBAY TIMES; November 17, 2025)

In an industry fixated with figuring out what the audience will opt for next, director Aanand L Rai insists that the real crisis isn’t of misreading the audience, but of diminishing honesty and genuineness from the filmmakers. It wasn’t the audience that changed, he says – it was the filmmakers whose conviction began to wobble. From his learnings from the success of Raanjhanaa and Tanu Weds Manu, and the failure of Raksha Bandhan, to the coming full circle and trying to reconnect to his middle-class grounding, the director opens up about an internal battle that many artists face, but few admit to.

Why are Hindi filmmakers often struggling to predict audience behaviour?
The audience has become very – how do I put it – woh thodi se bhi beimaani ab nahi le pa rahe hain storytelling mein.

What does that mean? Audience ka imaan jaag gaya hai ab?
Nahi, I think woh toh aise hi thay, hum (filmmakers) beimann ho gaye. Humko lagne laga, achcha, unka yeh emotion exploit kiya ja sakta hai. Iss tarah ki kahani, uss tarah ki kahani unko pasand aayegi. But in all that, joh ek cheez chali gayi in filmmaking, woh thi conviction – jo ki ek Pushpa ya KGF ya Kantara – inmein hai. They have proved that conviction works.

Define conviction. What’s the difference here?
Our approach to the film was just to please the audience. Their approach was to tell a story. There is a huge, huge difference between the two. I can speak for myself – kahani hi banayi thi na Tanu Weds Manu, kahani hi banayi thi na Raanjhanaa. But jahan mujhe laga ki audience ko yeh pasand aayega – Raksha Bandhan – nahi! It didn’t work for anyone.

So, when you made an audience-led film, it didn’t work because it was not with your personal conviction?
My conviction was that they will like it.

‘Maine detour liya toh mujhe sab yaad aaya’
​When I was shooting last in Delhi, over a year back, I was staying near Nehru Place. And early morning I was on my way to the shooting location when I asked my driver to take a short detour to Sadiq Nagar. Our family stayed in Sadiq Nagar, government quarters – a Type III Quarter – that was allotted to my mother. I stayed there till my Class XII and then went to do my engineering. So on an impulse I told my driver, idhar le chal, main zara dekhoon Flat 152, Sector 1, kaisa dikh raha hai. Maine neeche khade ho kar dekha.

I remembered all those days. Roz wahin se nikalna, peeche bus stop se bus pakadna, uss window pe baithna, 2:45 pe ek ladki ka wahan se cross kar ke jaana, school uniform mein…that was such a memory. Maa ka chale jaana pyaaz ki rotiyan bana ke. Mera ghar aana, fridge mein se chhachh ka jug uthana…But if I don’t go there, all this is not happening to me. Main toh bhool gaya tha. Maine woh detour liya toh sab mujhe yaad aaya.

But the story was not your conviction?
No. Even if I make a film that I want to make, there is no assurance that it will work – but at least ek jana to khush hoga! Doosre tareeke mein toh dono hi khush nahi hain. This theory is easy, the practical – not so much. But when I think like this – mujhe mazaa aa raha hai – I can see the difference in how things go when I change the approach.

What is your learning curve of the last half a decade or so? What is your selfeducation in this journey?
My self-education is that when I was telling stories fearlessly, and at the same time, main apne pe kabhi successful film ka pressure nahi le raha tha, sirf kahani sunane ka pressure le raha tha – achche se sunane ka – tab tak meri duniya theek thi. Jab mujhe laga ki there are these growing expectations from this director, and I should go bigger – I started faltering.

That ‘formula’ work has been the reason for many an artiste to lose touch with their original craft.
Haan. At the end of the day, we are human – but at the end of the day, artiste jitna apni fakeeri mein reh jaye, utna achcha…

Artiste ki fitrat badal jaati hai toh uske kaam mein bhi farak aa jaata hai?
Aa jaata hai! Mujhe khud ko hi lagne laga ki bolta rehta hai middle class, middle class, but it doesn’t reflect in your work anymore – but it used to, earlier.

Achanak se sab badal gaya. So you keep talking about middle class, middle class, but you didn’t nurture the middle-class sensibility inside of you. My holidays changed – I began holidaying in Europe. I’m not saying that is wrong. If God has given you that success, you have to enjoy, there is nothing wrong with that. But it is a professional hazard – this profession makes you lose touch with your roots, and you have to understand that, and to hold on to it, if you want to remain in that space.

Midway nahi hai yahan. Ya toh aisa kar lo, ya toh phir udd jao. Be clear ki main toh aaya hi paise kamane ke liye tha. That is a different direction, a different track. But if you want to tell the stories that are inside you, then you have to stay grounded, stay in that world, and tell your stories.

And where are you placed – returning back to your original world?
Yes, I feel I am coming back to my world, jahan mujhe maza aayega.

What has changed in your approach to filmmaking now, as you come back?
I think if I am evolving, I should try to have my audience evolve with me. I will never be scared of telling an old story in a new way. I think the man-woman relationship was not depicted as an equal one for a long time. Many filmmakers got it wrong, and I need to make it right – that is my learning. Shayad main Tanu Weds Manu ya Raanjhanaa ke waqt iss tarike se nahi sochta tha, lekin ab sochta hoon.

You got a fair amount of flak for Raanjhanaa – not entirely unfair – in terms of your depiction of how a man behaved with a woman.
Yes, yes, and I took it. I understood. Ho sakta hai ki mere kaam mein going ahead you will see that I understood.

Hasn’t cinema sold the male entitlement pitch so often while making money at the box office? There is also a view that many of the blockbusters from the south have worked by playing that up while relatively more woke multiplex-ish Bollywood stories struggled.
I don’t disagree that many of the hits have a strong male perspective, they are very macho, and all that, but at the same time I think we cannot be the masters who decide beforehand what the audience should or should not watch.

I disagree with the thought that if we show them a lot of aggressive, macho male characters it will reflect in their behaviour. Because the reverse does not happen, does it? If I make films on Swami Vivekananda tomorrow, will all of them start doing sadhna? If they will not emulate what he does after watching a film on him, then they will not emulate the macho aggressive character either, will they?

Now you have seen me with my success and failures and trajectory. Obviously, success and failure matter, but at the end of the day, I enjoy the process. I am trying to not be afraid. I am trying to experiment. When I was making Raksha Bandhan I was thinking we don’t make enough cinema for the Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. I thought I had it all clear in my head. But my judgement was wrong.

Staying connected is very important. Meri zameen chhoot jaati hai, phir mujhe pakadna padta hai, phir mai apne penthouse mein chala jaata hoon, phir mujhe yaad dilana padta hai apne ko Tu woh Dilli ka ladka hai, teri aadhi zindagi unn peele gharon mein guzri hai. Teri apni kahaniyan woh hain! Tu soch kyun nahi raha hai!

Isn’t it true that a lot of names, after they enter Bollywood, tend to forget the USPs or the nuances that brought them into Bollywood in the first place. Even if you’re circling back to the place you started from, mentally, that’s also part of any artiste’s graph, perhaps? And nothing teaches us more than failures, always, right?
Obviously (laughs)! The problem is that, fortunately or unfortunately, even when you have failures, so to say, your bank balance does not change dramatically. Your lifestyle does not change. So, you feel ki theek toh chal raha hai sab. After a point you have to realize that it does not matter how much you made or how much you lost in a project. You need to sit down and introspect and see how far you have drifted from your original path. If you don’t do that then even failure is teaching you nothing.

Right now I am enjoying myself. I am also relishing making films for other directors as a producer. I can’t compete with the big houses, but I will try to pick the stories that others won’t. I will search for an identity, something that is original, not a copy of anything ‘successful’. I have not reached a 200-crore movie ever. But I ask myself, what is a better option? To make something that I have fun making and have something that is still not a bad return, or to chase that number? I am not chasing that number. I am not chasing any number. I will keep my middle-class approach. Mujhe khana achcha chahiye, lekin mujhe chaandi ki thaali nahi chahiye.

It’s not just directors, though, is it?
Amol Palekar, Farooq Sheikh – they played some very relatable, everyday; then paused and said: Main dhoond raha hoon Vinod Mehra in this character. Tu mujhe bana ke de raha hai Vinod Khanna. If I do that, the character itself will change and you may not be the right fit for that version of it! Some directors complete the circle, like we were discussing, and come back to a more grounded version. But actors, if they do the same, wapas aa hi nahi paate hain. They reach a point of no return and sometimes they are neither grounded, nor superstars either.

Irrfan went to Hollywood but stayed capable of playing the everyday character, though.
Bilkul. Woh chala gaya, phir bhi aaj bhi kahaani bolte-bolte aap ruk jaate ho aur kehte ho, ‘Irrfan sahab hone chahiye thay…’ (Pauses) Bahut kahaniyan directors ke andar maar gaye woh. Ab aap suna hi nahi sakte, unke bina.

To wrap up what we’ve been talking about: Your USP, that you are rooted, gives you a nuance, an audience connect and also gives you commercial success. However, that success means that shortly thereafter, you are no longer rooted. So you lose your ability to repeat the original connect, and to do the same sort of work that brought you success in the first place.
Yes (laughs)! Yeh ajeeb sa circle hai! When you talk about great makers – and when I say great makers, I mean Hrishikesh Mukherjee or Bimal Roy, names like that – they somehow never lost connect with their roots or their storytelling. Even the Hollywood names who have taught us things about filmmaking – they have kept a consistency in their storytelling. I hope more of us can do that.

