Showing posts with label Aditya Pancholi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aditya Pancholi. Show all posts

Aditya Pancholi’s conviction upheld, but jail term now probation

Aditya Pancholi snapped in Ahmedabad

Swati Deshpande (THE TIMES OF INDIA; February 22, 2025)

Mumbai: Observing that criminal jurisprudence recognizes reformative action rather than retribution, a Mumbai sessions court judge upheld the conviction of actor Aditya Pancholi for assaulting a man in a two-decade-old car parking dispute but dropped the one-year jail term handed to him and ordered his release on a bond of good behaviour.

Sessions judge D G Dhoble, in a Feb 20 judgment, cited provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, to say both aim to avoid sentencing first-time offenders to prison.

The Railway Mobile Court Magistrate at Andheri had in Nov 2016 held Pancholi, then 52 years old, guilty under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to a year in jail and also imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 as compensation to victim Pratik Pashine.

The FIR filed at Versova Police Station had said on August 21, 2005, a fight broke out between Pancholi and the complainant over a car that was parked in the wrong place near the Four Bungalows market. The complainant accused the actor of "verbally abusing him" and allegedly hitting him with his fist, leading to a nose "fracture." After evidence was presented and four prosecution witnesses deposed, the magistrate found Pancholi guilty of causing grievous hurt.

The actor appealed against his conviction. He claimed he was falsely implicated. The sessions court said, "There is no reason to believe that the victim falsely implicated" Pancholi. It said the evidence of the informant was "crystal clear" that he was assaulted on his nose and head with a "fist blow" over a parking dispute, leading to a hairline nose fracture. "His evidence is cogent, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence," said the judgment.

However, judge Dhoble also added, "The Magistrate should have considered whether imprisonment serves any purpose other than stigmatization. Sentencing policy should balance deterrence and correction." 

he sessions judge agreed with Pancholi's lawyer that the sentence was harsh and benefit of probation was not even considered by the magistrate. Considering that the crime occurred 20 years ago and Pancholi is a "71-year-old prominent actor" with no criminal antecedents, with it being a "spur of the moment" act in a parking dispute, the court must consider these aspects. Besides, he "did not act in a cruel manner," said the appeal court. Imposing a sentence "without considering its effect on the social order in many cases may be a futile exercise," the court said, granting Pancholi the benefit of release under the Probation of Offenders Act.

The court ordered Pancholi to "maintain peace and good behaviour for one year'' and not get involved in criminal activities. The sessions court also directed Pancholi to pay enhanced compensation of Rs 1.5 lakh.

After a decade, I was able to look my parents in the eye-Sooraj Pancholi

sooraj pancholi reaction on jiah khan case

Renuka Vyavahare (BOMBAY TIMES; April 30, 2023)

In his first exclusive interview after being acquitted in the Jiah Khan suicide case on Friday, actor Sooraj Pancholi (30), reflects upon his decade-long trial coming to an end, his hopeful present and what lies ahead for him. In this conversation with us, the actor drops his guard like never before. Excerpts…

After 10 years you were declared not guilty by the Special CBI Court in the Jiah Khan case where you were accused of abetment to suicide. Talking to us at this point, what are your feelings?
It’s a huge weight off my shoulders. These past 10 years, even when I was in a relationship, I couldn’t give it my hundred per cent because my future was uncertain. I can now plan my life. No matter what you have in life, peace is what you need the most, beyond fame, money and success. I have not been at peace for the past 10 years. Every night before I slept, I thought about this. As I woke up, I thought about it and this happened to not just me, but my father (Aditya Pancholi), mother (Zarina Wahab) and sister (Sana). I am yet to come to terms with the fact that it is over. I am still getting used to me being a free man. It hasn’t sunk in yet.

Today, how do you remember Jiah Khan and the relationship you two shared?
I sent a friend request to Jiah on Facebook. She was a beautiful girl and had done a few films. She reverted about a year later and we became friends. I was in a relationship with Jiah for only five months and I didn’t know the magnitude of what she was going through. She needed love not from her boyfriend, but her family too. She wanted them to support and understand her.

Jiah had a lot of pressure to support her family - two younger stepsisters, mother and her partner. She was the only earning member and she wasn’t getting the kind of work that would help her in doing so. I didn’t know the gravity of the situation then as a 20-year-old, but I had informed her mother about her depression and that she needed help. Back then, there wasn’t much awareness about mental health. She didn’t have that emotional support from them. She only had me.

When I had initially met Jiah and we weren’t in a relationship, she had tried to slit her hand wanting to end her life in 2012. I had called Rabiya ji in London, and she told me she will be in Mumbai on the next flight, but she didn’t show up for months. Was this a normal parent-child relationship? I was there for her and during that time, we fell in love. She was a wonderful person but my love for her wasn’t enough. She needed familial love. There’s so much I could have said in court, but I didn’t because I want the family to have peace, but accusing me is not the way. The court has observed that the suicide letter presented as Jiah’s was not written by her and was submitted to the police days after it was given to the media. The judgement copy states, ‘The circumstances create serious suspicion regarding the actual author of the said letter.’

All these years, did you feel ostracized or judged by people even before the courts gave their verdict. How did you deal with it?
From the moment I stepped out of my house to the time I got back, I felt trapped, breathless, and judged every day. Especially in showbiz, perception is everything. At any event, I was the last person to reach and the first to leave. Even when they were probably not judging me, I felt that way. There was this constant pressure, a feeling that people don’t want to be around me or seen with me and that is the worst feeling ever… the thought of being unwanted. When this happened to me, I was not a part of the industry. I was accused in 2013 and my first film came out in 2015. I did sense a bit of hesitation and hostility. I was removed from projects. The films that I was working on were stopped midway. Every time I tried to move on, some fake reports in the media and vicious online trolling held me back.

At one point you even went black on social media to register your outrage.
I was so fed up. Baseless accusations and bizarre conspiracy theories connected me to the death of Disha Salian (celebrity manager), which I had nothing to do with! When you are in the dirt, it’s easy to put some more dirt on you. It was horrible! I don’t speak about my problems to anyone. I don’t share my inner turmoil even with my parents because I don’t want them to suffer. On Friday, after a decade I looked my parents in the eye. We wouldn’t speak about this case (Jiah Khan) in the house. I would discuss it with my lawyers, but never with my family. My mother wanted to accompany me to court for the verdict, so you saw her there. My sister stayed with my father at home. For 10 years, I went to the court alone. I didn’t want them to see what I was facing in court or going through in life. I don’t vent, I have trained myself to be this way. The only time I cried was when I entered my house after the acquittal. That was closure for me.

Despite the verdict, a certain section might continue to troll you. How do you feel about that?
I must make this clear. Eight years ago, as an accused, I had a right to be discharged based on insufficient evidence against me, but my family and I opted to undergo trial. It was my decision to face trial. I had a discharge order from the Bombay HC, but I wanted the truth to come out. Had I been discharged, people would have assumed that I got away because I am ‘influential’. I am sure people even today might think that Sooraj got away, but I did not. I have hardly spoken about this case in the media, so it was easy for people to think that I was the bad guy. I want people to go through my judgement letter. It has all the details. They can then decide for themselves.

Your proximity to Salman Khan is often spoken about. In 2015, he even launched you with Hero, a film that he produced.
Salman Khan is not a friend of my father or mother. Of course, they know each other as they all work in the same industry. I was an AD on Ek Tha Tiger and he had told me that he will produce my first film. I was accused in 2013 two years before that film (Hero) came out, and he still produced that film and stood by me. He has done more than anyone else for me, but I know my limits and I won’t exploit that bond. I have met him a hundred times, but never for work. He was the first person I messaged as soon as I left the court. He had told me, ‘Sooraj, if you know in your heart that you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.’ I knocked on everyone’s door for work in these last 10 years. Corporates and studios didn’t want to work with someone who had travel restrictions and a sword dangling over his head. They wanted me to have a clean chit first. I feel reborn now and I am ready to work.

