Showing posts with label Deepika Padukone cleavage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deepika Padukone cleavage. Show all posts
There isn't really a script for #SidSessions - Sidhartha Mallya
7:46 AM
Sidhartha Mallya on incorrect perceptions, a change in name and how he deals with his followers’ obsession with his crotch on his six-episode web show
Sristhi Dixit (DNA; November 6, 2014)
Bratty and arrogant are the words one usually
associates with Sidhartha Mallya, but what one usually doesn’t see
coming is his quirky brand of humour. Sid (as he now prefers being
called) feels he’s been seriously misunderstood for his harmless
one-liners and jokes that he often cracks at his own expense.
He even produced a series of six webisodes titled #SidSessions where he takes on his critics and answers questions like ‘Do you have dick?’. He didn’t just stop there in the first episode, where he took a light-hearted jab at a media house for putting out a video that focussed on his former girlfriend Deepika Padukone’s cleavage. Given the fact that Sid was linked to her in the past we decided to ask him if she connected with him after watching this episode. Read to know more...
What brought about the idea for the web series?
I initially only intended to make a one-off video for a group of my friends after one of them asked me how I dealt with all the criticism I get on Twitter. We then realised that it was actually quite funny so I decided to make six episodes for the public.
What will we see next on #SidSessions?
More of the same!! A lot of people ask me why I don’t also feature the positive comments and compliments that I get. The reason is because you then become a self-promoter. There are already far to many of those in India, and I was not prepared to become yet another sheep in an already overpopulated flock.
Are you scripting the web series yourself?
Yes, there isn’t really a script though! I just reply off the top of my head to comments made…
Do you fear that the popularity of your web series will compartmentalise you as a YouTuber and not an actor?
No, because I don’t intend to do much more unscripted stuff in the future. This is all a bit of fun, but my next project will definitely be in the scripted variety.
Apart from what we see in the first episode of #SidSessions, how do you deal with nasty criticism in life?
Ignore it, laugh at it, and give it back!!
Do you think some people on Twitter are obsessed with your crotch? You took on three questions pertaining to that area!
That’s just the start….wait till the next few episodes!
Does the way people perceive you (as a rich spoiled brat) bother you?
Nope. That unfortunately is a perception created by the media. Those who really know me will tell you that I am exactly the opposite.
Why did you register yourself as ‘Sid’ Mallya in the Screen Actors Guild?
Because I have grown up my whole life in England being called Sid by friends, family, teachers, etc. A lot of people think I have changed my name, but all I have done is take the abbreviated form of ‘Sidhartha’, the same was that ‘Will’ is short for ‘William’, ‘Brad’ is short for Bradley, etc.
Why haven’t you tried your luck at Bollywood yet?
I don’t think I fully understand the space, neither do I feel like I can do it complete justice. And to be honest, I don’t think the Indian audiences would relate to me as their on-screen representative that easily either given both the accent and language barrier.
What’s your reaction to being compared to Russell Brand?
Love it. He is another person who isn’t afraid to speak his mind, even if it doesn’t sit too well with people.
We liked the bit towards the end of the first episode where you slammed The Times of India for the “cleavage controversy.”
Of course you did, you’re DNA (Laughs)! No, but seriously, it was all meant in jest.
Not many know that you are an ordained priest. Just two questions, why and how?
(Laughs) I saw Joey did it in an episode of Friends. I looked up how to do it, went through the process online and it happened!
Your cleavage is as sexy as Shah Rukh Khan's '8-pack' abs, says Bombay Times to Deepika Padukone
9:43 AM
Priya Gupta (BOMBAY TIMES; September 22, 2014)
Over the past few days,
there's been a flood of tweets and stories in other media in support of
Deepika Padukone's response to a video and tweet posted in the online
entertainment section of TOI. As one of the largest media houses in the
world with interests in print, TV, radio and online, we approach each
medium differently, as do our audiences.There isn't a one-fits-all
formula for either distributing or consuming content across various
media.
On Friday, Deepika wrote on FB: “A character may demand that I be clothed from head to toe or be completely naked, and it will be my choice as an actor whether or not I take either. Understand that this is a ROLE and not REAL, and it is my job to portray whatever character I choose to play convincingly."
Deepika, we accept your reel vs real argument, but what about all the times, and there have been many, when you have flaunted your body off screen - while dancing on stage, posing for magazine covers, or doing photo ops at movie promotional functions? What 'role' do you play there? So why the hypocrisy? What's equally hypocritical is that several media outlets have freely displayed Deepika's cleavage even as they sounded all outraged on her behalf. Surely they could have reported the story without those pictures?