I didn’t watch Umrao Jaan’s remake; the audience won’t allow its contamination either-Muzaffar Ali


Renuka Vyavahare (BOMBAY TIMES; June 17, 2025)

Come next week, Muzaffar Ali’s Umrao Jaan will be back in theatres, 44 years after its release. On June 26, ahead of its premiere in Mumbai, the veteran filmmaker will launch a book dedicated to his celebrated film. In a conversation with us, the filmmaker takes us down a nostalgic path as he revisits his timeless classic. Excerpts:

How would you describe Umrao Jaan, a film that went on to become a classic?
Umrao Jaan is a serious tragedy, a tale of entrapment. The story revolves around a woman’s helplessness and, at the same time, her resilience to face reality. When she wipes a mirror in which she sees herself, she comes to terms with what’s happened to her. It’s about the realization of losing yourself. The whole Lucknow ambience was so compelling and romantic that it gave birth to the persona of Rekha.

Your story is rooted in Lucknow and it’s fascinating how you cast Rekha, a south Indian actress for lead and made Asha Bhosle, a Maharashtrian singer, her voice.
Only Shahryar (lyricist) and I were from Lucknow. Farooq Shaikh was Gujarati, and the legendary music director Khayyam was Punjabi, yes. I wanted to break this myth of who’s from where. They belong to the world. When I chose Rekha, I realized that there was this resilience in her eyes which could make her fall and rise in the same moment. She can be broken and not defeated. I couldn't see that in anybody else. I found in her a sense of total surrender. For this film, she knew something organic was taking place in her system to become what she could never become otherwise. Had she been reluctant about it, she wouldn’t have reached where she did. She flowed with the wind. She was weightless. Asha ji and I had a lot of discussion, and she asked a lot of questions. Shahryar (lyricist) would complain, ‘why do you make me do women's poetry’? Mushkil nahi hai, kuch bhi agar thaan lijiye. He created that kind of optimism for a woman who was abducted from her home. That was special.

What inspired you to cinematically narrate this story, which is based on Mirza Hadi Ruswa’s 1899 Urdu novel Umrao Jaan Ada?
A lot of our imagination is based on truth. So, Umrao Jaan, for the writer, Mirza Ruswa, was also a compendium of many characters he must have met in life. Coming from Awadh, I wanted to tell the story of this region. I realized that many people who've come from Awadh have got lost in the ocean of Bollywood. They had these beautiful nuances, words and cultural imagination, which became a part of someone else's agenda. So, all these rich minds that went into Bollywood, they were not themselves, you know what I mean? Particularly the poets. Even Sahir Ludhianvi was not himself, in that sense. All these people probably had as rich an imagination as mine, and that imagination needed freedom. So, for me, it was that liberated mindset, which could create an authentic artistic statement. I wanted to tell the story of Umrao Jaan the way I felt it. Be it Umrao or the protagonist, who’s a taxi driver in my film Gaman (1978), the latter doesn’t realize that he would go to Mumbai and drive a taxi with no freedom and reason to come back to his village. Umrao was also trapped in a situation where she couldn't get out of it, and she then was also unacceptable in her own home. This was many people's predicament in Bollywood.

How did you navigate artistic vision and commercial expectations while making Umrao Jaan?
This is a good question because we were all battling between art and commerce at the time. Umrao Jaan is not a box office potboiler. My film was costless; it was the most inexpensive film made at the time. I don’t think expensive, and opulence translates into emotion. Fortunately, I didn't struggle as much because I was working for Air India while making the film. After six months into the film’s making, I myself decided to quit the job because I realized the film will take almost 3 years to be made. Mr. Ratan Tata was gracious and said, “Don't we have employees who play cricket and hockey? Let him make his movie.” I worked for them for 11 years. They were extremely generous.

What were your views on the remake of Umrao Jaan made by J P Dutta starring Aishwarya Rai Bachchan?
I didn't watch the remake but saw bits of it and I didn't find anything. I didn't want to disturb my own world of Umrao Jaan. I had no point of reference when I made Umrao jaan. My point of reference was me looking inside. The remake’s point of reference was my film. They had to reinterpret it to make it look originally different and that’s not an easy step. The thing is that people don't understand the kind of layering that goes into a film that’s emotional and artistic. You're telling the story of textiles, the story of sunsets and sunrises in Awadh. You're telling the story of this light going into Rekha's eyes and coming out as a tear, so these are the nuances that the story contains. It is not my story now. I'm very fortunate that it has gone into a domain where viewers are the fortress protecting the film. They won’t allow any contamination. They want the purity of what Rekha could present to the audience. A melody which goes into people’s souls cannot be erased by some limb shaking music.

If you were to make the film today, who would you cast as the lead?
It's not easy for Umrao Jaan to find Rekha and for Rekha to find Umrao Jaan. There were layers of preparation that went into essaying this role. You must also be the right age. Kareena Kapoor has something. Alia Bhatt has something. They have a lot of magic, but I can't say till I open the book. I think actors today work in shifts. They have too many commitments, they're spread out too thin, so they don't immerse themselves in their roles as much as they should. Also, it's not just them, everybody is in a hurry these days. Everyone’s attention span has depleted.
--------------------------------------------
Deep Saxena (HINDUSTAN TIMES; June 17, 2025)

Filmmaker Muzaffar Ali believes the 1981 cult movie Umrao Jaan, based on Mirza Hadi Ruswa’s novel, should not be reinterpreted. As the film prepares for a re-release in theatres later this month, he admits he wouldn’t even attempt to remake it.

“Rekha is not easy to find! You don’t people with such commitment — what she did, no one else can do today. Every person in the film was as real as Rekha, and she, too, became part of that milieu. It reflected in everything: Shahryar’s lyrics, Khayyam’s music, Kumudini Lakya’s choreography, Asha Bhosle’s playback singing, the characterization, the actors, the cinematography, and the costumes. Everything was crafted in layers,” he says.

Muzaffar adds, “The film has reached such a level that anything new should surpass it. Films aren’t made just with budgets; they’re made with commitment and passion. I haven’t felt that same passion again, and even I wouldn’t redo it. Closure is important — you can’t make it better than this. It can’t be recreated. Others have tried and failed, so why should I? Instead, I’d rather tell new stories with the same passion.”

The film has been restored in 4K by the National Film Archive of India (NFAI) and the National Film Development Corporation (NFDC). On the release date (June 27), he will also launch his coffee table book, featuring archival pictures and write-ups, including contributions from Rekha and Naseeruddin Shah.

Even today, when the Behls get together and discuss movies, I still don’t feel like an insider-Sonali Bendre

I am the  proverbial  outsider,  says Sonali

Neha Maheshwri (BOMBAY TIMES; April 6, 2024)

She did not have any connections in the industry when she began her career, but Sonali Bendre took up the challenge and carved her own path in showbiz. The actress credits her upbringing for making her the way she is.

Reflecting on it, she says, “I am the proverbial outsider. I come from a family that’s into education. Also, since my father was in government service, the entire family would move to a new city every two years and start all over again. I don’t have childhood friends to go back to.”

This almost-nomadic lifestyle, while unsettling at times, instilled within her a sense of independence. She explains, “Being able to be with myself and not needing people constantly gave me immense inner strength when I entered this industry.”

Navigating through the competitive landscape of Bollywood, Sonali found herself on the outside, which she believes gave her an edge. “On a film set where people knew each other, I was a complete outsider. Even today, when the Behls (her husband Goldie Behl’s family) get together and discuss movies, I still don’t feel like an insider. Goldie asks me for my opinion about a script as he finds that I still have that outsider’s point of view, which aligns more with the audience. Now, with my son (Ranveer) studying abroad, I am getting more involved with our production house.”

The actress has always enjoyed exploring other mediums. Recounting her stint on stage, she says, “While I was eight-and-a-half months pregnant, I acted in the iconic Farooq Shaikh and Shabana Azmi’s play, ‘Tumhari Amrita’. I was scared because look at the actors I was going to work with. However, I didn’t want to let go of the opportunity due to fear and regret later. The idea was to learn from the experience of working with a wonderful team.”

Sonali, who made a full-fledged comeback to acting after a break with the web series ‘The Broken News’ in 2022, is candid about her insecurities as an actor.

“I was not trained in acting, and I miss that. I am insecure about not having all the tools as an actor. ‘The Broken News’ was very important for me because I wanted to make a comeback with a certain kind of role that set the tone for my next chapter and that’s exactly what it has done,” she signs off.

I never thought I’d get such diverse roles in the 50th year of my career-Shabana Azmi

‘Never thought I’d get such diverse  roles in the 50th year of my career’

Niharika Lal (BOMBAY TIMES; February 25, 2024)

During a recent discussion with a student collective, Shabana Azmi spoke about her days at St. Xavier's, her experience at FTII, her first roles, and the lasting impressions her teachers left on her. Shabana shared how in the 50th year of her career, she is once again getting the kind of roles she had never expected: from Steven Spielberg's Halo and Shekhar Kapur's What's Love Got To Do With It to Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani and Ghoomer.