Rabiya Khan has maintained that her child was murdered and abetment to suicide was a wrong charge. Are you ready to continue with your fight?
This is no longer about justice but harassment. I just want her to leave me alone. There is no revenge to take from me. I have done nothing wrong. Baseless allegations were made against me, and nothing was proved in court except that I was in a relationship with her. The mother just wants to take the guilt off her shoulders and put it on someone else. She needs a person to be blamed so that she feels at peace. Jiah didn’t have a father. She met him once when she was a baby. Her mother moved houses, she came to Mumbai at 16 to become an actor and she had been supporting her family financially since then. No other person was investigated except for me because I was her boyfriend. Is being in a relationship or loving somebody a crime? As a 20-year-old boy, I tried to help Jiah as much as I could. There’s nothing more that I could have done. Today, I am 10 years more mature, more aware about mental health. I could have strived harder to save her had it happened now.

I was cautioned not to pursue case as Aditya Pancholi had clout-Rabiya Khan

Jiah Khan

Rebecca Samervel (THE TIMES OF INDIA; August 19, 2022)

Mumbai: Narrating events leading to the moment she found her daughter, actor Jiah Khan (25), dead in their Juhu home and moments after, Rabiya Khan told the special CBI court on Thursday that when she screamed out saying that she had repeatedly told her eldest child to stay away from her boyfriend, actor Sooraj Pancholi, her friend, actor Anju Mahendru told her to not take his name. “His father (actor Aditya Pancholi) is connected to underworld and has political clout and is very dangerous. They will do something to you,” Rabiya quoted Mahendroo as warning her.

On the second day of her examination in chief by special public prosecutor Manoj Chaladan, Rabiya said this happened moments after Aditya Pancholi walked into the house, fell at her feet, apologized and said, “Sorry, my son has ruined his life…career…Jiah was a child.”

Rabiya iterated that Jiah had not died by suicide but was murdered. “Both agencies (CBI and city police) never collected any legal evidence to prove it was a case of suicide. I believe it is a murder and the accused is responsible for killing my daughter,” she submitted in her deposition.

Rabiya broke down in court multiple times. She said that a couple of hours before she found Jiah dead, she had overheard a phone conversation where Sooraj was shouting at her.

During the hearing, Rabiya identified clothes Jiah wore when she found her body, and the muslin dupatta used in the alleged suicide. She also alleged that her two daughters had found a letter left by Jiah and “discovered all the grievance and pain that Jiah had expressed which was directly pointing to Sooraj.”

“We saw on the screen of the phone (Jiah’s) there were many text messages and many missed phone calls… We read messages on the screen and it was filled with anger with abusive language. . ” she said.
Pancholi’s lawyer is likely to cross-examine Rabiya on Monday.

On June 3, 2013, Jiah was found hanging in her Juhu flat, after which Sooraj was arrested and charged with abet-ment. He was later given bail.

During deposition before special judge A S Sayyad, Rabiya iterated alleged instances where she suspected Jiah was being abused in the relationship and Sooraj was allegedly “manipulative”. She spoke about frequents fights between Jiah and Sooraj, Aditya Pancholi’s alleged disapproval of the relationship and how Sooraj’s mentor Salman Khan did not have any objection to the relationship. Rabiya also submitted that in May, Sooraj came to her and told her how he wanted space from a “depressed” Jiah as he was starting work soon. She denied that Jiah was depressed.

Aditya Pancholi and producer Sam Fernandes file police complaints against each other

aditya-pancholi

While the producer alleges that the actor verbally abused him for wanting to replace Sooraj Pancholi in his film Hawa Singh, Aditya says that Sam borrowed over Rs. 90 lakhs from him for the movie
Neha Maheshwri (BOMBAY TIMES; February 6, 2022)

Actor Aditya Pancholi and Sam Fernandes, producer of the film Hawa Singh,havegot into a feud. Both have filed non-cognisable complaints against each other. Sam has alleged that Aditya has been pressurising him to retain his son, Sooraj Pancholi, in the film Hawa Singh.

The producer says, “I had announced the film with Sooraj in the lead role in 2019. He shot for around 12 days for the project. However, things went awry after the first lockdown, as the investors did not want to back a film with Sooraj in the lead. I spoke to Sooraj about it, who himself asked us to go ahead with another actor. However, his father, Aditya Pancholi, insisted that we retain Sooraj and that he would get an investor, but that didn’t happen. He did give some money for the film, but that wasn’t enough. This film is a biopic of an Indian heavyweight boxer, and we would need a budget of around Rs. 25 crore to make it.”

Things took an ugly turn between them on January 27. Sam says, “Aditya wanted to meet me, so he called me to a hotel. Since a few people were already present in his room, we decided to have a discussion in the corridor. After some time, he told me that I must take his son in the film, or he wouldn’t let me make it. He abused me and tried to punch me. When I turned to leave, he kicked me on my back. I went straight to the Juhu police station and filed an NC against him.”

Meanwhile, Aditya also filed a cross NC for verbal abuse and intimidation against Sam at Juhu Police Stationon January 28. The actor refutes Sam’s allegations and says he has borrowed a huge sum from him last year.

Aditya says, “In February 2020, Sam came to me, shared a sob story and asked for money. He told me, ‘Khatam ho jaaunga, ghar girvi rakh diya hai, vendors ka paisa dena hai’. Being an emotional person, I gave him money up to Rs. 90 lakh 50 thousand from my wife’s and children’s accounts. On January 27, he visited me at a hotel and, after a while, started misbehaving with me and talking rubbish about Sooraj and my family. He asked me for more money, and I refused. I asked him to return the money he had earlier borrowed, but he flatly refused. Next, I got to know that he filed an NC against me at the Juhu Police Station. I, too, filed an NC against him the following day. I have also filed an application for an FIR against him at the Versova police station.”

In the complaint filed with the police, the actor has attached the bank statement to show the transfer of money to Sam.

Sam accepts that Aditya gave him the amount (Rs 90 lakh 50 thousand). He says, “He didn’t lend me money for my personal use, but for the sake of his son. He knew about the risk involved. I would have liked to continue the film with Sooraj if the finances were sorted, but I couldn’t. In fact, I have told Sooraj that I will do my best to recover his investment from the investor who comes on board.”

I have never met Disha in my life, and I found out about her after Sushant’s death-Sooraj Pancholi


The actor rubbishes conspiracy theories that allege his involvement in Sushant Singh Rajput and his former manager Disha Salian’s deaths
Renuka Vyavahare (BOMBAY TIMES; July 4, 2020)

A lot of rumours have been doing the rounds, which, in a way, blame you for Sushant Singh Rajput’s and his former manager Disha Salian’s deaths. It’s been speculated that Disha was pregnant with your child, and Sushant, who reportedly had a scuffle with you in 2017, was aware of it and was about to expose you. It’s also been said that Salman Khan has been protecting you...
What scuffle with Sushant? I never had any argument with him, which I have clarified before as well. And, why will Salman Khan get involved in my life? Does he not have other things to do? I don’t even know who Disha is, I have never met her in my life. I found out about her after Sushant’s death, and I feel bad for the families involved. Someone has written this rubbish on their personal Facebook page, made it into a movie script and put it out there.

Taking up for you, your father (actor Aditya Pancholi) has said, “Somebody makes up a vague story, puts it online, people lap it up and make him the villain!”
It feels like it’s me against the world. First of all, it’s painful that Sushant is no more. People using his name for whatever reasons is wrong. The situation is such that anyone writes anything and it goes viral in a few minutes. People who don’t know the truth, actually believe what’s been written. I have also been getting supportive messages saying, ‘Be strong and cope with it, these are hard times and jobless people are spreading these rumours’. But, at the end of the day, I am human, too.

Are you saying that there was no hostility between Sushant and you whatsoever?
None at all. He was a senior actor and way more successful. I was not in his league to even compete with him. I was nowhere a threat to him. He treated me like a younger brother. Whenever we met, we either spoke about films or my fitness training. When the article about our ‘tiff’ came out in 2017, it was Sushant who had reached out to me. He told me, ‘Bro, yeh koi faltu article aaya hai saying Salman bhai is angry with me. Can you please give a statement to clarify this?’ He thought it would be better if I stated the facts, as the story claimed that he misbehaved with me. I clarified the reports. We met for dinner at a friend’s place after that in Bandra, clicked that funny picture where we posed like we are fighting and that’s it. We had each other’s numbers. He called me for movie screenings, and I even went for Raabta screening. We must have met around four-five times.

Were you in touch with Sushant in the recent past?
No, I wasn’t. He was not a best friend of mine or anything. We had never been to each other’s houses. We were from the same industry, that’s all.