Yes, the headline could have been better. But the world of online is very different from that of newspapers. It is chaotic and cluttered - and sensational headlines are far from uncommon. We have always campaigned against the moral police. We believe there's no shame in Deepika showing off her body, but does she now want us to first check with her as to which pictures of her - taken at public events - we can or cannot publish? Are we going to have a parallel censor board for pictures of film stars taken off screen but in plain sight of the world, as Deepika's was? It's not as if the pictures were shot with hidden cameras, or that someone sneaked into her home, invaded her privacy, and took those pictures without her knowledgeor permission.
Deepika, who began her career as a 'calendar girl' for a liquor brand, has written, "Yes we marvel, envy and drool over a male actors 8pack abs in a film, but do we zoom in on the mans 'crotch' when he makes a public appearance and make that `cheap headlines'??!!'' Deepika, just for the record, we do not zoom into a woman's vagina or show her nipples. As a newspaper, we take every care to ensure that we pixelate them if they show up in a picture, but your cleavage is as sexy as Shah Rukh Khan's '8-pack' abs. Given the nature of the online media worldwide, there could well have been a story headlined, “OMG...Shah Rukh's 8-pack sexy abs!!!“ You've also written, "Everyone is entitled to an opinion. I have little interest to take this further as it might get more attention than it deserves and might be further misconstrued and twisted to sell more undeserved headlines.''
Despite having made your point on Twitter, you have chosen to re-tweet every message and given as many interviews as you could. This has obviously been great publicity for you, timed perfectly with the release of your new film. The video's been on YouTube for a year, why object now?
As for our friends in the media, we wonder if they'll henceforth stop carrying pictures of cleavages, including Deepika's.
On Friday, Deepika wrote on FB: “A character may demand that I be clothed from head to toe or be completely naked, and it will be my choice as an actor whether or not I take either. Understand that this is a ROLE and not REAL, and it is my job to portray whatever character I choose to play convincingly."
Deepika, we accept your reel vs real argument, but what about all the times, and there have been many, when you have flaunted your body off screen - while dancing on stage, posing for magazine covers, or doing photo ops at movie promotional functions? What 'role' do you play there? So why the hypocrisy? What's equally hypocritical is that several media outlets have freely displayed Deepika's cleavage even as they sounded all outraged on her behalf. Surely they could have reported the story without those pictures?
Yes, the headline could have been better. But the world of online is very different from that of newspapers. It is chaotic and cluttered - and sensational headlines are far from uncommon. We have always campaigned against the moral police. We believe there's no shame in Deepika showing off her body, but does she now want us to first check with her as to which pictures of her - taken at public events - we can or cannot publish? Are we going to have a parallel censor board for pictures of film stars taken off screen but in plain sight of the world, as Deepika's was? It's not as if the pictures were shot with hidden cameras, or that someone sneaked into her home, invaded her privacy, and took those pictures without her knowledgeor permission.
Deepika, who began her career as a 'calendar girl' for a liquor brand, has written, "Yes we marvel, envy and drool over a male actors 8pack abs in a film, but do we zoom in on the mans 'crotch' when he makes a public appearance and make that `cheap headlines'??!!'' Deepika, just for the record, we do not zoom into a woman's vagina or show her nipples. As a newspaper, we take every care to ensure that we pixelate them if they show up in a picture, but your cleavage is as sexy as Shah Rukh Khan's '8-pack' abs. Given the nature of the online media worldwide, there could well have been a story headlined, “OMG...Shah Rukh's 8-pack sexy abs!!!“ You've also written, "Everyone is entitled to an opinion. I have little interest to take this further as it might get more attention than it deserves and might be further misconstrued and twisted to sell more undeserved headlines.''
Despite having made your point on Twitter, you have chosen to re-tweet every message and given as many interviews as you could. This has obviously been great publicity for you, timed perfectly with the release of your new film. The video's been on YouTube for a year, why object now?
As for our friends in the media, we wonder if they'll henceforth stop carrying pictures of cleavages, including Deepika's.
It is not about breasts, penises, or any other body part being reported-Deepika Padukone
8:23 AM
By Deepika Padukone
My Point of View...
There is only ONE sign that a woman wants to have sex and that is that she says “YES”.
The reason I write the above line is because we all know that in India we are so desperately trying to make a change in the way sections of our society think in order to move towards a happier world devoid of inequality, rape, fear and pain.
I am not naive about my own profession; it is one that requires lots of demanding things of me. A character may demand that I be clothed from head to toe or be completely naked, and it will be my choice as an actor whether or not I take either. Understand that this is a ROLE and not REAL, and it is my job to portray whatever character I choose to play convincingly.