"Meri energy wahan se aati hai ki mujhe zindagi se bahut dilchaspi hai. Mere 50th saal mein ek naya silsila shuru hua hai mere career mein - do saal ke dauran mujhe itne mukhtalif (diverse) roles mile. Pehle main yeh kabhi nahi soch sakti thi ki mujhe itne mukhtalif role milenge. I feel I'm so lucky. I am at that stage in life where I don't need to do any roles, so when I find a role challenging, if I feel if the role is saying something that I believe in, then I do it. Mujhe ek mauka milta hai apne films ke zariye unn subjects ko chhune ka jo aam taur par log nahin discuss karte."

Talking about her co-stars, Shabana remembered Farooq Sheikh. Shabana shared that when she enrolled at St. Xavier's College, she found that there was no Hindi theatre program in the college. So Shabana and Farooq Shaikh decided to form the Hindi Natya Manch. Talking about her friendship with Farooq Shaikh, she said, "Farooq se meri behad dosti thi. Woh St. Xavier's College mein mere saath thay." 

Later in their careers, they worked together in the play Tumhari Amrita, directed by Feroze Khan, which they performed across various countries. She recalled, "Jab aakhri show hua Tumhari Amrita ka, toh humne usey Taj Mahal ke backdrop mein kiya. Maine kaha ye play hum 22 saal se kar rahe hain, ab humein iss play par parda gira dena chahiye. Farooq ne poocha, kyun? Hum 22 saal se kar rahe hain, agle 22 saal tak aur karenge isey."

She added how just 14 days after this, Farooq passed away. “Ye baat mere sar mein constantly ghoomti hai. Woh itni young age mein guzar gaye ki mujhe aaj tak ajeeb lagta hai ki itni jaldi zindagi ne use kyun chheen liya humse? It's a huge pity."

Shabana also shared other anecdotes from her career. When Shyam Benegal offered her two roles together for the first time, she told her mother 'koi fraud director hai'. And when Satyajit Ray offered her a role, “main khushi se pagla gayi.” She told the students how these directors appreciated her craft and the nuances of acting that she learned from them.

My self-image is contrary to the girl-next-door label, says Deepti Naval

‘My self-image is contrary to the girl-next-door label’

Henna Rakheja (HINDUSTAN TIMES; July 8, 2022)

She is Deepti Naval, the actor, to the world. But she is also a painter, filmmaker and writer. However, when it came to compiling her recently-released memoir, A Country Called Childhood, she chose to write about Dolly (her nickname as a child).

“I’ve lived life on my own terms. Most of the time, I’ve behaved non-practical, impromptu and spontaneously. When people label me the sweet, girl-next-door, I don’t [relate to it since] I’ve no such self-image. My self-image is completely contrary,” asserts the 70-year-old, known for critically acclaimed films such as Chashme Buddoor (1981), Leela (2002), Listen…Amaya (2013), among others. But, if there’s one thing she’d wish to go back in time and fix, it’s “running away from home”. “I would never do such a stupid thing!” she says.

Her writing has been appreciated in the past as well, wherein she experimented with poetry and short stories. Before publishing, she recalls making late Farooq Sheikh — with whom she has worked in numerous films — her sounding board: “I’d run the final version of the short story by Farooq. He was happy to see my growth as a writer, and had said, 'Pehle bhi padhi thi tumhari nazmein, but this is far ahead'.”

Ask Naval, who was last seen in 2021’s OTT series Criminal Justice: Behind Closed Doors, if she would like to see any of her work of writing on screen, may be in the form of a web series, and she says, “I haven’t thought of it yet, but now that you bring it up, yes, why not? I know that my book is very visual.”

The medium of Gaman came from Calcutta, inspiration from Aligarh and soul from Awadh-Muzaffar Ali


Filmmaker Muzaffar Ali on his 1978 directorial debut — about a taxi driver from Uttar Pradesh in Bombay — which chronicles the plight of migrants in the big city
MUMBAI MIRROR (May 17, 2020)

I was moved to read Trisha Gupta’s piece, Tell me how long the train’s been gone, which appeared in Mirror last week. I am happy to see Gaman is still relevant after so many years. Each film is a world in itself. A universe we create out of ideas and emotions that have been a part of our building blocks. It is a pictorial canvas of what we have seen, and would like to show to this world, with the utmost honesty and sincerity.

Many a time we make films that people would like to see with equal sincerity and artistry, yet there is a fine difference between the two, and people can see the difference. It is what you want them to see that lives on.

Gaman is about displacement. In scientific terms, it is the adding of an external element and thereby the replacement of the original organic element. I saw the emergence of a Gaman-like world in Bombay when I moved there in 1971: The influx of people from all over to displace the original character of the city. The making of a metropolis is the unmaking of a place. Spaces are threatened in layers, year after year, and each year changing the aesthetics of an urban cityscape, rendering the earlier out of date. The enormity of this tragedy was rendering people faceless.

‘Kya koi nayi baat nazar aati hai hammeiñ Aeina hameiñ dekh ke hairan sa kyoñ hai’

A question of becoming a stranger to oneself: Bombay, to becoming Mumbai, a strange mirror that reflects our past with a perspective of the future. Bombay was a series of fading mirrors that pulled one, each time one saw oneself in them. Most of these mirrors find their way from sacred spaces to the crowded narrow gullies of places called Chor Bazaar.

Gaman is a journey of changing images in such mirrors. It is the reflection of the dynamics of roadscapes of a city, which never sleeps, in the rear-view mirror of a taxi in the eyes of a helpless driver. Spaces that are yours and not yours: A river that can never afford to stop. The protagonist of this ceaseless flow is a throbbing heart, beating, yet lifeless like a stone. Seeking reasons, yet finding none.

‘Dil hai to dharakne ka bahana koi dhoondhe Pathhar ki tarah behiss o bejaan sa kyun hai’

Where music is the melodic refrain for the orchestration of a mechanical world — this was me in Bombay in the 1970s, a city, which I saw from atop the Air India building, where I worked on the 18th floor. From where for hours on end, I watched yellow-roofed taxis crawl like ants. I wondered whether under those yellow metal sheet roofs was a man like me far away from his home. How far was his home; it was anybody’s guess. What he had left behind was beyond anyone’s imagination. The feeling was enough of an answer. Was it worthy of a film, I thought to myself? Was this loneliness our inevitable destiny — a wilderness beyond what meets the eye? On one hand, the ocean, and on the other, an endless sea of humanity...

‘Tanhai ki ye kaun si manzil hai rafiqo Ta hadde nazar ek biyabaan sa kyun hai...’

But certainly it was an emotion as deep as the Arabian Sea. It was an emotion in which I saw the fathomless tenderness of a thumri. Each time our eyes met in a rear-view mirror, a truth transpired. One saw beyond what the eyes could see. I saw the piercing eyes of Khairunnissa wait for Ghulam Hasan. I saw the eyes of Farooq Sheikh and beyond that the piercing helpless gaze of Smita Patil. Was it still worthy of a film?

What was beyond these frozen frames? There were moments of truths and more truths, of humans waiting at traffic lights on metalled roads and zebra crossings, metal bridges across mighty rivers ferrying helpless souls packed in metal cabins. Amidst this human exodus were shattered windows of glass, allowing the last ray of the setting sun play its flute on a windswept face.

‘Aaja sañwariya tohe garwa laga luñ Ras ke bhare tore nayan...’

It was a lonely journey. Can the loneliness of this phenomenon become a collective journey of a film? I had found the words, which described the emotional angst of the migrant. When Krishna leaves, would Radha’s tears drown Braj? In this diabolical answer, I felt, I was near the beginning and the end.

Everything was in the mind of these mindless travellers, at times, bringing the odd tear when emotions aligned themselves to the sound of the changing tracks. But the sharp tearing horn of a railway diesel engine wiped it off in an instant as the morning sun rose in the formidable ghats and one was sucked into an endless tunnel. One wonders which side one is on. The ones in the train or those they are going to displace. I had become a ‘Ghati’ and a ‘Bhaiyya’ in the same breath. For many years I had been in that train not knowing the difference between the beginning and the end of these journeys.

Hence Gaman: A name given by my friend Asghar Wajahat to this feeling. Something I had begun to see with the inner eye. But Gaman was more than I could hold in one glimpse. It had too many metaphors, both vivid and fading. Khairunnissa sniffing and wiping her nose with her chadar as she extinguishes a night fire at dawn. Clothes becoming one’s second skin, fading and becoming sensuous, looking nostalgic and inviting with their faded textures under the smoke filled thatched roof, turning black with soot. The soot and the smoke was not different to the soot and the smoke from the speeding train... one was towards darkness and gloom and the other towards the light at the end of the tunnel.

‘Aap ki yaad aati rahi raat bhar Gham ki lau thartharati rahi raat bhar...’

One was static in a moving environment and the other moving in a static world.

‘Dard ke chaand dil mein utarte rahe Chandni muskurati rahi raat bhar...’

Gaman was yet to be born. And was it worthy of being a film? I didn’t care anymore. I had begun to unearth the city called Bombay.

The medium of Gaman came from Calcutta, inspiration from Aligarh and the soul from the heart of Awadh... and my palette from my paintings, having sketched out each frame. I was fascinated by khaki from the paper of my paintings and was fascinated by the khaki clad taxi driver protagonist of my film. Symbolically as a migrant taxi driver and as a migrant, he had no identity left but to become khaki, the colour of dust.