How true are the ‘Salman Khan is defending Sooraj’ stories?
Why would he do this for me? Salman Khan is the producer of my first film (Hero, 2015). He gave us a chance, and after that, it has been my journey. He is not responsible for what we do in the future. You need to find your way. I cannot rely on Salman sir and cannot expect him to be my Godfather. I have never been dependent on him and he wouldn’t want it that way, too.

Why do you think you find yourself being dragged into controversies over and over again? Is it also fuelled by the fact that you were among the privileged to be launched by Salman Khan, and of course, the whole nepotism debate?
If it was all about nepotism, I would have been on my 10th film by now. Nepotism has nothing to do with what’s happening right now. I worked from a very young age as an assistant director. First on Guzaarish (2010) and then on Ek Tha Tiger (2012). That is where I met Salman sir and he had promised me that he would give me a film because he must have seen some potential in me. He asked me whether I wanted to be an actor and I worked really hard for it. It’s not that I came out of nowhere, woke up from my sleep and went to a movie set. The first film that I auditioned for was Kai Po Che (2013), and I was rejected there. I worked on myself after that. I also auditioned for Hero (2015). My mom is 60. She has been in the industry for over 30 years and till date, she auditions for movies. It’s a myth that star kids don’t have to give auditions.

You already have a case looming over your head (Jiah Khan) and now, the Sushant-Disha tragedy has your name being dragged into it.
I am very numb and hurt right now. This is affecting me a lot. I don’t know what to say. It’s been eight years and my case (Jiah) hasn’t even taken off and it’s only because Rabiya Khan (Jiah’s mother) doesn’t show up in court. I had to face the CBI since I was 21-22. I have cooperated with the police. I have done everything possible, haven’t missed a single date in court even when I was down with fever. But if the complainant (Rabiya) isn’t showing up in court, what are they looking for?
-------------------------
ADITYA PANCHOLI: WHY IS MY SON BEING DRAGGED INTO THIS?

Sooraj’s family is upset about him being dragged into this controversy. His father, actor Aditya Pancholi, told us, “Why is my son being dragged into this? Truth will eventually come out, but if he does something to himself tomorrow, who is to be blamed? He has been going through a tough time for seven-eight years now.

Somebody makes up a vague story, puts it online, people lap it up and make him the villain! People need to be responsible about what they share on the web. Shouldn’t you let the cops do their job? No one is above the law. You cannot kill anyone and get away with it. Sooraj was cordial with Sushant. If Disha was pregnant, wouldn’t that be in the police records?”

Salman Khan wanted two songs reshot in Time To Dance-Sooraj Pancholi


Sooraj Pancholi explains why his musical is delayed, dismisses rumours of a new romance, insists he wants to remain single and focus on work
Hiren Kotwani (MUMBAI MIRROR; October 31, 2019)

It’s been four years since you made your debut with Hero. Why did it take you so long to return with your second film, Satellite Shankar?
Even before Hero’s release and later, I got many offers but nothing I really wanted to do. So, I waited. Meanwhile, my personal problems grew bigger and compounded the delay.

What’s the status on the Stanley D’Costa musical, Time To Dance, which was to be your second release and would flag off Isabelle Kaif’s career?
That’s for T-Series to answer; we have just seven days of shoot left. When I got back from Time to Dance, I gave my dates to Murad (Khetani) sir and Ashwin (Varde) sir for Satellite Shankar which was not with T-Series at that point. I sport long hair in the musical and had to cut it short for this film. Since I couldn’t grow out my hair and cut it again twice, that seven days’ shoot is now scheduled for December.

Buzz is, the film is almost 70 per cent complete, but Salman Khan didn’t like the rushes and the project has been scrapped.
Not 70 per cent, it’s 95 per cent complete. And he wanted just two songs to be reshot which is about three days of work each. I can only do my job as an actor, everything else is the producer’s call.

In retrospect, do you think starting out with the remake of an iconic film like Hero was a mistake?
At that point, I wasn’t in the position to take my own call because despite my film background, I didn’t know much about the industry. I had professionals taking decisions on the film and I had big shoes to fill as Hero was a big film in its time. I feel blessed to be a part of the film. From here on, it’s for me to prove myself.

The army has been getting youngsters to enlist through recruitment drives and advertisements. Do you think Satellite Shankar will inspire more people to join the forces?
It’s an inspiring story and showcases a soldier’s love for the country and vice versa. I hope more people join the army. Some time ago, I read that 2000 Kashmiris turned up for the recruitment drive in the Valley.

Your film releases on the same day as Ayushmann Khurrana’s Bala. Does that make you anxious?
Competition is healthy. I’m not Shah Rukh, Aamir or Salman Khan or even Akshay Kumar to get my preferred release date though I hope to be in an enviable position in future. If not Bala, it could have been a bigger Hollywood release. Of course, Ayushmann is a big star and Bala is looking good.

What’s next?
A sports biopic to be shot in Haryana which will begin after I wrap up Time To Dance and cut my hair. It’s the story of an unsung hero who won India a couple of gold medals in boxing, but only a few people know about him. No, no names.

Is Salman Khan still micro-managing your career?
He is my mentor and I respect him. His only advice is that I should do a film only if it feels right. I want to make him happy and proud with my work. My family is happy with me anyway.

Your sister was to make her debut some years ago…
She says now that the industry is not for her. She is in the restaurant business.

And what’s your mom, Zarina Wahab, doing?
Her last film was PM Narendra Modi. She enjoys working and could be doing a role in Salman sir’s Radhe. There were talks about her playing my mother in Satellite Shankar, but things didn’t work out.

What about working with your dad, Aditya Pancholi?
We shared screen space in Hero, I don’t know if it will happen again. That chapter is done. I want to work with mom because she is the more emotional actor.

What’s happening on his legal battle with Kangana Ranaut?
I don’t want to discuss that. It’s been very tough for the family, especially my mother and sister.

You were recently spotted with a pretty foreigner. Is there a romance brewing?
I have some friends but just because one of them is white, people assumed there’s a romance. I want to be single and invest all my energy into my career right now.

Aditya Pancholi drugged and raped me when I was 17, says Bollywood actress

Aditya Pancholi drugged and raped me when I was 17, says Bollywood actress
Leading Bollywood actor also tells the police that she detailed the serial assaults, which happened between 2004 and 2006, to a senior IPS officer, but no action was taken
Faizan Khan and Samiullah Khan (MID-DAY; July 3, 2019)

Days after an A-list Bollywood actor registered an FIR accusing actor Aditya Pancholi of rape, mid-day has accessed the complainant's statement to the police, in which she has detailed how Pancholi drugged, raped and blackmailed her from the time she was trying to break into the film industry. The actor has also said that she'd met a senior IPS officer in 2004-06 and narrated what she had been through with Pancholi, but no action was taken.

The actor completed giving her statement on June 26 and the FIR against Pancholi was filed on June 27. In the statement, she has narrated details from 2004, when she had entered the industry as a minor. In the two-and-a-half page statement to the Versova police, the actress has stated, "In 2004, I came to Mumbai with the dream of becoming a big actor someday. That year, I met Aditya Pancholi, who was then 38 years old, almost 22 years older than me. I used to stay at a hostel with group of girls while he was married and had two children; his daughter was my age then."

Raped inside a car
The actor said in her statement, "In 2004, I went to a party with him. Sometime after having a drink, I started feeling dizzy. I suspected then that he [Pancholi] had spiked my drink. After the party got over, Pancholi said he will drop me home. So I went with him in his Range Rover car. He stopped it in the middle of Yari road and started getting forcefully physical with me. He also took photographs of, which I wasn't aware of."

"When we met the next time, he said we now share a relationship like the one between a husband and wife and we will live that way. I told him he was my father's age and I want to marry someone who is as old as me. Then, he showed me all the photographs he'd taken of me inside his car and started blackmailing me. He threatened to show these pictures to others. At the time, I was quite young, I had no one in Mumbai and he took the advantage of that," said the actress.

