Showing posts with label Atika Chohan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Atika Chohan. Show all posts
Tandav row: Writers decide to self-regulate; stay away from politically and religiously sensitive references
8:29 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

After multiple FIRs and extreme pushback to political drama Tandav, lawyers are likely to vet web show scripts at inception. What does that mean for streaming regulation, and where does this leave the writer?
Aastha Atray Banan (MID-DAY; January 31, 2021)
A director like Hansal Mehta knows how to deal with, and digest censorship. His 2017 film Omerta told the story of Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British terrorist of Pakistani origin, who was behind the 1994 kidnapping of tourists in India. In 1999, he was released and found himself safely in Afghanistan backed by the Taliban in exchange for the release of Indian passengers aboard an Indian Airlines hijacked flight. When the film went to the Censor Board, two scenes proved contentious: Omar relieving himself as the national anthem played, and the protagonist having violent sex preceding a terror operation. “I had expected that it would be problematic, but you [the filmmaker] can try. My argument was that it’s the character who is disregarding the national anthem, not me!” Mehta argues.
His argument would certainly not hold true today.
The last few weeks have been defining for freedom of expression for the entertainment industry in India. After Saif Ali Khan-headlined political drama Tandav, directed by top Bollywood maker Ali Abbas Zafar, premiered on Amazon Prime Video, dissenting voices said Hindu religion had been disrespected through scenes in the first episode. The first was a stage play where college students playing Shiva and Narada wonder how they can improve the former’s social media popularity, while another was seen as a casteist slur where Tigmanshu Dhulia, who plays Prime Minister Devki Nandan Singh mocks a Dalit politician. After the trolling, BJP MLA Ram Kadam filed a complaint at Ghatkopar police station on January 20, and an FIR was registered in Mumbai. On January 18, a FIR was filed against the director, producer and the writer of the web series, along with Amazon Prime Video’s India head of original content at the Hazratganj police station of Lucknow. Another one at Greater Noida, then Jabalpur, followed by a complaint in Patiala House, New Delhi. Even the Confederation of All India Traders wrote a letter to Prakash Javadekar, Union Information Broadcasting Minister, on January 19, asking to stop the streaming. Zafar apologised unconditionally, and the makers responded by deleting the scenes. Last week, the Supreme Court declined to grant interim protection to Zafar, actor Mohd Zeeshan Ayyub and others facing multiple FIRs, and remarked that an actor “cannot take up a role without reading the script”.
For Mehta, the brouhaha is unreasonable, because “Tandav is just a pot boiler”. But he suggests we don’t let despair take over.
“I get that people are depressed with what’s unfolding, but I also believe that this government is business conscious. The OTT ecosystem rakes in a lot of business. Perhaps we should keep away from religious and political content for a while.”
Mehta’s suggestion may be prudent but this means the end, or at least partial suspension, of freedom of expression that defined web shows in India. Last November, the government brought video streaming over-the-top (OTT) platforms under the I&B Ministry’s ambit instead of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. While the government has demanded a list of what constitutes prohibited content and more muscle to the complaints mechanism, the industry had responded with what’s called an Implementation Toolkit. Following the scale of this recent protest, it could very well mean that makers and writers self-regulate, choosing to stay away from politically and religiously sensitive references.
It’s then the first officers of creation—the writers—who have the most rewiring to do, whether it’s with their beliefs or process. Mayank Tewari, writer of the critically acclaimed political satire Newton, and behind the dialogues for Ragini MMS, is currently working for a Netflix show. “Let’s see how things pan out. It’s curtailment for sure. Can we now show a policeman or judge as corrupt? I don’t know. The good part is that once the content is made, you can have a problem with it, but it will find its audience anyway, even if through WhatsApp. That’s the beauty of living in these times.”
But he also admits that because making a show or film takes a whole lot of money, energy and time, the investment is huge. “No one wants their time and money to go down the drain. So we will be told, ‘you are an entertainer, not an activist’. And when writers start second guessing, it’s not good. The trouble is that today anything can cause a problem — if you look at Kalidas’s poetry, it’s erotica about Shiva and Parvati. If we reference that, even that will cause a problem. We are a nation addicted to outrage, and anything can offend,” he says, adding that platforms and creators are now looking for legal backing, with lawyers likely to vet the script.
For Atika Chohan, who wrote Meghna Gulzar’s Chhapaak, which got into trouble as lead actress Deepika Padukone, visited JNU in her personal capacity to show solidarity with the anti-CAA protesters, auto editing creative thoughts is a reality. The idea of having legal vet a series is making writers doubt their ability and scope. “I read somewhere this crazy word called ‘cinema jihad’. Didn’t writers have enough of a struggle to put up while pitching their stories, that we now have to make sure no one gets offended. India is not an exciting place to be, the creative possibilities are shrinking,” says Chohan.