What my concern is and I am stating it clearly so it is not misconstrued or confused with Shahrukh’s 8-pack or any other woman’s or man’s anatomy. I have spoken out against an ideology that such regressive tactics are still being employed to draw a reader’s attention at a time when we are striving for women’s equality and empowerment. In a time where women should be applauded for making headway in a male-dominated society, we blur the lines between REEL and REAL life and dilute all our efforts by making a one-year old back sliding piece of news a headline. Digging out an old article and headlining it “OMG: Deepika’s Cleavage Show!” to attract readers is using the power of influence to proliferate recessive thought.
When an actresses inner wear decides to do a "peek-a-boo", she most definitely did not step out with the intention to do so. So instead of zooming in, circling it and pointing arrows at it, why don't we give her some 'respect' and let it go instead of making it 'headlines'!? Are we not human? Yes we marvel, envy and drool over a male actors 8pack abs in a film, but do we zoom in on the man's 'crotch' when he makes a public appearance and make that 'cheap headlines'??!!
I have no issue celebrating my body and I have never shied away from anything on-screen to portray a character. In fact my next character portrayed is a bar dancer (sorry Farah for the spoiler!) who titillates men as a means to support her livelihood. My issue is you propagating the objectification of a REAL person, and not a character being played. Sure, dissect my characters if you wish-if it is of so much interest then discuss the character’s cup size and leg length if it is relevant to making the role convincing. All I am asking for is respect as a woman off-screen.
It is not about breasts, penises, or any other body part being reported. It is a matter of context and how out-of-context the reportage is just to sell a headline. And more so during a time in dire need of an attitude shift towards women.
For me this topic ends here. Everyone is entitled to an opinion. I have little interest to take this further as it might get more attention than it deserves and might be further misconstrued and twisted to sell more undeserved headlines.
Having said that, please may we show love, dignity and respect to each other.
Live well, laugh often and love much.
Deepika Padukone
We don't go into a hostile frenzy when cameras caressed SRK's & Hrithik's perfect 6-pack abs
8:05 AM
Pooja Bedi (BOMBAY TIMES; September 17, 2014)
So Deepika Padukone flaunted her
perfect assets and some gawked and gaped, some others drooled
and swooned, while some raised eyebrows and friends and feminists went
into protest overdrive about the media coverage of it. In this era of
women emancipation, we have forgotten that it should be about equality,
not being over-sensitive. We don't go into a hostile frenzy when
cameras caress and capture
SRK's and Hrithik's perfect six-pack abs. We marvel, we envy and we
drool. Why should it be different for a woman?
So Deepika Padukone flaunted her
perfect assets and some gawked and gaped, some others drooled
and swooned, while some raised eyebrows and friends and feminists went
into protest overdrive about the media coverage of it. In this era of
women emancipation, we have forgotten that it should be about equality,
not being over-sensitive. We don't go into a hostile frenzy when
cameras caress and capture
SRK's and Hrithik's perfect six-pack abs. We marvel, we envy and we
drool. Why should it be different for a woman?
When you are a public
figure and you go out to a press event, you are bound to be dissected
from your chipped nail polish to your repeated shoes. If admiring and
focussing on a woman's assets is a crime, all item numbers should be
banned. How fair is it to say, I will dress to tantalise publicly, but
you have to look the other way? In your homes, you dress keeping in
mind the reactions you will receive from your family, in-laws,
husband and neighbours. For a celebrity, going out in front of the
cameras is a responsibility to flaunt only what they want noticed and
it's really silly in the name of
women's rights to say, “Why did you notice and focus on what I
flaunted?“ Or, “How dare you give a public appearance media attention!“
We react to situations from our point of view. Of course, to us, our
point of view is absolutely valid and correct; else we wouldn't be so
vehement about it. It's often quoted that one man's meat is another
man's poison and that one man's freedom fighter is another man's
terrorist. Everything in life is about perspective, and while you are
governed by yours, you must keep an open mind about the flipside of the
coin. As long as there is no violence or unlawful methods being adopted,
everyone is entitled to their point of view. Even if it's top angle!
An overview of Deepika Padukone's Twitter outburst and the reactions generated
8:03 AM
Harshada Rege (DNA; September 16, 2014)
It was a top-angle shot and a tweet under the TOI
Entertainment (@TOIEntertain) handle that screamed ‘OMG: Deepika
Padukone’s cleavage show’ that had the actress see red. A livid DP
retorted: ‘Supposedly India’s ‘LEADING’ newspaper and this is ‘NEWS’!?
YES! I am a Woman. I have breasts AND a cleavage! You got a problem!?