Senior Officer Was Informed
She also said she'd spoken to a senior police officer about the alleged harassment. "From 2004 to 2006, Pancholi kept me at different locations and established a forceful physical relationship with me by spiking my drinks all the time. He used to take my photos to blackmail and threaten me. Once, I was going to file a complaint against him, but he stopped my autorickshaw and beat me up; I was rescued by a pedestrian who me getting thrashed. At the time, I met and informed senior police officer Bipin Bihari about the incident," the actress said.

mid-day repeatedly tried to contact Bihari, but he remained unavailable for comment. He is currently a DG-rank officer of the Maharashtra police, posted as the managing director of the Maharashtra State Police Housing and Welfare Corporation. Between 2004-06 he was the additional commissioner (west region) of Mumbai police.

The actress also stated, "Between 2004 to 2005, I shifted to Pallavi Apartment with my aunt. Pancholi would come to that flat all the time with his friends and get forcefully physical with me. Every time, he would carry some medicine to spike my drinks. I used to feel dizzy after having them. He locked me in whenever he left my apartment. He would also assault me. He would give me drugs and click my photos; at the time, he used to get MDMA and ecstasy." Pancholi also managed to access the actor's Versova apartment, she alleged. "Fed up with him, in 2006-2007, I bought a flat in Versova and started living alone. Pancholi came there, made duplicate keys and trespassed into my house and assaulted me. He started breaking everything inside my house and screamed in a completely drunken state. He took all of my keys and left after locking me inside," the actress claimed.

His Wife Knew
The actor also claimed that Pancholi's wife Zarina Wahab knew about what she was going through. However, the actor said, "Instead of helping me out she said she does not have any problem with whatever is going on between me and Pancholi; both of us can carry on. She told me that she felt happy whenever Pancholi was not at home and said there will be peace at home only when he's not around. She also said that he is a big actor and she wouldn't like it if someone defamed him. He has no fear because his wife was helping him with whatever he has done to me. Through a journalist friend I also got to know that he raped a 14-year-old who used to work at a famous actress's house."

Beat up her sister
Further, she also accused Pancholi of assaulting her sister. "Between 2008 and 2009, I shifted to Bandra. My sister, who was unwell then, came to my house and we were living together. When I was away at a shoot, he came to my house and beat up my sister. When I returned home, I saw my sister was shivering and completely scared. I asked her what happened and she told me about how Pancholi had beaten her up. Then, I called him up to ask why he was troubling us, to which he started demanding money from me, saying that [I should pay] whatever he has spent on me. He asked for Rs 1 crore. In fact, I paid Rs 50 lakh and he stopped troubling us for a bit," the actress said.

But the blackmail didn't stop. "Once I got famous and people began recognising me, Pancholi once again started demanding money by blackmailing me with the photographs. I have the threatening messages he sent to my sister and brother. Pancholi kept threatening that he to send the photos to my friends, family and relatives to destroy my career," the actor claimed.

Following this, the Versova police registered an FIR against Pancholi under sections 376 (rape), 328 (causing hurt by means of poison, etc. with intent to commit an offence), 384 (extortion), 341 (wrongful restraint), 342 (wrongful confinement), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC.The Versova police had recorded Pancholi's statement on May 12, after they first received the complaint from the actor's sister via e-mail. Pancholi denied all allegations and also submitted video footage to them of the actor's lawyer allegedly talking about the rape case that would be filed if Pancholi didn't withdraw the defamation complaint against her. A senior police officer said, "We are investigating the matter and will record the statement of everyone named in the complainant's statement. Apart from this, we are also examining the video footage submitted by the accused."

Pancholi's Lawyer Says
Pancholi's lawyer Prashant Patil said, "The case against my client has been filed with mala fide intentions the day after the Andheri Magistrate Metropolitan court summoned the complainant and her sister in a criminal defamation case filed by my client. The complainant was quiet for 15 years. She says one thing in her statement to the police while her sister tweets something different."

Pancholi Gets Bail
The Dindoshi sessions court on Tuesday granted interim relief from arrest to Aditya Pancholi till July 19 in connection with the rape case on executing a personal bond of Rs 30,000. Under the conditions for the bail, Pancholi has been asked to go to the Versova police station every Wednesday and co-operate with the interrogation.

This move is premeditated; I knew this was coming-Aditya Pancholi


Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; June 29, 2019)

Legal hassles don’t seem to leave Aditya Pancholi’s side. On Thursday, June 27, the Mumbai Police lodged a rape case against him on a complaint filed by a well-known actress. Reportedly, the complaint has been filed against the actor in the matter that purportedly took place many years ago, when he had allegedly sexually assaulted the actress.

The FIR has been lodged at the Versova Police Station under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and a probe has been launched. Reports state that the police has registered the case vide CR no 198/2019 under sections 376, 328, 384, 341, 342, 323 and 506 of the IPC. In her complaint, the actress told the police that Aditya had sexually assaulted her several times between 2004 and 2009. She also alleged that he beat her up and kept her confined in the house. Until last afternoon, Aditya had not been questioned by the police.

When we reached out to the actor, he told us, “This is a false case. The charges of drugging, raping and extorting money are all wrong. This move is premeditated; I knew this was coming. I had recorded a conversation with her lawyer Rizwan Siddiquee, in which he had threatened my wife (Zarina Wahab) and me of creating legal hassles for us if we didn’t withdraw our defamation cases against his client.”

Aditya adds, “The conversation was recorded by me during a meeting held on January 6 this year. The other voices in the video are of my wife Zarina and me. We submitted the evidence to the court earlier this year with a report verifying that the material has not been doctored. I’m not surprised that they have filed a case with these charges against me. What this actress doesn’t realise is that her sister and she will have to prove every word that they have spoken against my wife and me. We don’t live in a jungle; the law is above everything and everyone.”

When asked how his family has reacted to the news of the fresh charges against him, Aditya says, “My family knows the facts. This move is premeditated. We have evidence for what we’re talking.”

We reached to the complainant’s lawyer, but there was no response till the time of going to press.

Kangana Ranaut and Rangoli summoned to Mumbai court on July 26, the day Mental Hai Kya releases


The actress and her sister have been issued summons by the Andheri Metropolitan Court, in connection with the criminal defamation cases filed by actors Aditya Pancholi and his wife Zarina Wahab
Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; June 27, 2019)

Call it a strange coincidence, but Kangana Ranaut and her sister Rangoli Chandel have been summoned to court on July 26, the day the actress’ next, Mental Hai Kya, releases. They have been issued summons by the Andheri Metropolitan Court in the criminal defamation cases filed by Aditya Pancholi and his wife Zarina Wahab in 2017.

Four cases were filed after Kangana allegedly defamed the actor couple on national TV, while Rangoli took to social media to make allegations against him. Summons have been issued in connection with each case — Aditya Pancholi vs Kangana Ranaut, Aditya Pancholi vs Rangoli Chandel, Zarina Wahab vs Kangana Ranaut and Zarina Wahab vs Rangoli Chandel.

Aditya, who is being represented by advocate Shreya Srivastava, told BT, “We filed the case in 2017, when Kangana appeared on two TV shows and said a lot of things against my wife and me, which we felt were extremely defamatory. It’s taken two years for the matter to get this far, but I trust our judiciary to serve justice. The court has finally issued summons against both the sisters. Kangana had said a lot of stuff, which she will now have to prove, and failing which, she will face the consequences. I understand that matters like these take their own time to conclude, but I won’t lose hope.”

Aditya’s lawyer Shreya said that Kangana and Rangoli have to be present for the hearing on July 26. She added, “We had filed these cases two years ago. The judge had issued orders to investigate the matter, and the police did not find any FIRs or NCs against Aditya, as claimed by Kangana on television. If the sisters don’t turn up, they will have to apply for bail on the same day. They’ve been charged for a bailable offence.”

We reached out to Kangana and Rangoli’s team, but they didn’t respond to our queries till we went to press.

Veeru Devgan will be remembered as an iconic action director, says Bollywood


Bollywood actors and filmmakers share their fondest memories of Veeru Devgan who helped them pull punches on the screen for almost three decades
Natasha Coutinho, Avinash Lohana, Himesh Mankad (MUMBAI MIRROR; May 28, 2019)

Flying punches, gravity-defying kicks, blood and dhishoom dhishoom, the Bollywood audience of the 1980s and ’90s loved all this, and Veeru Devgan delivered stunts in plenty, stylishly packaged in films like Kranti, Loha, Himmatwala, Khatron Ke Khilaadi, Dilwale and Phool Aur Kaante to compete with the gun-slinging Westerns. On Monday, the action director-turned-producer-director breathed his last in Mumbai. He was 77.