It is sad that on World Theatre Day, there will be no theatre anywhere in the world-Manav Kaul


Sanchita Kalra (HINDUSTAN TIMES; March 27, 2020)

The world of theatre has taken a pause and is struggling in the wake of the Coronavirus pandemic. As March 27 marks the occasion of World Theatre Day, prominent theatre personalities talk about the impact of Covid-19 on the industry and their memories of performing on stage.

Theatre director and actor Manav Kaul, with a heavy heart, says, “It is sad and unfortunate that on World Theatre Day, there will be no theatre anywhere in the world.” He also reveals his play was scheduled to open in Mumbai on March 17 but was cancelled due to the shutdown. Kaul adds, “This is the need of the hour. I’ve been rehearsing rigorously for four months. I even gave a break to my acting jobs for this.”

Many actors unanimously agree that taking appropriate preventive measures during such critical crisis should be the topmost priority. Film and theatre actor Deepak Dobriyal says that it has not only impacted Indian film and theatre industry but also wreaked havoc in numerous professional worlds as well. He says, “The entire country is in the same situation. Whether it’s theatre or any other profession, every individual needs NOC from coronavirus. Only then will everyone be able to perform.”

Talking about the idea of presenting archived theatre shows on digital media platforms, actor Pankaj Tripathi says, “I saw that the members of the music fraternity are doing digital concerts on social media. Mujhe lagta hai rangmanch mein bhi log thoda bohot aise karenge. But ye medium toh nahi hai aisa. Woh toh live medium hai. But for now, our primary concern is health, whether it’s an artiste or general public. So, our complete focus should be on that. Rangmach Diwas toh har saal aata hai.”

https://epsfs.hindustantimes.com/HT/2020/03/27/HTC_MUMB/HTC_MUMB/5_01/f15449_125445_5_mr.jpgActor Saurabh Shukla emphasises on the stress-free usage of social media, if people can’t go out to catch a play. He says “We are in this together. In a time when you know there’s an ominous fear, it’s good to have stress-free time. If people have recorded plays, then the footage should be on social media.” However, for many, it’s the happy memories that keep them going.

Actor Shabana Azmi shares one such incident and says , “I was once arrested along with 16 slum dwellers for a demonstration. My parents, Javed (Akhtar; husband), Feroz Abbas Khan and Farooq Sheikh all came to the police station because I was to perform Tumhari Amrita in Mumbai at 6 pm. My mother, Shaukat Kaifi pleaded with the police officer and said, ‘We come from theatre and for us the show must go on. Please release my daughter so she can do her play and I will personally bring her back to you’. Ultimately, I reached the auditorium at 8 pm and was on stage seven minutes later. We got a standing ovation!”

Khayyam saab convinced Muzaffar Ali to add a male song in Umrao Jaan-Talat Aziz

Talat Aziz: Khayyam saab specially added song in Umrao Jaan
Talat Aziz bids farewell to his mentor and father figure
As told to Upala KBR (MID-DAY; August 21, 2019)

Talat AzizI first met him during my performance at a private mehfil in Khar, in 1978. After my performance, Khayyam saab walked up to me and told me, ‘Beta, I like your voice. One day, I will give you a break.’ When Umrao Jaan (1981) was conceived, there was no male song in the original script. So, Khayyam saab told Muzaffar Ali [director] saab, 'I want you to include a male song so that it can lend a poetic vibe to Farooq Sheikh’s character and Umrao Jaan can fall in love with him.' That’s how the song, Zindagi Jab Bhi Teri Bazm Mein, was created, and I came into the picture. I remember going to his house for 15 days for rehearsals before we recorded the song.

Khayyam saab was a father figure to me. I used to meet him at his home every three-four days, and if I couldn’t make it, he would invariably check on me and ask me where I was. I learned the art of perfection from him. He made me record the ghazal, Nagma-e-Jaan Saaz-e-Dil, [Yatra, 2007] 20 times before he was satisfied.

He once narrated to me that when he was recording the song Hazar Raahein [Thodisi Bewafai, 1980] with Kishore Kumar, Kishore da wanted to sing the song without interludes while Khayyam saab wanted it with interludes. He let Kishore da sing it his way, but the singer was not happy with the result. That’s when Khayyam saab told him, ‘I put those interludes because the story is about an estranged couple. The director can show flashbacks of what happened in their relationship in those music pieces.’ This was the kind of detailing that Khayyam saab practised.

I was by his side all through his illness. I took care of him over the last 21 days in the hospital. I was praying by his bedside when he breathed his last.

Khayyam
Khayyam was accorded State Honours. Pics/ Sameer Markande, Yogen Shah

I would think how wonderful it would be if Farooq Sheikh & Shabana Azmi had got married-Feroz Abbas Khan

Picture
Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; March 2, 2019)

In 1992, a couple of days before the opening of the play Tumhari Amrita on February 27, director Feroz Abbas Khan and his two actors, Shabana Azmi and Farooq Shaikh, were petrified to find only 10 people present at the first technical rehearsal of which eight nodded off. “This was the first time Prithvi Theatre was having a three-day festival and the play was my tribute to Jennifer (Kendal Kapoor), the singularly biggest influence behind my theatre journey. The agreement was for just four shows and we all thought it would be the biggest disaster we had ever encountered,” Feroz reminisces more than a quarter of a century later, admitting that while many could understand that he had lost his marbles, they couldn’t fathom why two senior actors would put their reputation on the line for a play unlike any they had seen before.

Feroz’s instructions were clear: No lighting effects, no show of histrionics, no music. The two actors were instructed to simply read the letters exchanged between Amrita Nigam and Zulfikar Haider over 35 years, starting on her eighth birthday party in 1940 when she wrote to 10-year-old Zulfi. They were instructed not to memorise their lines. “Keep it fresh, don’t affect the text, if the text affects you, react as individuals and not actors. Remember the star of this play is the writer (Javed Siddiqui) so let his pure words come to you, experience them in a pure way and give them back to the audience without any kind of corruption in this transaction of truth to truth to truth,” he urged. However, after seeing the reactions at the technical rehearsals, he made one concession and decided on a small introduction before the curtains went up to prepare the audience to what is to come.

Surprisingly, the shows at Prithvi were well received, with lots of claps. But soon after when they went to Kolkata, they faced a disconcertingly silent audience that left them depressed till it dawned on them that they had been absorbing it all quietly and were actually deeply affected by this play of letters. “Every show drew different reactions, depending on the audience,” says Feroz, recalling yet another show in Kolkata which had to be cancelled following a newspaper report which quoted Shabana saying that Satyajit Ray shouldn’t have been given an honorary Oscar. “A mob of 2000 looking for political mileage landed up at the theatre and despite Shabana insisting she’s never said this, ensured the performance didn’t happen,” he sighs.

They flew back to Mumbai where a fully-booked show at Mumbai’s Tata Theatre awaited them. But on the day of the performance, Shabana who was also an active social activist, decided to take part in a morcha in Navy Nagar and was arrested. “While an audience of 1000 waited, her parents and Mr Bhabha rushed to get her out on bail. The cops were ready to let her go but she wanted the case against her dropped first till her mother (Shaukat Kaifi) reminded her that she was an actress first and had a responsibility towards people who had been waiting for two hours to see her perform. She went straight to the stage to come up with one of the finest performances ever,” recounts Feroz.

He points out that in temperament and spirit, Shabana was a lot like the feisty Amrita. She knew no boundaries in her quest for artistic excellence and social justice. “As an actor she is constantly evolving and raising the bar and for a cause she will even risk her life. On stage, both fed off and challenged each other,” he points out.

And was Farooq also like Zulfi, you wonder, and he admits that while they were both steady, calming influences, he points out that Zulfi cracks at the end. “Farooq wouldn’t have, he had more spirit and spine,” asserts Feroz.

There’s an interesting story behind how he came to cast the two actors together. At the time, he didn’t know either personally but had watched Farooq perform at IPTA and Shabana at Prithvi. “For me, they were an ideal couple, both so beautiful and cultured, and I would think how wonderful it would be if they had got married. I even imagined them in a picture perfect pose in the same photo frame,” he laughs, admitting that’s how he thought of them to play Amrita and Zulfi who could not live with each other and at the same time could not live without each other. “When I told them this, they burst out laughing. And after getting to know them, I realised what a disaster the marriage would have been had it happened.”

However, till the end, the duo remained the best of friends and continued to perform Tumhari Amrita over 22 years across the country and the world. The last show, the only one outdoors, was on December 14, 2013, in front of the Taj Mahal before an audience of around 6,000. “Both Shabana and I were as usual nervous and excited, wondering if people would sit through it in the biting cold. Farooq, as always, was calm, insisting everything would go off well and it did. After the curtains came down to a tumultuous response, Shabana told me it was time for them to stop and me to think of a new cast. Farooq instantly piped up, saying, ‘No, no, we will do this play even when in wheelchairs. Two weeks later, he was gone,” narrates an emotionally choked Feroz, recalling how this was the first time Farooq had asked for photographs from a show.

Six years have gone by without Tumhari Amrita which was more than just another play. It has become a part of our cultural history and during its run made a huge social contribution, raising money for every cause, be it the Latur earthquake or a chair in a university, and every social organisation. Feroz admits, he is seriously thinking of reviving it with a new cast. “It’s a legacy of memories that parents passed on to their children. After seeing three generations come together to see my play Mughal-e-Azam, I feel it’s only right that I bring back Tumhari Amrita to keep the bond from breaking,” he says. 