So, what’s the solution? Resourceful thinking. “History has taught us that in times like these, creatives find ways to say what they want—tiered narratives, metaphors, layers. In Iran, when creators were censored, they still told stories of social divide, but by using children as protagonists. Maybe, we need to do that, but right now I am angst ridden and worried.”
Sidharth Jain is the founder of the Story Ink, a platform that seeks film or dramatisation rights to books written by Indian authors. He says he isn’t surprised b the developments because in India, some things we don’t talk about. He is currently working on a book deal that concerns a fiction title. “And yet [after the Tandav episode], I told the writer, let’s go over it all over again. Fighting legal battles is expensive. Writers and creators can’t be expected to seek legal help in early stages [of creation]. For now, it’s best to stick to finding family comedies, where everyone is happy.”
Some argue that even in the absence of a censor body, the freedom to approach a court of law exists and can be used to stifle expression. Mihir Desai, senior advocate, Bombay High Court, explains that anyone can set criminal law in motion, and it’s harsh. Multiple complaints can be made against a single party across locations, complicating the matter. The police, of course, has the power to review the complaint and judge if an FIR should be registered. “Usually, complaints seem to get converted into FIRs in states where a particular ideology has political backing, and so the consequences are harsh.”
The irony lies in the fact, says a writer who didn’t wish to be identified for the story because he is pursuing a legal suit, that OTT platforms want cutting edge stories. But when the environment isn’t conducive, they have no choice but to take note. For an international player like Netflix, this means having to ascribe to multiple rulebooks, a different one for every market. An article published in The Hollywood Reporter in 2019 said: Until very recently, Netflix has always taken a “move fast and break things” approach typical of Silicon Valley startups, with most criticism of its shows either ignored or dismissed.”
After having a presence in over 190 countries, not anymore. In the past, the platform has got into trouble for smoking scenes in Stranger Things, for depiction of Palestinian terrorists in Fauda, and for kissing scenes in their Arabic original Jinn. Amazon Prime Video, which had admitted to self- censorship as early as in 2016, had said: “Amazon is a responsible company and we are here to entertain the Indian customer with award-winning content from the US along with blockbusters from Indian and regional makers. We will keep Indian cultural sensitivities in mind while offering this content to customers.”
Rangita Pritish Nandy, who created the racy Four More Shots Please!, for Amazon Prime, says nobody really starts out with the idea of offending. “The arts are a reflection of the times we live in, always have been. What we, as creators and producers, bring to cinema and streaming, finds its seeds in the world around us. I don’t really see that changing. What may change is the way we choose to say it. Blatant calling out will stop and intelligent profiling and writing will be celebrated. Streaming has shrunk the world. When the world is your audience, it makes you brave.”
Vishal Watwani, writer and producer for Helllo Jee, a show about phone conversations between call centre employees and men who need to be “entertained”, for ALT Balaji, says while we cannot expect to be free to say anything we like, censorship in India seems more about appeasing the powerful than reviewing content in the interest of audience good. He echoes the words of the senior counsel representing Amazon Video Prime in the Tandav case. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, authorised counsel for Amazon India, had told mid-day last week, “People are entitled to make a political satire. If you don’t need to watch it, don’t; no one is forcing individuals to watch the collection. According to me, these circumstances are not about hurting individuals’s non-secular sentiments, however of individuals looking for publicity.”
Sumeet Vyas, who played dodgy politician Yudi in last year’s show Dark 7 White on ALT Balaji, says he is reminded of George Orwell’s 1984. “Whatever you say, think, write, or perform will be monitored. It’s not just harmful for actors, but for society. My argument is simple—if you think what actors perform has a negative impact on society, then what about all the stories [we perform] where good wins over evil? Then credit us and us alone also for all the good that has happened in this country.”
A new wave of female screenwriters is bringing real and relatable women characters to films and web shows
8:47 AM
Posted by Fenil Seta

Window dressing no more. A new wave of female screenwriters is bringing real and relatable women characters to films and web shows
Sonam Joshi (THE TIMES OF INDIA; June 30, 2019)
When Gazal Dhaliwal began working on a film script about a Punjabi girl who falls in love with another girl at a wedding, she took a trip down memory lane. Many of Dhaliwal’s own experiences of being bullied in school for being an effeminate male child, ragged in college, and her father’s support when she came out as a transwoman found their way into the Sonam Kapoor-starrer Ek Ladki Ko Dekha Toh Aisa Laga.