Through the ’70s,’80 s and a sizeable part of the ’90s, Veeru Devgan was the man to go to for action sequences. “He worked systematically, within a budget, with creativity. He’ll be remembered as an iconic action director who always wanted to make a film,” shares producer and distribution partner Suneel Darshan.

Boney Kapoor agrees that Veeru ji was among the best in the industry, always ready to try something new, and was in demand for the longest time. “His Hanuman sequence in Mr India is unforgettable while Sanjay’s (Kapoor) ‘test’ on the bridge in Prem was brilliantly executed. The train robbery in Roop Ki Rani Choron Ka Raja still remains way ahead of similar sequences attempted by international stunt coordinators later,” he eulogises.

Gulshan Grover lauds the action director for redefining kicking techniques in Hindi cinema. “Since not everyone is flexible, he made the actor wear trousers and shoes on his hand and punch. This translated as a mighty kick on camera, a trick I incorporated in one of my early Hollywood films, The Second Jungle Book: Mowgli & Baloo,” informs the ‘Bad Man’.

Shatrughan Sinha reveals that when they were doing Mere Apne in 1971, while the film’s action director was Ravi Khanna, debutant director Gulzar got Veeru ji to choreograph most of the action. He goes on to confide how the fight master played Cupid for him and wife Poonam on the sets of their film Dharti Ki Godh Mein, spiriting away his future mother-in-law so he could ride away with his lady love during an action scene. He remembers Veeru ji as a disciplined man who fasted twice a week and after he retired, was happy to devote himself to his family.

He was like family for Anil Kapoor who’d walk in and out of his house and gratefully recalls how Veeru ji made action scenes safe and easy for him when he was just starting out as an actor. Jackie Shroff agrees, describing him as an ever-smiling, gentle soul. “He took care of actors like his children and made the biggest action sequences simple for us,” shares Jackie who’s worked with him in Izzat, Police Officer and Doodh Ka Karz.

Anil adds, “During shooting, if we ever fell short of money, Boney would unhesitatingly turn to him, he was always there for us. His contribution to Mr India was immense.”

Kumar Mangat whose association with Veeru ji spans 38 years since he was a production manager, reiterates Anil’s claim: “When I turned producer, Veeru ji bailed me out whenever I ran out of money. He didn’t even charge me for the action in Qayamat Ki Raat and after Ajay was launched as an actor, he told me to manage his work.”

For Shakti Kapoor he was a “royal man” who always stayed in five-star hotels when in Chennai or Hyderabad. “And whenever I was there, he’d insist on having dinner together. He was the highest paid action coordinator in India and technically very sound,” he says, recalling Veeru ji telling him to help his introverted son open up before he got into films. “I’m happy he saw Ajay become a superstar.”

Ajay’s director-actor buddy, Sajid Khan, remembers how, as teenagers, they’d hang out at his building in the evening. “As soon as Veeru ji arrived, Ajay would go home even if we were in the middle of a cricket match. He pushed Ajay hard because as the best action director’s son, he had to be the best action hero. And till the last day, Ajay respected and cared for him like a good son.”

The memories come flooding for Harry Baweja for whom Veeru ji was a “pillar of support” when he produced and directed his first film Dilwale. “He treated me like a younger brother,” he says emotionally.

Another filmmaker Milan Luthria reminisces how when he had to wait for Ajay’s dates, his father would call him into his cabin and promise to help. “It is unheard for someone to have done over 500 films and never have a disagreement with anyone,” Milan asserts.

Aditya Pancholi recalls the Rs 100 baksheesh he got for fearlessly standing at a high point and jumping on boxes at Madh Fort for an action scene in Dus Numbri while producer-director Rajiv Rai who worked with Veeru ji in Tridev points out that the ’80s were tough times for action directors because of the lack of CGI and VFX. “But there were seldom any accidents on his sets. He was the Amitabh Bachchan of action, he worked with many cameras and I learnt a lot about technique from him,” Rai remembers from London.

Anees Bazmee who’s returned from the shoot of Pagalpanti in London, flashbacks to how in the ‘90s, when films had three-four busy heroes, Veeru ji helped resolve date issues and when that was not possible, would shoot with actors separately in a way that the audience didn’t realise it. “He was brilliant!” raves the writer-director. 

Aditya Pancholi claims he was threatened with a rape case, submits video

Aditya Pancholi claims he was threatened with a rape case, submits video
Day after mid-day reported that police are investigating him following a complaint of 'assault and exploitation', Aditya Pancholi shares what he claims are threats against him
Faizan Khan (MID-DAY; May 16, 2019)

Days after investigations were opened into an A-list actor's complaint against actor Aditya Pancholi, accusing him of sexually exploiting her 13 years ago, he has shared a video with mid-day in which the actor's lawyer is supposedly seen discussing the case with Pancholi and his wife Zarina Wahab. Pancholi, who had earlier claimed he was threatened with a rape case by the lawyer, has submitted the video to the police as well.

Pancholi shared a five minute 50-second recording of the 18-minute conversation he and his wife Zarina Wahab had with the actor's lawyer on January 6. The lawyer, who knows Pancholi socially, had asked to meet him. During their meeting, the defamation cases Pancholi has filed against the actor were discussed, which is when the case the actor's sister ended up filing against Pancholi came up.

Pancholi claims he was threatened by the lawyer. He has shared the videos with the Versova police along with a written complaint on May 11 against the actor and her sister. He stated in the complaint, "After I filed a case against [the actor and her sister] before the honourable metropolitan magistrate's 44th court in Andheri, they were summoned but they failed to appear. They are using various pressure tactics so that I withdraw all four cases I've filed two years ago. Now, a false, fabricated afterthought has been filed which is a tissue of lies [sic] after 14 years."

Referring to the tape he shared with mid-day, Pancholi said, "This is the truth. These kind of allegations are being made against me with mala fide intentions to malign my image for personal gain. Now, the truth is out there. Let the law take its course. I'm sure I'll get justice."

"When the meeting concluded, he clearly hinted that I should withdrew all of my criminal defamation cases against his client or else there will be a rape case against me, but I didn't listen to him. Thus, as the lawyer mentioned in the video, the actor's sister filed the complaint against me in March," he added.

To prove the authenticity of the video, Pancholi has also shared a certificate from a private agency which has verified the video. Speaking about the development, a police officer said, "We are looking into all the aspects." mid-day reached out to the actor's sister, but she remained unavailable for comment. Their lawyer, meanwhile, refused to comment.

'This Is Bigger Than #MeToo'

Lawyer: So, there was Aditya bhai's pressure. She [the actor] was upset because she felt she had been wronged. On top of that, she said he is troubling me and putting pressure on me. If he continues to bait the law like this, I will also do the same, she said, adding, I will also file a case against him, whatever case it may be.

Wahab: Which case?

Lawyer: I told him about it — a rape case. Yes, a rape case, meaning Aditya bhai raped her. That theirs was a forced relationship, which falls under the definition of rape...She claims it was forced, she was pressured and assaulted and how incidents have been reported in the media as well. Anyway, I don't want to get into that.

Pancholi: No, who is saying all of this to you? The actor or her sister?

Lawyer: Whatever case will be filed will be through the sister... They are going in a different direction. This is another kind of #MeToo altogether. It would be bigger than that; than Alok Nath's case.

Pancholi: So they want to make this bigger than that?

Lawyer: This will automatically turn into a big deal, I'm telling you. [Referring to Aditya] He is a very good man and I know him personally, but because he's very open and vocal about whatever he does, this will backfire and I don't want that.

The actor's lawyer spoke to Aditya Pancholi and his wife Zarina Wahab in January. Pic/AFP

Aditya Pancholi-Kangana Ranaut feud takes an ugly turn, both approach the police


Last month, Kangana Ranaut’s sister Rangoli Chandel sent an email complaint to the cops alleging that Aditya Pancholi had assaulted and exploited the actress a decade ago. Now, Aditya has filed a counter complaint
Renuka Vyavahare (BOMBAY TIMES; May 16, 2019)

The long-standing feud between Kangana Ranaut and Aditya Pancholi is getting murkier by the day. The Versova police has opened an investigation against Aditya after receiving a complaint on e-mail from Kangana’s sister Rangoli Chandel on April 9, which reportedly alleges that the actress was subjected to assault and exploitation by Aditya a decade ago. In turn, Aditya has filed a counter complaint claiming that Kangana's lawyer had threatened to file a rape case against him. When BT contacted the Versova police station, they confirmed that they were in receipt of the complaints.