The Kapoor family has always been secular-Rishi Kapoor

Kapoor in Mulk which released in August
On the eve of his 66th birthday, Rishi Kapoor chats about the Muslim characters he’s played on screen, Twitter controversies, and Alia Bhatt
Khalid Mohamed (MUMBAI MIRROR; September 2, 2018)

He’s at Wit’s End, a neat apartment complex in a slim lane in Bandra. Around noon, the mood is distinctly upbeat; his pet dog Dudley scampers through the bespoke appointed rooms. Neetu Singh is pecking on an avocado salad after a yoga session. And he’s in his den snugly settled on a black leatherupholstered chair, sipping an espresso from a copper cup.

Rishi Kapoor, who turns 66 on Tuesday, has never looked so sorted down the years and years I’ve known him. At the outset, he speaks at length about the family resolve to sell R K Studios, ending with, “We’ve taken an impractical decision for practical reasons.” Right.

Next, I bring up the Instagram post by Neetu Singh, saying she’s so proud that her two boys are rocking the movie casbah — he with his emotionally-layered performance in Mulk, and son Ranbir with his tour de force act in Sanju. The Sr. boy smiles bashfully, “Yup, it feels good. I’ve been getting sweet text messages from all over the world. My only regret is that the film was banned in Pakistan. Perhaps because we showed that Indian Muslims continue to be heckled with that awful line, ‘Go back to Pakistan’. I wish they would reconsider the ban.”

The beleaguered Murad Ali Mohammed of Mulk is an addition to the gallery of at least ten Muslim characters the actor has portrayed over the decades.

These choices weren’t deliberate, he emphasises, adding, “Uncannily, I’ve been the good guy as well as the baddie. Rauf Lala of Agneepath and Murad of Mulk are at two ends of a spectrum. There was a time, when, like most actors, I’d shun villainous parts, except in the whodunit Khoj which few remember. Imagine, I’d even turned down the Shah Rukh Khan role of the stalker in Darr. Once, bad guys on the screen were bad news.”

Enacting the lovestruck qawwal in Amar Akbar Anthony for Manmohan Desai was a lark. In Tawaif, his name was Dawood which led the infamous D to invite him to tea during a concert tour in Dubai, circa 1988, and express gratitude for ‘redeeming’ his name. Piquantly, years later he was to portray the D in D-Day.

The Muslim social Deedar-e-Yaar, he points out, may have bombed, but it did deal with the issue of talaaq. As for Rauf Laala of Agneepath, he rewinds, “It took me months to say yes. I’m glad I did. It was among the initial bunch of films, along with Do Dooni Chaar, Aurangzeb and Luck By Chance which got my second innings going.”

Not an actor to be easily creatively satisfied, Rishi Kapoor whoops, “Belatedly maybe, it’s been a thrill ride with Kapoor and Sons, 102 Not Out (right), and Mulk, which is my greatest leap forward. As soon as (writer-director) Anubhav Sinha narrated the story to me, I was on. Mind you, he didn’t bat an eyelid when I said fine, but I will take my full price. No concessions. If he had haggled, I would have shown him the door.” If there was a shadow of doubt, it was vis-a-vis the Central Board of Film Certification. “I thought we may have trod on too many toes. My apprehensions were misplaced. Not one cut was imposed,” the actor exults, “because of the ending, the judge’s verdict. Anubhav was called in after the censor screening and told they would have banned it if it wasn’t for the finale which sensibly answered all the questions raised by the film.”

His voice softens, “The Kapoor family has always been secular. At the height of communal strife around 1947, my grandfather Prithviraj had staged the play Pathan, about a friendship between a Hindu and a Muslim. It ran to 600 packed shows.”

Several actors of late have aligned themselves to political ideologies if they haven’t become practising politicians themselves. To that, he grimaces, “Count me out of that, please. Apart from a few exceptions, the film industry cannot be accused of partisanship or bigotry. Sure, I’ve been trolled about my tweets — like the one about the ban on alcohol in Bihar and the one where I said I eat beef when I’m out of the country. Trolls don’t affect me any more though my family keeps telling me to go easy. Maybe I have.”

Can he top his Mulk performance? “Uff!” he looks at me pityingly. “An actor doesn’t plot and plan his next move. Undoubtedly, I will keep doing some inane films and hopefully, some significant films which raise awareness on social issues — without getting preachy or foisting a political agenda. In fact, there’s Pandit Ki Gully Mein Ali with Sanjay Dutt in the works. It’s a strong subject done with humour. When the subject was first brought to me, I’d said, ‘What! Are you trying to create a civil war?’ [The late] Farooq Sheikh, who was to co-star, then, had called to ask, ‘Aap dar gaye kya?” Since then, the script has been redone. All the details are still to be finalised.”

Lunch is served. Rishi Kapoor’s controlling his lust for food, though. Salad and poached eggs on wheat bread are served. Would I like Chinese instead? he apologises. No, no, all’s perfect. Between mouthfuls, I ask why he’s never been honoured with the Padma Shri, which has been bestowed generously on lesser actors. “You’re bent on spoiling my lunch, aren’t you?” he ripostes. “Look, Kishore Kumar and Shammi Kapoor weren’t given the honorifics during their lifetime. So who am I?”

Fearing Rishi Kapoor’s flash of temper, I’ve saved my last morsel of curiosity for dessert. As soon as Belgian chocolates are offered for dessert, I stammer, “Aa…and what’s your take on Alia Bhatt?”

“What take? Talk straight,” he responds coolly.

“Okay, there’s much curiosity about Ranbir and Alia. You approve of the jodi?”

The straight-off answer is: “It’s Ranbir’s life. Who he wants to get married to is his prerogative. Neetu likes her, I like her, Ranbir likes her. Get it? I can’t be judgmental. After all, my uncles Shammi ji and Shashi ji and I chose our life partners. Ranbir is entitled to choose his.”

The afternoon’s almost done. Rishi Kapoor wants to snatch a nap before a photo-crew arrives for a look-test for his next project. Cradling Dudley in his arms, he sees me to the elevator with the parting shot, “They say nothing is permanent, nor temporary. Could be but right now I’m feeling on top of the world. And I hope it stays that way.”

Meet Ashraf Thamarassery, the man who brought back Sridevi

Ashraf Thamarassery
Ashraf Thamarassery, who helped send back actor's mortal remains from Dubai, has been the 'From' address for over 4,700 people repatriated to 39 countries, including Farooq Sheikh
Vinod Kumar Menon (MID-DAY; March 1, 2018)

He is the "messiah" for bereaved families awaiting mortal remains of their loved ones from UAE. All coffins getting airlifted from UAE and taken across the world are sent "from" him. He is Ashraf Thamarassery, 43, a Kozhikode native who works at the embalming centre in Dubai.

The Ajman resident, in the last 18 years, has got connected to approximately 4,700 families world over, having assisted in the repatriation of their loved ones' bodies.

Ashraf knows every death that gets reported in any part of six of UAE's emirates — Dubai, Sharjah, Ras Al Khaiman, Fujairah, Umm al-Quwain and Ajman.

Assisting the Kapoors
On Wednesday, as Bollywood superstar Sridevi was laid to rest at Vile Parle, Ashraf was busy completing formalities to repatriate two cases that had come to him for embalming — C Haridasan, 41, of Kochi, who worked with a construction company in Ajman and had died of a heart attack, and Vijay Reddy, 36, from Ahmedabad, an accidental death.

Speaking to mid-day over the phone, Ashraf said, "I was at the embalming centre when I learnt about Sridevi's death through my network in the hospital, where she was brought and declared dead. But I have no role to play unless the police or prosecution clear the body after post-mortem for embalming. Usually, it takes anywhere between a day and four for them to decide on the reason and circumstances surrounding the death. Only after that the body is sent for embalming, and then repatriation. Unlike earlier, when it would take nearly a week for repatriation, as most of the work was done manually at different offices, technology has changed things today."

When asked if Boney Kapoor came to the embalming centre to claim the body, Ashraf replied in the negative and said, "The distance between the mortuary and embalming centre is around 15 km; the body was accompanied by the Bur Dubai police and a person representing them. He (Boney) was not around even after the body was kept in the ambulance post embalming."

Refuting social media rumours about the late actor having sustained injuries, he added, "She (Sridevi) had no injuries, and her body wasn't bloated either, as stated in some reports. Her photograph was shown for completing formalities, and she looked like she did in the picture."

Interestingly, Ashraf has not seen a single movie of Sridevi. "I am at the embalming centre from morning till late night, assisting the police and next of kin in completing formalities and obtaining necessary permissions from various offices. I seldom take leave; I don't watch television even when I go to Kerala for a visit."

Not his first celebrity
This is not the first time Ashraf has assisted the family of a celebrity in repatriation. On December 28, 2013, actor Farooq Sheikh, 65, died of a heart attack while on a holiday in Dubai.

Ashraf recalled, "Farooq's body could be handed over within a day, as the police and prosecution were satisfied with heart attack being the cause of death, and papers were cleared faster. I had assisted in the paperwork and in getting the body repatriated faster. A huge crowd had turned up at the embalming centre then, his fans and admirers."