After the film released this year, Dhaliwal received several messages from lesbian women in India and Pakistan. “Many of them had taken their parents to watch the film, and they came out ready to talk to their daughters,” says Dhaliwal.
Dhaliwal is among a growing number of female writers in Bollywood writing stories about real women, and breaking conventions in a film industry that objectifies female actors or presents them as flat supporting characters to the male hero.
In recent years, there have been a growing number of successful films with women screenwriters at the helm: Juhi Chaturvedi for October and Piku, Kanika Dhillon for Manmarziyaan, Dhaliwal for Ek Ladki Ko Dekha..., Nidhi Mehra and Mehul Suri for Veere Di Wedding, Zeenat Lakhani for Hindi Medium, and Pooja Dhala Surti for Andhadhun. “These movies tell women that their stories are worthy of being told. It makes them feel validated,” Dhaliwal says.
“Gone are the days when female characters were just prototypes,” says Kanika Dhillon, who most recently wrote Manmarziyaan and drew upon her own early life in Amritsar to create the spitfire lead Rumi. “The women that I write are real”. One reason for this change is that more actresses are turning producers, says Bhavani Iyer, who co-wrote the 2018 film Raazi. “They want the story to be about them and not just be window dressing.”
The overall representation of Indian women’s stories has been dismal, but there are signs of change. According to a study on gender bias in popular films by the Geena Davis Media Foundation in 2015, only 12.1% of writers in Bollywood were women, lower than the global figure of 19.7%. In 2018, only 19.6 % of the 102 Hindi films released on the big screen were written by women, according to a study by Arre.
These skewed demographics also affect on-screen representations of women. According to a 2017 study of 4,000 Wikipedia pages of Hindi movies released since 1970 by researchers from IBM, The Indian Institute of Information Technology and Delhi Technological University, 80% of movie plots had more mentions of male characters than than female ones.
The credit for change also goes to streaming platforms that offer more opportunities and freedom to women writers. For instance, five out of 11 Netflix Originals and four of the five Hotstar Specials announced so far have at least one woman writer on board.
“The film industry believes they are creating their films for middle India, and most of their audience is male,” says Devika Bhagat, co-writer of the Amazon series Four More Shots Please. Bhagat says it still wouldn’t be possible to make a show like FMSP, which explores themes like bisexuality, one night stands and dating after divorce.
Though a lot has changed, there is still considerable inequality, says Alankrita Srivastava, who co-wrote and co-directed the acclaimed web series Made in Heaven with three other women. “This inequality is systemic and historic. The male gaze has shaped popular culture, the way we watch films, the way films are made,” she says. This extends to the roles women are given and the boxes they’re put in — the slutty vamp, the virtuous wife, or the virginal pure girl — and the lack of interiority in their characters. “The more women there are on set, not just directors but also writers, producers and technicians, the more it will change cinema narratives,” she says.
While OTT platforms are more open and inclusive, women should have equal representation on all mediums, says Srivastava. There remain deep-rooted challenges such as casual misogyny, unequal pay and the pigeonholing of women into certain genres. While the pay gap has been shrinking, Bhagat points out that there is still a 10-15% difference between male and female screenwriters. “I was once told by a line producer that the male dialogue writer deserved more money because he had a family to support and I was single and could just ask my dad for money,” she recalls. Pooja Varma, a co-writer on the second season of Netflix’s Sacred Games, seconds this. “During negotiations, people have asked me to accept a lower fee because I have been assured that I will be protected on set,” she says.
Dhaliwal recalls how a director once refused to hire her for a project though he liked her work “because it’s a man’s story and you wouldn’t be able to write it.” Yet, some writers such as Iyer, who is working on Amazon’s crime drama web series Breathe after Raazi, are breaking this norm. “It makes a lot of sense to subvert the genre if you get a woman writer to do an action film or a male writer to write a saas bahu story,” she says.
Some male directors rely on a collaborative process such as director Sriram Raghavan who worked with writer and editor Pooja Ladha Surti since his debut, most recently in the 2018 film Andhadun. “When we discuss female characters, I rely on her for certain insights I may not have,” he says.
It’s still far from a level playing field but Atika Chohan, who is writing the script for Deepika Padukone’s forthcoming biopic Chhapaak on the life of acid attack survivor Laxmi Agarwal, says there’s a distinct change in what writers like her could have done a few years ago. “It has been a time of transition. Talented female writers and directors who have waited in the wings for a long time are now getting a chance.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)