When we reached out to Aditya, he said, “My wife (Zarina Wahab) and I filed a defamation case against Kangana and her sister Rangoli in September 2017, after she gave interviews alleging that I did this and that to her (abuse).” The actor went on to add that Kangana's lawyer Rizwan Siddiquee pressurised him to withdraw the defamation case and he has a recording of their conversation. Aditya said, “I recorded his conversation and submitted it to the court on April 10. The case was on and I told the honourable judge in my statement that this lawyer had threatened to file a rape case against me in January. I got the pen drive (with the videos of his conversation) verified under the Indian Evidence Act. I have a certificate which proves that the videos are not doctored. I have submitted the evidence with the certificate at the Versova police station, and given an application to investigate the videos that I have submitted.” While Bombay Times has a copy of the application submitted by Aditya to the cops, we haven't been able to verify his claims. We also reached out to Kangana, her sister Rangoli and their lawyer, but they did not respond till the time of going to press.

Mumbai police probe Aditya Pancholi for 'assault and exploitation'

Mumbai police probe Aditya Pancholi for 'assault and exploitation'
The complaint was filed by Bollywood A-lister's sister on her behalf
Faizan Khan (MID-DAY; May 15, 2019)

Versova police have opened an investigation against veteran Bollywood actor Aditya Pancholi after they received an email application from the sister of a leading Bollywood A-list actor. It is learned that the complaint was about "assault and exploitation" at a time the actor began her career over a decade ago. Pancholi told mid-day that the actor's lawyer threatened him with a false rape case following a defamation suit Pancholi filed against her. The police recorded Pancholi's statement on May 12.

An officer told mid-day on condition of anonymity, "After receiving the complaint, we have approached the actor to record her statement so we can ascertain the nature of alleged exploitation and file the FIR under appropriate sections."

"The incident happened 13 years ago and we have to gather lot of evidence to register an FIR. In her application, the complainant has also alleged that Pancholi's wife was aware of this," the officer added.

While speaking to mid-day, Pancholi said, "I have already filed a defamation case against the actor, which is sub-judice. Following the defamation case, her lawyer, on January 6 this year, threatened to file a rape case against me if I didn't withdraw the defamation case against his client. Thankfully, I have recorded the 18-minute meeting with him. The video in the form of evidence has been submitted to the court and to the police as well."

"This is a conspiracy against me. I was surprised when the Versova cops reached out to me with a notice on April 25 this year at my residence. The very same day, I informed the investigating officer about the video I had recorded. I have also given a detailed statement on May 12 to the Versova police and submitted the video with my application," Pancholi said.

A senior officer from Versova police station said, "After recording the statements of both the parties and inquiring about the matter, we will decide on a further course of action." Messages and calls to the actor and her sister remained unanswered. The actor's lawyer said he did not want to comment. The actor's representative refused comment.

I’ve never had egg on my face publicly-Kangana Ranaut

Kangana Ranaut
Meena Iyer (DNA; January 15, 2019)

2019 looks like a particularly exciting year for you. More so as last year we hardly saw you on screen.
(Laughs) There were only cases; about six to seven of them. People were trying to put me behind bars, can you believe that? They should make a film on my life also (laughs uncontrollably). This year, I have Manikarnika - The Queen of Jhansi, Mental Hai Kya and Panga, all of these are exciting subjects. I personally feel that life moves like a wave. I have had a really horrible time and I hope it changes this year. 2018 was bad. My films weren’t working, cases were filed against me; it was going really downhill, till a point, it couldn’t go any further down. But you never know; life has a way of surprising you. Hopefully, it will change for the better.

You are an extraordinarily spirited individual. But do you see yourself as a lone wolf?
I don’t feel lonely, because honestly, people may not be there with me physically, but I get a lot of support from various quarters. I’ve stood up for so many things. But I’ve never had a situation where I had egg on my face publicly. Like I said, it may not necessarily be from our industry, but I do get support from individuals across different walks of life. God knows where that comes from and how much people really resonate and identify with me.

For example, when the whole nepotism thing happened, Karan Johar went on record and apologised to me. There are a whole lot of instances of such a nature. When I began shooting for Manikarnika, I switched off from everything. I never bothered about it, but there were these never-ending open letters. Even in the past, when I faced uneasy accusations from one quarter and I was sent a notice, there was such an outrage. But though I was not relevantly a big star and I was having this conflict with a co-actor, I did find people supporting me.

However, at times I did feel cornered, especially after Simran’s failure. Script writer Apurva Asrani, filmmakers Ketan Mehta, Karan Johar and Rakesh Roshan and some others singled me out for criticism. The industry was having these intense meetings to make sure I was put in my place. Probably that was the only phase when I felt suffocated.

It makes me feel suffocated even now when I think about it. Ketan went to the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), Aditya Pancholi filed a case and Rakesh Roshan continued to say he would ‘reveal’ something. However, all of this didn’t go anywhere.

The EOW withdrew the case. Nothing came out of that propaganda, they did. As for nepotism, Karan had to apologise. But at that time, I felt I couldn’t take it anymore because there were six-seven things happening simultaneously and I was the lone target.

Is the Bollywood hierarchy dominated by Deepika Padukone, Alia Bhatt and you? How do you view the top position?
Let’s not have any delusions about that. The kind of place Shah Rukh Khan and Aamir Khan naturally inherited from their seniors like Dilip Kumar and Amitabh Bachchan worked differently. Actually as far as the girls go, this is not something that can be looked upon so superficially. With women it has been different. What we have currently is definitely as good as it can get.  However, I don’t know about us being a part of the hierarchy. In the ’80s and ’90s, we’ve had Sridevi and Madhuri Dixit-Nene, who enjoyed a certain spurt of superstardom. If you see, there were those small phases of stardom that they saw, it was very age oriented and focused only around that span of time. Keeping all that in mind, we’ve definitely made a better place for ourselves. But are we on par with our male counterparts? No. However, we do wield a certain amount of influence on the audience and that feels good.

A recent media report quoted you as saying that you can identify with Rani Lakshmibai because there are similarities between your life and hers.
I don’t think I said exactly that. Her life was very extreme. It would be naive of me to say that I identify with her life or say my life is similar to that of hers. We are born in free India. Our issues are, jaise kehte hain na, ‘amiron ki gambhir samasyaaein’. In those days, there were real problems. The way she struggled, or even how unfortunate her death was. It’s too much for us to realise its intensity.

We can fight cases openly, we have a proper constitution. But someone throwing you out of your palace or for that matter from your land because they think they can grab your wealth! Jhansi was one of the princely states at that time, especially a Hindu princely state and perhaps the richest. So, they had very real issues. But I do identify with her spirit. And that is perhaps what I have tried to convey. If I’m tested, I don’t know to what extent; but not giving up, standing for what I feel and having a voice is definitely what I identify with.

If one relationship fails, it doesn’t imply that the next one doesn’t stand a chance-Sooraj Pancholi


Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; June 26, 2018)

After four years of waiting in the wings, Sooraj Pancholi has started shooting for his second film, Time To Dance, with newcomer Isabelle Kaif (Katrina Kaif ’s sister), in London. He is relieved and excited to finally face the camera again. The actor spoke to BT about the long interval between his first two films and his impending court case. Excerpts...

Time To Dance has come your way after a long wait. In the last four years, there was talk about several films that you were expected to headline, but none took off…
That phase was as confusing for me as it was for everyone else. It has been a long journey since Hero (2015). I read a lot of scripts, but I didn’t find anything that challenged me. Also, none of the films that I had heard during that phase took off; maybe they were ill-fated or maybe, I wasn’t destined to be a part of them. It all happens for the best. What I am doing now is more challenging than whatever I was offered.

Are your parents (Aditya and Zarina Pancholi) happy that you are back on set?
My parents stay in the next wing of my building and all they knew then was that I used to go for dance rehearsals. Now, they are very happy that I am rightfully occupied. Things are moving for me. I’m hoping to start shooting for another film in August.