Another case he remembers is that of Nandana, the eight-year-old daughter of renowned playback singer Chitra, who had drowned in a hotel pool in April 2011.

"In the last 18 years, I have handed over bodies right from a two-year-old to an 80-year-old. I have dealt with all sorts of deaths — natural and unnatural, including accidents — and have repatriated coffins to 39 locations across the world. I believe that when in distress, especially in case of death in a foreign land, we must come forward and do everything possible to help faster repatriation," he said.

Putting connections to use
According to Ashraf, the cost of repatriating a body from UAE to the destination is between 5,000 and 6,000 UAE dirham, including the local ambulance and embalming costs and cargo airfare.

Ashraf's elder brother Mohammed Bashir, 55, speaking to mid-day from Kozhikode, said, "At times, when claimants do not have sufficient money or the air cargo does not have room to accommodate the coffin (usually, airlines allow only two coffins per aircraft), Ashraf uses his network with influential people in the UAE and provides every assistance he can to them."

Ashraf has a suggestion for the Indian government: request UAE to fix an amount for airlifting coffins, currently decided on the weight of the coffin and body. "These are human remains, which can't be weighed like vegetables or meat. We must do away with this system of weighing a dead body and then paying a few thousand dirhams; it's a hurtful practice."

Modest beginnings
When asked how he came into this field, Ashraf, who has studied only till Std X, said, "I came to Ajman as a water tanker driver and did all sorts of odd jobs to make ends meet. During that time, an Indian friend, who was settled here with his family, passed away in a hospital after falling sick.
"I went to the hospital and saw his wife and children helpless, as they had to take the body back to India. I then decided to take up the cause and help every single Indian pravasi to get decent last rites at his/her homeland."

Ashraf stays with his wife Fatima Suhra, 36, and two children in Ajman; his elder son is pursuing his engineering in Kerala and joins them during vacations. Ashraf has become a single point of contact not only for Indians based in UAE, but also for government officials and the UAE police.
He has won many awards, including the Bharatiya Pravasi Sanman in 2015 at Ahmedabad, a function in which PM Narendra Modi and other senior leaders were present. Four novels have been written on him, with the recent one just a few months ago.

A proud village
Ashraf hails from Chungam in Thamarassery, Kozhikode, and is one of Fatima's, 75, nine children. He is a known face in the UAE and in Kozhikode, having won awards for his work. He is financially supported by his brothers and sister based in the Gulf. He owns land and a villa close to their ancestral house in Kerala.

Bashir said, "I am joining him next month; I have assisted him in nearly 300 cases of repatriation. It gives us immense satisfaction as we feel that the bereaved family needs to get their loved ones' remains at the earliest."

Boney Kapoor (top centre of frame) and daughters Khushi (right) and Jhanvi (partly seen behind Boney Kapoor) bid adieu to Sridevi on Wednesday. Pic/Sayyed Sameer Abedi

Sai Paranjpye was the only director who could reprimand me without so much as a peep from her-Deepti Naval


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; February 1, 2018)

There is something about her that makes you want to stroll down sun-dappled lanes towards a cinema that mirrored everyday life in a way that was engaging, enriching and entertaining. Perhaps it’s her girl-next-door charm or maybe it’s that Miss Chamko smile that scrubs away all that’s wrong with the world, leaving it sparkling. And even if that’s a delusion because the towel to test the detergent was freshly laundered, you still buy it, like Farooq Shaikh aka Siddharth Parashar in Chashme Buddoor, never mind if it left him fighting a rash the next day because he left his face lathered with shaving cream way too long.

Three decades later, point Deepti Naval towards Sai Paranjpye’s iconic 1981 romcom and breaking into peals of laughter she admits Sai was perhaps the only director who could reprimand her without so much as a peep from her. “Knowing it was my fault, I’d stare at the floor, silently listening to her. I had so much affection and regard for her,” she reminisces.

She listened to Sai when the director told her that for the Chamko scene when she comes into the bachelors’ pad selling her detergent, she should smile only as much was absolutely necessary. “Having grown up in Amritsar, I understood her middle-class morality remembering my mother telling me to look straight ahead when walking on the street and not make eye contact with anyone. With these values ingrained in me, I understood that smiling too much at a strange man could be misconstrued so the Chamko smile was bright, professional and rationed,” Deepti chuckles.

This small town wisdom came from a girl who’d just graduated from the City University in New York and was the first Indian-American actress to migrate to Mumbai and Bollywood. “I had no knowledge of the craft and went about choosing my films based primarily on instinct. Naseer (Naseeruddin Shah) told me during Katha that the best thing about me was that I wasn’t trained in acting,” she says.

Farooq was equally encouraging, telling her, “Dipps, you are capable of so much more, don’t get distracted, stay focused.” One of the best loved jodis of the ’80s, the duo went on to pair in many more films, including Ek Baar Chale Aao, Kissi Se Na Kehna, Rang Birangi and the TV serial, Hasrat Mohani. “But it was only during Listen… Amaya that released in 2013, that we actually chatted about life, writing, cinema and how it had changed since Chasme Buddoor and Katha when we made these classics without realising it. In the early days, he’d only tease me,” she recalls, adding that the one subject on which they could never come to an agreement was food. “I enjoy my salad, while he relished his wholesome meals. That’s why even though I invited him often to my place, he never visited me socially, grousing he’d only get ghaas phus.”

On February 3, Deepti will bring in her 66th birthday quietly. “I was hoping to spend it in Himachal but I have to be in Delhi for a retrospective at the Daulat Ram College but there’s nothing better than talking films with young people,” she smiles, adding Listen… Amaya, Saath Saath will be screened there.

Saath Saath… Farooq wooing Deepti with Jagjit Singh’s first Hindi film song penned by Javed Akhtar. “Tum Ko Dekha To Yeh Khayal Aaya…” The smile flashes… Brighter and unhibited.

Farooq was no longer a stranger and nor was movie town. As his equal in the film she could remind him of the integrity and values he was fast losing in the struggle to make a better living, bring him back on track… Ah if only we could hold on to that world, those ideals too… “Hum Jisse Gungunaa Nahi Sakte, Waqt Ne Aisa Geet Kyun Gaaya…”

I want to be the parallel superstar-Ayushmann Khurrana

Ayushmann Khurrana
He doesn’t care about the numbers game. All he wants to do is create a niche of his own, one where he is the Badshah
Mohar Basu (MID-DAY; June 11, 2017)

Though his last release, Akshay Roy’s Meri Pyaari Bindu, failed to stir the box-office, Ayushmann Khurrana walked away with everyone’s hearts. As the unrequited lover of Bindu (Parineeti Chopra), he brought to life a character who was not the quintessential Indian male. With two films lined up for release — Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari’s Bareilly Ki Barfi and R S Prasanna’s Shubh Mangal Savdhan — in the coming months, the actor-singer talks of creating a niche for himself in the industry, being the Amol Palekar and Farooque Shaikh of this generation, and his wife, writer Tahira Kashyap. We caught up with Ayushmann at Yash Raj Studios, Andheri. Excerpts from an interview.

Five years into the industry, have you finally found your space?
People expect novel stuff from me, which is great. Dum Laga Ke Haisha (2015) was a defining film for me. I practically sleepwalked through Vicky Donor (2012). Playing a quirky Punjabi guy was just playing myself. In Dum Laga Ke Haisha, I became a different person adapting to different languages and physicalities.

Why did you choose Meri Pyaari Bindu?
It started with Balki’s Ki & Ka (2016) and in Meri Pyaari Bindu, it is the potent subtext where the man is a giver and a pleaser. I knew it was an unrequited love story which might not work, but it was a risk. Mainstream movies are depicting what’s changing in reality, at least in urban India. By Indian standards, the nation by and large is attempting to think more progressively. Happy endings aren’t the focus. Moreover, Kolkata (where a major chunk of Meri Pyari Bindu was shot) lured me. I always thought I am a Bengali trapped in a Punjabi body. When I went to Kolkata, I was blown away. I can spend hours strolling down Park Street and live there forever. I have spent months there and I am in love with the city. The first time, however, when I was part of the reality show Roadies in 2004. When we flagged off from Shantiniketan, everyone around was focussing on the bikes and the races, but I sat under Tagore’s favourite tree, soaking in the moment.

Ayushmann Khurrana With his wife Tahira Shah

How is it that a progressive thinker like you made your wife Tahira shift base?
When I got married, I had no money. Tahira has been doing better than me professionally for the longest time. She was gutsy enough to marry a man just for love and have faith in his talent. She is a rockstar; she was a professor, had her own PR firm in Chandigarh. She was also the programming head of a radio station in Punjab. She supported me in every possible way. I was a struggling actor, which is often a gamble. But there was never any ego between us. When there’s love, there’s no scope for ego. Most men in India aren’t secure enough to be comfortable with such an arrangement. It comes with the family. It depends on how your father treats your mother. But a man, no matter where he comes from, could always trigger a change. If it’s a patriarchal family, the dynamics are different. In my case, Tahira became the daughter in a household that had none.

With the lines blurring, would you ever go back to television?
I was a VJ because I wanted to be an actor. If I were a star kid, I wouldn’t need to do Roadies or be a radio presenter. Now that I am here, I would never want to go back. Star kids get that guaranteed good launch by virtue of their lineage and network. But, I don’t agree with people when they say there’s nepotism. We might not have had a direct entry into the industry, but those who are good will stay.