Dont talk about woman’s empowerment when YOU don’t know how to RESPECT
women!’.Soon after, a steady flow of support from friends and colleagues followed. The hashtag #IStandWithDeepikaPadukone began trending.
First stand
Among the first to react were filmmakers and designers who tweeted thus:
Ritesh Sidhwani: Shocked! What it takes to get attention. Our media needs to be more responsible and sensitive.
Homi Adajania: We just slam ourselves back into the dark ages! Reputed channels inciting regressive shit. What are they thinking?! Sad!
Designers Gauri and Nainika: Sexist and utterly sad that instead of covering true talent, the media resorts to such low means to attract readership.
Masaba Gupta: Three cheers to breasts and cleavage. We don’t see pics of men who wear unflattering pants, the penis is holy or what?
Girls stand together
In an unprecedented move, actresses industrywide took a united stand for DP, without mincing words
Some tweeted...
Priyanka Chopra: Well done @deepikapadukone ! Taken a stand for all of us.
Huma Qureshi: More power to @deepikapadukone, that’s how you shut them up.
Ileana D’Cruz: Absolutely disgusting that this is what they choose to write about! Good on you for speaking up against this bullshit!
Esha Gupta: @deepikapadukone well said, proud of you. Thank you for doing this. Women power.
Aditi Rao Hydari: Thank you for this! About time! RESPECT
Sophie Choudry: Media attacks a celeb’s personal & professional life all the time but this is a new low! Thank you for speaking out! Shame!
Others sent in personal reactions...
Dia Mirza: Deepika has stirred up a hornest’s nest. A section of the media has for years treated women in the entertainment industry disgracefully. Some papers use their entertainment pages to objectify women. The irony of it is that these same publications get paid hefty amount of money from us for sponsored stories. It was about time someone reacted.
Gauahar Khan: It makes my blood boil. I am glad Deepika gave back as good as she got. Just because we are public figures doesn’t mean we should allow any kind of behaviour.
Malaika Arora: Way to go, girl. She said it exactly the way it should be. Put the yellow journalists in their place.
Nimrat Kaur: The fearlessness and intolerance for such pepper-spray worthy reportage is what all of us should display. Deepika has dared to show us what role models are made of.
Reema Kagti: It’s good that Deepika stood up for herself. A section of the media has hit an all-time low. The way the Shweta Prasad case was handled last week made that quite apparent.
What some men tweeted
Karan Johar: Appalled, shocked and disgusted at the level of disrespect shown. Deepika or any women in the world cannot and should not stand for this!!
Shoojit Sircar: Eve-teasing of different kind.
Gaurav Kapur: So the TOI has done something crude and classless again! I’m not surprised. I stopped subscribing to it years ago. Listen TOI, you want to be a junky tabloid then go ahead. I mean, you already are. Just don’t pretend to be a national ‘news’paper’.
Arjun Kapoor however, tweeted in a superficial manner, saying: We have hit a new low today...forget complimenting a woman have the ability to respect a woman first.
What DP’s men said
While Deepika’s ex-boyfriend Sidhartha Mallya voiced his opinion through two strongly worded tweets, current beau Ranveer Singh sent out a message late in the night.
Sid said: ‘Proud of @deepikapadukone for standing up and speaking her mind. Too many others in this country would have sat on the fence and kept quiet.’ He again tweeted when TOIENtertain called the link a ‘compliment. His tweet said: And the @TimesofIndia response may just have to go down as one of the most idiotic, shambollic and stupid responses of all time. Bravo.’
Ranveer though barely mentioned the issue and seemed to be rather superficial, saying: @deepikapadukone way to let ‘em know! #LikeABoss @TOIEntertain TUM se yeh ummeed nahi thi #SMH #owned.
The Media, Too
Among the many journalist tweets that poured in, this was one that put it quite well
Barkha Dutt: Good for you @deepikapadukone — nothing embarrasses misogynists more than some plainspeak!
And then it got worse
Noticing that Deepika had decided to take a stand about the link that they had tweeted, @TOIEntertain sent out a message, perhaps in a bid to make peace. It only ended up aggravating the situation further. The tweet read: It’s a compliment! You look so great we want to make sure everyone knew! The twitterati condemned the ‘pacifying’ stand rather strongly.
The following tweets sum up the outrage that followed...
Nimrat Kaur: with this ‘compliment’, I shudder to think who this ‘everyone’ is you’re reaching out to?
Farah Khan: Above all, be the heroine of your life, not the victim. @deepikapadukone doing just that!! (N THATS how u pay a compliment )
Boman Irani: Complimenting a lady is a grace reserved for gentlemen! I stand on a tall tall chair and applaud you @deepikapadukone
(With inputs from Subhash K Jha)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)