After such a big launch, waiting for so many years for the second film to take off can get frustrating for an actor, right?
When Hero released, it wasn’t the best time for the movies, but though the film featured newcomers, it did good business. People expected bigger numbers from my film for obvious reasons. If Hero had released today, it would have done very well, like Baaghi 2 (2018) and Sonu Ke Titu Ki Sweety (2018). Also, at that time, looking at the business, not too many people wanted to back a new actor and run a risk. Times are a lot better now.

Were people apprehensive about you because you were a newcomer who had an impending court case?
See, if I was a producer, even I would think about these things, as there is lot money riding on actors. I have charges levelled against me. At the onset, people probably didn’t cast me because they wanted things to settle down. While I completely believe in our legal system, it has taken time. It took five years for my trial to merely start. I don’t know how long it will take before it ends. I will have to battle this throughout.

Talk was that although producers were keen to work with you, some actresses refused to be paired with you...
Not everyone, one or two actresses did have apprehensions and they made it evident. Strangely, the films I was being offered weren’t with top heroines. Like a football-based film, which only had male characters. There was no part for a girl or a love story. Also, an actress doesn’t refuse a film only because a director or an actor is bad, it’s also because they often feel that they have insufficient screen time. Everyone has ups and downs, and people behave in a certain manner, which you can’t do much about.

Do you think the perception about you has changed after the trial began earlier this year?
No. I think till it doesn’t end and even after it ends, people will still think that I come from a known family and so, we must have pulled strings. I am not thinking much about this. I have been blamed for something grave and I will have to live with that all my life. Even after my case is over, it will haunt me.

Do you think you will be able to move on and fall in love again?
Of course, I will. It has been five years. I mean, I was blamed for something that I feel was unfair. I was 21 then, I am 27 now. When I look at 21-year-old boys, I feel they’re all my younger brothers who don’t know what it is to be put behind bars at that age. Trust me, age has nothing to do with maturity, although at 21, a boy is considered an adult.

What does love mean to you today?
It’s a feeling which I am very open to and I have experienced it again after Jiah (Khan) passed away. I believe that if one relationship fails, it doesn’t imply that the next one doesn’t stand a chance. If I don’t think that way, I will be stuck for life in a time warp. Life has to go on. I was in a beautiful relationship recently which is in a confused state right now.

Talking about your contemporaries, Harshvardhan Kapoor and Tiger Shroff have had at least two releases each. Tiger has raced further ahead. Does the competition around you ever make you nervous about what lies ahead?
I feel that if I didn’t go through a tough phase in my life, things would have been incomplete. I am happy that I am going through a difficult phase. It can’t get worse than this. The future will be easier, whether good or bad, I am prepared for everything. Had everything been perfect, maybe I would not have been equipped to deal with tough times in the future. My experiences have made me a mature person. My only question is: Everyone will move on, and make my life a dinner table discussion, but what about the years that I have lost?

Most newcomers have found their backing in influential people or production studios. Do you feel the lack of it?
I am still very close to Salman Khan. He hears all the scripts that come to me. He sits through all the narrations. He’s pretty much there for me all the time. I don’t expect too much from him, but he does a lot for me. Now, it’s my job to find my way through.

Have people from the industry extended their support to you?
People from the industry have been very nice to me, but I am not concerned about them because they know everything. Everyone here knows everything about everyone. It’s just that no one wants to come out and say anything because they have nothing to do with it. They think, ‘If he’s doing well, we will sign him in future’. If my case is still on after the two films in queue, and if these films do well, then the ride home might get a little smoother.

My case against Kangana has nothing to do with what is happening between Hrithik-Aditya Pancholi


Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; October 13, 2017)

Soon after Kangana Ranaut made a string of statements about her past relationship with Aditya Pancholi on national television a few weeks ago, the actor had sent her a legal notice, accusing her of defamation. And today , he is expected to file a criminal defamation case in an Andheri court.

Aditya's lawyers, Zameer Khan and Shreya Srivastav, have cited sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code in their petition. A source close to the actor told BT, “Aditya and his wife (Zarina Wahab) had no option, but to move court. Kangana dragged their names and threw muck at them while promoting her film. The couple is extremely offended and has decided to move court.“

While Zameer and Shreya didn't revert till we went to press, Kangana's lawyer Rizwan Siddiquee maintained that he'll comment on the matter only after the case is officially in court. However, Aditya told BT, “I am not angry, but I am definitely hurt by Kangana's act.“

Aditya adds, “The legal team sent Kangana and her sister Rangoli notices, but their response wasn't up to the mark. We asked them to apologize unconditionally on the same national platforms where Kangana made those derogatory remarks against me. Eventually, her sister and she dragged even my son, daughter and wife into all this. That's the reason Zarina and I decided to file a defamation case against her, which is both civil and criminal.“

Over the last few days, Kangana has been in the headlines after Hrithik Roshan broke his silence on the raging controversy. His statements opened another chapter in their on-going duel, with Farhan Akhtar and Yami Gautam penning open letters in Hrithik's favour. The actor also amassed support from other pockets of the industry. Did that encourage Aditya to file a dual defamation suit against the actress? “My case against Kangana has nothing to do with what is happening between Hrithik and her. Hrithik can deal with his own issues, but I'm clear that I will not keep quiet about whatever is bothering me,“ says Aditya.

He adds, “Cases are fought on merit and evidence. Remarks and statements will not come handy in the court of law, proof will. The onus to prove her merit lies with her. Once the case is up for hearing, we'll know.“

Would it have been more dignified on his part to let the matter pass without moving court, given the sheer amount of dirty linen being washed in public already? “I'm not doing anything undignified,“ argues Aditya, adding, “Kangana has no right to talk about my family and me in such a manner. Why should I shut up? If I don't fight for my family, who will? If someone makes remarks about my family, should I lock myself up in a room and sit tight? Someone has to put an end to her lies, and the only way to do it is through the law. I don't want to stoop to her level.“

I don't want to be involved with all this negativity-Sooraj Pancholi


The actor has deleted his Twitter account after being dragged into the Aditya Pancholi-Kangana Ranaut controversy
Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; September 13, 2017)

It doesn't look like the Kangana Ranaut vs the exes controversy will die down anytime soon. In a string of recent interviews, conducted for the promotion of her upcoming film, a lot of the actress' past controversies were raked up, including alleged affairs with actors Aditya Pancholi and Hrithik Roshan. While Hrithik hasn't reacted so far, Aditya and his wife Zarina Wahab have retaliated to her comments. Aditya has reportedly called Kangana 'a mad woman' and threatened legal action against her, and his wife has gone all out to rubbish her claims.

In a turn of events, Aditya's son, Sooraj Pancholi deleted his Twitter account yesterday morning. Before doing that, he wrote, “It's my humble request to all the media platforms out there to keep my sister and me out of the current situation. I have nothing against anyone and I would like to keep away from the mess...It's something that I have been trying to avoid for years. And I think it's really not right for anyone to tag my sister or me in every single article about it.“

When BT reached out to Sooraj, he said, “I just don't want to be involved with all this negativity any further. I have said what I had to say. There's nothing more for me to add. Anyway, I am active on Instagram and Facebook, which is enough for me. I barely wrote on my Twitter page. It was becoming time consuming to be active on so many platforms. So, I bowed out of Twitter.“

On Monday evening, the matter between his parents, and Kangana turned murkier.The official documents of Aditya, Sana and Kangana, including PAN card and passport, made the rounds on websites. Aditya has reportedly asked Kangana to prove he's older than her father with evidence (since Kangana had claimed so in several of her interviews while promoting her forthcoming film). Following this and exasperated by the barrage of comments and views on Twitter, Sooraj decided to delete his micro-blogging page.

Salman Khan has already done way more for me than what I deserved-Sooraj Pancholi


Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; May 29, 2017)

Sooraj Pancholi has his been waiting for his big follow-up after much-talked-about debut, Hero. His personal life has also been tumultuous, but the boy seems undeterred. Conversing with Sooraj is like chatting with a regular lad, who's toiling to find his feet in a workspace, without being beaten by the pressure of what's-next. In a candid conversation with BT, at a bustling suburban cafe, the 26-year-old talked about his career, his equation with his father and why he doesn't expect anything more from Salman Khan. Excerpts...