How do you take failure?
The string of flops made me work harder. It was a great learning experience. I am a realist in life. I do my work and get detached fairly easily. Success is a lousy teacher. Actors are myopic sometimes, focusing on their lines, their look and not caring much about the film. When something flops, you analyze things in totality. That’s when Dum Laga Ke Haisha happened. I was playing a despicable man, but I was up for the challenge because I saw more than just what I am doing in it.

Is there a set goal in terms of what you aspire to be in the industry?
In five years, I have given two films (Vicky Donor and Dum Laga Ke Haisha), which have won National Awards. Everyone is gung-ho about being a superstar these days, but who will become the Amol Palekar and Farooq Sheikh of this age? I want to own that space. I want to be the parallel superstar. Everyone is a good actor these days. There is no room for non-actors anymore. At least in the space I am targetting, the crowd is less. Playing safe cannot work. I have to do quirky stuff. My next film, R S Prasanna’s Shubh Mangal Savdhan, is about a likeable guy who is suffering erectile dysfunction. His girlfriend loves him despite that. That love story is on a different spiritual level, focussing on a problem that is as common as a headache. Men don’t talk about it because they feel being a man is about how well they are able to perform in bed. As long as anything I do triggers a discussion, I am happy.

Mughal-E-Azam makes a comeback with a Broadway-style musical


Feroz Abbas Khan returns to theatre with a Broadway-style musical, an adapation of K Asif's classic love story, Mughal-e-Azam, which will ring to Pyar Kiya Toh Darna Kya
Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; September 9, 2016)

Feroz Abbas Khan was just a child when he saw Mughal-e-Azam for the first time and returned home wondering why Akbar had to stop Salim from marrying the girl he wanted and why the beautiful Anarkali had to be humiliated, imprisoned and walled up for falling in love with a prince. Since he lived in Dongri then where it was an Eid ritual to rerelease the K Asif classic every year, the filmmaker-playwright-stage director saw the film many more times at various ages. And each time Madhubala's heart-breaking innocence moved him to tears.

He grew up and fell in love with Sonya, a Jain girl, and though he was just a 'floating' theatre-actor then, without a prosperous past or a steady job in the present, her progressive family graciously accepted him. Yet, Salim-Anarkali's quintessential love story, rooted in class war with an emperor for an antagonist, still captured his imagination every time he watched it. "The last time was when we were touring Hyderabad with my play, Tumhari Amrita. It had returned to the theatre after 40 years in colour and Farooq (Sheikh) insisted we catch a show. Shabana (Azmi) and I went along apprehensively but I was mesmerised again," he reminisces.

After making a name for himself on stage with small, intimate plays like Salgirah, Tumhari Amrita and Kuchh Bhi Ho Sakta Hai, bigger, more intense dramas like Salesman Ramlal and the well-mounted Mahatma Viruddh Gandhi, Feroz took a break to travel with the education series, Main Kuch Bhi Kar Sakti Hoon, which promoted women empowerment, family planning and behavioural changes. "It's been an important part of my life and the staggering numbers prove we made a difference," he exults.

A year ago, almost suffocating from the yearning to get back to the stage with a bigger challenge, Feroz came up with the idea of adapting K Asif's 1960 magnum opus.

Partnering with the original producer, Shapoorji Pallonji and NCPA, he is busy rehearsing the Broadway-style Mughal-e-Azam which unveils on October 21 and will play almost daily till November 1, followed by a 14-show run in the Capital. "We plan to take it across India and the world, Broadway too," he asserts.

After the Gujarati Eva Mumbai Ma Chaal Jaiye inspired by Westside Story, Feroz admits he's wanted, for a while, to direct a lavishly-mounted musical rooted in an Indian story. "Mughal-e-Azam is apt because even the film was inspired by a play, Anarkali, which K Asif saw and borrowed passages of dialogue from. It's a dramatic father-son story with the nation at stake. In its writing skills and mounting, it was close to perfection with great dialogues and emotional story-telling, complemented by eye-catching visuals and a terrific score which picked up 'Mohe panghat pe Nandadalal' from Gujarat's Balwadi theatre," he says, having retained around eight songs including the evergreen "Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya".

He won't divulge the names of his actors yet but informs that they will be dressed by Manish Malhotra and choreographed by Mayuri Upadhyay. We'll also see a 'theatrical' Sheesh Mahal and staged battles.

But he's trimmed the length, turned the royal sculptor Sangatarsh into the narrator and given the story the language of theatre. Also, he's brought a modern sensibility to the presentation. "But in its heart and spirit, it's still Mughal-e-Azam and everything we love about it. We have Broadway's finest talents recreating the grandeur so as not to disappoint its fans," he promises.

After this, in November, Feroz moves to an original play, Maseeha Tonight, and is planning to revive Tumhari Amrita too. Having made two films he's proud of—the satire Dekh Tamasha Dekh and the emotional drama, Gandhi, My Father — he wants to get back to cinema towards the end of 2017-end. "I have an idea in my head which I will sketch out soon. I've written a couple of scripts but they fell apart after the interval and were discarded. I don't want to be apologetic about my work. Whether it's a film, play or TV, I must have something to say which will make a difference to me and remain with the audience for a long time. I've travelled with Gandhi, My Father to Oxford and Harvard and even now the reactions are heart-warming," he reasons.

For now though its sleepless nights till Mughal-e-Azam opens. He's hoping to have Dilip Kumar and Lata Mangeshkar, health permitting, at the premiere, along with anyone else associated with the film. "We don't have love stories today because parents have become reasonable and if they put their foot down, they will be told to take a chill pill. So this is our chance to savour a love story. A classic love story that threatened an empire and touched our heart," he signs off.

Farooq Sheikh bought 25 kgs of Gulab Jamun for the entire unit-Swara Bhaskar


The actor fondly remembers shooting with the late Farooq Sheikh, his quick wit, charm and generosity
As told to Ektaa Malik (MUMBAI MIRROR; December 13, 2015)

This is one of the most colourful memory that I have of Farooq Sir. It was the second day of shooting for our film, Listen Amaya, in the crowded Paranthey waali gali in Old Delhi. The signature Delhi heat had made its appearance, and the narrow lane was chock-a ­block with onlookers. Clearly word had gotten around that the beloved veteran actor was shooting in Purani Dilli. Having stuffed ourselves with paranthas, we were making a brave attempt to shoot sync-sound a long scene. The set-lock had been relaxed, and the crowd was free to come and go as it pleased. Two men, with their arms thrown around each other, hollered, “Abey yeh Farooq Sheikh hai kya?“. The other one countered - “nahin yaar, yeh kaise ho sakta hai“. This went on for a while. Finally one of them walked up to Farooq sir and blatantly asked, “Abey tum Farooq Sheikh ho kya?“ “Haan bhai sahib, hoon. Maaf kar do, agley janam mein yeh galati nahi karun gaa!“ Farooq sir replied apologetically. Grace, dignity and wit in any situation, these were some of the telling facets of Farooq sir.

He was also one of the most generous persons I have ever met. He liked giving gifts, like a true nawab, a role which he had portrayed on screen a number of times. Once we were passing a sweet-shop in Old Delhi, he asked, “Swaraji, would you like a gulab jamun?“ I agreed. He bought the entire lot that the shop stocked - a whopping 25 kgs, and turned to the spot boy and said, “Dada, distribute these among the entire unit.“

Working with him was like attending a master class, though his technique was difficult to fathom. He never spoke much about his 'acting process'. He would often read a book in-between shots. Once he was narrating a story to me, he paused in the middle of the narration and said, “An actor can never go beyond the vision of a director. This is the truth of the cinematic medium and it's important for any actor to understand that.“ And then with a telltale gleam in his eye, he quipped, “There - now you have an excuse to shirk hard-work.“

I had drunk almost half a bottle of cough syrup while filming a scene in Noorie-Poonam Dhillon


Roshmila Bhattacharya (MUMBAI MIRROR; November 17, 2015)

"I was disappointed with my performance. Those days there were no monitors on the set and when I saw what I had done during the dubbing, I wanted to choke myself. I was so gawky and amateurish but Noorie did really well," Farooq Sheikh had reminisced in an interview, revealing that thanks to a weekly show on Doordarshan, he had started sparking off curiosity on the streets, and this love story, the surprise hit of '79, made him even more famous.

However, Farooq candidly admitted that, as an actor, he never created mass hysteria, but his co-star, Poonam Dhillon, took off like a rocket after Noorie. "Ramesh Talwar, who had introduced me to IPTA (Indian People's Theatre Association) and was associated with the film, was confident it would work. He was the only one who believed that," Farooq had laughed, adding that Talwar was equally confident that Poonam, who had been introduced in Trishul and was playing the lead in this film, would make it big. "She was a pretty face so half the battle was won anyway."

Over a quarter of a century later, the actress in question informs that she had been in the 10th standard when she did Trishul for a lark and after that had gone back to her studies. When Noorie was offered to her she was far from excited, even after she was told that some really established actresses were vying for the role. The academically minded Poonam only gave her nod to her second film, albeit reluctantly, when the director, Manmohan Krishna, agreed to shoot in one start-to-finish schedule during her vacations so that she would not have to bunk classes.

Trishul had been shot in Delhi and Poonam had stayed at a five-star hotel. Noorie was filmed in the beautiful but inaccessible Bhaderwah Valley of Kashmir and she was put up in a hostel. It was actually a school that was closed for the holidays and hence bunk beds had been dragged into the classroom. There was no room service but cooks had been flown down to prepare meals. There were no attached bathrooms, a few common toilets serviced the entire unit staying there.

"Hot water often ran out and I was teased by Rajiv Rai and Rajeev Sethi, who were Manmohanji's assistant directors, about whether I had taken a bath or not," chuckles Poonam, who was the youngest in the crew and the most inexperienced actor amongst the cast which boasted of theatre veterans like Bharat Kapoor and Geeta Kak. "The budget was small but spirits were high. There was plenty of camaraderie and no starry tantrums. Rameshji would help out with the rehearsals and the villagers opened their homes to us, supplying us with a steady stream of kawa. Till today, I share a great bonding with everyone who was part of that shoot."

It was a simple love story of a Noorie and Yusuf, with an unhappy ending after the beautiful Kashmiri girl catches the eye of her fiance's boss. Bashir Khan gets her father murdered, rapes Noorie who then commits suicide, fatally shoots Yusuf who dies on his beloved's grave. He is finally killed by her pet dog, Khairoo. "I was an unwilling film heroine but the look and Khayyam saab's songs caught on in a big way. People liked my performance too, I even got nominated for the Filmfare award for best actress, and to this day I am remembered as the Noorie girl," smiles Poonam, who is equally picture perfect even today.

The rape scene, aesthetically shot but still darkly disturbing because a sweet, pure girl is brutally violated, is what makes Noorie unforgettable. But Poonam remembers another scene because she just couldn't get the dialogue right.

"I must have given at least 20 retakes. Farooq and Manmohanji thought I had forgotten my lines despite my telling them that I was word perfect. I kept slurring over them because in an effort to cure a bad cough and cold, I had drunk almost half a bottle of cough syrup which had left me groggy and disoriented. Today, whenever I read the warning on a medicine bottle, I remember Noorie and how I overdosed," she sighs off with a shiver.

Rekha, Smita Patil were ladies with a dream; Shabana Azmi is a woman with a cause-Muzaffar Ali


Priya Gupta (BOMBAY TIMES; August 6, 2015)

Muzaffar Ali, 70, may be soft-spoken with impeccable manners, but he is also invisibly headstrong. He is fixated to his environment, be it his paintings or his ambience, and wants to have a constant dialogue with it. A painter from his childhood, he is romantic and today has learnt to have a great sense of record. He needs his family and friends to put him together, but he's also extremely clear on exactly what he wants. He may have married thrice, but has been consistent with his commitment to Kotwara. In 1981, he created Rekha as Umrao Jaan. Over two decades later, he has made Jaanisaar. Over an hour-long conversation with Bombay Times, he talks about his best companion his wife Meera, his commitment to Kotwara and why Smita Patil was his favourite muse. Excerpts:

Tell us about your family background?
I was born in Lucknow but my father, Raja Sajid Husain Ali, was the raja of Kotwara. He had become a raja at a very young age and thus, there was an attempt on his life due to which there was a danger to his life. He was packed off to Edinburgh to study. He returned to India as a man ready to take on the world in 1936. The British opened us up to a strange sense of democracy, which later became communalised just before independence and that finally drove us to becoming two countries, India and Pakistan. I was very young at the time of Partition, but remember lot of family friends being separated from us. I studied at La Martiniere Lucknow after which I did my BSc at Aligarh Muslim University, where I got exposed to poetry that became a very important part of my evolutionary process of waking up to the world. Right from my school, I always won the first prize for painting and was always a painter that till today has helped me in my films as I sketch each scene out before I shoot it. I always wanted to do something creative and so moved to Calcutta to join advertising. I worked as the account executive to Satyajit Ray, who was the art director of Clarion McCann. I was very close to him and would go to his house. I learnt from him how you can take your culture to people through your cinema. I then joined another ad agency ASP where I worked with Shyam Benegal and Aziz Mirza after which I joined Air India where I made a couple of films for them and then made my first film Gaman. I won my first Filmfare Award. It also gave me the strength to make Umrao Jaan.

All your films, be it Gaman or Umrao Jaan, had a central powerful woman character.
Yes, for me the lady has to be strong. She has to make a difference and that comes from my mother. My mother's father was the nawab of Moradabad, but while she too came from a princely background, she always put things in perspective for me in a humane and practical way. In Jaanisaar, there is a scene inspired by the real-life incident that took place with her father. Because he was a revolutionary, the prince of Rampur spied on him, got him arrested and the British tied his body to an elephant's feet and dragged him around Moradabad and that is a very hair-raising thought. I loved my mother the most, I lost her to cancer when I was studying at Aligarh. And I still have very strong memories of her.

Talk about working with Smita Patil in Gaman?
Smita was a dream to work with. Like me, she too was a Libran and we were very similar. She could see the aesthetics in everything one was trying to do and she would respond to a lot of things that normally people don't respond to, like music, people, clothes, dialogues. We had great fun together. Asha Bhosle's daughter was her companion and the whole night, we would sit on the terrace in Kotwara and laugh and people would think that some bhoot had come.

You created Rekha as the Umrao Jaan. What is she like?
She's also a Libran but she's just he opposite of Smita. While Smita surrendered more, Rekha was more reserved. Smita was more stimulating as a muse. She had a different kind of imaginaion. Rekha has a lot of grace. She has a mystery and a quaint sense of humour. She's an interesting person, but we had a very professional relationship. She was a bit temperamental and knew what she was getting into. She was positioned within the the environment, be it the people, the music and everything else that made her Umrao Jaan.

You also worked with Dimple Kapadia in Zooni and with Shabana Azmi in Anjuman.
Dimple has a very interesting sense of romance in her. If Rekha, Smita and Dimple were ladies with a dream, Shabana is a woman with a cause.

Farooq Sheikh was a part of most of your films.
He was my alter ego. He was a gem and what he did for me, I don't think anyone could do for me on screen. He was perceptive, vulnerable, encouraging and supporting.

You lived in Mumbai. What made you move back to Lucknow and Kotwara?
When my father died in 1990, that's the time I left Mumbai to go back to live in Lucknow. I had to take on the responsibility of sorting everything out. In his will, he had said that he did not want to see anyone hungry in Kotwara. He was a big father figure there. Everything fell in place for me and I too felt that why should they have to migrate for work like in my film Gaman? That was also the time I had married my third wife Meera. The first thing I told her at the time of marriage was, 'You are marrying me and Kotwara.' Kotwara has been an important cultural influence on me and I am deeply linked to the people out there. I have also shot most of my films there.

You fought the Lok Sabha elections several times. What made you do that?
I got into politics due to Ayodhya as for me it was a watershed moment and I felt I had to say something politically. I fought against Atal Bihari Vajpayee and lost but still got 2.5 lakhs votes. I have been fighting all my life. In a way, I am fighting even in Bollywood to make films on my own terms. Now I am not politically-aligned but I like Akhilesh Yadav. I am happy that I have managed to convince him to extend the film subsidy to shoot in UP. I am not only politically aligned anymore but am aligned to humanism and secularism that is why my film Jaanisaar is important for me as it can humanise people.

You have married thrice. Talk about your relationship with Subhashini Ali (mother of director Shaad Ali).
We never divorced and are just separated. She was too much into her politics and I was too much into my own madness and our lives were just not fitting in. The whole period of 1988-1990 was the toughest and lowest for me. Zooni had got held up, my younger brother who lived in Liverpool died, I lost my father. When Zooni was stopped, I lost not just all my money, but also faith in people and politics. After Zooni, when I walked out of Kashmir I didn't know where I would go. First I thought I would just stay in Kashmir only as I had fallen in love with the valley. I had been promised many things from the government as a guarantee for my money, but I lost all my money. I came to Delhi and had to literally stand on my own again. I was living out of a suit case in a small room of a friend. And that's when I met Meera. She came as a breath of fresh air and has since been my best companion and wife. That's also when I got into making clothes as I thought that if I could make Rekha look beautiful, then I could also make other women look beautiful.

What do you like the most about Meera?
That she is very loving and compassionate and very responsible. She likes my madness.

What made you make a film like Jaanisaar after so many years?
I always try and live a film. 1857 is an important period in Indian history. Hollywood has explored the holocaust threadbare, we have done nothing for our history. I made Jaanisaar as I felt that the period of history post 1857 needed to be exposed. There was not a tree left from where there were no bodies hanging and I owed it to my country to talk about the sacrifices that have got pushed under the carpet. And while I don't know the market, I do know what goes into people's bloodstream. I still meet people every evening who fill up my glass with Umrao Jaan. It could be a matter of time but I feel Jaanisaar too will get into people's mental cache.

What did your father like the most about you?
He liked my honesty and that I was straightforward. I didn't hide anything from him though he was not always sure about how responsible I could be as I did certain things in my life that reflected my being irresponsible. For instance, he had a very beautiful Italian Rolls-Royce car that he had brought from England, which I just sold. He had a beautiful stamp collection, which I just threw around. Now I have developed a sense of record and that is also helping me with my work.

Do you wish he was alive to see you like this?
He would not have given me full marks even now. But, I do know that he is marking me.