What's next, really?
I was expected to start Faruk Kabir's film, which is taking a while, but we'll be on course soon. I've been prepping for it. There's also a Remo D'Souza film, which will hopefully start once he completes his next with Salman Khan. And, there was another movie that never took off.

It's been two years since Salman Khan launched you, but your second film hasn't taken off yet. Does it unnerve you?
I have been through something so drastic in my life so early on, that I see the world in a completely different light. I've been through what no one goes through at the age of 21. It changed the course of my life and my world view. So, the slow pace of my career doesn't bother me. Hero did decent business, particularly for a film with newcomers. With two star kids being launched by Salman, the expectations for Hero to clock in magical figures were high. I agree that two years is a long gap, but I am using the time to travel and read, and to prepare myself to be noticed as an artiste. I wanted to do something more performance-oriented, which is the reason I took up Faruk's film.

When you made your debut, it was expected that Salman might bankroll your next film too...
I don't expect too much from him. Salman Khan has already done way more for me than what I deserved.

But there must have been additional pressure on you compared to other newbies to find your way out of a superstar's shadow...
My journey has been different from other newcomers'; easy or difficult, I don't know. I have a few other battles to win before I can become a winner at work. So, it's not like I have an easy life. I don't have a superstar father or mother who can handhold my career or a parent who is a producer. Salman sir helped me with Hero and backed me in more ways than one. Having said that, I'm just 26; I'll find my way around things.

What did you learn from your tough times?
I wouldn't say my experiences taught me something because you need to do something wrong to learn what is right. I was in a relationship, which didn't work. I was young then. I didn't know what life meant. At that age, how many youngsters know what they want in life or the meaning of life? I don't really think that there was something to learn there, but yes, time has made me wiser and brought me closer to my loved ones. My family has stood by me like a rock and I value that completely. My sister and mother (Sana and Zarina) are exceptionally strong women, but my father (Aditya Pancholi) tends to get very emotional.

Considering the fact that your dad is an established actor, did he have a strong role to play in your career?
He never made a call to anyone for me and he wouldn't ever do it. That's how he is. And I like it that way. I am not a baby. It was okay if he had made that call when I was 19. At my age (26), he was already a father. So, we bond more as friends. He gave my sister and me a lot of freedom in our formative years.

You come across as shy and reserved. Have you been able to make friends in this industry?
I am shy, but I am not uptight. Once I get comfortable with people, I'm like an open book. I have a lot of friends, but only about five of them know me inside out, at times even better than what my family would know.

Your circle of friends includes Athiya (Shetty), Rinzing Denzongpa (Danny's son) and Tiger Shroff among others. How often do you guys catch up?
I spoke to Athiya just recently. Tiger and I are still very thick, but he's so caught up that we hardly get to see him. He's the busiest among us. Actually, we meet his dad (Jackie Shroff) more often. He's very social and friendly.

Tiger's dad Jackie and your father are also thick friends. Like Tiger, I am sure you get compared to your dad, too...
Our fathers actually bond over drinks, and sometimes catch up on the phone. Come to think of it, if I were a girl, I would have run away with Jackie Shroff, he's so hot (laughs). Look, it's good that we are compared to our dads. I don't think anyone of us feels bad when women say, 'Tumhare daddy kitne handsome hain.' Our kids, hopefully, will get to hear the same thing. Actually, we have beautiful mothers too, but no man dare say, 'Hey, your mother is really hot.' They'll be crushed (laughs).

You continue to live in Juhu while your family has moved to Versova. Do you ever feel lonely?
I am not leaving my old house in Juhu; too many memories are attached to the place. I like being alone. My house is very tiny, so at times, I host three to five friends. If Rinzing (Denzongpa) comes over, then only three can be accommodated because he takes up all the space (laughs). On a serious note, I am hardly home. I leave home at 8 or 9 am and return 12 hours later. If I am not doing anything, I sleep by 11 pm. I like the idea that there's no one at home. As for the void, I meet my parents every day for lunch; they stay just a few minutes away. My room in their Versova pad has been converted into a TV room, which means I've officially been kicked out (laughs).

The Pancholis file contempt petition against Rabia Khan


Rachana Dubey (BOMBAY TIMES; December 24, 2016)

Sooraj Pancholi's family -dad Aditya, mom Zarina Wahab and sister Sana - on Wednesday moved the Bombay High Court against Rabia Khan, late actress Jiah Khan's mother. The Pancholis filed a Contempt petition, seeking to restrain Rabia from mak ing defamatory remarks against them on social and other mass media. BT is in possession of a copy of the said petition.

The matter was up for hearing on Thursday (December 22), but couldn't be heard during the business hours. It's expected to be taken up when the court reopens after the Christmas and New Year holidays.

Advocate Prashant Patil, who represents the Pancholis, says, “The Rs 100-crore defamation suit was filed a couple of years ago. Rabia had given her word to the court, through her counsel, that she will not use any defamatory language on any social media or print media platforms and hence, the notice of motion was disposed off in favour of the Pancholis. But her interviews and tweets haven't quite stopped. In fact, they were found to be quite defamatory, which compelled the Pancholis to file a Contempt of Court petition a few weeks ago. Looking at the sensitivity of the matter, we were provided a production date when we asked for it on Wednesday (December 21, 2016). The proceedings couldn't happen on Thursday, but will happen as soon as the court reopens in January 2017. We are seeking relief against her. Rabia must publicly apologise for this, if found guilty by the court. Our stand is simple: whatever the verdict in the entire matter, one must have faith in the law. No one has the right to defame the other. Unlawful language is not permissible, whatever the merits of the case.“

On the other hand, Advocate Swapnil Ambure, Rabia's lawyer, says, “There is no substance in their (Pancholis') petition. The lady has only been seeking fair investigation in the matter. And, they have not been able to show what the defamatory material is. As per us, this is nothing but a way of deviating from the main matter.“

Jiah was found hanging in her Mumbai home on June 3, 2013. In December 2015, the CBI had charged Sooraj with abetting Jiah's suicide.

Aditya Pancholi gets 1 year imprisonment in 2005 parking row case


Granted Bail, Actor To Appeal Conviction For Assault
Swati Deshpande (THE TIMES OF INDIA; September 6, 2016)

A magistrate convicted actor Aditya Pancholi on Saturday and sentenced him to one-year simple imprisonment in a 2005 assault case filed by a neighbour over a car parking issue.

The court also imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 on the actor. Following pronouncement of the judgment, the court granted him bail on a request made by his lawyer M R Rangnekar. The actor, who was present in court, was granted a bail of Rs 15,000 with surety and subsequently a cash bail of Rs 12,000. When a punishment is for less than three years, the law empowers courts to grant bail the same day and the sentence is deemed as suspended.

The court convicted and sentenced him only under Indian Penal Code Section 325 for an offence of voluntarily causing grievous hurt. It acquitted him of two other offenses under sections 504 (intentional insult to cause breach of public peace) and 502-II (criminal intimidation). The actor, who had denied all charges, told TOI later that he plans to appeal the guilty verdict. The 20-page verdict was handed over to him by 5.45pm. It said the “charge is proved“ against Pancholi.

Andheri metropolitan magistrate Amitabh Panchbhai passed the order in a case registered over a decade ago by the complainant, Pratik Pashine, who lived in the same Andheri West building as the actor.

The complainant accused Pancholi of having assaulted him and fracturing his nose over a car parking argument. But the actor who denied the charge said the “FIR filed in 2005 was an afterthought, as it was filed a day after the alleged incident“. His lawyer said a non-cognizable complaint registered a day earlier, by the complainant, had mentioned only simple hurt under Section 323. He argued the complainant went to a private hospital first and then to civic Cooper Hospital to show an alleged fracture and filed the FIR. He argued that no case was made out against Pancholi.

The actor's case was that one of his visitors had parked his car in the building compound parking slot that belonged to the complainant, who then had blocked the vehicle by parking his own vehicle across it. As a result, there was some argument between the complainant and the visitor. Pancholi too was called down by the building watchman at the time.

The FIR lodged by Versova police station had also mentioned IPC sections 323 for voluntarily causing hurt, which attracts a maximum of one-year simple imprisonment with or without a Rs 1,000 fine or only a fine; 504, which attracts up to two years; and 506-II for criminal intimidation. The chargesheet was filed only in 2009 and the first hearing was held in January 2010 at Andheri magistrate court.